Spatial Representations of Ideology and politics in Urban Scene: Keçiören Example

Osmanlı Dönemini takiben kurulmuş olan Türkiye Cumhuriyetinin başkenti olan Ankaraya bu bağlamda önemli sembolik anlamlaryüklenmiştir. Modern Türk Cumhuriyetinin temsili olan Ankara kenti, modern ve laik bir devlet olarak küresel tabloda yer edinmeyiamaçlamıştır. Diğer şehirlerden farklı olarak, siyasi alanın merkezinde olması sebebiyle, siyasi alanda olan dönüşümleri mekânüzerinden okumak mümkündür. Bu bağlamda, Ankaranın en büyük ve nüfusu en fazla olan ilçelerinden Keçiören 1994 yılı sonrasısiyasi sahada olan dönüşümler sonucunda tamamen değişmiştir.Bu çalışmanın amacı, Ankaranın Keçiören ilçesinde 1994 yılı sonrası başlayan ve hâlâ devam eden dönüşümü incelemektir. AK Partimimarisinin üzerinde durularak bu dönüşümün etrafında sosyal, politik, kültürel ve ekonomik sahalarda meydana gelen değişimlerincelenecektir. Bu çalışma ile amaçlanan, geçmişi sadece fiziksel olarak değil, bunlar ile iç içe geçmiş sosyal ve siyasi olarak dabenimsemiş yeni bir mimari oluşumun incelemesini Pierre Bourdieunun sosyolojik kavramları ile yapmaktır.

İdeoloji ve politikanın mekânsal gösterimi: Keçiören örneği

Being the capital city of a newly established Turkish Republic that was descended from the Ottoman Empire, Ankara was attributed amassive symbolic meaning. Ankara became the representative of a new Turkish State that aimed to attain a place in the global picture asbeing a modern and secular nation state. It carries a distinct characteristic as the refections of transformations taking place in the politicalsphere can be read from the urban space. In this context, Keçiören District, being one of the largest and most populated districts of Ankarahas undergone a massive transformation afer 1994 with the change in the political structure.Te aim of this study is to make an analysis of the transformation that has been taking place in Keçiören district of Ankara since 1994,focusing on the architecture of AKP government that has been taking place not only in the architectural or urban field but also in thepolitical, social, economic and cultural fields. What has been tried to be analyzed in this study is the emergence of a new architecturalstyle that imitates the past with a modern approach not only in terms of urban and architectural quality but also from social and politicalmotives that are embedded in the culture by using Pierre Bourdieu s sociological notions as elements of interpretation.

