The effects of sedation with propofol and propofol ketamin combination on postoperative cognitive functionin elderly patients undergoing spinal anesthesia

The effects of sedation with propofol and propofol ketamin combination on postoperative cognitive functionin elderly patients undergoing spinal anesthesia

Aim: Elderly patients frequently require surgery. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is an adverse event and reduces thepatient’s quality of life. We aimed to compare the effects of sedation applied with propofol or propofol-ketamine (ketofol) combinationon hemodynamics and POCD during spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing urological surgery.Materials and Methods: Study was performed on 60 ASA I-III patients over 65 years of age. Before the operation (standardizedMini Mental Test) sMMT was applied by a blind researcher. The cases were randomly divided into two groups as propofol (Group P,n=30) and ketofol (Group K, n=30). ECG, SpO2 , Bispectral Index (BIS), noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) was monitored. After spinalanesthesia, group P received propofol 0.5 mg/kg IV bolus and then 1.5 mg/kg/hour infusion. Group K received propofol 0.4 mg/ kg and ketamine 0.1 mg/kg IV bolus and then propofol 1.2 mg/kg/hour and ketamine 0.3 mg/kg/hour infusion. Hemodynamic andrespiratory data were recorded. The sedation level was monitored by RAMSAY sedation score. sMMT was repeated by the researcherwho performed the initial test at postoperative first 24 hours and postoperative 3rd day.Results: Significant decreases were observed for heart rate, SAP, and MAP in both groups compared with baseline values. Nostatistically significant difference was detected between the groups in sMMT values at postoperative 1st and 3rd days. Within group comparisons revealed significant differences between preoperative sMMT and postoperative 1st day sMMT and betweenpostoperative 1st and postoperative 3rd day sMMT (p< 0.001). No difference was detected between preoperative and postoperative3rd day sMMT (p< 0.25). In Group P, there was statistically significantly higher injection pain (p

___

  • 1. Erden IA, Uzun S, Turgut HC et al. Anesthesia in elderly patients. Akad Geriatri 2009;3;162-6.
  • 2. Ozatamer O, Alkis N, Batislam Y et al. Current issues in anesthesia. Nobel Matbaacılık 2002;197-202.
  • 3. Carole L, Curtis D, Ban CHT. Practical regional anesthesia guide for elderly patients. Drugs Aging 2019;36;213-34.
  • 4. Mackenzie N. Sedation during regional anaesthesia: indications, advantages and methods. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1996;13;2-7.
  • 5. Ramaiah R, Lam AM. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly. Anesthesiol Clin 2009;27;485-96.
  • 6. Canet J, Raeder J, Rasmussen LS, et al. Cognitive dysfunction after minor surgery in the elderly. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47;1204-10.
  • 7. Xiaojin F, Jialing H, Fuzhou H, et al. The correlation of intraoperative hypotension and postoperative cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 2020;20;193
  • 8. Hu P, Harmon D, Frizelle H. Patient comfort during regional anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2007;19;67-74.
  • 9. Yaddanapudi S, Batra YK, Balagopal A, et al. Sedation in patients above 60 years of age undergoing urological surgery under spinal anesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam infusions. J Postgrad Med 2007;53;171-75.
  • 10. Frizelle HP, Duranteau J, Samii K. A comparison of propofol with a propofol-ketamine combination for sedation during spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1997;84;1318-22.
  • 11. Singh R, Batra YK, Bharti N, et al. Comparison of propofol versus propofol-ketamine combination for sedation during spinal anesthesia in children: randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Paediatr Anaesth 2010;20;439-44.
  • 12. Sielenkamper AW, Booke M. Anaesthesia and the elderly. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc 2001;14;679- 84.
  • 13. Monk TG, Price CC. Postoperative cognitive disorders. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011;17;376-81.
  • 14. Hartholt KA, Van der Cammen TJ, Klimek M. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in geriatric patients. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2012;45;411-6.
  • 15. Bryson GL, Wyand A. Evidence-based clinical update: general anesthesia and the risk of delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Can J Anaesth 2006;53;669-77.
  • 16. Wu CL, Hsu W, Richman JM, et al. Postoperative cognitive function as an outcome of regional anesthesia and analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004;29;257-68.
  • 17. Rasmussen LS, Johnson T, Kuipers HM, et al. Does anaesthesia cause postoperative cognitive dysfunction? A randomised study of regional versus general anaesthesia in 438 elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47;260-66.
  • 18. Tognoni P, Simonato A, Robutti N, et al. Preoperative risk factors for postoperative delirium (POD) after urological surgery in the elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011;52;166-9.
  • 19. Tian L, Luan H, Zhu P, et al. A randomized controlled trial for measuring effects on cognitive functions of adding ketamine to propofol during sedation for colonoscopy. Medicine. 2020;99;36-21859.
  • 20. Höhener D, Blumenthal S, Borgeat A. Sedation and regional anaesthesia in the adult patient. Br J Anaesth 2008;100;8-16.
  • 21. Sieber FE, Zakriya KJ, Gottschalk A, et al. Sedation depth during spinal anesthesia and the development of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture repair. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85;18-26.
  • 22. Casati A, Aldegheri G, Vinciguerra E, et al. Randomized comparison between sevoflurane anaesthesia and unilateral spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20;640-66.
  • 23. Celik N, Bombaci E, Colakoglu S, et al. Propofolketamin ve propofol-fentanil ile yapılan total intravenöz anestezide hemodinami ve derlenmenin karşılaştırılması. J Kartal TR 2000;11;801-4.
  • 24. Kalindi AD. Pain on propofol injection: Causes and remedies. Indian J Pharmacol 2016;48;617-23.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Effects of cardiac rehabilitation on cardiac autonomic functions in ankylosing spondylitis patients: A randomized controlled study

Yakup ERDEN, Ahmet Lütfü SERTDEMİR, Mükremin ÇOŞKUN, Hatice UĞURLU

Comparative study of multiple sclerosis patients based ondistance from the advanced health center

Mehmet TECELLİOĞLU, Hatice TOSUN

Evaluation of the relationship between human brucellosisand pregnancy loss

Ayşe Özlem METE, Mete Gürol UĞUR, Mustafa NAMIDURU, İlkay KARAOĞLAN, Berna KAYA UĞUR

OVID-19 computed tomography reporting systems: inter rater and inter-system agreement study

Ural KOÇ, Bircan KAYAASLAN, Özlem ÜNAL, Erdem ÖZKAN

Coronary CT Angiography Findings with 64-Detector CT

Pınar NERCİS KOŞAR, Behice Kaniye YILMAZ, Elif ERGÜN, Cansu ÖZTÜRK

The posterior surgical treatment and outcomes of cervicalspondylotic myelopathy: Why not C5 nerve root palsyoccur

Yunus AYDIN, İsmail YÜCE, Okan KAHYAOĞLU, Müzeyyen ATASEVEN, Halit ÇAVUŞOĞLU

The effects of sedation with propofol and propofol ketamin combination on postoperative cognitive functionin elderly patients undergoing spinal anesthesia

Duygu DEMİRÖZ ASLAN, Hatice BİRGÜL CUMURCU, Ülkü ÖZGÜL, Cemil ÇOLAK, Mahmut DURMUŞ, Yusuf Ziya ÇOLAK

Laparoscopic management of ureter stones, comparisonof two techniques

Ali AKKOÇ, Cemil AYDIN

Impact of patient’s clinical features on the recurring lungmetastases of breast cancer

Murat SARIÇAM

A concerned clinical situation in pediatric cases: Acutemyopericarditis, experience of a center from Anatolia

Taner KAŞAR, Emine YURDAKUL ERTÜRK