Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques

Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques

Aim: With the improvement of minimally invasive urology procedures, open surgical interventions are less common to treat ureteralcalculus. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) indications are large multiple and/or impacted ureteral calculus that may not be treatedwith shock-wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy approaches. In this study, we aimed to compare laparoscopic retroperitoneal andtransperitoneal ureterolithotomy techniques in terms of perioperative-postoperative results. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 45 patients with large and impacted upper ureter calculus who underwent transperitonealor retroperitoneal LU between January 2012 and December 2017. The transperitoneal and retroperitoneal routes were grouped asgroup 1 and 2, respectively. Groups were crosschecked according to preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical datum. Results: We did not find statistically meaningful disparity between groups with regards to age, gender, stone size, blood loss andbody mass index. The stone free accomplishment ratio was 100% in group 1 and 2. Visual analogue scale scores were higher andstatistically meaningful in group 1 (p

___

  • 1. Lopes Neto AC, Korkes F, Silva JL, et al. Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy. J Urol 2012;187:164-8.
  • 2. Fang YQ, Qiu JG, Wang DJ, et al. Comparative study on ureteroscopic lithotripsy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for treatment of unilateral upper ureteral stones. Acta Cir Bras 2012;27:266-70
  • 3. Huri E, Basok EK, Ugurlu O, et al. Experiences in laparoscopic removal of upper ureteral stones: multicenter analysis of cases, based on the Turk Uro Lap Group. J Endourol 2010; 24:1279-82.
  • 4. Tugcu V, Simsek A, Kargi T, et al. Retroperitoneal Laparoendoscopic single site ureterolithotomy versus conventional laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Urology 2013; 81:567-72.
  • 5. Gaur DD, Trivedi S, Prabhudesai MR, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and longterm follow-up. BJU Int 2002;89:339.
  • 6. Khaladkar S, Modi J, Bhansali M, et al. Which is the best option to treat large (>1.5cm) midureteric calculi? J Laparoendoscopic? Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:501-4.
  • 7. Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tepeler K, et al. Classifications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 2008; 53:184-90.
  • 8. Rabani SM, Moosavizadeh A. Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Comparative Clinical Trial Between Transureteral Lithotripsy (TUL) and Shock Wave lithotripsy (SWL). Nephrourol Mon 2012;4:556- 9.
  • 9. Turk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, et al. Skolarikos, K. Thomas: EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis: 3.4.11. Laparoscopy and open surgery for removal of renal stones. EAU Guideline, 2020.
  • 10. Wickham JEA (ed). The surgical treatment of renal lithiasis. In: Urinary Calculus Disease. New York: Churchill Livingstone 1979;145-98.
  • 11. Raboy A, Ferzli GS, Ioffreda R, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Urology 1992;39:223-5.
  • 12. Feyaerts A, Rietbergen J, Navarra S, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2001; 40:609-613 VE Gaur DD, Rathi SS, Ravandale AV, et al. A single centre experience of retroperitoneoscopy using the balloon technique. BJU Int 2001;87:602-6.
  • 13. Harewood LM, Webb DR, Pope AJ. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: the results of an initial series, and an evaluation of its role in the management of ureteric calculi. Br J Urol 1994;74:170-6.
  • 14. Sancaktutar AA, Bozkurt Y, Atar M, et al. Urological laparoscopic surgery: Our experience of first 100 cases in Dicle University. J Clin Exp Invest 2012 3:44- 8.
  • 15. Gaur DD: Retroperitoneal endoscopic ureterolithotomy: our experience in 12 patients. J Endourol 1993;7:501.
  • 16. Bove P, Micali S, Miano R, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a comparison between the transperitoneal and the retroperitoneal approach during the learning curve. J Endourol 2009;23:953-7.
  • 17. Singh V, Sinha RJ, Gupta DK, et al. Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Study. J Urol 2013;189:940-5.
  • 18. McAllister M, Bhayani SB, Ong A, et al. Vena cava transection during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: report of the complication and review of the literature. J Urol 2004;172:183-5.
  • 19. Rofeim O, Yohannes P, Badlani G. Does laparoscopic ureterolithotomy replace shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for ureteral stones? Curr Opin Urol 2001; 11:287-91.
  • 20. Garg M, Singh V, Sinha RJ, et al. Prospective Randomized Comparison of Open versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: Experience of a Single Center Prospective Randomized Comparison of Open versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: Experience of a Single Center from Northern India. Curr Urol 2013;7:83-9.
  • 21. Flasko T, Holman E, Kovacs G, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: the method of choice in selected cases. JLaparoendoscAdvSurgTechA 2005;15:149- 52.
  • 22. Kaygisiz O, Coskun B, Kilicarslan H, et al. Comparison of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy with Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for Large Proximal and Mid-Ureter Stones Urol Int 2015;94:205-9.
  • 23. Karami H, Javanmard B, Hasanzadeh-Hadah A, et al. Is it necessary to place a Double J catheter after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy? A four-year experience. J Endourol 2012; 26:1183-6.
  • 24. Bellman GC, Smith AD. Specialconsiderationsinthetechnique of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. J Urol 1994;151:146-9.
  • 25. Hammady A, Gamal WM, Zaki M, et al. Evaluation of ureteral stent placement after retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteral stone: randomized controlled study. J Endourol 2011; 25:825.
  • 26. Kijvikai K and Patcharatrakul S: Laparascopic ureterolithotomy: its role and some controversial technical considerations: İnt J Urol 2006;13:206.
  • 27. Nouira Y, Kallel Y, Binous MY, et al. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy: initial experience and review of literature. J Endourol 2004;18:557-61.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of cardiometabolic function with serum adropin levels in psoriasis patients

