Designing a Networked Learning Process About ICT Integration for Preservice Teachers

Buaraştırmanınamacı öğretmenadaylarınayönelikolarakdüzenlenen BİT'in öğrenme ve öğretme sürecine entegrasyonu eğitimi için bir ağsal öğrenme süreci tasarlamak ve bu tasarımın öğretmen adaylarının entegrasyon ile ilgili bilgi yapılandırma süreçlerine ve yapılandırdıkları bilginin kalitesine katkısını incelemektir. Araştırma grubunu 60 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Ağsal öğrenme sürecinin tasarımında üç öğe ele alınmıştır: görevlerin tasarımı, ortamın tasarımıve örgütsel tasarım. Sürecin başında ve sonunda öğretmen adaylarıtarafındanyapılantartışmalararacılığıylatoplananverileriçerikanalizi yoluyla incelenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, BİT entegrasyonunu temele alan bir ağsal öğrenme sürecinin, öğretmen adaylarının BİT'in öğrenmeveöğretmesürecineentegrasyonunailişkinbilgiyapılandırma süreçleri ile bilgi yapılandırma kalitelerini desteklediği ve olumlu katkı sağladığı belirlenmiştir

Öğretmen Adaylarının BİT Entegrasyonuna Hazır Olmalarını Sağlamada Bir Ağsal Öğrenme Sürecinin Tasarlanması

The purpose of this study is to design a networked learning process for ICT integration training and to explore the contribution of the design on preservice teachers' knowledge construction qualities. The study group was formed by 60 preservice teachers. Three items were discussed in the design; design of tasks, design of environment, and organizational design. The data was obtained from the activities carried out in the networked learning environment. Preservice teachers' knowledge construction process was examined by content analysis. Consequently, it was found that a networked learning process, which based on ICT integration and carried out in a networked learning environment, supports and contributes positively preservice teachers' knowledge construction process and qualities related to integration of ICT

