Clinical results of primary repair with silicone tubeintubation after traumatic injury of lacrimal canalicularsystem

Clinical results of primary repair with silicone tubeintubation after traumatic injury of lacrimal canalicularsystem

Aim: To evaluate clinical results of primary repair with silicone tube intubation after traumatic injury of lacrimal canalicular system. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients applied to ophthalmology clinic at Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University betweenJanuary 2010 and May 2020 with traumatic injury of lacrimal canaliculi were included in the study. Data including the patients’demographic characteristics, causes of injury, time between trauma and surgery, surgical technique, post-operative time of siliconetube removal, post-operative follow-up period, and anatomical as well as functional outcomes were retrieved from the patients’clinical records. Results: Mean age of the patients was 26±22.5 (3 to 70 years) years (13 males, 2 females). Ten patients (66.6%) had blunt trauma,whereas penetrating injury was detected as causative factor of trauma in five patients (33.3%). Twelve patients (80%) had isolatedlower canalicular injury, two (13.3%) had upper canalicular injury, and the remaining one (6.7%) had both lower and upper canalicularinjury. The primary surgical repair with silicone tube intubation was performed in all patients. Twelve patients (80%) had successfulanatomical and functional outcomes. Post-operative ptosis was detected in one patient. Although two patients (13.3%) underwentre-operation at another center, status their functional success could not be acquired. Conclusion: Annular intubation with the silicon tube can be used as an effective method for providing anatomical and functionalintegrity of the drainage system after blunt and / or penetrating traumatic injuries of the lacrimal canaliculi.

___

  • 1. Yazici B. Lacrimal system traumas. Oculoplasty, Turkish Society of Ophthalmology Education Publications No: 1, 2003; 275-84.
  • 2. Murat O, Tekin Y, Saban S, et al. Epidemiological Evaluation of Our Eye Trauma Cases. Van Med J 2002;9.
  • 3. Struck HG. Lacrimal system lacerations and their surgical repair. Ophthalmologe 2009;106:223-8.
  • 4. Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, Honavar SG. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:375-80.
  • 5. Herzum H, Holle P, Hintschich C. Eyelid injuries: epidemiological aspects. Ophthalmologe 2001;98: 1079-82.
  • 6. Jordan DR, Ziai S, Gilberg SM, Mawn LA. Pathogenesis of canalicular lacerations. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;24:394-8.
  • 7. Demir T, Gul FC. Repair results of canaliculi injuries with pigtail probe and silicone tube. Inonu University Med Faculty J 2011;18:87-90.
  • 8. Leibovitch I, Kakizaki H, Prabhakaran V, Selva D. Canalicular lacerations: Repair with the Mini-MonokaR monocanalicular intubation stent. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2010;41:472-7.
  • 9. Ari S, Sahin A, Cingu AK, et al. Results of annular intubation with silicone tube in patients with canalicular damage after blunt and penetrating trauma. Dicle University Faculty of Med Department of Ophthalmology 2011;41:380-4.
  • 10. Worst JG. Method for reconstructing torn lacrimal canaliculus. Am J Ophthalmol 1962;53:520-2.
  • 11. Saunders DH, Shannor GM, Flanagan JC. The effectiveness of the pigtail probe method of repairing canalicular lacerations. Ophthalmic Surg 1978;9:33- 40
  • 12. Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn LA. The round-tipped, eyed pigtail probe for canalicular intubation: a review of 228 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;24: 176-80.
  • 13. Liang T, Zhao GQ, Li YL, et al. Efficiency and therapeutic effect of modified pigtail probe in anastomosing lacerated lacrimal canaliculus. Chin J Traumatol 2009;12:87-91.
  • 14. Argin A, Demir MN, Duman S. Repair techniques in canalicular incisions. Turkish J Ophthalmology 2001;31:327-33.
  • 15. Taskapili M, Kucuksahin H, Kocabora S, et al. Annular intubation of the silicone tube with the pigtail probe into both canaliculi only in the lower canaliculus incisions. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol 2008;17:173-7.
  • 16. Yilmaz A, Argin A, Lokmanoglu O. et al. Bicanalicular nasolacrimal intubation in canalicular incisions. Turkish J Ophthalmology 2006;36:373-6.
  • 17. Wulc AE, Arterberry JF. The pathogenesis of canalicular laceration. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1243-9.
  • 18. Jordan DR, Ziai S, Gilberg SM, et al. Pathogenesis of canalicular lacerations. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;24:394-8.
  • 19. Kennedy RH, May J, Dailey J, Flanagan JC. Canalicular laceration. An 11 year epidemiologic and clinical study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;6:46-53.
  • 20. Demir T, Gul FC. Results of Repair of Canalicular Injuries with Pigtail Probe and Silicone Tube. J Inonu University Faculty of Med 2011;18:87-90.
  • 21. Yener Hİ, Gul A, Kilic A, et al. Annular Silicone Tube Placement with Pigtail Probe in Traumatic Canalicular Incision Repair. Dicle Med J 2008;4:245-8.
  • 22. Conlon MR, Smith KD, Cadera W, et. all. An animal model studying reconstruction techniques and histopathological changes in repair of canalicular lacerations. Can J Ophthalmol 1994;29:3-8.
  • 23. Wu SY, Ma L, Chen RJ, Tsai YJ, Chu YC. Analysis of bicanalicular nasal intubation in the repair of canalicular lacerations. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2010;54:24- 31.
  • 24. Ozay S, Bakbak B, Onder F. Monoca tube implantation with Ritleng method in eyelid injuries complicated bycanalicular incision. MN Ophthalmology 2004;11:324-8.
  • 25. Mauriello JA Jr, Abdelsalam A. Use of a modified monocanalicular silicone stent in 33 eyelids. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1996;27:929-34.
  • 26. Gunenc U, Maden A. Canalicular reconstruction with silicone tube in valve injuries Turkiye Klinikleri Ophthalmology 1995;4:1-4.
  • 27. Hanselmayer H. Prognosis of injured canaliculi in relation to elapsed time until primary operation. Ophthalmologica 1973;166:175-9.
  • 28. Hawes MJ, Segrest DR. Effectiveness of bicanalicular silicone intubation in the repair of canalicula lacerations. OphtalPlast Reconstr Surg 1985;1:185- 90.
  • 29. Jordan DR. Monocanalicular lacerations: to reconstruct or not? Can J Ophthalmol 2002;37:245-6.
  • 30. Caca I, Unlu K, Cakmak SS, et al. Efficacy of bicanalicular annular intubation with silicone tube in lacrimal canaliculi incisions. MN Ophthalmology 2005;12:238-41.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Clinical results of primary repair with silicone tubeintubation after traumatic injury of lacrimal canalicularsystem

