Serhat KARAMAN, Yusuf TANRIKULU, Ceren ŞEN TANRIKULU, Atıf BAYRAMOĞLU

2011 VAN DEPREMİ: ERZURUM BÖLGE EĞİTİM VE ARAŞTIRMA HASTANESİ ACİL SERVİSİNE BAŞVURAN OLGULARIN ANALİZİ

AMAÇ: Depremler dünyada olduğu gibi ülkemizde de en sık görülen, yüksek mortalite ve morbititeye neden olan doğal afetlerdir. Deprem esnasında bir taraftan afet bölgesine tıbbi destek sağlanırken, bir taraftan da hastaların çevre hastanelere sevki yapılarak bölgedeki tıbbi yetersizlikler giderilmeye çalışılmaktadır. Biz bu çalışmada, 2011 Van depreminde hastanemize olan depremzede başvurularını incelemeyi amaçladık. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEMLER: Hastanemiz bölgeye yakın en kapsamlı hastanelerden birisi olup, çalışmamızda deprem nedeniyle hastanemize başvuran 45 hasta, başvuru şekilleri, tanıları, yapılan müdahaleler ve yattıkları kliniklere göre incelenmiştir.BULGULAR: Hastaların 22'si kadın, 23'ü erkek olup, yaş ortalamaları 29.6 idi. En yüksek başvuru şekli kara ambulansı idi. Triaj alanlarına göre dağılımları eşit olan hastaların 1/3'ü taburcu edilirken, 2/3' ü yatırılmıştır. En sık görülen yaralanmalar ekstremite yaralanmaları idi ve bununla uyumlu olarak en yüksek yatış oranı ortopedi kliniğine aitti. SONUÇ: Deprem öncesi ve sonrası alınacak önlemlerin hepsi mortalite ve morbidite oranlarını azaltmada mutlaka etkili olacaktır. Deprem bölgesindeki sağlık hizmetlerinin etkin bir biçimde planlanması kadar, saha ile hastaneler ve hastane içinde klinikler arası uyumu ve bunların birlikte çalışması hastaların tedavi ve iyileşme sürecini olumlu yönde etkileyecektir

THE 2011 VAN EARTHQUAKE IN TURKEY: THE ANALYSIS OF CASES ADMITTING TO EMERGENCY CLINIC OF ERZURUM REGIONAL TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL

OBJECTIVE: Earthquakes are natural disasters that most common in our country, as in the world and cause high mortality and morbidity. During the earthquake, both while medical support is provided to the disaster area and medical deficiencies in the region are corrected by making the referral of patients to close hospitals. In this study, we aimed to investigate admissions related to earthquake in the 2011 Van earthquake. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our hospital is one of the most comprehensive hospital near the earthquake region. In our study, 45 patients admitted to our hospital because of an earthquake were analyzed according to their admission forms, diagnosis, interventions, and hospitalization clinics. RESULTS: 22 patients were female, 23 patients were male and mean age was 29.2. The most common admission form was by land ambulance. Distributions of patients according to the triage areas were equal. While 1/3 of patients were discharged, 2/3 of patients were hospitalized. Extremity injuries were the most common injury and in accordance with this state, the highest hospitalization rate was orthopedic clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Measures to be taken before and after earthquake will necessarily impact to reduce mortality and morbidity rates. As well as the planning of health services effectively in earthquake region, harmony between the field with hospitals and between clinics in hospital, and work together will positively affect treatment and healing process of patients

