ÇELİŞEN KRİTERLER ALTINDA BULANIKLAŞTIRILMIŞ ERP YAYILIM STRATEJİSİ SEÇİMİ YAKLAŞIMI
İmalat ve hizmet
sektöründeki organizasyonlar satınalmadan depolamaya, üretim planlamasından
maliyet hesaplamasına kadar birçok fonksiyonun entegrasyonu için Kurumsal
Kaynak Planlamasına (ERP) ihtiyaç duymaktadırlar. Şirketlerin, ERP sistemlerini
bilgi seviyeleri ile birleştirmeleri onlara yürüttükleri süreçlerde karlılık,
verimlilik ve etkinlik gibi hissedilir avantajlar sağlamaktadır. ERP yayılım
stratejisinin seçimindeki belirsizlik seviyesi nispeten yüksek olup dikkatli
analiz yapılmasını gerektirmektedir. Doğru strateji şirketlere çeşitli
avantajlar getireceği gibi, kusurlu strateji seçimi para kaybı ile
sonuçlanabilir. Bu makalede, modifiye edilmiş bulanık DEMATEL ve ortalama
çözüme olan uzaklığın değerlendirilmesinin temel alındığı (EDAs) metotları en
iyi ERP yayılım stratejisini seçmek için kullanılmıştır. Kullanılan model için
açıklayıcı bir örnek olması açısından çeşitli mobilya şirketlerinin ERP
danışmanlığını yapan şirket verilerinden faydalanılmıştır. ERP yayılım
stratejilerini derecelendirmek için dört ana kriter ve onbir alt kriter ortaya
konulmuş olup tekil-sistem, bulut-tabanlı, operasyonel, parçalı, hibrit ve
çok-seviyeli yayılım stratejileri değerlendirilmiştir.
AN INTEGRATED FUZZY APPROACH FOR ERP DEPLOYMENT STRATEGY SELECTION UNDER CONFLICTING CRITERIA
Manufacturing and
service organizations are in the need of using Enterprise Resource Planning
(ERP) systems to integrate many functions from purchasing to storage and
production planning to calculation of costs. Using ERP systems by the
integration in the level of information provides companies remarkable
advantages in terms of profitability, productivity and efficiency in processes.
The level of uncertainty in the selection of ERP deployment strategies is
relatively high and needs to be carefully analyzed. While the correct strategy may provide
various advantages to the firms, incomplete strategy may cause money loss. In this paper, modified fuzzy DEMATEL and
evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAs) methods are used for
choosing the best ERP deployment strategy. For the presented integrated model,
an illustrative example is conducted through an ERP consultant company working
with various furniture companies. In rating of ERP deployment strategies four
main criteria and eleven sub criteria are considered to rank Single-system,
Cloud-based, Operational, Peer, Hybrid and multi-level deployment strategies
___
- P.-F. Hsu, H.R. Yen, J.-C. Chung, (2015) “Assessing ERP post-implementation
success at the individual level: Revisiting the role of service quality”,
Information & Management, 52, p.925-942.
- U. Jayawickrama, S. Liu, M.H. Smith, (2016) “Empirical evidence of an
integrative knowledge competence framework for ERP systems
implementation in UK industries”, Computers in Industry, 82, p.205-
223.
- I.C. Ehie, M. Madsen, (2005) “Identifying critical issues in enterprise resource
planning (ERP) implementation”, Computers in Industry, 56, p.545-
557.
- D.E. O'Leary, (2002) “Knowledge management across the enterprise resource
planning systems life cycle”, International Journal of Accounting
Information Systems, 3, p.99-110.
- M.C. Jones, M. Cline, S. Ryan, (2006) “Exploring knowledge sharing in ERP
implementation: an organizational culture framework”, Decision
Support Systems, 41, p.411-434.
- K. Kumar, J. van Hillegersberg, (2000) “Enterprise resource planning:
introduction”, Communications of the ACM, 43, p.22-26.
- K. Kandananond, (2014) “A roadmap to green supply chain system through
enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation”, Procedia
Engineering, 69, p.377-382.
- F. Fui-Hoon Nah, J. Lee-Shang Lau, J. Kuang, (2001) “Critical factors for
successful implementation of enterprise systems”, Business process
management journal, 7, p.285-296.
- R. Samani, J. Reavis, B. Honan, (2014), CSA Guide to Cloud Computing:
Implementing Cloud Privacy and Security, Syngress.
- A. Baykasoğlu, V. Kaplanoğlu, Z.D. Durmuşoğlu, C. Şahin, (2013) “Integrating
fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck
selection”, Expert Systems with Applications, 40, p.899-907.
- B. Sohrabi, I.R. Vanani, (2013) “Collaborative planning of ERP implementation:
A design science approach”, Competition, Strategy, and Modern
Enterprise Information Systems, p.130-140.
- A. Jakupovic, M. Pavlic, N. Vrcek, (2012) “A Proposition for Classification of
Business Sectors by ERP Solutions Support”, Enterprise Information
Systems and Advancing Business Solutions: Emerging Models, p. 19-
39.
- H.-J. Li, S.-I. Chang, D.C. Yen, (2017) “Investigating CSFs for the life cycle of
ERP system from the perspective of IT governance”, Computer
Standards & Interfaces, 50, p.269-279.
- B. Aslan, M. Stevenson, L.C. Hendry, (2012) “Enterprise resource planning
systems: An assessment of applicability to make-to-order companies”,
Computers in Industry, 63, p.692-705.
