Quality of internet-based information on obstetric anesthesia

Aim: The internet is one of the most frequently used tools to reach up to actual information. In the field of health, patients frequentlysearch for treatment options and outcomes over the internet. In this study, the quality and reliability of the data on obstetricanesthesia were investigated.Material and Methods: The ten most frequently searched keywords for obstetric anesthesia and the first 30 search results for eachword were analyzed with JAMA Benchmark Criteria and Discern score. The web sites that emerged as servers were divided into 5classes as anesthesia associations and academic papers, public institutions, private hospitals/clinics, news and forums/personalblogs.Results: The average DISCERN score of all sites was calculated as 29.75±7.04. The quality of the information provided on theinternet about obstetric anesthesia was evaluated as poor. The most common results for our keywords were provided by privatehospitals (27.8%). Web sites linked to public institutions were the last to provide information (2.2%). Treatment options and benefitsare the most clearly mentioned issues, while risks and treatment failure are the least addressed. According to the JAMA benchmarkcriterion, the majority of sites had up-to-date but unclear information.Conclusions: In obstetric anesthesia, the quality and reliability of the information provided on the internet are poor. It was concludedthat the anesthesiology associations were not sufficiently involved on the internet in informing patients about obstetric anesthesia.Patients applying in health institutions should be advised that the information on the internet may not be reliable and that theyshould consult a specialist physician.

PDF

___

1. İstatistiksel Tablolar ve Dinamik Sorgulama. Sabit Telefon, Cep Telefonu ve İnternet Abone Sayısı. http:// www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?alt_id=1062 access date 22.07.2019
2. İstatistiksel Tablolar/ İnternet Kullanan Bireylerin İnterneti Kişisel Kullanma Amaçları. http://www. tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?alt_id=1028 access date 22.07.2019
3. Google.com search engine market share in Turkey. http://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-marketshare/all/turkey access date 22.07.2019
4. Cervellin G, Comelli I, Lippi G. Is Google Trends a reliable tool for digital epidemiology? Insights from different clinical settings. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2017;7:185-9.
5. Kaicker J, Dang W, Mondal T. Assessing the quality and reliability of health information on ERCP using the DISCERN instrument. Health Care Curr Rev 2013;1:1.
6. Kaicker J, Debono VB, Dang W, Buckley N, Thabane L. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument. BMC Med 2010;8:59.
7. O’Neill SC, Baker JF, Fitzgerald C, et al. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet. Spine 2014;39:645-9.
8. Charnock D. The DISCERN Handbook: Quality criteria for consumer health information on treatment choices. Radcliffe: University of Oxford and The British Library 1998.
9. Turkish Society of Anesthesia and Reanimation. Neuraxial Anesthesia for Caesarean Surgeries Guideline. https://www.tard.org.tr/assets/kilavuz/16. pdf access date 22.07.2019.
10. Weiss MA, Junior LDS, Bliacheriene F, et al. What does the Internet teach the obstetric patient about labor analgesia? Rev Bras Anestesiol 2018;68:254-9.
11. Kothari M, Moolani S. Reliability of “Google” for obtaining medical information. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63:267–9.