Üç farklı genel anestezi yaklaşımının QT ve QTc aralığı üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Amaç: QT aralığında uzama ciddi kardiyak aritmiler, polimorfik ventriküler taşikardi ve ventriküler fibrilasyon ile sonuçlanabilir. Bu çalışma da üç farklı genel anestezi protokolünün QT ve QTc aralığı üzerine etkilerinin araştırılması amaçlandı. Yöntem: Jinekolojik ve ürolojik operasyon geçirecek ASA I-II risk grubundan 60 hasta rasgele 3 eşit gruba ayrıldı. Tüm grup- lara genel anestezi indüksiyonu propofol ve fentanil ile ve trakeal entübasyon ise rokuronyum ile sağlandı. Anestezi idamesinde Grup I’de (n=20), propofol-remifentanil, Grup II’de (n=20) desfluran ve remifentanil, Grup III’te (n=20) desfluran ve % 40 O2+N2O karışımı kullanıldı. ‹ndüksiyon öncesi, indüksiyondan sonraki 5., 15., 45. dakikalarda ve postoperatif dönemde 3 derivas- yonlu EKG kaydı yapıldı. Aynı dönemlerde Grup II ve Grup III’te MAK değerleri ve tüm gruplarda oksijen saturasyonu (SpO2), sistolik (SAB), diastolik (DAB) ve ortalama arter basınçları (OAB) kaydedildi. Kalp hızı ile düzeltilmiş QT aralığı Bazett formülü kullanılarak hesaplandı. Ki-kare veya Unpaired Student t testi üç grubun demografik verilerini karşılaştırmada kullanıldı. Üç gruptan elde edilen verilerin istatiksel analizinde tek yönlü varyans analizi ve t testi kullanıldı. Her grup içinde farklı zamanlarda yapılan ölçümlerin bazal değerle karşılaştırılmasında ANOVA ve paired t testi kullanıldı. p0.05). Grup I’de bazal QT ve QTc değerleri ile 5.,15., 45. dakikalar ve postoperatif ölçümler benzerdi (p>0.05). Grup II ve III’te QT ve QTc değerleri 15. ve 45. dakikalarda bazal değere göre uzamıştı ve bu uzama her grup için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı idi (p

Comparison of the effects of three different general anesthesia methods on QT and QTc intervals

Objective: Prolongation of the QT interval may result in grave cardiac arrhythmias, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of three different general anesthesia protocols on QT and QTc intervals. Method: Sixty ASA I-II patients undergoing gynecological and urological operations were randomly allocated into three groups. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl and tracheal intubation was facilitated by rocuronium in all groups. Anesthesia was maintained in Group I (n=20) with propofol and remifentanil, in Group II (n=20) with desfluran and remifentanil, in Group III (n=20) with desfluran and 40% O2+60% N2O. Three lead electrocardiogram recordings were taken before induction, 5, 15, 45 minutes after induction and postoperative period. MAC values in Group II and Group III and oxygen saturation (SpO2), systolic (SAB), diastolic (DAB) and mean (OAB) arterial pressure in all groups were recorded at the same time. Heart rate and corrected QT interval were evaluated by using Bazett&#8217;s formula. Chi-Square or unpaired Student t-test were used for comparison of demographic data between the three groups. One -way analysis of variance and t-test were used for comparison of data between the three groups. For each group, measurements which were made at the different times were evaluated with control values by ANOVA and paired t-test. p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline QT and QTc values of the groups (p>0.05). In Group I, there were not any statistical differences between basal QT and QTc values and the 5th , 15th , 45th minutes and postoperative measurements. In Group II and III, QT and QTc values were longer at 15th and 45th minutes compared with basal values and this prolongation was statically significant for each group (p<0.05). When the three groups were compared for QT and QTc interval prolongation, 15th , 45th minutes and postoperative measurements of QT and QTc interval were significantly longer in Group II and III than Group I (p<0.05). Arrhythmia was observed 5 cases in Group III and this was statistically significant when compared with Group I and II (p<0.05). In 3 cases in Group III, tachicardia was observed and was statistically significant when compared with group I (p<0.05). Conclusion: In this study, we concluded that desfluran and N2O or desfluran and remifentanil prolongs the QT and QTc interval but propofol and remifentanil do not prolong QT and QTc interval.

