Hipospadiyas ve interseks olgularında prostatik utrikül konfigürasyonu

Amaç: Hipospadiyas ve interseks olgularında prostatik utrikül (PU) sıklığı, klinik karakteristikleri, tedavi metodları ve izlem sonuçlarını değerlendirdik. Gereç ve Yöntem: Hipospadiyas (n:72) ve interseks (n:108) tanılarıyla tedavi edilen, radyolojik ve endoskopik incelemelerle PU varlığı araştırılan hastalar retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bulgular: PU sıklığı hipospadiyas olgularında %12.5, interseks olgularında ise %22.2 bulundu. Her iki grupta en sık görülen klinik semptomlar üriner enfeksiyon, üriner obstrüksiyon, enürezis ve ürolitiyazisdir. Sonuç: İnterseks ve ağır hipospadiyas olgularında PU varlığı radyolojik ve endoskopik yöntemlerle araştırılmalıdır. Cerrahi tedavide ana amaç üretra, mesane boynu, sfi nkterler ve pelvik sinir ağına zarar vermeden, büyümüş PU yapılarının tümüyle çıkartılmasıdır.

Prostatic utricle configuration in hypospadias and intersex patients

Aim: A retrospective clinical trial was performed to evaluate prostatic utricle (PU) incidence, clinical characteristics, treatment and follow-up outcomes in hypospadias and intersex patients. Material and Methods: Hypospadias (n:72) and intersex (n:108) patients in whom the confi guration of PU were evaluated by radiological and endoscopic investigations. Results: The incidence of PU was 12.5% and 22.2% in hypospadias and intersex patients. Urinary infection, obstruction, enuresis and urolithiasis were the most common clinical symptoms in both groups. Conclusion: PU should be evaluated by radiological and endoscopic investigations in intersex and hypospadias patients. The main goal of surgical therapy is total excision of extended PU structures without damaging to urethra, bladder outlet, sphincter and pelvic plexuses.

___

  • 1. Kato H, Komiyama I, Maejima T et al. Histopathological study of the mullerian duct remnant: clarification of disease categories and terminology. J Urol 2002; 167:133-6.
  • 2. Zondek LH, Zondek T. The prostatic utricle in the fetus and infant. Urol Int 1974; 29:458-65.
  • 3. Currarino G. Large prostatic utricles and related structures, urogenital sinus and other forms of urethrovaginal confluence. J Urol 1986; 136:1270-9.
  • 4. Devine CJ, Gonzalez-Serva L, Stecker JF Jr. et al. Utricular configuration in hypospadias and intersex. J Urol 1980; 123:407-11.
  • 5. Utikalova A. Large prostatic utricle: unusual cause of urine infection. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med 1996; 140:69-71.
  • 6. Gregg DC, Sty JR. Sonographic diagnosis of enlarged prostatic utricle. J Ultrasound Med 1989; 8:51-2.
  • 7. Ciftci AO, Senocak ME, Buyukpamukcu N et al. Abnormal prostatic utricle configuration in hypospadias and intersex patients. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1999; 9:167-72.
  • 8. Kojima Y, Hayashi Y, Maruyama T et al. Comparison between ultrasonography and retrograde urethrography for detection of prostatic utricle associated with hypospadias. Urology 2001; 57:1151-5.
  • 9. Lopatina OA, Berry TT, Spottswood SE. Giant prostatic utricle (utriculus masculinis): diagnostic imaging and surgical implications. Pediatr Radiol 2004; 34:156-9.
  • 10. Ikoma F, Shima H, Yabumoto H. Classification of enlarged prostatic utricle in patients with hypospadias. Br J Urol 1985;57:334-7.
  • 11. Ikoma F, Shima H, Yabumoto H et al. Surgical treatment for enlarged prostatic utricle and vagina masculina in patients with hypospadias. Br J Urol 1986; 58:423-8.
  • 12. Krstic ZD, Smoljanic Z, Micovic Z et al. Surgical treatment of the Mullerian duct remnants. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36:870-6.
  • 13. Meisheri IV, Motiwale SS, Sawant VV. Surgical management of enlarged prostatic utricle. Pediatr Surg Int 2000; 16:199-203.
  • 14. Monfort G, Guys JM. Trans-vesical approach to surgery on the prostatic utricle. Chir Pediatr 1981; 22:279-84.
  • 15. Shima H, Yabumoto H, Okamoto E. Testicular function in patients with hypospadias associated with enlarged prostatic utricle. Br J Urol 1992; 69:192-5.
  • 16. Barzilai M, Ginesin Y. A mullerian prostatic cyst protruding into the base of the urinary bladder. Urol Int 1998; 60:194-6.
  • 17. Gualco G, Ortega V, Ardao G et al. Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the prostatic utricle in an adolescent. Ann Diagn Pathol 2005; 9:153-6.
Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 1947
  • Yayıncı: Erkan Mor
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Karsinoembriyonik antijene özgül immün yanıtların HLA-A 0201 transjenik fare modelinde ölçülmesi ve değerlendirilmesi

Emin Ümit BAĞRIAÇIK

Antegrade locked nailing of adult femoral shaft fractures and non-unions: a retrospective review of 48 cases

Hakan SELEK, Hakan KINIK, Ertan MERGEN, Hakan ATALAR, Osman Yüksel YAVUZ

Uterin kavitedeki fetal kemik kalıntılarına ikincil gelişen infertilite

Murat DEMİRİZ, Alper Nadir SELVİ, Sema MUTGAN, Uğur TOPRAK

Radial basis function neural network and logistic regression analysis for prognostic classification of coronary artery disease

Şeref SAĞIROĞLU, M. Ali ATICI, M. Cengiz ÇOLAK, Cemil ÇOLAK, Necati ALASULU

Hipospadiyas ve interseks olgularında prostatik utrikül konfigürasyonu

Levent DUMAN, Mehmet Emin ŞENOCAK, Arbay Özden ÇİFTÇİ

A severe form of cantrell' s pentalogy with complete ectopia cordis

Meltem Bingöl KOLOĞLU, Aydın YAĞMURLU, İsmail Haluk GÖKÇORA, Bilal ALPER, Hülya Özkan ULU

Quality of life in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: non-mesh suture repair vs. Lichtentein procedure

Betül BOZKURT, Ömer CENGİZ, Melih KARABEYOĞLU, Mete DOLAPÇI, Belma KOÇER, Demet ÜNAL, Osman YILDIRIM, Bülent ÜNAL

Penile schwannoma

Özcan KILIÇ, Halit TALAS, Tansu GÜDELCİ

Ölüm sürecini standardize edilmesi ile hospiz yaklaşım tarzının ilişkisi

Yaşar Bilge

Tekrarlayan orbital myozitli bir olgu

Suat FİTÖZ, Emine SUSKAN, Deniz TEKİN, Eda AYBERKİN, Erdal İNCE