Cerrah Yaşı ve Deneyiminin Pilonidal Sinüs Operasyon Tekniği ile İlişkisi

Objective: Most surgeons continue to use classical methods of surgical treatment despite the introduction of minimally invasive approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the association of surgeon age and experience on Pilonidal sinus (PS) treatment method. Methodology: Clinical data of patients who presented with PS and underwent surgical treatment between January 2011 and November 2021 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Operation method was classified as classical or minimally invasive. Surgeons were divided into three age groups: 28–35 years, 36–45 years, and ≥46 years. Drain use, anesthesia type, and operation method were compared between age groups. Correlation of surgeon age and these variables was also evaluated. Results: In total, 253 patients were included for analysis (203 men and 50 women). Median age was 25 years (range, 16–64). The number of patients in the classical and minimally invasive groups was 155 and 98 patients, respectively. Use of minimally invasive surgery increased (r = 0.153) and drain use decreased (r = −0.232) as surgeon age and experience increased. Spinal anesthesia was the most frequently used anesthesia method; only 7.1% of patients underwent surgery using local anesthesia. There was no significant correlation between surgeon age and anesthesia type. Conclusion: Classical surgical treatment of PS remains more common than minimally invasive approaches in our hospital. Use of minimally invasive approaches increased in conjunction with surgeon age and experience.

Association of Surgeon Age and Experience with Pilonidal Sinus Operation Technique

Objective: Most surgeons continue to use classical methods of surgical treatment despite the introduction of minimally invasive approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the association of surgeon age and experience on Pilonidal sinus (PS) treatment method. Methodology: Clinical data of patients who presented with PS and underwent surgical treatment between January 2011 and November 2021 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Operation method was classified as classical or minimally invasive. Surgeons were divided into three age groups: 28–35 years, 36–45 years, and ≥46 years. Drain use, anesthesia type, and operation method were compared between age groups. Correlation of surgeon age and these variables was also evaluated. Results: In total, 253 patients were included for analysis (203 men and 50 women). Median age was 25 years (range, 16–64). The number of patients in the classical and minimally invasive groups was 155 and 98 patients, respectively. Use of minimally invasive surgery increased (r = 0.153) and drain use decreased (r = −0.232) as surgeon age and experience increased. Spinal anesthesia was the most frequently used anesthesia method; only 7.1% of patients underwent surgery using local anesthesia. There was no significant correlation between surgeon age and anesthesia type. Conclusion: Classical surgical treatment of PS remains more common than minimally invasive approaches in our hospital. Use of minimally invasive approaches increased in conjunction with surgeon age and experience.

___

  • 1. Barrial MA, Vilanova-Sánchez A, Gortázar S, et al. Pilonidal sinus in pediatric age: primary vs. secondary closure. Cir Pediatr. 2020;33:61-4.
  • 2. Johnson EK, Vogel JD, Cowan ML, et al. Clinical practice guidelines Committee of the american Society of Colon and rectal Surgeons _ the american Society of Colon and rectal Surgeons ' Clinical practice guidelines for the Management of Pilonidal disease. External colon rectum. 2019;62:146 -57.
  • 3. Mahmood F, Hussain A, Akingboye A. Pilonidal sinus disease : Review of current practice and prospects for endoscopic treatment . Ann Med Surg ( London ). 2020;57: 212-7.
  • 4. Allen-Mersh TG. Pilonidal sinus: finding the right track for treatment. BrJ Surg. 1990;77:123-32.
  • 5. Wells K, Pendola M. Pilonidal disease and perianal hydradenitis. Yeo cJ (Ed). Shackelford's surgery of alimentary tract ,8th ed. Philadelphia Elsevier; 2019: p.1793.
  • 6. Anderson, RE. Less invasive pilonidal sinus surgical procedures. Coloproctology. 2019;41:117-20.
  • 7. Iesalnieks I, Ommer A: The management of pilonidal sinus. Dtsch Arztebl int 2019; 116:12-21.
  • 8. Bi S, Sun K, Chen S, Gu J. Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10:13720.
  • 9. McCallum IJ, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;336:868-71.
  • 10. Bascom J. Pilonidal disease, Origin from follicles of hair and results of follicleremoval as treatment. Surgery 1980;87:567-72.
  • 11. Garg P, Garg M, Gupta V, Mehta SK, Lakhtaria P. Lay open ( deroofing ) and curettage under local anesthesia for pilonidal disease: an outpatient procedure. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;7:214–8.
  • 12. Iesalnieks I, Ommer A, Petersen S, et al. German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease . Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401:599-609.
  • 13. Abdelnaby M, Fathy M, Emile SH, et al. Sinus laser therapy versus sinus lay open in the management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Colorectal dis. 2021;23:2456-65.
  • 14. Çolak T, Sücüllü İ, Sinan H, et al. Results of Surgeon Attitude Questionnaire in Pilonidal Disease. Journal of Disease of the Colon Rectum. 2011; 21:165 -272.
  • 15. Fabricius R, Petersen LW, Bertelsen CA. Treatment of pilonidal sinuses in Denmark is not optimal . Dan Med bull . 2010;57:4200.
Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-6187
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2003
  • Yayıncı: Ankara Eğitim ve Araşt. Hast.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

