Cüneyt KAYAALP, Mehmet Can AYDIN, Akile ZENGİN, Yusuf Murat BAĞ

Conversion in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery ahighlight on the abdominal access

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the data of patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery as laparoscopically completedand converted to open surgery and draw attention to complications arising from trocar entry. Materials and Methods: This study included 211 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. Patients were dividedin to two groups as laparoscopically completed and converted to open surgery. Demographics parameters and perioperative datawere retrospectively analyzed. Results: The median age of the study group was 62 (19-91) years and 68.2% were males. Conversion occured in 16 patients (7.5%).The reasons for conversion were locally advanced tumor (n=6), complications due to trocar insertion (n=4), technical difficultyin performing esophagojejunostomy anastomosis (n=4), leakage in esophagojejunostomy anastomosis (n=1), and persistentbradycardia (n=1). Intraoperative blood loss was higher and time to oral intake was longer in the conversion group. No significantdifference was found in terms of demographic parameters, operative time, length of hospital stays, the rate of postoperativecomplications, reoperation, 30-day mortality.Conclusion:Complications due to trocar entry is an unpredictable and preventable conversion reason in laparoscopic gastric cancersurgery. Thin patients are riskier for complications during abdominal access. Abdominal access should be performed with an opentechnique in thin patients.

PDF

___

1. Ye M, Jin K, Xu G, et al. Short-and long-term outcomes after conversion of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A single-center study. J BUON 2017;22:126-33.
2. Yue F, Geng X. Impact of conversion during laparoscopic gastrectomy on outcomes of patients with gastric cancer. JBUON 2017;22:926-31.
3. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
4. Fuller J, Ashar BS, Carey-Corrado J. Trocar-associated injuries and fatalities: an analysis of 1399 reports to the FDA. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:302-7.
5. Cornette B, Berrevoet F. Trocar injuries in laparoscopy: techniques, tools, and means for prevention. A systematic review of the literature. World J Surg 2016;40:2331-41.
6. Alhossaini RM, Altamran AA, Cho M, et al. Lower rate of conversion using robotic-assisted surgery compared to laparoscopy in completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2020;34:847– 52.
7. Liao G, Wen S, Xie X, et al. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: Risk factors associated with conversion and a systematic analysis of literature. Int J Surg 2016;34:17-22.
8. Ding Z, Jiang L, Zhang K, et al. Short-and long-term outcomes of conversion in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J BUON 2018;23:1004-12.
9. Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Noguchi K, et al. A MetaAnalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials that Compared Laparoscopy-Assisted and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:958-64.
10. Son T, Hyung W, Lee JH, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for serosa-positive gastric cancer (pT4a) in patients with preoperative diagnosis of cancer without serosal invasion. Surg Endosc 2014;28:866-74.
11. Jeong O, Ryu SY, Choi WY, et al. Risk factors and learning curve associated with postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:2994-3001.