Mustafa DOĞAN, Özgür EROĞUL, Hamidu HAMİSİ GOBEKA

The posterior surgical treatment and outcomes of cervicalspondylotic myelopathy: Why not C5 nerve root palsyoccur

Yunus AYDIN, İsmail YÜCE, Okan KAHYAOĞLU, Müzeyyen ATASEVEN, Halit ÇAVUŞOĞLU

Impact of patient’s clinical features on the recurring lungmetastases of breast cancer

Murat SARIÇAM

Conversion in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery ahighlight on the abdominal access

Cüneyt KAYAALP, Mehmet Can AYDIN, Akile ZENGİN, Yusuf Murat BAĞ

Rosuvastatin's effects on ischemic skin flaps: Facts aboutstatins' effects on skin flap viability

Emrah Kağan YAŞAR, Murat Şahin ALAGÖZ, Ahmet DEMİR, Levent TRABZONLU

The prognostic value of T-peak T-end among patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator for secondary prevention

Oğuzhan Ekrem TURAN, Mürsel ŞAHİN, Ali Nail KAYA, Armağan KAYA, Burcu KODAL

Evaluation of cardiometabolic function with serum adropin levels in psoriasis patients

Soner ÇANKAYA, Sevda ÖNDER, Tülin BAYRAK, Murat ÖZTÜRK, Yasemin KAYA

Effects of cardiac rehabilitation on cardiac autonomic functions in ankylosing spondylitis patients: A randomized controlled study

Yakup ERDEN, Ahmet Lütfü SERTDEMİR, Mükremin ÇOŞKUN, Hatice UĞURLU

Periprosthetic joint infections are different from osteosynthesis-associated infections

Erman CEYHAN, Güzelali ÖZDEMİR, Niyazi Erdem YAŞAR, Alper DEVECİ, Olgun BİNGÖL, Sualp TURAN

Protective effect of thymol and coenzyme Q10 administered in two different doses against gentamycin-induced ototoxicity in rats

Serkan YILDIRIM, Korhan KILIÇ, Muhammed Sedat SAKAT, Abdulkadir ŞAHİN, Abdulbaki SÖKMEN