Soner ÇANKAYA, Sevda ÖNDER, Tülin BAYRAK, Murat ÖZTÜRK, Yasemin KAYA

The review of admissions of oncologic patients toemergency service: A cross-sectional study

Ural KAYA, Abdullah Cüneyt HOCAGİL, Levent KOCA, Ceren ŞEN TANRIKULU, Şükran KOCA, Hilal HCOAGİL

Commonly administered physiotherapy techniques inthoracic surgery clinics in Turkey

Osman YAKŞİ, Mehmet ÜNAL, Ali KILIÇGÜN, Alp ÖZEL

Comparative study of multiple sclerosis patients based ondistance from the advanced health center

Mehmet TECELLİOĞLU, Hatice TOSUN

The effect of periodontal treatment on depression, bodyimage, self esteem and anxiety in individuals:A randomized controlled clinical trial

Hatice BALCI YÜCE, Osman DEMİR, Özge GÖKTÜRK, Sema İNANIR, Hümeyra AYDEMİR TÜRKAL

Evaluation of drug poisoning cases in pediatric emergencydepartment

Kazım KUTLUTÜRK, Mehmet ASLAN

Periprosthetic joint infections are different from osteosynthesis-associated infections

Erman CEYHAN, Güzelali ÖZDEMİR, Niyazi Erdem YAŞAR, Alper DEVECİ, Olgun BİNGÖL, Sualp TURAN

Is neutrophil/lymphocyte and platelet/lymphocyte ratioa predictive factor for the fibrous stage in patients withchronic hepatitis B?

Adnan ÖZKAHRAMAN, Yusuf KAYAR, Neslihan SÜRMELİ, Şevki KONĞR, Ramazan DERTLİ

A concerned clinical situation in pediatric cases: Acutemyopericarditis, experience of a center from Anatolia

Taner KAŞAR, Emine YURDAKUL ERTÜRK

Conversion in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery ahighlight on the abdominal access

Cüneyt KAYAALP, Mehmet Can AYDIN, Akile ZENGİN, Yusuf Murat BAĞ