PDF

___

Akın, E. (2007). Kentsel gelişme ve kentsel rantlar: Ankara örneği. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ankara University Social Sciences Institution, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Ankara.
Alanya Kalesi. (n.d.). Antalya il Kültür ve Turizm Müdürlüğü. Retrieved March 20, 2014, from http://www. antalyakulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,67819/alanya-kalesi.htm
Allen, D. E. and Anderson, P. F. (1994). Consumption and social stratification: Bourdieus distinction. Advances in Consumer Research, 21 , 70-74.
Ankara University Social Sciences Institution, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Ankara. Arslan, R. (1989). Gecekondulaşmanın evrimi. Mimarlık, 27(238), 34-37.
Aslanoğlu, İ. (2010). Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi mimarlığı. İstanbul: Bilge Kültür Sanat.
Ataöv, A. and Osmay, S. (2007). Türkiyede kentsel dönüşüme yöntemsel bir yaklaşım. METU JFA, 24(2), 57-82.
Aydın, Ö., Bayraktar, N. and Tekkaya, E. (2003). Cumhuriyet ilçesinde aykırı bir ilçe: Keçiören. Mimarlık, 307, 56-59.
Baştuğ, S. (1979). Urban growth and cultural change: two squatter settlements in Ankara. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
Batur, A. (2005). A concise history: Architecture in Turkey during the 20 th century. Ankara: Chamber of Architects of Turkey.
Birol, İ. and Derman, Ç. (1991). Motifes in Turkish decorative arts. İstanbul: Kubbealtı Akademisi Kültür ve Sanat Vakfı.
Bloom, J. and Blair, S. S. (2009). Te grove encyclopedia of Islamic art and architure (Vol. 3). New York: Oxford University Press.
Blunden, A. (2004). Bourdieu on status, class and culture . Retrieved 20.03.2014, from http://home.pacific.net.au/~andy/works/
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction . Cambridge Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Te forms of capital. In A. H. Halsey (Ed.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 46-58). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Teory, 7(1), 14-25.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). Te logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). On symbolic power. In J. B. Tompson (Ed.), Language and symbolic power (pp. 163-170). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). Vilhelm Aubert memorial lecture: Physical space, social space and habitus. Paper presented at the Oslo, Department of Sociology, University of Oslo and Institute for Social Research.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action . Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1999). Te weight of the world: Social sufering in contemporary society: social sufering and ımpoverishment in contemporary society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Refexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Çalışkan, O. (2009). Forming a capital: Changing perspectives on the planning of Ankara (1924-2007) and lessons for a new master-planning approach to developing cities. Metropolitan Form, Autumn 2009 , 23-53.
Davis, F. (1970). Te Palace of Topkapı in Istanbul. New York: Charles Scribners Sons.
Degeorge, G. and Porter, Y. (2002). Iran and Central Asia, fourteenth to nineteenth century the art of the Islamic tile. Italy: Flammarion.
Dener, A. (1996). Hangi ideoloji, kimin erki, ya acılı arabesk? In Sempozyum: İdeoloji, Erk ve Mimarlık (pp. 4-9). İzmir: Çimentaş.
Deriu, D. (2013). Picturing modern Ankara: New Turkey in Western imagination. Te Journal of Architecture, 18 (4), 497-527.
Elçin, T. (2008). Bürokrasinin mimari görünümü. Unpublished manuscript. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Siyaset Bilimi Ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü, Ankara.
Eldem, S. H. and Akozan, F. (1982). Topkapı Sarayı . İstanbul: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Eski Eserler ve Müze Genel Müdürlüğü.
Erman, T. (2001). Representations of Rural Migrants in the Academic Discourse the Politics of Squatter (Gecekondu) Studies in Turkey: Te Changing Representations of Rural Migrants in the Academic Discourse. Urban Studies, 38 , 983- 1002.
Erman, T. (2004). Gecekondu çalışmalarında öteki olarak gecekondulu kurguları. European Journal of Turkish Studies, 1. Retrieved March 20, 2014, from http://ejts.revues.org/85
Estergon Türk Kültür Merkezi. (n.d.). Retrieved 20.03.2014, from www.kecioren.bel.tr/ESTERGON_TURK_KULTUR_ MERKEZI-5-sosyal-tesis.html
Keyder, Ç. (1998). 1990larda Türkiyede modernleşmenin doğrultusu. In S. Bozdoğan and R. Kasaba (Eds.), Türkiyede modernleşme ve ulusal kimlik (pp.29-42) . İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
Keyder, Ç. (2005). Globalization and social exclusion in Istanbul. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , 29(1), 124-134.
Keyman, F. and Koyuncu, B. (2005). Globalization, alternative modernities and the political economy of Turkey. Review of International Political Economy 12 (1), 105-128.
Kuban, D. (2008). Selçuklu çağında Anadolu sanatı. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Kurtoğlu, A. (1998). Local politics and social networks in urban Turkey: Te case of hemşehrilik in the Keçiören Municipality. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Ankara.
Kurtoğlu, A. (2004). Hemşehrilik ve şehirde siyaset: Keçiören örneği. İstanbul: İletişim.
Küçükerman, Ö. and Yücel, İ. (1993). Milli saraylardaki cam eserlerin 19. yüzyılda Türk cam sanayiinin gelişimine etkileri ve Ahmet Fethi Paşa. In T. İnce (Ed.), Milli Saraylar 1993 (pp. 26-37). Ankara: TBMM Basımevi.
Lewcock, R. (1978). Architects, crafsman and builders: Materials and techniques In G. Michell (Ed.), Architecture of the Islamic world: Its history and social meaning (pp. 112-144). London: Tames and Hudson.
Lingard, B., and Christie, P. (2003). Leading theory: Bourdieu and the field of educational leadership. An introduction and overview to this special issue. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Teory and Practice, 6(4), 317-333.
Mahalle/Muhtar. (n.d.). Keçiören Belediyesi. Retrieved 20.03.2014, from http://www.kecioren.bel.tr/muhtarliklar. html
Mathieu, C. J. (1999). Te history of the tifany windows at the Erskine and American Church Montreal. Unpublished Masters Tesis, Concordia University, Montreal.
