HABERMAS'IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM TEORİSİNDE LORENZER ETKİSİ: DİL, SEMBOL VE SAHNESEL ANLAMA

Adorno, Horkheimer ve Marcuse gibi Frankfurt Okulu-Eleştirel Teori düşünürleri pozitivizm, modernite ve faşizm eleştirisi temaları etrafında birleşirken normatif-politik bütünlüklü bir projeksiyon ileri sürmekten uzak durmuşlardır. Buna karşın, Jürgen Habermas iletişimsel eylem teorisiyle normatif-entelektüel boşluğu doldurmaya çalışmıştır. Habermas, modernitenin özgürleştirici potansiyelinin iletişimsel eylemin rasyonel doğasında mevcut olduğunu ileri sürmüştür; kamusal alanda aktörler arası karşılıklı anlama ve uzlaşıyı mümkün kılmak için tarafların baskıdan uzak ve serbestçe iletişime girebilmeleri ideal söylemler oluşturacaktır. Fakat özneler-arası iletişim pürüzsüz olmaktan uzaktır; iletişimde bilinçli-manipülatif veya bilinçdışı sistematik pürüzler bulunabilir. Bu makale Alfred Lorenzer'in dilbilimsel psikanalitik yaklaşımının önemini Habermas'ın görüşleri üzerindeki etkisi bağlamında; iletişimdeki sistematik pürüzlerinin giderilmesi bakımından tartışmaktadır: Sahnesel anlama ve derinlemesine yorumlama, deforme olmuşsembolleştirilememiş özneler-arası dil oyunlarını anlaşılır kılmaktadır. Eleştirel Teori geleneğinde normatif bir entelektüel girişim olarak iletişimsel eylem teorisinin oluşumunda Lorenzerci psikanalizin rolü önemlidir.

The Lorenzer Effect on Habermas's the Theory of Communicative Action: Language, Symbol and Scenic Understanding

The thinkers of the Frankfurt School - Critical Theory - such as Adorno, Horkheimer and Marcuse, whilst revolving around criticising the themes of positivism, modernity and fascism, stayed strictly away any normative-political projection. However, Jürgen Habermas sought to fill in this normative-intellectual gap by means of the theory of communicative action. Habermas argues that the liberating potential of modernity is embedded in the rationality of communicative action; actors in public sphere are capable of constructing ideal discourses to render consensus and agreement but so long as they are free from any constraint. Yet the intersubjective communication is far from distortion; there may be either conscious-manipulative or unconscious systematic distortions in communications. This article suggests the role of Alfred Lorenzer's linguistic psychoanalysis and in eliminating systematic distortions: Scenic understanding and in-depth hermeneutics make understandable the de-formed and de-symbolised inter-subjective language games. The Lorenzer's psychoanalysis holds significance in the formation of the theory of communicative action as a normativeintellectual enterprise in the tradition of Critical Theory.

___

  • Adorno, Theodor ([1951] 2005), Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life (London: Verso).
  • Adorno, Theodor ([1969] 1976), The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology (London: Heinemann).
  • Adorno, Theodor (2008), Lectures on Negative Dialectics: Fragments of a Lecture Course 1965/1966 (Cambridge: Polity Press)
  • Adorno, Theodor, Betty Aron, Maria Hertz Levinson ve William Morrow (1951), The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper and Row).
  • Bereswill, Mechthild, Christine Morgenroth ve Peter Redman (2010) "Alfred Lorenzer and the Depth-hermeneutic Method", Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 15 (3): 221-250.
  • Bottomore, Tom (2003), The Frankfurt School and Its Critics (London: Routledge).
  • Connerton, Paul (1980), The Tragedy of Enlightenment: An Essay on the Frankfurt School (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Durkheim, Emile ([1912] 1995), Elementary Forms of Religious Life (New York: Free Press).
  • Freud, Sigmund ([1900] 2010), The Interpretation of Dreams (New York: Basics).
  • Freud, Sigmund ([1910] 1990), Five Lectures on Psycho-Analysis (New York: W. W. Norton & Company).
  • Froggett, Lynn ve Wendy Hollway (2010), "Psychosocial research analysis and scenic understanding", Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 15 (3): 281-301.
  • Habermas, Jürgen ([1968] 1972 ), Knowledge and Human Interests (Boston: Beacon Press).
  • Habermas, Jürgen ([1969] 1997), Toward a Rational Society: Studen Protest, Science, and Politics (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • Habermas, Jürgen ([1973] 1976), Legitimation Crisis (London: Heinemann).
  • Habermas, Jürgen ([1981] 1984), The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. 1) (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • Habermas, Jürgen ([1981] 1987), The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. 2) (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • Habermas, Jürgen ([1983] 1990), Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • Habermas, Jürgen ([1984] 2003), On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: PreliminaryStudies in the Theory of Communicative Action (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • Habermas, Jürgen ([1985] 1987), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • Habermas, Jürgen ([1988] 1992), Post-Metaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • Habermas, Jürgen ([1999] 2003), Truth and Justification: Philosophical Essays (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1970), "On systematically distorted communication", Inquiry, 13 (1-4): 205-218.
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1991), Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics (Cambrdige MA: MIT Press).
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1996), Between facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, MASS: MIT Press).
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1997), "Modernity: An Unfinished Project", Benhabib, Seyla ve Maurizio d"Entrèves (Der.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: Critical Essays on the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (Cambridge, MASS: MIT Press).
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1998), On the Pragmatics of Communication (Cambridge MA: MIT Press). Horkheimer, Max ve Theodor Adorno (2002), Dialectic of Enlightenment (Stanford: Stanford University Press)
  • Jay, Martin (1996), The Dialectical Imagination: A history of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923-1950 (California: University of California Press).
  • Kogawa, Tetsuo (1980), "Adorno"s ,,Strategy of Hibernation"", Telos (46): 147-153.
  • Lacan, Jacques (2006), Écrits (New York: W.W. Norton & Co).
  • Lorenzer, Alfred (1970), Symbol und Verstehen im psychoanalytischen Prozess, Vorarbeiten zu einer Metatheorie der Psychoanalyse (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag).
  • Marcuse, Herbert ([1956] 2002), Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud (London: Routledge).
  • Marcuse, Herbert ([1964] 2002), One Dimensional Man (London and New York: Routledge).
  • Olesen, Henning S. ve Kirsten Weber (2013), "Socialization, Language and Scenic Understanding: Alfred Lorenzer"s Contribution to a Psycho-Societal Methodology", Historical Social Research, 38 (2): 26-55.
  • Surin, Kenneth (1989), The Turnings of Darkness and Light: Essays in Philosophical and Systematic Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Vollstedt, Tobias (2013), The Work of Alfred Lorenzer, http://www.otherscene.org/pdf/VollstedtLorenzer.pdf (10.06.2017).