___

  • 1. Bozbaş H, Özin B. QT ölçümünü nasıl yapalım? Türk Aritmi, Pacemaker ve Elektrofizyoloji Dergisi 2005; 3: 63-68.
  • 2. Beyazıt Y, Güven GS, Iskit AB. Uzun QT sendromu, Hacettepe Tıp Dergisi 2005; 36: 43-48.
  • 3. Booker PD, Whyte SD and Ladusans EJ. The Long QT syndrome and Anesthesia, Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 349–366.
  • 4. Kleinsasser A, Kuenszberg E, Loeckinger A, et al. Sevoflurane, but not propofol, significantly prolongs the Q-T interval. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 25–27.
  • 5. Tanskanen PE, Kyttä JV, Randell TT. QT interval and QT dispersion during the induction of anaesthesia in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage: a comparison of thiopental and propofol. Eur J Anaesth 2002; 19: 749–754.
  • 6. Bazett HC. An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Heart 1920; 7: 353-370.
  • 7. Lindgren L, Yli- Hankala A, Randell T, Kirvela M, Scheinin M, Neuvonen PJ. Haemodynamic and cateholamine responces to induction of ananaesthesia and tracheal intubation: comparison between propofol and thiopentone. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70: 306-310.
  • 8. Charbit B, Samain E, Merckx P, Funck-Brentano C.: QT interval measurement: evaluation of automatic QTc measurement and new smple method to calculate and interpret corrected QT interval. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 255-260.
  • 9. Viskin S, Rosovski U, Sands AJ et all. Inaccurate electrocardiographic interpretation of long QT: The majority of phsysicians cannot recognize a long QT when they see one. Heart Rhythm 2005; 2: 569-574.
  • 10. Owczuk R, Sawicka W, Wujtewicz M.A, Kawecka A, Lasek J, Wujtewicz M. Influence of spinal anesthesia on corrected QT interval. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2005; 30: 548-552.
  • 11. Abriel H, Schlapher J, Keller DI et al. Molecular and clinical determinants of drugs- induced long QT syndrome: An iatrogenic channelopaty. Swiss. Med 2004; 134: 685-694.
  • 12. Paris ST, Cafferkey M, Tarling M et al. Comparison of sevoflurane and halothane for outpatient dental anaesthesia in children. Br J Anaesth 1997;79: 280–284.
  • 13. Mahla E, Rotman B, Rehak P, Atlee JL et al. Perioperative ventricular dysrhythmias in patients with structural heart disease undergoing noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 16–21.
  • 14. Karagöz AH, Basgul E, Celiker V, Aypar U. The effect of inhalational anaesthetics on QTc interval. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 171–174.
  • 15. Gurkan Y, Canatay H, Agacdiken A, Ural E, Toker K. Effects of halothane and sevoflurane on QT dispersion in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 2003; 13: 223-227.
  • 16. Silay E, Katı İ, Tekin M, Güler N, Hüseyinoğlu UA et all. Comparison of the effects of desflurane and sevoflurane on the QTc interval and QT dispersion. Acta Cardiol 2005; 60: 459-464.
  • 17. Güler N, Bilge M, Eryonucu B, Katı İ, Demirel CB. The effects of halothane and sevoflurane on QT dispersion. Acta Cardiol 1999; 54: 311-315.
  • 18. Yıldırım H, Adanır T, Atay A, Katircioğlu K, Savacı S. The effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane and desflurane on QT interval. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 566-570
  • 19. Weiskopf RB, Moore MA, Eger EI 2nd et al. Rapid increase in desflurane concentration is associated with greater transient cardiovascular stimulation than with rapid increase in isoflurane concentration in humans. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 1035–1045.
  • 20. Kong CF, Chew ST, Ip-Yam PC. Intravenous opioids reduce airway irritation during induction of anaesthesia with desflurane in adults. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 364–367.
  • 21. Picker O, Schwarte LA, Schindler AW, Scheeren TW. Desflurane increases heart rate independent of sympathetic activity in dogs. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 945–951.
  • 22. Paventi S, Santevecchi A, Ranieri R. Effects of sevoflurane versus propofol on QT interval. Minerva Anestesiol 2001; 67: 637–640.
  • 23. Saarnivaara L, Hiller A, Oikkonen M. QT interval, heart rate and arterial pressures using propofol, thiopentone or methohexitone for induction of anaesthesia in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1993; 37: 419–423
  • 24. Whyte S D., Booker P D. and Buckley D G. The Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane on the QT Interval and Transmural Dispersion of Repolarization in Children. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 71-77.
  • 25. Yamada M, Hatakeyama N, Malykhina AP, Yamazaki M, Momose Y, Akbarali HI. The Effects of Sevoflurane and Propofol on QT Interval and Heterologously Expressed Human Ether-A-Go-Go Related Gene Currents in Xenopus Oocytes. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 98-103.
  • 26. Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A, Lindner KH, Keller C, et al. Reversing sevoflurane- associated QTc prolongation by changing to propofol. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 248-250.
  • 27. Magnano AR, Talathoti N, Hallur R, Bloomfield DM, Garan H. Sympathomimetic infusion and cardiac repolarization. The normotive effects of epinephrine and isoproterenol in healty subjects. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17: 983-989.
  • 28. Wilton NC, Hantler CB, Congenital long QT syndrome. Changes in QT interval during anesthesia with tiopental, vecuronium, fentanyl, and isoflurane. Anesth Analg 1987; 66: 357-360.
  • 29. Lischke V, Wilke HJ, Probst S, Behne M, Kessler P. Prolongation of the QT interval during induction of anesthesia in patients with coronary artery disease. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994; 38: 144-148.
  • 30. Blair JR, Pruett JK, Crumrine RS, Balser JJ. Prolongation of QT interval in association with the administration of large doses of opiotes. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 442-443.
  • 31. Kweon TD, Nam SB, Chang CH, Kim MS, Lee SJ, Shin CS, June DB and Han DW. The effect of bolus administration of remifentanil on QTc interval during induction of sevoflurane. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 347-351.
  • 32. Owczuk R, Wuctewicz M.A, Sawicka W, Kawecka A, Lasek J, Wuctewicz M. The influence of desflurane on QTc interval, Anesth. Analg 2005; 101: 419-422.
Anestezi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0578
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1993
  • Yayıncı: Betül Kartal
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Entübasyon sırasında oluşan hemodinamik yanıtlar üzerine deksmedetomidin'in etkisinin remifantanil ile karşılaştırılması