Pınarevli, M. (2005). A study on the urban/architectural transformations in Keçiören afer 1990s. Unpublished Masters Tesis, Middle East Technical University Department of Architecture, Ankara.
Poyraz, U. (2011). Looking at the urban transformation project from the gecekondu dwellers perspective: Te case of Mamak. Unpublished Masters Tesis, Middle East Technical University Te Program of Urban Policy Planning and Local Governments, Ankara.
Rahkonen, K. (2011). Bourdieu and Nitzche: Taste as struggle. In S. Susen and B. S. Turner (Eds.), The legacy of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 125-144). London: Anthem Press.
Garrick, B. (1997). Producing and practising social justice policy in education: A policy trajectory study from Queensland, Australia. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 7(2), 157-179.
Gartman, D. (1991). Culture as class symbolization or mass reification? A critique of Bourdieus Distinction. American Journal of Sociology, 97(2), 421-447.
Göle, N. (1998). Modernleşme bağlamında İslami kimlik arayışı. In S. Bozdoğan and R. Kasaba (Eds.), Türkiyede modernleşme ve ulusal kimlik (pp.70-81). İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
Gülhan, S. T. (2011). Devlet müteahhitlerinden gayrimenkul geliştiriciliğine, Türkiyede kentsel rant ve bir meta olarak konut üreticiliği-Konuta hücum. Birikim , 270, 27-33.
Günay, B. (2006). Ankara çekirdek alanının oluşumu ve 1990 Nazım Planı hakkında bir değerlendirme. In T. Şenyapılı (Ed.), Cumhuriyetin Ankarası: Doç. Dr. Özcan Altabana armağan (pp. 61-118). Ankara: ODTÜ Geliştirme Vakfı.
Hasol, D. (2005). Ansiklopedik mimarlık sözlüğü (9. ed.). İstanbul: Yapı-Endüstri merkezi Yayınları.
Hillier, J. and Rooksby, E. (2005). Habitus: A sense of place . Hants: Ashgate.
Jenkins, R. (1992). Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge. Jenkins, R. (2002). Pierre Bourdieu: Revised Edition . London: Routledge.
Joas, H., and Knöbl, W. (2011). Between structuralism and theory of practive: Te cultural sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. In S. Susen and B. S. Turner (Eds.), Te legacy of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 1-32). London: Anthem Press.
Kalaycıoğlu, M. (2006). Poverty mapping with geographic information systems: A case study in Keçiören district, Ankara. Unpublished Masters Tesis. Middle East Technical University Te Graduate School of Natural And Applied Sciences, Ankara.
Kartal, K. (1982). Ankara as the focus of social change in the process of urbanization, In Te Urban Integration (pp. 123163). Ankara: Te Turkish Society for Social Science Publications.
Kasaba, R. (1998). Eski ile yeni arasında Kemalizm ve Modernizm. In S. Bozdoğan and R. Kasaba (Eds.), Türkiyede modernleşme ve ulusal kimlik (pp. 12-28). İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
Kaya, T. (2002). Post evaluation of physical planning experience of Ankara: 1957 Plan of Uybadin Yücel Plan. Unpublished Masters Tesis, Middle East Technical University Department of City and Regional Planning, Ankara.
Keçiöreni Adeta Yeniden Yarattık. (2007). Retrieved March 20, 2014, from http://v3.arkitera.com/h23203-kecioren-i-adeta- yeniden-yarattik.html
Tekin, Ç. and Oğuz, Z. (2013). Traces of birdhouse tradition in Anatolia. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Civil, Architectural Science and Engineering, 7(4), 186-192.
Tuçaltan, G. (2008). Dynamics of Urban Transformation via Improvement Plans for Ankara City. Unpublished Masters Tesis, Middle East Technical University, Master of Science in Urban Design, Ankara.
Tuğal, C. (2002). Islamism in Turkey: Beyond instrument and meaning. Economy and Society, 31 (1), 85-111.
Tuğal, C. (2009). Passive revolution: Absorbing the islamic challenge to capitalism . Standford: Standford University Press.
Tuncer, O. C. (1986). Anadolu kümbetleri. Ankara: Güven Matbaası.
Turan, M. (2007). Başkentin gecekonduları: Kentsel dönüşüm projelerinin arka bahçeleri. In A. Mengi (Ed.), Kent ve planlama- geçmişi korumak geleceği tasarlamak (pp. 390 404). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
Uzun, C. N. (2005). Residential transformation of squatter settlements: Urban redevelopment projects in Ankara. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20 (2), 183-199.
Wacquant, L. (2011). Durkheim and Bourdieu: The common plinth and its cracks. In S. Susen and B. S. Turner (Eds.), The legacy of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 91-110). London: Anthem Press.
Webb, J., Schirato, T. and Danaher, G. (2002). Understanding Bourdieu. London: Sage Publication.
Webster, H. (2011). Bourdieu for architects. New York: Routledge. Rey, T. (2007). Bourdieu on religion: Imposing faith and legitimacy. London: Equinox Publishing.
Saylan, A. (2008). Karmaşıklık ve beğeni: Keçiören örneği. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi.
Simakof, N. (1993). Islamic designs in color. New York: Dover Publications.
Susen, S. (2011). Bourdieu and Adorno on the transformation of culture in modern society: Towards a critical theory of cultural production. In S. Susen and B. S. Turner (Eds.), The legacy of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 173-202). London: Anthem Press.
Şahin, S. Z. (2007). Te politics of urban planning in Ankara between 1985 and 2005. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Department of Political Science And Public Administration, Ankara.
Şengül, H. T. (2001). Kentsel çelişki ve siyaset: Kapitalist kentleşme süreçleri üzerine yazılar. İstanbul: Demokrasi Kitaplığı.
Şenyapılı, T. (2004). Barakadan gecekonduya: Ankarada kentsel mekânın dönüşümü 1923-1960 . İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Tatar, D. (2012). Te AKPS delirious spaces: Enjoying the notions of construction and architecture in neoliberal Turkey. Unpublished Masters Tesis, Sabancı University Department of Sociology, Istanbul.
Tekeli, İ. (1982). Türkiyede kentlesme yazıları başkent Ankaranın öyküsü. Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi Yayınları.
Tekeli, İ. (2005). Kent tarihi yazımı konusunda yeni bir paradigma önerisi. In T. Şenyapılı (Ed.), Cumhuriyetin Ankarası: Doç. Dr. Özcan Altabana armağan (pp. 3-21). Ankara: ODTÜ Geliştirme Vakfı.