Uluslararası alan indekslerinde Türkiye pazarlama yazını: Bibliyometrik analizler ve nitel bir araştırma

Bu çalışma, Web of Scienceta yer alan ve 1980-2012 yılları arasında SSCIda dizinlenen Türkiye adresli ve konu başlığında pazarlamakelimesi yer alan yayınların bibliyometrik analizini gerçekleştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu yönüyle çalışma, uluslararası alan indeksleri kapsamında, Türkiyenin pazarlama yazınına katkısını belirlemeyi hedeflemektedir. Çalışmanın bir diğer amacı, Türkiye pazarlama yazınının uluslararası alan indekslerindeki yerinin Türkiye adresli pazarlama akademisyenleri örnekleminde gerçekleştirilen nitel bir araştırma çerçevesinde incelemektir. Pazarlama disiplinindeki uluslararası yayınların bibliyometrik analizini gerçekleştirmesi, Türkiye pazarlama yazınının gelişim sürecine ilişkin ipuçları vermesi ve nitel bir araştırma yardımı ile Türkiye adresli pazarlama akademisyenlerinin görüşlerine başvurularak değerlendirme yapılması ve öneriler geliştirilmesi çalışmanın beklenen katkıları arasında yer almaktadır.

Turkısh marketıng lıterature ın ınternatıonal cıtatıon ındexes: Bıblıometrıc analyses and a qualıtatıve study

This study aims to present the findings of bibliometric analysis regarding Turkey adressed studies based on the topic of marketingand indexed in the Web of Science and SSCI between 1980-2012. The study intends to reveal the contribution of Turkey to the marketing literature in the context of international citation indexes through bibliometric analysis. The study attempts to investigate the situation of Turkish marketing literature through a qualitative study of Turkey adressed marketing academicians. Consideration of the studies in Turkish marketing literature, the presentation of the development process and the evaluation of the findings based on the outcomes of the qualitative research can be mentioned as the expected contribution of this study.