Yusuf DOĞAN, Alp ALPTEKİN, Derya ÖZKAN, Emine ARIK, Haluk GÜMÜŞ

Üç farklı genel anestezi yaklaşımının QT ve QTc aralığı üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Elif KUTLU, Ahmet TOPAL, Jale Bengi ÇELİK

İnguinal hernilerde faklı dozlarda ketamin kullanımı

Hüseyin SERT, Tülin GÜMÜŞ, Muhammet GÖZDEMİR, Senem TÜFEKÇİOĞLU, Orhan KANBAK

Sezaryen operasyonlarında intratekal uygulanan hiperbarik bupivakain, ropivakain ve levobupivakainin etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Rukiye AYDIN, Özdemir İclal KOL, Kenan KAYGUSUZ, Sinan GÜRSOY, Caner MİMAROĞLU

Transüretral prostat rezeksiyonunda intratekal düşük doz levobupivakain ve bupivakainin etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Hale BORAZAN, Tuba B. ERDEM, Işıl DAVARCI, Şeref OTELCİOĞLU

Premedikasyonda deksmedetomidin veya midazolam kullanımının spinal anestezide anksiyete ve hemodinamik parametreler üzerine etkisi

Seden EMİNFERZANE, Hanife ALTUNKAYA, HİLAL AYOĞLU, Yetkin ÖZER, Osman YAPAKLI, IŞIL ÖZKOÇAK TURAN

Anestezide xenon: Geçmiş ve günümüz

Mehmet Emin ORHAN

Glanzman trombastenili gebede sezaryen operasyonunda rekombinant aktive faktör VII kullanımı

Berrin GÜNAYDIN, Ahmet ERDEM, Atilla ALTINSOY, Rauf HAZNEDAR

Spinal anestezi sonrası serviko-torakal ağrı

Akın Suna TAKMAZ, Ayşe Günay KAYA, Solmaz GÜNAL, Nurşen GÜRSOY, Hülya BAŞAR

Kalp cerrahisinde serebral monitörizasyon

Elif A. AKPEK