Okuma Eğitiminde Okuma Teorileri

Okuma tarih boyunca önemli bir olgu olmuştur. Tarih boyunca uzmanların ilgisini çeken okuma, günümüzde de çok büyük öneme sahiptir. Bazı insanlar akademik gibi özel amaçlar için okurken bazıları sadece vakit geçirmek için okumaktadır. Her ne sebeple olursa olsun, okuma geliştirilebilen bir süreç ve beceridir. Her insanın kendine özgü okuma alışkanlığı ve yöntemleri vardır. Bu makale, okumayla ilgili kapsamlı bir teorik çerçeveyi ele almaktadır. Bu bağlamda, tarih boyunca, okuma ve okuma eğitimindeki dokuz farklı temel teori detaylı bir şekilde ele alınacaktır. Okuma günümüzde son derece önemlidir ve bireylerin bilinçsiz okuma stratejileri oldukça fazla zaman kaybına sebep olmaktadır. Bu makale, öğrencilere ve öğreticilere okuma zorluklarının üstesinden gelmede ve okuma alışkanlıklarını geliştirmede yardımcı olmayı amaç edinmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Okuma, okuma teorileri, okuma eğitimi

Reading Theories in Reading Education / Okuma Eğitiminde Okuma Teorileri

Abstract: Reading has been an important concept throughout the history. Readingdrawing the attention of the experts is of great importance. Some read for specificpurposes such as academic whereas the others read just for pleasure. Regardless of whatpurpose it is, reading is a process and skill that can be improved. Each person has his/herown reading habit and methods. This study reviews an overall theoretical frameworkof reading. In this respect, nine different predominant theories in reading and readingeducation throughout the history will be examined in detail. Reading has been remarkablyimportant today and unconscious reading strategies cause too much waste of time. Thisarticle aims to assist learners and instructors to overcome difficulties in reading andstreamline reading habits.Keywords: Reading, reading theories, reading education. Öz: Okuma tarih boyunca önemli bir olgu olmuştur. Tarih boyunca uzmanların ilgisiniçeken okuma, günümüzde de çok büyük öneme sahiptir. Bazı insanlar akademik gibi özelamaçlar için okurken bazıları sadece vakit geçirmek için okumaktadır. Her ne sebeple olursaolsun, okuma geliştirilebilen bir süreç ve beceridir. Her insanın kendine özgü okumaalışkanlığı ve yöntemleri vardır. Bu makale, okumayla ilgili kapsamlı bir teorik çerçeveyiele almaktadır. Bu bağlamda, tarih boyunca, okuma ve okuma eğitimindeki dokuz farklıtemel teori detaylı bir şekilde ele alınacaktır. Okuma günümüzde son derece önemlidirve bireylerin bilinçsiz okuma stratejileri oldukça fazla zaman kaybına sebep olmaktadır.Bu makale, öğrencilere ve öğreticilere okuma zorluklarının üstesinden gelmede ve okumaalışkanlıklarını geliştirmede yardımcı olmayı amaç edinmektedir.Anahtar Kelimeler: Okuma, okuma teorileri, okuma eğitimi

PDF

___

Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aebersold, J.A. & Field. M. L. (1997). From Reader to Reading Teacher. Issues and strategies for second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, R. C. & Pearson, P. D. (1984) A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.). Handbook of reading research (Vol.1, pp.185-224). New York: Longman.
Ball, E. W. & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49 66.
Beach, R. (1993). A teachers introduction to reader response theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Bigge, M. L. & Shermis, S. S. (1992). Learning theories for teachers (5th ed.). New York: HarperCollins
Bryne, B. (1992). Studies for the acquisition procedure for reading: Hypotheses and data. In P.B.Gough, L.C. Ehri, & R. Treiman. (Eds) Reading acquisition. (pp. 4-15) New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
Carver, R. P. (1977). Toward a theory of reading and raiding. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 8 63.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P. & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589 608.
Darch, C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1987). Teaching LD students critical reading skills: A systematic replication. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 82 91.
Ehri. L. C. (1994). Development of the ability to read words: Update. In R.B. Ruddell. M. R. Ruddell & H. Singer (Eds). Theoritical models and processes of reading (pp.323-358). Delaware: International Reading Association.
Gee, J.P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Taylor & Francis.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6, 126 135.
Gutek, G. L. (1972). A history of the Western educational experience. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Harris, R. (2005) Rethinking Writing. London, GBR: Continuum International Publishing. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/ataturk/ Doc?id=10224753&ppg=231
Irvin, J.L. (1990). Reading and the middle school student: Strategies to enhance literacy. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kingham, P. H. (2003). Developmental approaches to reading comprehension in children with reading difficulties. Retrieved from http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/ R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=13398&local_base=GEN01-ERA02
Kintsch, W. (1994). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction integration model. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 951 995). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Lipson, M. Y., Mosenthal, J. H. & Mekkelsen, J. (1999).The nature of comprehension among grade 2 children : Variability in retellings as a function of development, text,and task. In T. Shanahan & F. V. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), Forty-eighth yearbook of the National Reading Conference ( p p .1 0 4 - 119). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
Lyon, G. R. (1997). Report on learning disabilities research. (Adapted from testimony by Dr. Reid Lyon before the Committee on Education and the Workforce in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 10, 1997). Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/article/6339
Moorman, K. & Ram, A. (1994) Integrating Creativity and Reading: A Functional Approach. In The Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci-94), Atlanta, GA, August. Retrieved from QUESTIA database.
Piaget, J. (1969). The psychology of the child (H. Weaver, Trans.) New York: Basic Books.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Towards an R&D program in reading comprehension. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/ pubs/monograph-_reports/2005/MR1465.pdf
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (Vol. 6, pp. 573 603). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Vol. 1. Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Snow, C. E., Burns, S. M., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC. National Academy Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32 71.
Thorndike, E. (1917). Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Summer, 1971), pp. 425-434. International Reading Association. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/ stable/746938?seq=7
Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School of Psychology, 40(1), 7-26.
Tracey, D. H. (1995). Family literacy: Overview and synthesis of an ERIC search. In K. A. Hinchman, D. J. Leu, & C. K. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice: Forty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 280 288). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
Tracey, D. H. (2006). Lenses on Reading : An Introduction to Theories and Models. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press. Retrieved from EBRARY database.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wolf, M. & Bowers, P. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 1 24.
Woolfolk, A. E. (1998). Educational psychology (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.