PANDEMİ DÖNEMİNİN KADINLAR ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN ODAK GRUP ÇALIŞMASI ÜZERİNDEN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Kadınlar geçtiğimiz yüzyıllar boyunca erkeklerden daha fazla zorlukla karşılaşmıştır. Son on yılda kadın-erkek eşitliğini sağlamaya yönelik birçok adım atılmış olsa da, bu açık hala tam olarak kapatılabilmiş değildir. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü'nün (WHO) 11 Mart 2020 tarihinde COVID-19 salgınını pandemi olarak ilan etmesinin ardından, dünya genelinde birçok ülke virüsün yayılmasını azaltmak için kısıtlayıcı kurallar ve önlemler getirmiştir. COVID-19 pandemi sürecinde meydana gelen ani arz ve talep daralmaları, dünya ekonomilerini ve sağlık sistemlerini doğrudan ve derinden etkilemiştir. Pandeminin en büyük etkilerinden biri de kadınlar üzerinde olmuş, özellikle karantina dönemlerinde aile içi şiddet ve kadına yönelik cinsel istismar sayılarında artişlar meydana gelmiştir. Bu makale AB Horizon 2020 kapsamında hibelendirilen, PandeVITA projesi kapsamında, odak grup etkinliğinde tartışılan örnekler üzerinden, beşli̇ sarmal i̇şbi̇rli̇ği̇ modeli̇ni̇n 5 si̇stemi̇nden gelen kadınların yaşadığı olumsuzlukları göstererek, gelecekte benzer durumlar için pandeminin kadınlar üzerindeki etkilerini en aza indirmek amacıyla hazırlanmıştır. Çalışma, pandeminin ilk dalgasından sonra çok olumsuz etkilenen finans ve işgücü piyasasında, karar alma süreçlerinde, ev işlerinde yer alan kadınların yaşadıkları olumsuzlukları belirleyerek, çözüm ve öneriler getirmektedir.

THE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF THE PANDEMIC PERIOD ON WOMEN THROUGH A FOCUS GROUP STUDY

Women have faced more difficulties than men in all the past centuries. In the last decade, although many steps have been taken to ensure equality between men and women, this gap has still not been fully closed. After the announcement of the World Health Organisation (WHO) about the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic on March 11, 2020, many countries around the world have introduced restrictive rules and measures to reduce the spread of the infection. The sudden supply and demand contractions that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic process directly affected the economies and the health systems of the world deeply. One of the biggest effects of the pandemic was on women, especially in the lockdown periods domestic violence and sexual abuse towards women increased. This article has been prepared under the pandevita project with the aim of minimizing the effects of pandemic on women for the similar situations in the future by showing the negativities experienced by women, from 5 systems of the quintuple helix collaboration model, through examples discussed in the focus group event. The paper identifies and brings solutions and suggestions, for women in the finance and labour market, decision-making processes, domestic work, who were very adversely affected after the first wave of the pandemic.

