Orhan Meral, Onur Baykan, Tayfun Ozturk, Hayriye Gonullu

Characteristics of non-urgent visits in emergencydepartment

Aim: In recent years, the number of patients using the emergency department is increasing and majority of these patients constitutenon-emergency patients. In this study, it was aimed to examine the green field patients who applied to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital by non-urgent reasons and define the socio-demographic characteristics, the reasons for preferring the emergency department, to assess the rate of urgency defined by the participant, and to contribute to the literature by obtaining data for our country.Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study in which the subjects were selected among the whole green area patientsapplied to emergency department in between 02 and 11 November 2018. Among these patients, the subjects who did not accept to be included to the study and didn’t fulfill the inclusion criteria were excluded. As a result, a total of 716 patients who accepted to be in the study and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included to the study. Then, a questionnaire for the aim of assessing the socio-demographic characteristics and the reasons for preferring the emergency department, involving a scale to define the self-report of urgency were applied to those 716 volunteered patients.Results: In our study, 23.9 % of a total of 5644 patients applied to emergency department in between 02 and 11 November 2018were grouped as non-urgent green area patients by the triage personnel. Of these green area patients those who accepted to be included to the study and fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 356 were female (49.7 %) and 360 were male (50.3 %). When the participants were evaluated according to their level of educations, 5.4 % were illiterate, 4.1 % were literate but had no school graduate, 30.6 % were primary education graduates and 13.4 % were university graduates. According to the reasons for choosing the emergency department, 48.2 % of the patients stated that they applied to the emergency department in need of emergency treatment, 22.5 % of the visitors declared that they were unable to get permission from their work in their working hours and 13.1 % of the visitors applied due to their opinion that things were progressing faster in the emergency department. In addition, the patients were asked to scale their urgency in a 10-point scale and the mean rate of urgency defined by the participants in the self-report scale was found to be 6 points (0-10) and negative correlation was observed between education levels and urgent levels.Conclusion: In this study, we obtained descriptive data about the green field patients who applied to the emergency departmentby non-urgent reasons, defined their socio-demographic characteristics, revealed the reasons for non-urgent applications to the emergency department, and assessed the self-rate of urgency defined by the participants. Since it can be predicted that the overcrowding generated by these non-urgent visits has negative effects and consequence on patients and employees; we consider that this study and similar studies may be helpful in describing the current problem, may help to solve the problem by contributing to the literature.

PDF

___

1. Trzeciak S. Emergency Department Overcrowding In The United States: An Emerging Threat To Patient
Safety And Public Health. Emerg Med J 2003;20:402-
5.
2. Soyuk S, Arslan Kurtulus S. The Evaluation Of
The Problems’ Emergency Services From Staff
Perspectives. Gumushane University J Health Sci
2017;6:44–56.
3. Kim J, Yun BJ, Aaronson EL, et al. The Next Step To
Reducing Emergency Department (Ed) Crowding:
Engaging Specialist Physicians. PLoS ONE
2018;13:0201393.
4. Yarmohammadian MH, Rezaei F, Haghshenas A, et al.
Overcrowding In Emergency Departments: A Review
Of Strategies To Decrease Future Challenges. J Res
Med Sci 2017;22:23
5. Aslan S, Unluer EE. Retrospective Analysis of
Emergency Crowd, Master Thesis, Izmir Katip Celebi
University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital,
Emergency Medicine Clinic, 2012.
6. Hsu CM, Liang LL, Chang YT, et al. Emergency
Department Overcrowding: Quality Improvement in a
Taiwan Medical Center. J Formos Med Assoc 2018:1-
8.
7. Ersel M, Karcioglu O, Yanturali S, et al. Emergency
Department Utilization Characteristics And Evaluation
For Patient Visit Appropriateness From The Patients’
And Physicians’ Point Of View. Turk J Emerg Med
2006;6:25-35.
8. Kilicaslan I, Bozan H, Oktay C, et al. Demographic
Properties Of Patients Presenting To The Emergency
Department In Turkey. Turk J Emerg Med 2005;5:5-13.
9. Tayfun A, Akkose Aydin S, Koksal O, et al. Evaluation
of Features of Patients Attending the Emergency
Department of Uludag University Medicine Faculty
Hospital and Emergency Department Practices.
Academic J Emerg Med 2010;9.
10. Derlet RW. Overcrowding in Emergency Departments:
Increased Demand And Decreased Capacity. Ann
Emerg Med 2002;39:430-2.
11. Asplin BR. Undertriage, Overtriage, or No Triage? In
Search of the Unnecessary Emergency Department
Visit. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:282-5.
12. Richards JR, Navarro ML, Derlet RW. Survey Of
Directors Of Emergency Departments In California On
Overcrowding. West J Med 2000;172:385-8.
13. Hoot NR., Aronsky D. Systematic Review of Emergency
Department Crowding: Causes, Effects, and Solutions.
Ann Emerg Med 2008;52:126-36.
14. Altindis S, Unal O. Situation of Turkey About Emergency
Service Quality Standards. J Biotechnol and Strategic
Health Res 2017;2:51-9.
15. Cevik C, Tekir O. Emergency Service Admission
Evaluation Of Diagnosis Codes, Triage And Socio-
Demographic. Balikesir J Health Sci 2014;3.
16. Idil H, Kilic TY, Toker I, et al. Non-Urgent Adult Patients
In The Emergency Department: Causes And Patient
Characteristics. Turk J Emerg Med 2018;18:71-4.
Published 2018.
17. Sempere-Selva T, Peiro S, Sendra-Pina P, et al.
Inappropriate Use Of An Accident And Emergency
Department: Magnitude, Associated Factors, And
Reasons-An Approach With Explicit Criteria. Ann
Emerg Med 2001;37:568-79.
18. Andrews H, Kass L. Non-Urgent Use Of Emergency
Departments: Populations Most Likely To Overestimate
Illness Severity. Intern Emerg Med 2018;13:893-900
19. Bilisli Y, Hizay D. Violence Against Healthcare Workers
In Workplace: A Case Of University Hospital. Int J Soc
Sci Res 2016;52:473-86.
20. Aksel G, Bildik F, Demircan A, et al. Effects Of Fast-
Track In A University Emergency Department Through
The National Emergency Department Overcrowding
Study. J Pak Med Assoc 2014;64:791-7.
21. Kose A, Kose B, Oncu M, et al. Admission
Appropriateness And Profile Of The Patients Attended
To A State Hospital Emergency Department. Gaziantep
Med J 2011;17:57.
22. Aksel G, Bildik F. Evaluation of Impact of Fast Track on
Emergency Overcrowding, Master Thesis, Hacettepe
University, Department of Emergency Medicine,
Ankara, 2011.
23. Bas S, Oksay A. The Reasons Why Family Practice Is
Not Preferred By Patients, Master Thesis, Suleyman
Demirel University, Social Sciences Institute,
Department of Health Management, Isparta, 2017.