Oyun, Bilişsel Gelişim ve Toplumsal Dünya: Piaget, Vygotsky ve Sonrası

Öz Bu makale, oyun ve bilişsel gelişim araştırmalarına eleştirel bir bakışın yanısıra bu bakışı aydınlatan iki büyük kuramsal çerçevenin bir analizini ortaya koymaktadır.. Son zamanlara kadar bu alandaki başat etki, oyuna yaklaşımı, bilişsel gelişim kuramının bütünleyici bir parçasını oluşturan Piaget'in olmuştur. Pigaetci araştırma programı, tükenmiş olmaktan uzak olmasına karşın, bu yaklaşımda sosyokültürel boyutun bulunmaması, gelişim kuramı giderek büyük bir alternatif çerçeve olarak ortaya çıkan Vygotsky'nin etkisi için bir alan yaratmıştır. Ancak bu ikinci araştırma akımı, bugüne kadar Vygotskyci "esin”i sınırlı ve yetersiz bir biçimde dikkate almıştır. Özellikle, etkileşime çok sınırlı olarak odaklanılmış ve oyun bağlamını tanımlayan ve biçimlendiren daha büyük sosyokültürel öğelerle ilgilenilmemiştir. Bu makale, daha güçlü bir araştırma bakışaçısının anahatlarının önerilmesiyle sonuçlanmaktadır. Diğer kaynaklar arasında bu yaklaşım, kısmen Piagetci ve Vygotskyci perspektiflerdeki belirli öğelerin Durkheim ve Freud'daki kökleriyle yeniden bağlantılandırılması ve Geertz tarafından savunulan kültürel yorumlama yaklaşımının kullanılması yoluyla, Piagetci ve Vygotskyci yaklaşımların kendi içlerindeki keşfedilmemiş bazı olanaklar üzerine kurulmaktadır
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Oyun, Bilişsel Gelişim, Piaget

