Periprosthetic joint infections are different from osteosynthesis-associated infections

Periprosthetic joint infections are different from osteosynthesis-associated infections

Aim: The aim of the study is comparing the treatment results and showing the differences between periprosthetic joint infectionsand osteosynthesis-associated infections.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of orthopedic implant-associated infections. All patients werecategorized into two groups; Group A has consisted of osteosynthesis-associated infections, and Group B has consisted ofperiprosthetic joint infection. The time interval between implantation and infection, length of hospitalization, number of operations,the status of preoperative and postoperative intensive care unit, and number of outpatient clinic applications were recorded. Culturedata from intraoperative deep tissue samples were also recorded.Results: There were 28 patients in Group A and 20 patients in Group B. The age distributions and operation numbers were significantlydifferent between the two study groups (p=0.000 and p=0.05, respectively). There was a significant difference between the numberof outpatient clinic applications and the success of treatment (p=0.016). There was a significant difference between the postoperatively intensive care unit status and success of treatment (p=0.002).Conclusion: Periprosthetic joint infection patients were older and had a higher number of operations, however orthopedic implantassociated infections were more likely outpatient clinic applications and post-operatively intensive care unit status

___

  • 1. Yano MH, Klautau GB, Da Silva CB, et al. Improved diagnosis of infection associated with osteosynthesis by use of sonication of fracture fixation implants. J Clin Microbial 2014;52:4176-82.
  • 2. Berkes M, Obremskey WT, Scannell B, et al. Southeast Fracture Consortium. Maintenance of hardware after early postoperative infection following fracture internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:823-8.
  • 3. Rightmire E, Zurakowski D, Vrahas M. Acute infections after fracture repair: management with hardware in place. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:466-72.
  • 4. Romano CL, Manzi G, Logoluso N, et al. Value of debridement and irrigation for the treatment of periprosthetic infections. A systematic review. Hip Int 2012;22:19-24.
  • 5. Gustilo RB, Merkow RL, Templeman D. The management of open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:299-304.
  • 6. Zimmerli W. Antibiotic prophylaxis. In: Ruedi T et al, eds. AO Principles of Fracture Management. New York: Thieme 2007;425-33.
  • 7. Arciola CR, An YH, Campoccia D, et al. Etiology of implant orthopedic infections: a survey on 1027 clinical isolates. Int J Artif Organs 2005;28:1091-100.
  • 8. Brady RA, Leid JG, Calhoun JH, et al. Osteomyelitis and the role of biofilms in chronic infection. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2008;52:13-22.
  • 9. Otto M. Staphylococcal biofilms. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2008;322:207-28.
  • 10. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2992-4.
  • 11. Xu YQ, Zhu YL, Fan XY,et al. Implant-related infection in the tibia: Surgical revision strategy with vancomycin cement. Sci World J 2014;2014:124864.
  • 12. Kim JH, Chun SK, Yoon YC, et al. Efficacy of debridement for early periprosthetic joint infection after hip arthroplasty. Hip Pelvis 2014;26:227-34.
  • 13. Murdoch DR, Roberts SA, Fowler VG, et al. Infection of orthopedic prostheses after staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:647-9.
  • 14. R Sevimli, O Aslanturk, K Ertem, et all. An investigation of infection rate and seasonal effect level in total joint replacement cases, Med-Science 2018;7:210-3.
  • 15. Fang C, Wong TW, To KK, et al. Infection after fracture osteosynthesis-Part II. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2017;25:2309499017692714.
  • 16. Torbert JT, Joshi M, Moraff A, et al. Current bacterial speciation and antibiotic resistance in deep infections after operative fixation of fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:7-17.
  • 17. Ochsner PE, Sirkin MS, Trampuz A. Acute Infections. In: Ruedi TP, Buckely RE, Moran CG, eds. AO Principles of Fracture Management (vol 1). Stuttgart and New York: Thieme, 2007;520-40.
  • 18. Struijs PA, Poolman RW, Bhandari M. Infected nonunion of the long bones. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:507-11.
  • 19. Olszewski D, Streubel PN, Stucken C, et al. The fate of patients with a “surprise” positive culture after nonunion surgery. J Orthop Trauma 2016;30:19-23.
  • 20. Aggarwal VK, Bakhshi H, Ecker NU, et al. Organism profile in periprothetic joint infection: pathogens differ at two arthroplasty infection referral centers in Europe and in the United States. J Knee Surg 2014;27:399- 406.
  • 21. Y Duman, R Sevimli. Investigation of the presence of pantone-valentine leukocidin in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from orthopedic surgical site infections. Mikrobiyoloji Bulteni 2018;52:340-7.
  • 22. Vuong C, Otto M. Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. Microbes Infect 2002;4:481-9.
  • 23. Qasim SN, Swann A, Ashford R. The DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) procedure for infected total knee replacement -a literature review. SICOT J 2017;3:2.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of cardiometabolic function with serum adropin levels in psoriasis patients

Soner ÇANKAYA, Sevda ÖNDER, Tülin BAYRAK, Murat ÖZTÜRK, Yasemin KAYA

Protective effect of thymol and coenzyme Q10 administered in two different doses against gentamycin-induced ototoxicity in rats

Serkan YILDIRIM, Korhan KILIÇ, Muhammed Sedat SAKAT, Abdulkadir ŞAHİN, Abdulbaki SÖKMEN

The value of ultra-sensitive troponin I in determining theprognosis of patients with the suspected acute coronarysyndrome in the emergency department

Cihan BEDEL, Mustafa KORKUT, Aslıhan YÜRÜKTÜMEN ÜNAL, Osman GÜRSOY ÜNAL, Manolya YILDIZ ÜNAL

OVID-19 computed tomography reporting systems: inter rater and inter-system agreement study

Ural KOÇ, Bircan KAYAASLAN, Özlem ÜNAL, Erdem ÖZKAN

The review of admissions of oncologic patients toemergency service: A cross-sectional study

Ural KAYA, Abdullah Cüneyt HOCAGİL, Levent KOCA, Ceren ŞEN TANRIKULU, Şükran KOCA, Hilal HCOAGİL

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotropinsfor Clomiphene Citrate resistant Polycysticovary syndrome leads to a higher risk of ovarianhyperstimulation syndrome

Serhat EGE

Prevalence of toxoplasma, cytomegalovirus and rubella inpregnant women in Erzurum, Turkey

Ahmet YILMAZ, Mahmut UÇAR

A rare cause of dyspnea: Isolated congenitally correctedtransposition of the great arteries

Erkan YILDIRIM, Siho HİDAYET, Zeynep ULUTAŞ, Hasan ABDELRAHMAN

The posterior surgical treatment and outcomes of cervicalspondylotic myelopathy: Why not C5 nerve root palsyoccur

Yunus AYDIN, İsmail YÜCE, Okan KAHYAOĞLU, Müzeyyen ATASEVEN, Halit ÇAVUŞOĞLU

Clinical results of primary repair with silicone tubeintubation after traumatic injury of lacrimal canalicularsystem

Mustafa DOĞAN, Özgür EROĞUL, Hamidu HAMİSİ GOBEKA