___

  • Al, U., (2008a), “Bilimsel Yayınların Değerlendirilmesi: h-endeksi ve Türkiye’nin Performansı”, Bilgi Dünyası, 9 (2): 263-285.
  • Al, U., (2008b), “Türkiye'nin Bilimsel Yayın Politikası: Atıf Dizinlerine Dayalı Bibliyometrik Bir Yaklaşım”, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  • Al, U. (2009), "Türkiye'nin Göreli Atıf Etkisi Üzerine Bilimetrik Bir Çalışma", Bilgi Dünyası, 10(2): 231-244.
  • Al, U. ve Tonta, Y., (2004), “Atıf Analizi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphanecilik Bölümü Tezlerinde Atıf Yapılan Kaynaklar”, Bilgi Dünyası, 5: 19-47.
  • Alon, A. Morrin, M. ve Bechwati, N. N., (2002), “Comparing Journal of Consumer Psychology and Journal of Consumer Research”, Journal of Consumer Research, 12: 15–20.
  • Bakır, A. Scott, V. J. ve Gregory, M. R., (2000), “Publications in Major Marketing Journals: An Analysis of Scholars and Marketing Departments”, Journal of Marketing Education, 22(2): 99–107.
  • Barua, M. ve Udo, G., (2010), “Development and Diffusion of Customer Relationship Management Across Disciplines: Fad or Fashion;?” Issues in Information Systems, 11(1): 1-8.
  • Bauerly, R. J. ve Johnson, D. T., (2005), “An Evaluation of Journals Used in Doctoral Marketing Programs”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33: 313–329.
  • Baumgartner, H. ve Pieters, R., (2003), “The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and its Subareas Over Time”, Journal of Marketing, 67: 123-139.
  • Bayram, Ö., (1998), “Atıf Verisi (citation data) ve Enformatik Yasalar: Türk Kütüphanecilik Literatüründeki Doktora Tezleri Üzerinde bir Uygulama”, Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 12(1): 21-32.
  • Bilgin, Z. ve Wührer, G., (2008), “Trends in the Field of Scholarly Marketing in Turkey A Scientometric Review of 25 Years of Master and Ph.D. Thesis Work”, http://www.marketing-trends-congress.com/content/trends-field- scholarly-marketing-turkey-scientometric-review-25-years-master-and- phd-thesis-, 08.06.2012.
  • Björneborn, L. ve Ingwersen, P., (2004), “Toward a Basic Framework for Webometrics” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14): 1216-1227.
  • Braun, T., Glanzel, W. ve Grupp, H., (1995a), “The Scientometric Weight of 50 Nations in 27 Science Areas, 1989-1993. Part I: All Fields Combined, Mathematics, Engineering, Chemistry and Physics”, Scientometrics, 33(3): 263-293.
  • Braun, T., Glanzel, W. ve Grupp, H., (1995b), “The Scientometric Weight of 50 Nations in 27 Science Areas, 1989-1993. Part II: Life Sciences”, Scientometrics, 34(2): 207-237.
  • Burgess, S. M. ve Steenkamp, J., (2006), “Marketing Renaissance: How Research in Emerging Markets Advances Marketing Science and Practice”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23: 337- 356.
  • Cote, J. A., Leong, S. M. ve Cote, J., (1991), “Assessing the Influence of Journal of Consumer Research: A Citation Analysis”, Journal of Consumer Research, 18: 402–410.
  • Cote, J. A., Leong, S. M. ve Cote, J., (1992), “Assessing the Influence of Marketing Research on the Social Science Literature”, Marketing Letters, 3: 251–258.
  • Easton, G. ve Easton, D.M., (2003), “Marketing Journals and the Research Assessment Exercise”, Journal of Marketing Management, 19(1/2): 5-25.
  • Eaton, J. P., Ward, J. C. , Kumar, A. ve Reingen, P. H., (1999), “Structural Analysis of Co-author Relationships and Author Productivity in Selected Outlets for Consumer Behavior Research”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8: 39–59.
  • Egghe, L. ve Rousseau, R., (1990), Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science, Elsevier. Amsterdam.
  • Erdoğan, Z. ve Uzkurt, C., (2007), “Türkiye Pazarlama Akademisi: Biz Kimiz, Ne Yapıyoruz?”, 12.Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi, 18-20 Ekim 2007, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Bildiriler Kitabı: 37-53.
  • Fry, E., Walters, G. ve Scheuermann, L., (1985), “Perceived Quality of Fifty Selected Journals: Academicians and Practitioners,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13(1): 352–361.
  • Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., Muller, E. ve Stremersch, S., (2010), “The Evolving Social Network of Marketing Scholars”, Marketing Science, 29 (3): 561-567.
  • Guidry, J. A., Brandi, N., Guidry, H., Linda, J., John, R. T. ve Christiane, V., (2004), “Surveying the Cites: A Ranking of Marketing Journals Using Citation Analysis”, Marketing Education Review, 14(1): 45–59.
  • Gülgöz, S. Yedekçioğlu, Ö.A. ve Yurtsever, E., (2002), “Turkey’s output in social science publications: 1970-1999”, Scientometrics, 55: 103-121.
  • Harrigan, P. ve Hulbert, B., (2011), “How Can Marketing Academics Serve Marketing Practice? The New Marketing DNA as a Model for Marketing Education”, Journal of Marketing Education, 33: 253-272.
  • Hofacker, C., Gleim, M. ve Lawson, S., (2009), “Revealed Reader Preference for Marketing Journals”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2): 238–247.
  • Hoffman, D. L. ve Holbrook, M. B., (1993), “The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Study of Author Co-citations in the First 15 years of the Journal of Consumer Research”, Journal of Consumer Research, 19: 505–517.
  • Hood, W. ve Wilson, C., (2001), “The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics”, Scientometrics, 52(2): 291-314.
  • Hubbard, R., Norman, A., Parsa, R., (2010), “Marketing’s “Oscars”: A Citation Analysis of Award-Winning Articles”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 28(5): 669-684.
  • Hult, G. T., Neese, W. T., Bashaw, R. E., (1997), “Faculty Perceptions of Marketing Journals,” Journal of Marketing Education, 19: 37–52.
  • Jacobs, D. ve Ingwersen, P., (2000), “A Bibliometric Study of the Publication Patterns in the Sciences of South African Scholars 1981-96”, Scientometrics, 47(1): 75-93.
  • Jobber, D. ve Simpson, P., (1988), “A Citation Analysis of Selected Marketing Journals”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 5(2): 137–142.