___

  • Ariés, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. New York: Vintage. (Originally published in French in 1960).
  • Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, J. (1977). From gesture to first world: On cognitive and social prerequisites. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), Interaction, conversation, and the development of language. New York: Wiley.
  • Bateson, G. (1971). The message ‘This is play.’ In R. E. Herron & B. Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Child’s play (pp. 261-266). New York: Wiley.
  • Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2, 1-19.
  • Bruner, J. S. (1975). Early social interaction and language acquisition. In H. R. Schaffer (Ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction. London: Academy Press.
  • Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play, and games. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in French in 1958).
  • Cohen, D. (1987). The development of play. New York: New York University Press.
  • Connerton, P. (1989). How societies remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Corsaro, W. (1985). Friendship and peer culture in early years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Curry, N. E. (1974). Dramatic play as a curricular tool. In D. Sponsellor (Ed.), Play as a learning medium. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
  • Curry, N. E. & Arnaud, S. (1984). Play in preschool settings. In T. Yawkey & A. Pellegrini (Eds.), Child’s play: Development and applied (pp. 273-290). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Dunn, J. & Dale, N. (1984). I a daddy: 2-year-olds’ collaboration in joint pretend with sibling and with mother. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play: The development of social understanding (pp. 131-158). New York: Academic Press.
  • Durkheim, E. (1965). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in French in 1912).
  • Durkheim, E. (1973). The dualism of human nature and its social conditions. In R. N. Bellah (Ed.), Emile Durkheim on morality and society (pp. 149-163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in French in 1914).
  • Durkheim, E. (1973). Moral education. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in French in 1925).
  • El’konin, D. (1971). Symbolics and its functions in the play of children. In R. E. Herron & B. Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Child’s play (pp. 221-230). New York: Wiley.
  • Fein, G. G. (1975). A transformational analysiss of pretending. Developmental Psychology, 11, 291-296.
  • Fein, G. G. (1979). Play and acquisition of symbols. In L. Katz (Ed.) Current topics in early childhood education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Fein, G. G. (1981). Pretend play: An integrative review. Child Development, 52, 1095-1118.
  • Fein, G. G., & Apfel, N. (1979). The development of play: Style, structure, and situation. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 99, 231-250.
  • Fein, G. G., & Moorin, E. R. (1985). Symbols, motives and the words. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s language(Vol. 5), New York: Gardner Press.
  • Fein, G. G., & Robertson, A. R. (1975). Cognitive and social dimension of pretending in two-year-olds. Detroit: Merril-Plamer Institute. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 119 806).
  • Fenson, L. Kagan, J., Kearsley, R. B., & Zelazo, P. R. (1976). The developmental progression of manipulative play in the first two years. Child Development, 47, 232-235.
  • Fenson, L., & Ramsay, D. (1980). Decentration and integration of the child’s play in the second year. Child Development, 51, 171-178.
  • Fine, G. A. (Ed.) (1985). Meaningful play: playful meanings. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Fine, G., A. (1987). With the boys: Little league baseball and preadolescent culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Franklin, M. B. (1983). Play as the creation of imaginary situations: The role of language. In S. Wapner & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Toward a holistic developmental psychology (pp. 197-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Garvey, C. (1977). Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Garvey, C., & Bendt, R. (1977). Organization of pretend play. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.
  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
  • Geertz, C. (1983). The way we think now: Toward an ethnography of modern thought. In Local knowledge. Further essays in interpretive anthropology (pp. 147-163). New York: Basic Books.
  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston: Beacon Press. (Originally published in German in 1944).
  • Inhelder, B., Lezine, I., Sinclair, H., & Stambak, M. (1972). Les débuts de la fonction symbolique [Origins of the symbolic function]. Archives de Psychologie, 41, 187-243.
  • Jackowitz, E. R., & Watson, M. W. (1980). The developmnet of object transformations in early pretend play. Developmental Psychology, 16, 543-549.
  • Kagan, J., Kearsley, R. B., & Zelazo, P. R. (1978). Infancy: Its place in human development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Kaye, K. (1982). The mental and social life of babies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kessen, W. & Fein, G. G. (1975). Variations in home-based infancy education. Final report to the Office of Child Development. HEW (ERIC Document No. ED 118 233).
  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition ,n practice: Mind, Mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers. (Originally published in Russian in 1959).
  • Lowe, M. (1975). Trends in the development of representational play in infants from one to three years -An observational study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 33-47.
  • MAcIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Miller, P., & Garvey, C. (1984). Mother-baby role play: Its origin in social support. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play : The development of social understanding (pp.101-130). New York: Academic Press.
  • Mussen, P. H. (Series ed.) & Hetherington, E. M. (Vol. Ed.) (1983). Handbook of child psychology: Vol 4. Socialization, personality, and social development. New York: Wiley.
  • Nelson, K. & Seidman, S. (1984). Playing with scripts. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play : The development of social understanding (pp. 45-71). New York: Academic Press.
  • Nicolich, L. (1977). Beyond senserimotor intelligence: Assessment of symbolic maturity through analysis of pretend play. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 23, 89-99.
  • Nicolopoulou, A. & Cole, M. (in press). The generation and transmission of shared knowledge in the culture of collaborative learning: The Fifth Dimension, its play world, and its institutional contexts. In E. A. Forman, N. Mİnick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Socio-cultural dynamics in children’s development. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nicolopoulou, A. & Scales, B. (1990). Gender differences and aesthetic imagination in the stories of four-year-olds: ‘Socialist realism’ versus ‘grotesque surrealism.’ Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the International Children’s Literature Association. San Diego, CA. Nicolopoulou, A., Scales, B. & Weintraub, J. (in press). Gender differences and symbolic imagination in the stories of four-year-olds. In A. H. Dyson & C. genishi (Eds.), The need for story: Cultural diversity in classroom and community. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
  • Paley, V. (1981). Wally’s stories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Paley, V. (1984). Mollie is three: Growing up in school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Paley, V. (1986). Boys and girls: Superheroes in the doll corner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Paley, V. (1988). Bad guys don’t have birthdays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton. (Originally published in French in 1945).
  • Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgmentof the child. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in French in 1932).
  • Ratner, N., & Bruner, J. S. (1978). Games, social exchange, and the acquisition of language. Journal of Child Language, 5, 391-402.
  • Rizzo, T. (1989). Friendship development among children in school. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Rogoff, B., & Wertsch, J. V. (1984). Editors’ notes. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the zone of proximal development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rosenblatt, D. (1977). Developmental trends in infant play. In B. Tizard & D. Harvey (Eds.), The biology of play. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
  • Ross, H. S., & Kay, D. A: (1980). Theorigins of social games. In K. H. Rubin (Ed.), Children’s play (pp. 17-31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rubin, K. H. (1980). Fantasy play: Its role in the development of social skills and social cognition. In K. H. Rubin (Ed.), Children’s play (pp. 69-84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rubin, K. H., Fein, G. G., & Vandenberg, B. (1983). Play. In P. H. Mussen (Series ed.), & E. M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol.4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 693-774). New York: Wiley.
  • Sachs, J. (1980). The role of adult-child play in language development. In K. H. Rubin (Ed.), Children’s play (pp. 33-48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schwartzman, H. B. (1978). Transformations: The anthropology of children’s play. New York: Plenum.
  • Schwartzman, H. B. (Ed.) (1980). Play and culture: 1978 proceedings of the anthropological study of play. West Point, NY: Leisure Press.
  • Sutton-Smith, B. (1971). Piaget on play: A critique. In R. E. Herron & B. Sutton-Smith (Eds.) Child’s play (pp. 326-336). New York: Wiley.
  • Sylva, K., Bruner, J. S., & Genova, P. (1974). The role of play in the problem-solving of children 3-5 years old. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.) Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 244-257). New York: Basic Books.
  • Turner, V. (1967). The forrest of symbols. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Turner, V. (1986). Carnavalin Rio: Dionysian drama in an industrializing society. In The anthropology of performance (pp. 123-138). New York: PAJ Publications.
  • Vandenberg, B. (1980). Play, problem-solving, and creativity. In K. H. Rubin (Ed.), Children’s play (pp. 49-68). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 12, 6-18. (A stenographic record of a lecture given in 1933; included in J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva, eds., 1976; partly produced in Vygotsky, 1978.)
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. JohnSteiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (including the volume ‘Thinking and Speech’) (R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton, eds.: N. Mİnick, trans.). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Watson, M. W., & Fischer, K. W. (1977). A developmental sequence of agent use in late infancy. Child Development, 48, 828-836.
  • Weintraub, J. (1974). Some reflections on Durkheim’s concept of human nature: Preliminary expectorations. Unpublished manuscript. University of California, Berkeley.
  • Weintraub, J. (fourthcoming). Freedom and community: The republican virtue tradition and sociology of liberty. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985). The social formation of mind: A Vygotskian approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.