___

  • Aghajanian, Lina and Ella Page. Help Desk Report 850: COVID-19 and the participation of women and women’s rights organisations in decision-making. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, 2020, https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/15532.
  • Bhat, Lekha D., Surabhi Kandaswamy, B.S. Sumalatha, Gayathree Mohan and Ourania Vamvaka Tatsi. “Fear, discrimination, and healthcare access during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring women domestic workers’ lives in India.” Agenda 35, no.4 (2021): 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2021.2046392
  • Boniol M, M. McIsaac, L. Xu, T. Wuliji, K. Diallo and J. Campbell. Gender equity in the health workforce: analysis of 104 countries. Working paper 1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 (WHO/HIS/HWF/Gender/WP1/2019.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
  • Brechenmacher, Saskia and Caroline Hubbard. “How the Coronavirus Risks Exacerbating Women’s Political Exclusion.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, (November 2020). https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/11/17/how-coronavirus-risks-exacerbating-women-s-political-exclusion-pub-83213
  • Bwire, G.M. “Coronavirus: Why Men are More Vulnerable to Covid-19 Than Women?,” SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, no. 2, (2020): 874–876.
  • Cordova, A. and R. Gabriela. “Addressing the Gender Gap.” Comparative Political Studies 50, no. 2 (2017): 260-270.
  • Çelikel, Aysel. “Kadınlarin Siyasal Yaşama Katılımı Konusunda Yeni Uluslararası Çalışmalar.” Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 54 (1994): 45-53.
  • Dahl, Robert A. Democracy and Its Critics. Yale: Yale University Press, 1991.
  • George Tegan. “What Is a Focus Group | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples.” (6 February 2023), accessed 24 April 2023, https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/focus-group/
  • Güneş Peschke, Seldağ. “Quota Applications for Women at Work.” in A Comparative Study of Women Issues, Eds. Seldağ Güneş Peschke and Lutz Peschke, Norderstedt: Books on Demand, 2018.
  • Güneş Peschke, Seldağ and Lutz Peschke. “Women Issues in An Interdiciplenary Context.” in A Comparative Study of Women Issues, Eds. Seldağ Güneş Peschke and Lutz Peschke, Norderstedt: Books on Demand, 2018.
  • Keten, M. and Elif Keten Edis. “Covid-19 Pandemisinin Kadın Sağlığı Üzerindeki Etkisi.” STED Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi 30, No. 4 (2021): 293 - 300.
  • Peschke, Lutz. “Subject Women, Object Women. Image Building in Social Media.” in A Comparative Study of Women Issues, Eds. Seldağ Güneş Peschke and Lutz Peschke, Norderstedt: Books on Demand, 2018.
  • Rozenberg, S., J. Vandrommea and C. Martin. “Are we equal in adversity? Does Covid-19 affect women and men differently?.” Maturitas 138 (2020): 62–68. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.009
  • Sánchez, Odette R., Diama B. Vale, Larissa Rodrigues, Fernanda G. Surita. “Violence against women during the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrative review.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (03 September 2020) https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13365
  • Yüksel, Anıl Güven. Toplumsal Yaşama Katılma Hakkı. İstanbul: Oniki Levha, 2022.
  • Yüksel, Anıl Güven. “İspanya’da Olağanüstü Hal Dönemlerinin İnsan Haklarının Kısıtlanması Bakımından Güncel Gelişmeler Doğrultusunda Değerlendirilmesi.” Yıldırım Beyazıt Law Journal, no. 2022/2 (2022): 667 – 698, https://doi.org/10.33432/ybuhukuk.1104477
  • Zittel, Thomas. “Participatory Democracy.” in Participatory Democracy and Political Participation, Eds. T. Zittel and D. Fuchs, London and New York: Routledge, 2007.
  • CDC. Evaluation Briefs - Data Collection Methods for Program Evaluation: Focus Groups, 2018, accessed 24 April 2023, https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/pdf/brief13.pdf
  • CEDAW Committee. General Recommendation. art. 4 paragraph 1 of CEDAW - temporary special measures, 2004.
  • Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). 1981, https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/text/econvention.htm#article7
  • Convention on the Political Rights of Women (CPRW). 1954, https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XVI-1&chapter=16
  • Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women. General Assembly Resolution 48/104, 1993, https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/eliminationvaw.pdf
  • Declaration on the Participation of Women in Promoting International Peace and Co-operation (1982) UNGA R. 37/63, https://www.refworld.org/docid/528de9544.html
  • DG EAC. DG Education and Culture Management Plan - 2016, 2016 https://eige.europa.eu, Access Date: 09.09.2022.
  • EIGE (European Institute of Gender Equality). Economic Case for Gender Equality in EU, 2022 https://eige.europa.eu/gender-mainstreaming/policy-areas/economic-and-financial-affairs/economic-benefits-gender-equality
  • IDEA. “Global overview of COVID-19: Impact on elections”, accessed 21 May 2023, https://www.idea.int/news-media/multimedia-reports/global-overview-covid-19-impact-elections
  • ILO. International Labour Organization Declaration on Equality of Opportunity and Treatment for Women Worker. Official Bulletin Vol. LVIII Serie A, 1975.
  • ILO. “Who Are Domestic Workers?.” 5 April 2013, https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/domestic-workers/WCMS_209773/lang--en/index.htm
  • ILO. Making decent work a reality for domestic workers – Progress and prospects ten years after the adoption of the Domestic Workers Convention 2011 (No. 189). 15 June 2021, https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_802551.pdf
  • ILO. Building Forward Fairer: Women’s rights to work and at work at the core of the COVID-19 recovery, (July 2021) accessed 24 April 2022 https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---gender/documents/publication/wcms_814499.pdf
  • OHCHR. COVID-19 and women's human rights: guidance, 2020 https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/tools-and-resources/covid-19-and-womens-human-rights-guidance
  • UN. General Assembly during its 18th Session - 1274th Plenary Session, 5 December 1963, accessed 22.02.2021, https://undocp.org/en/A/RES/1920(XVIII)
  • UN News. “Bachelet: Women’s participation forging peace worldwide, vastly worse post pandemic”, accessed 20 May 2023, https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/01/1109992
  • UN WOMEN. Policy brief: The impact of COVID-19 on women, 9 April 2020, accessed April 24, 2023
  • UN WOMEN. Policy Brief: Covid-19 and Women’s Leadership: From an Effective Response to Building Back Better, 2020. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2020/06/policy-brief-covid-19-and-womens-leadership