PDF

___

1)Gans L. Disaster planning and management. In: Harwood Nuss AL, ed. The clinical practice of emergency medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers. 1996: 1511–1513.
2)Reitherman R. How to prepare a hospital for an earthquake. J Emerg Med. 1986; 4: 119-31.
3)Mujeeb SA, Jaffery SH. Emergency blood transfusion services after the 2005 earthquake in Pakistan. Emerg Med J. 2007; 24: 22-4.
4)Taviloğlu K. Felaketlerde yaralılara yaklaşım ve hekimlik hizmetleri. İçinde: Depremlerde uzmanlık hizmetleri. İstanbul Tabip Odası Yayınları, İstanbul: Ekspres Ofset; 2000: 1-36.
5)Çakmakçı M. Felakette sağlık düzeni. Bilim Teknik Dergisi. 1999; 31: 11-7.
6)Mahoney LE, Reutershan TP. Catastrophic disasters and the design of disaster medical care systems. Ann Emerg Med. 1987; 16: 1085-91.
7)Aylwin CJ, König TC, Brennan NW, Shirley PJ, Davies G, Walsh MS, et al. Reduction in critical mortality in urban mass casualty incidents: analysis of triage, surge, and resource use after the London bombings on July 7, 2005. Lancet. 2006; 368: 2219-25.
8)Hirshberg A, Holcomb JB, Mattox KL. Hospital trauma care in multiple-casualty incidents: a critical view. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 37: 647-52.
9)Seaman J. Disaster epidemiology: or why most international disaster relief is ineffective. Injury. 1990; 21: 5-8; discussion 15-6.
10)Dursun R, Görmeli CA, Görmeli G. (Evaluation of the patients in Van Training and Research Hospital following the 2011 Van earthquake in Turkey). Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012; 18: 260-4.
11)Zaré M, Nazmazar B. Van, Turkey earthquake of 23 october 2011, mw 7.2; an overview on disaster management. Iran J Public Health. 2013; 42: 134-44.
12)Van depremi hakkında. T.C Başbakanlık Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı’nın resmi internet sitesi. https://www.afad.gov.tr/TR/IcerikListele1.aspx?ID=107.
13)Görmeli G, Görmeli CA, Güner S, Ceylan MF, Dursun R. The clinical profile of musculoskeletal injuries associated with the 2011 Van earthquake in Turkey. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2012; 23: 68-71.
14)Schultz CH, Koenig KL, Noji EK. A medical disaster response to reduce immediate mortality after an earthquake. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 438-44.
15)Peek-Asa C, Kraus JF, Bourque LB, Vimalachandra D, Yu J, Abrams J. Fatal and hospitalized injuries resulting from the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Int J Epidemiol. 1998; 27: 459-65.
16)Alexander D. Death and injury in earthquakes. Disasters. 1985; 9: 57-60.
17)Taviloğlu K. 17 Ağustos 1999 Marmara depreminin ardından: Felaket organizasyonunda neredeyiz? Ulusal Cerrahi Derg. 1999; 15: 333-42.
18)Chen WK, Cheng YC, Ng KC, Hung JJ, Chuang CM. Were there enough physicians in an emergency department in the affected area after a major earthquake? An analysis of the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake in 1999. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 38: 556-61.
19)Tanaka K. The Kobe earthquake: the system response. A disaster report from Japan. Eur J Emerg Med. 1996; 3: 263-9.
20)Collins AJ. Kidney dialysis treatment for victims of the Armenian earthquake. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 1291-2.
21)Oda J, Tanaka H, Yoshioka T, Iwai A, Yamamura H, Ishikawa K, et al. Analysis of 372 patients with Crush syndrome caused by the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. J Trauma. 1997; 42: 470-6.
22)Mulvey JM, Awan SU, Qadri AA, Maqsood MA. Profile of injuries arising from the 2005 Kashmir earthquake: the first 72 h. Injury. 2008; 39: 554-60.
23)Guner S, Guner SI, Isik Y, Gormeli G, Kalender AM, Turktas U, et al. Review of Van earthquakes form an orthopaedic perspective: a multicentre retrospective study. Int Orthop. 2013; 37: 119-24.
24)Liang NJ, Shih YT, Shih FY, Wu HM, Wang HJ, Shi SF, et al. Disaster epidemiology and medical response in the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 38: 549-55.
25)Suzuki S, Sakamoto S, Miki T, et al. Hanshin-Awaji earthquake and acute MI. Lancet 1995; 345: 981.
26)Trichopoulos D, Katsouyanni K, Zavitsanos X, Tzonou A, Dalla-Vorgia P. Psychological stress and fatal heart attack: the Athens (1981) earthquake natural experiment. Lancet. 1983; 1: 441-4.
27)Martchenke J, Pointer JE. Hospital disaster operations during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1994; 9: 146-53.
28)Haynes BE, Freeman C, Rubin JL, Koehler GA, Enriquez SM, Smiley DR. Medical response to catastrophic events: California's planning and the Loma Prieta earthquake. Ann Emerg Med. 1992; 21: 368-74.