İntraauterin ani bebek ölüm sendromu 3. Basamak Hastane Deneyimi ve Literatürün Gözden Geçirilmesi

Nilufer AKGÜN, Seval YILMAZ ERGANİ, Süheyla AYDOĞMUŞ, Yusuf USTUN

Hemşirelik Son Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Etik Duyarlılıklarının İncelenmesi

Emel KÜLEKCİ, Sibel YILMAZ ŞAHİN, Emine İYİGÜN

SİLİKON TÜP ENTÜBASYONLU EKSTERNAL DAKRİYOSİSTORİNOSTOMİ; UZUN DÖNEM SONUÇLARI

Derya DOĞANAY, Firdevs ÖRNEK, Umay GÜVENÇ

COVID-19 salgını sırasında çocuklarda diyet takviyeleri ve fonksiyonel gıdalar

Serçin TAŞAR, Ayşe Esra TAPCİ, Neslihan GÜRCAN KAYA, Ezgi Günce NURAL KIRCI, Yavuz TOKGÖZ

TRAKEOBRONKOPATİA OSTEOKONDROPLASTİKA; BİR OLGU EŞLİĞİNDE

Meltem YILMAZ, Arif İŞCAN, Levent MUTLU

Tam remisyonda izlenen opere meme, kolorektal ve akciğer kanserli veya lenfomalı hastaların işe dönüşü, iş doyumu ve bunu etkileyen faktörler

Olgun DENİZ, Fikri İÇLİ, Filiz ÇAY ŞENLER

ORTAM SICAKLIĞI VE AKUT KOLESİSTİT ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Saygın ALTINER, Mert ÇÖL, Enes CEBECİ, Bedri Burak SUCU, Enes DOĞANAY, Murtaza Kaan ÖZDEMİR, Serdar KURU, Salih TUNCAL

ENGELLİ SAĞLIK KURULU RAPORU (ESKR) OLAN ÇOCUKLARIN AİLELERİNİN ÇOCUKLAR İÇİN ÖZEL GEREKSİNİM RAPORU (ÇÖZGER) SÜRECİNDE BİLDİRDİĞİ DENEYİM FARKLILIKLARI

Ezgi ÖZALP AKIN, Hale SANDIKÇI İSKENDERLİ, Sıdıka Canan ATASOY, Betül YAĞBASAN, Cansu KELEŞ, Emine Bahar BİNGÖLLER PEKCİCİ

Östaki Tüpü Disfonksiyonunda Kullanılan Ölçeklerin Eksternal Validasyonu ve Etkinliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Gözde ORHAN KUBAT, Hilal KAYA

The Effect Of Age, Sex, And Indications For Operation On The Complications Of Total Thyroidectomy

Işılay TAŞKALDIRAN, Özlem TURHAN İYİDİR, Uğur TOPRAK, Bilal ÇAKIL, Gülin BULUT, Mehmet Tarık HACIBEKTAŞOĞLU, Sıla GEREN, Tolga KORKMAZ, Zeynep Ilgaz YAYLI, Neslihan BAŞÇIL TÜTÜNCÜ