  • Karasözen, B., Bayram, Ö. G. ve Zan, B. U., (2008), “1997-2006 Türkiye Bilim Göstergeleri Analizi”, http://eprints.rclis.org/handle/10760/12531, 23.07.2012.
  • Kurtuluş, K. ve Dündar, S., (1995), “Türkiye’de Pazarlama Araştırmalarında Kalite Nasıl Arttırılabilir?” 1.Ulusal Pazarlama Sempozyumu, 27-29 Ekim 1995, Bildiriler Kitabı, Silivri-İstanbul, ss. 1-3.
  • Kurtz, D. L. ve Boone, L. E., (1988), “Rating Marketing Faculties on the Basis of Editorial Review Board Memberships”, Journal of Marketing Education, 10: 64–68.
  • Lehmann, D. R., (2005), “Journal Evolution and the Development of Marketing”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 24(1): 137–142.
  • Leong, S.M., (1989), “A Citation Analysis of the Journal of Consumer Research”, Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4): 492–497.
  • Luke, R. H. ve Doke, R., (1987), Marketing Journal Hierarchies: Faculty Perceptions, 1986-1987”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15(1): 74-78.
  • Malhotra, N. K., (1999), “Guest Editorial: The Past, Present and Future of the Marketing Discipline”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2): 116-119.
  • Moed, H., (2002), “Measuring China’s Research Performance Using the Science Citation Index”, Scientometrics, 53(3): 281-296.
  • Mort, G.S., McColl-Kennedy, J., Kiel, G. ve Soutar, G., (2004), “Perceptions of Marketing Journals by Senior Academics in Australia and New Zealand”, Australasian Marketing Journal, 12(2): 51-61.
  • Moussa, S. ve Touzani, M., (2010), “Ranking Marketing Journals Using the Google Scholar-based hg-index”, Journal of Informetrics, 4: 107–117.
  • Osareh, F. ve Wilson, C.S., (2000), “A Comparison of Iranian Scientific Publications in the Science Citation Index: 1985–1989 and 1990–1994”, Scientometrics, 48(3): 427–442.
  • Özinönü, A.K., (1970), Growth in Turkish Positive Basic Sciences, 1933-1966. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Pecotich, A. ve Everett, J. E., (1989), “An Extension of the Citation Analysis of Selected Marketing Journals”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 6(3): 199–204.
  • Pieters, R., Baumgartner, H., Vermunt, J. ve Bijmolt, T. (1999) “Importance and Similarity in the Evolving Citation Network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(2), ss.113–127.
  • Polonsky, M. J., Jones, G. ve Kearsley, M., (1999), “Accessibility: An Alternative Method of Ranking Marketing Journals?” Journal of Marketing Education, 21(3): 181-193.
  • Pritchard, A., (1969), “Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?”, Journal of Documentation, 25: 348-349.
  • Rosenstreich, D. ve Wooliscroft, B., (2006), “How International are the Top Academic Journals? The Case of Marketing”, European Business Review, 18(6): 422-436.
  • Saad, G., (2010), “Applying the h-Index in Exploring Bibliometric Properties of Elite Marketing Scholars”, Scientometrics, 83(2): 423-433.
  • Samiee, S. ve Chabowski, B., (2012), “Knowledge Structure in International Marketing: A Multi-Method Bibliometric Analysis”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2): 364-386.
  • Seggie, S. ve Griffth, D., (2009), “What does it Take to Get Promoted in Marketing Academia? Understanding Production Productivity in Leading Marketing Journals”, Journal of Marketing, 73(1): 122-132.
  • Steward, M. ve Lewis, B., (2010), “A Comprehensive Analysis of Marketing Journal Rankings”, Journal of Marketing Education, 32(1): 75-92.
  • Tague-Sutcliffe, J., (1992), “An Introduction to Informetrics”, Information Processing and Management, 28(1): 1-3.
  • Tellis, G. J., Chandy, R. K. ve Ackermann, D. S., (1999), “In Search of Diversity: The Record of Major Marketing Journals”, Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1): 120–131.
  • Theoharakis, V. ve Hirst, A., (2002), “Perceptual Differences of Marketing Journals: A Worldwide Perspective”, Marketing Letters, 13(4): 389-402.
  • Urbancic, F., (2005), “Faculty Representation on the Editorial Boards of Leading Marketing Journals: An Update of Marketing Department Rankings”, Marketing Education Review, 15: 61-69.
  • Uzun, A. ve Özel, M., (1996), “Publication Patterns of Turkish Astronomers”, Scientometrics, 37: 159-169.
  • Vanneste, S. (2011), “Scientometric Studies in arketing”,http://www.feb.ugent.be/nl/Ondz/Proefschriften/Vanneste_S_proefschrift.pdf, 10.07.2012.
  • Vassinen, A., (2006), “The Concept of Strategic Marketing in Marketing Discourse–a Bibliometric Study”,http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/.../download?, 12.08.2012.
  • Vieira, P. C. ve Teixeira, A., (2010), “Are Finance, Management, and Marketing Autonomous Fields of Scientific Research? An Analysis Based on Journal Citations”, Scientometrics, 85: 627–646.
  • Wang, C. ve Hu, W. (2011), “Bibliometric Analysis of Advertising Endorser Research in Marketing”, International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research, 3: 102.
  • Wilkie, W. L. ve Moore, E. S., (2003), “Scholarly Research in Marketing: Exploring the ‘4 Eras’ of Thought Development”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 22(2): 116–146.
  • Wührer, G., Bilgin, Z. ve Karaosmanoğlu, E., (2011), “The Development and Transfer of Scholarly Marketing Thought in Turkey: A Scientometric Analysis of Master and PhD Theses 1980-2008 in an Emerging Market Country”, Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi, 6(1): 75-91.
  • Yavan, N., (2005), “SCI ve SSCI Bağlamında Türkiye’nin Coğrafya Biliminde Uluslararası Yayın Performansının Karşılaştırmalı Analizi: 1945-2005”, Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1): 27-55.
  • Yurtsever, E., Gülgöz, S., Yedekçioğlu, Ö.A. ve Tonta, M., (2002), Sağlık Bilimleri, Mühendislik ve Temel Bilimlerde Türkiye'nin Uluslararası Atıf Dizinindeki Yeri: 1973-1999. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi, Ankara.
  • Zinkhan, G. M., Leigh, T. W., (1999), “Assessing the Quality Ranking of the Journal of Advertising, 1986–1997”, Journal of Advertising, 28(2): 51–70.