- T.M. Somers, K. Nelson, (2001) “The impact of critical success factors across
the stages of enterprise resource planning implementations”, System
Sciences, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International
Conference on, IEEE, p.10.
- K.-K. Hong, Y.-G. Kim, (2002) “The critical success factors for ERP
implementation: an organizational fit perspective”, Information &
Management, 40, p.25-40.
- H.-S. Lee, P.-D. Shen, W.-L. Chih, (2004) “A fuzzy multiple criteria decision
making model for software selection”, Fuzzy Systems, Proceedings
2004 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, p.1709-1713.
- N. Kinuthia, S. Chung, (2017) “An Empirical Study of Technological Factors
Affecting Cloud Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Adoption”,
Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 30, p.1-22.
- A. Baykasoğlu, İ. Gölcük, (2017) “Development of a two-phase structural model
for evaluating ERP critical success factors along with a case study,
Computers & Industrial Engineering, 106, p.256-274.
- C.C. Claybaugh, K. Ramamurthy, W.D. Haseman, (2017) “Assimilation of
enterprise technology upgrades: a factor-based study”, Enterprise
Information Systems, 11, p.250-283.
- K. Jagoda, K. Jagoda, P. Samaranayake, P. Samaranayake, (2017) “An integrated
framework for ERP system implementation”, International Journal of
Accounting & Information Management, 25, p.91-109.
- A. Baykasoğlu, İ. Gölcük, D.E. Akyol, (2015) “A fuzzy multiple-attribute
decision making model to evaluate new product pricing strategies”,
Annals of Operations Research, p.1-38.
- P.C. Fishburn, (1970), Utility theory for decision making, DTIC Document.
- R.L. Keeney, (1988) “Building models of values”, European Journal of
Operational Research, 37, p.149-157.
- T.L. Saaty, (1980), The Analytical Hierarchy Process, Planning, Priority,
Resource Allocation, RWS Publications, USA
- T.L. Saaty, (1996), The analytic network process: decision making with
dependence and feedback; the organization and prioritization of
complexity, Rws publications, USA
- C.-L. Hwang, K. Yoon, (1981) “Multiple attribute decision making: methods and
applications a state-of-the-art survey”, Springer Science & Business
Media.
- B. Roy, (1990) “The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE
methods”, Theory and decision, 31, p.49-73.
- S. Opricovic, G.-H. Tzeng, (2004) “Compromise solution by MCDM methods:
A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS”, European journal of
operational research, 156, p.445-455.
- A.G. E. Fontela, (1976) “The DEMATEL observer”, DEMATEL 1976 Report,
Battelle Geneva Research Center, Switzerland Geneva.
- G. Büyüközkan, G. Çifçi, (2012a) “A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on
fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green
suppliers”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, p.3000-3011.
- D. Dalalah, M. Hayajneh, F. Batieha, (2011) “A fuzzy multi-criteria decision
making model for supplier selection”, Expert systems with applications,
38, p.8384-8391.
- T. Supeekit, T. Somboonwiwat, D. Kritchanchai, (2016) “DEMATEL-modified
ANP to evaluate internal hospital supply chain performance”,
Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, p.318-330.
- I.-S. Chen, (2016) “A combined MCDM model based on DEMATEL and ANP
for the selection of airline service quality improvement criteria: A study
based on the Taiwanese airline industry”, Journal of Air Transport
Management, 57, p.7-18.
- Y.-C. Chou, C.-C. Sun, H.-Y. Yen, (2012) “Evaluating the criteria for human
resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated
fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach”, Applied Soft Computing,
12, p.64-71.
- M. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, E.K. Zavadskas, L. Olfat, Z. Turskis, (2015) “Multi-
criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based
on distance from average solution (edas)”, Informatica, 26, p.435-451.
- T.H. Davenport, (2000) “The future of enterprise system-enabled organizations”,
Information Systems Frontiers, 2, p.163-180.
- T. Kalling, (2003) “ERP systems and the strategic management processes that
lead to competitive advantage”, Information Resources Management
Journal, 16, p.46.
- J.K. Nwankpa, (2015) “ERP system usage and benefit: A model of antecedents
and outcomes”, Computers in Human Behavior, 45, p.335-344.
- E.E. Watson, H. Schneider, (1999) “Using ERP systems in education”,
Communications of the AIS, 1, p.3.
- S. Shang, P.B. Seddon, (2002) “Assessing and managing the benefits of
enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective”, Information
systems journal, 12, p.271-299.
- E. ERP, (2014), Flexible Deployment Options with Epicor ERP, Epicor ERP
- G. Büyüközkan, G. Çifçi, (2012b) “A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS
based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare
industry”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, p.2341-2354.
- R. Goodman, (1988), Introduction to stochastic models, Courier Corporation.
- J.-S. Yao, K. Wu, (2000) “Ranking fuzzy numbers based on decomposition
principle and signed distance”, Fuzzy sets and Systems, 116, p.275-288.
- A. Baykasoğlu, T. Göçken, V. Kaplanoğlu, (2011) “A practical approach to
prioritize project activities through fuzzy ranking”, Cybernetics and
Systems: An International Journal, 42, p.165-179.
- Z. Xu, (2009) “An automatic approach to reaching consensus in multiple attribute
group decision making”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56,
p.1369-1374.
- P.T. Harker, L.G. Vargas, (1987) “The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's
analytic hierarchy process”, Management Science, 33, p.1383-1403.