Yıldıran SONGÜR, Tahsin EDGÜER, Cüneyt YÜCESOY, Meltem ÖZDEMİR, Alper DİLLİ, Emine ÖZTÜRK, Baki HEKİMOĞLU

İnce barsak hastalıklarında enteroklizis’in tanı değeri

Amaç: İnce barsak hastalıklarında enteroklizisin tanısındaki değerini araştırmak. Gereç-Yöntem: Üst ve alt gastrointestinal sistem değerlendirmesi ile nedeni açıklanamayan abdominal ağrılar, kronik diare, nedeni açıklanamayan ancak primer ince barsak hastalığı olasılığı taşıyan kilo kaybı, halsizlik, anemi gibi yakınma ve bulguları olan yaşları 15-84 (ort yaş 47.5) arasında değişen 9’u erkek, 7’si kadın toplam16 hastaya; baryum sülfat ve metil sellüloz eriyiğinin kullanıldığı Herlinger tekniği ile çift kontrast enteroklizis incelemesi yapıldı. Bulgular: Dört olguda malabsorbsiyon bulguları (ince barsak segmentlerinde dilatasyon, motilitede artış, mukozal sıvanmada azalma), Crohn hastalığı tanısı alan 3 olgudan ikisinde; terminal ileumde rijidite, distal kesimde ülserler, bir olguda kolon ½ distal kesiminde haustrasyon kaybı izlendi. Bir olguda askarise ait dolum defekti, 1 olguda çekum kitlesinin invazyonuna sekonder terminal ileumda rijidite ve mukozal düzensizlik, 1 olguda foldlarda kalınlaşma, 2 olguda ince barsak segmentlerine dıştan bası bulgusu, 2 olguda normal bulgular, 1 olguda motilitede azalma, 1 olguda terminal ileumda geçirilmiş operasyona sekonder değişiklikler izlendi. Sonuç: Enteroklizis, endoskopik ve radyolojik inceleme olanaklarının sınırlı olduğu ince barsak hastalıklarının tanı ve ayırıcı tanısında yüksek doğruluk oranlarına sahip, oldukça duyarlı bir inceleme yöntemidir.

The value of enteroclysis in small bowel disease

Objective: To Investigate The Diagnostic Value of Enteroclysis in Small Intestine Diseases. Material and Method: A total of 16 patients, 9 of which were male and 7 of which were female with an age range from 15 to 84 ( avarage 47.5) with abdominal pain which could not be explained by examining the upper and lower gastrointestinal system, chronic diarrhea, obcsure weight loss but suspected small intestine disease, asthenia, anemia, were investigated with double contrast enteroclysis examination using Herlinger method in which barium sulphate and methyl cellulose solution were used. Results: In four cases malabsorbion findings (dilation in small intestine segments, increase in motility, decrease in mucosal involvement); in 2 out of 3 cases with known Crohn disease rigidity in terminal ileum, ulcers in distal part; in one case loss of haustration in dismal half of the colon were detected. In one case filling defect by an ascaris; in one case rigidity in secondary terminal ileum to the invasion of cecum tumor and mucosal disorder; in one case thickening of folds; in two cases findings of external impression to small intestine segments; in two cases normal findings; in one case decrease in motility; in one case secondary changes to the operation in the terminal ileum were detected. Conclusion: Enteroclysis is an highly sensitive method of examination which has high accuracy rates at the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of small intestine diseases whose endoscopic and radiological examinations are limited.

PDF

___

1. Sellink JL. Thoughts on the radiologic study of the small intestine. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1971 Apr 24;115(17):743-8.
2. Herlinger H. A modified technique for the double-contrast small bowel enema. Gastrointest Radiol. 1978 Jun 25;3(2):201-7.
3. Gurian L, Jendrzejewski J, Katon R, et al. Small-bowel enema. An underutilized method of small-bowel examination. Dig Dis Sci. 1982 Dec;27(12):1101-8.
4. Johnson D. World literature review: Celiac disease: Biopsy or enteroclysis beter for evaluating response to a gluten free diet? Am J Gastroenterol. 1997; 92: 715-716
5. van den Bosch HC, Tjon a Tham RT, Gooszen AW, et al. Celiac disease: small-bowel enteroclysis findings in adult patients treated with a gluten-free diet. Radiology. 1996 Dec;201(3):803-8.
6. Herlinger H. Radiology in malabsorption. Clin Radiol. 1992 Feb;45(2):73-8.
7. Maglinte DD, Chernish SM, Kelvin FM, et al. Crohn disease of the small intestine: accuracy and relevance of enteroclysis. Radiology. 1992 Aug;184(2):541-5.
8. Carlson HC. Perspective: the small bowel examination in the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Jul;147(1):63-5.
9. Bernstein CN, Boult IF, Greenberg HM, et al. A prospective randomized comparison between small bowel enteroclysis and small bowel follow-through in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1997 Aug;113(2):390-8.
10. Maglinte DD, Burney BT, Miller RE. Lesions missed on small-bowel follow-through: analysis and recommendations. Radiology. 1982 Sep;144(4):737-9.
11. Gore RM. Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology, WB Saunders Company 1994 Vol 2, Section VII, VIII.
12. Herlinger H. The small bowel enema and the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 1982 Dec;20(4):721-42.
13. Maglinte DD, Hall R, Miller RE, et al. Detection of surgical lesions of the small bowel by enteroclysis. Am J Surg. 1984 Feb;147(2):225-9.
14. Bender GN, Maglinte DD, Klöppel VR, et al. CT enteroclysis: a superfluous diagnostic procedure or valuable when investigating small-bowel disease? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Feb;172(2):373-8.
15. Maglinte DD, Sandrasegaran K, Lappas JC, et al. CT Enteroclysis. Radiology. 2007 Dec;245(3):661-71.
16. Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, et al. Comparison of MR enteroclysis with MR enterography and conventional enteroclysis in patients with Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol. 2008 Mar;18(3):438-47. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
17. Massoud TF, Creasy T, Nolan DJ. Contrast radiography in small-bowel obstruction: enteroclysis forgotten? Surgery. 1991 Mar;109(3 Pt 1):345-6.
18. Caroline DF, Herlinger H, Laufer I, et al. Small-bowel enema in the diagnosis of adhesive obstructions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Jun;142(6):1133-9.
19. Maglinte DD, Peterson LA, Vahey TN, et al. Enteroclysis in partial small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 1984 Mar;147(3):325-9.
20. Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM, et al. Small bowel radiography: how, when, and why? Radiology. 1987 May;163(2):297- 305.
21. Frager D, Medwid SW, Baer JW, et al. CT of small-bowel obstruction: value in establishing the diagnosis and determining the degree and cause. Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Jan;162(1):37-41.
22. Maglinte DD, Gage SN, Harmon BH, et al. Obstruction of the small intestine: accuracy and role of CT in diagnosis. Radiology. 1993 Jul;188(1):61-4.
23. Gourtsoyiannis NC, Bays D, Papaioannou N, et al. Benign tumors of the small intestine: preoperative evaluation with a barium infusion technique. Eur J Radiol. 1993 Feb;16(2):115-25.
24. Rex DK, Lappas JC, Maglinte DD, et al. Enteroclysis in the evaluation of suspected small intestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology. 1989 Jul;97(1):58-60.
25. Maglinte DD, Chernish SM, DeWeese R, et al. Acquired jejunoileal diverticular disease: subject review. Radiology. 1986 Mar;158(3):577-80.
26. Maglinte DD, Elmore MF, Isenberg M, et al. Meckel diverticulum: radiologic demonstration by enteroclysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980 May;134(5):925-32.