___

  • Angeli, C. & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-168.
  • Archambault, L. & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1).
  • Banks, S., Goodyear, P., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2003). Introduction to the special issue on Advances in Research on Networked Learning. Instructional Science, 31 (1-2), 1-6.
  • Becker, H. J. (2001). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the 2001 Meetings of the American Educational Research Association, University of California-Irvine.
  • Chen, R. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers' use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 32-42.
  • Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., & Gao, P. (2009). Student teachers' intentions and actions in integrating technology into their classrooms during student teaching: A Singapore study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42 (2), 175-195.
  • Dawson, V., Forster, P., & Reid, D. (2006). ICT integration a science education unit for preservice science teachers; students' perceptions of their ICT skills, knowledge and pedagogy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 345-363.
  • De Jong, F.P.C.M., Veldhuis-Diermanse, A.E., & Lutgens, G. (2002). Computer supported learning in university and vocational education. CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation. Koschman, T., Hall, R., and Miyake, N. (eds), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 111-128.
  • Economic & Social Research Council [ESRC]. (2002). "Understanding the Implications of Networked Learning for Higher Education." [Online] Retrieved on 05-May-2008 at URL: http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/esrc/manifesto.pdf.
  • Gill, L. & Dalgarno, B. (2008). Influences on pre-service teachers' preparedness to use ICTs in the classroom. In Hello Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings Ascilite Melbourne 2008. [Online] Retrieved on 10-October-2008 at URL: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/gill.pdf
  • Glazer, E., Hannafin M.J. & Song L. (2005). Promoting technology integration through collaborative apprenticeship. Education Technology Research Development, 53(4), 57-67.
  • Gobbo, C. & Girardi, M. (2001). Teachers' beliefs and integration of information and communications technology in Italian schools. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1&2), 63-84.
  • Goodyear, P. (2002). Psychological foundations for networked learning. Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. Steeples, C. and Jones, C. (eds), London, Springer.
  • Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82-101. [Online] Retrieved on 24-May -2008 at URL: http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/goodyear.html
  • Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2004). Research on networked learning: An overview. In P. Dillenbourg, M. Baker, C. Bereiter, Y. Engeström, G. Fischer, H. Ulrich Hoppe, T. Koschmann, N. Miyake, C. O'Malley, R. Pea, C. Pontecorovo, J. Roschelle, D. Suthers, P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson & D. McConnell, Advances in Research on Networked Learning (Vol. 4, pp. 1-9). Springer: Netherlands.
  • Haşlaman, T., Mumcu, F. K. & Usluel, Y. K. (2008). "Integration of ICT into the teaching-learning process: toward a unified model." Paper presented at World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA), Vienna, June 30-July 4, Austria.
  • Haşlaman, T., Mumcu, F.K. ve Usluel, Y.K. (2007). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin öğrenme-öğretme süreçleriyle bütünleştirilmesine yönelik bir ders planı örneği, Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi. 32 (146), 54-63.
  • Holden, H., Ozok, A. A. & Rada, R. (2008). Technology use and perceptions in the classroom: Results from an exploratory study among secondary education teachers. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 5(2), 113-134.
  • Jones, C. & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2009). Analysing networked learning practices: An introduction. In Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Jones, C., & Lindström, B., Analysing Networked Learning Practices in Higher Education and Continuing Professional Development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, BV.
  • Kim, C., Kim, M., Lee, C., Spector, M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76-85.
  • Lawless, K.A. & Pellegrino, J.W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575.
  • Martin, S. & Vallance, M. (2008). The impact of synchronous inter-networked teacher training in information and communication technology integration. Computers and Education, 51(1), 34-53.
  • Martinovic, D. & Zhang, Z. (2012). Situating ICT in the Teacher Education Program: Overcoming challenges, fulfilling expectations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 461-469.
  • Marttunen, M. & Laurinen L. (2001). Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science, 29 (2), 127-153.
  • McLoughlin, C. (2002). Learner Support in Distance and Networked Learning Environments: Ten Dimensions for Successful Design. Distance Education, 23(2), 149-162.
  • Milliken, J. & Barnes, L. P. (2002). Teaching and Technology in higher education: Student perceptions and personal reflections. Computers & Education, 39(3), 207-317.
  • Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A New Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  • Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., DeYoung, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51, 1523-1537.
  • Muir-Herzig, R. G. (2004). Technology and its impact in the classroom. Computers and Education, 42(2), 111-131.
  • Mumcu, F. K. (2011). Bir Ağsal Öğrenme Ortamında Öğretmen Adaylarına Verilen BİT Entegrasyonu Eğitiminin Etkililiği. Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  • Mumcu, F.K. & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). ICT in vocational and technical schools: Teachers' instructional, managerial and personal use matters. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 9(1), 98-106.
  • National College for School Leadership [NCSL] (2003). What is networked learning? Paper presented to The American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Chicago, 21-25 April.
  • Niess, M., Browning, C., Driskell, S., Johnston, C. & Harrington, R. (2009). Mathematics Teacher TPACK Standards and Revising Teacher Preparation. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 3588-3601). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.
  • Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. (4th Edition). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Salmon, G. (2001). Psychological and group learning perspectives: Their relevance to e-learning. E-learning, February 2001, London.
  • Scardamalia, M. &Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
  • Steeples, C., Jones, C., and Goodyear, P. (2002). Beyond e-learning: A future for networked learning. Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. Steeples, C. and Jones, C. (eds), Berlin: Springer Verlag, 323-341.
  • Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144.
  • Veerman, A.L. (2000). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Through Argumentation. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.
  • Veldhuis-Diermanse, A.E. (2002). CSCLearning? Participation, Learning Activities and Knowledge Construction in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Doctoral dissertation, Wageningen University.
  • Veldhuis-Diermanse, A.E., Biemans, H.J.A., Mulder, M., & Mahdizadeh, H. (2006). Analysing learning processes and quality of knowledge construction in networked learning. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 12(1), 41-58.
  • Wang, Y. (2002). When technology meets beliefs: Preservice teachers' perceptions of the teachers role in the classroom with computers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(1), 150-161.
  • Ward, L. (2003). "Teacher practice and the integration of ICT: Why aren't our secondary school teachers using computers in their classrooms?" Paper presented at NZARE/AARE 2003, 1- 13.
  • Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V. & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173-207.
  • Zhao, Y. & Bryant, F. L. (2006). Can Teacher Technology Integration Training Alone Lead to High Levels of Technology Integration? A Qualitative Look at Teachers' Technology Integration after State Mandated Technology Training. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 5, 53-62.