OTONOM SİNİR SİSTEMİ VE ANESTEZİ
Otonom sinir sistemi temel olarak spinal kord, beyin sap ve hipotalamusta yer alan merkezler tarafndan aktive edilir. Homeostazisin devam ettirilmesinde önemli bir rol oynamaktadr. Efferent otonomik sinyaller vücudun çeflitli organlarna sempatik ve parasempatik sinir sistemi olarak adlandrlan 2 major alt ünite tarafndan iletilir. Her iki sistemin akti f olarak çalflmas sonucu doku aktivitesi artrlr yada inhibe edilir. Sonuçta doku fonksiyonlarnn do¤ru biçimde regülasyonu korunur. Anestezi uygulamalarnda kullanlan gerek volatil gerekse de intravenöz ajanlar sempatik ve parasempatik sistem üzerine farkl etkiler oluflturmaktadr. Bu derlemenin amac otonom sinir sistemi fizyolojisi ile anestezi prati¤inde uygulanan ilaçlarn bu sistem üzerine etkilerini gözden geçirmektir
AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM AND ANESTHESIA
The autonomic nervous system is principally activated by the centers located in spinal cord, brain stem and hypothalamus. It plays an important role in maintaining the homeostasis. Efferent autonomic signals are transmitted to various organs of the body by two major subunits called the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system. Tissue activity is increased or inhibited actively as a result of the functions of these two systems. Eventually the regulation of tissue functions is protected in a correct manner. Both volatile and intravenous agents, used in anesthesia practice, produce di fferent effects on sympathetic and parasympathetic systems. In this study we aim to review the autonomic nervous system physiology and the effects of drugs applied in anesthesia on this system.
___
- 1. Akyüz G, Akdeniz Leblebiciler M. Otonom Sinir Sistemi Anatomisi ve De¤erlendirilmesi. Turk Fiz Tp Rehab Derg 2012; 58: 1-5. 2. Hall JE, Guyton AC. Textbook of medical physiology. in: The Autonomic Nervous System and the Adrenal Medulla. eds: Gruliow R, Stingelin L. Volume 12. New York. W.B. Saunders. 2011; 729-736. 3. McCorry LK. Physiology of the Autonomic Nervous System. Am J Pharm Educ 2007; 71: 78. 4. Zimmermann M. Case studies in a physiology course on the autonomic nervous system: design, implementation, and evaluation. Adv Physiol Educ 2010; 34: 59-64. 5. Kvetnansky R, Lu X, Ziegler MG. Stress-triggered changes in peripheral catecholaminergic systems. Adv Pharmacol 2013; 68: 359-397. 6. Hanamoto H, Niwa H. Autonomic and cardiovascular effects of pentobarbital anesthesia during trigeminal stimulation in cats. Int J Oral Sci 2012; 4: 24-29. 7. Tassonyi E, Charpantier E, Muller D, Dumont L, Bertrand D. The role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the mechanisms of anesthesia. Brain Res Bull 2002; 57: 133-150. 8. Shin S, Lee JW, Kim SH, Jung YS, Oh YJ. Heart rate variability dynamics during controlled hypotension with nicardipine, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014; 58: 168-176. 9. El Beheiry H, Mak P. Effects of aging and propofol on the cardiovascular component of the autonomic nervous system. J Clin Anesth 2013; 25: 637-643. 10. Goodarzi M, Narasimhan RR. The effect of large-dose intrathecal opioids on the autonomic nervous system. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 456-459. 11. Svorc P Jr, Bacová I, Svorc P, Buzga M. Autonomic nervous system under ketamine/xylazine and pentobarbital anaesthesia in a Wistar rat model: a chronobiological view. Prague Med Rep 2013; 114: 72-80. 12. Nagashima Y, Furukawa Y. Cardiac effects of propofol and its interaction with autonomic nervous system in isolated, cross- circulated canine atria. J Anesth 1999; 13: 34-39. 13. Jooste E, Zhang Y, Emala CW. Neuromuscular blocking agents' differential bronchoconstrictive potential in Guinea pig airways. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 763-772. 14. Struckmann N, Schwering S, Wiegand S, et al. Role of muscarinic receptor subtypes in the constriction of peripheral airways: Studies on receptor-deficient mice. Mol Pharmacol 2003; 64: 1444-1451. 15. Lee AM, Jacoby DB, Fryer AD. Selective muscarinic receptor antagonists for airway diseases. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2001; 1: 223-229. 16. Naguib AN, Tobias JD, Hall MW, et al. The role of different anesthetic techniques in altering the stress response during cardiac surgery in children: a prospective, double-blinded, and randomized study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013; 14: 481-490. 17. Rowley TJ, Flood P. Isoflurane prevents nicotine-evoked norepinephrine release from the mouse spinal cord at low clinical concentrations. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 885-889. 18. Georgiev SK, Wakai A, Kohno T, Yamakura T, Baba H. Actions of norepinephrine and isoflurane on inhibitory synaptic transmission in adult rat spinal cord substantia gelatinosa neurons. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 124-128. 19. de Haan M, van Herck H, Tolboom JB, Beynen AC, Remie R. Endocrine stress response in jugular-vein cannulated rats upon multiple exposure to either diethyl-ether,halothane/O2 /N2 O or sham anaesthesia. Lab Anim 2002; 36: 105-114. 20. Kagawa K, Hayashi Y, Itoh I, et al. Identification of the central imidazoline receptor subtype involved in modulation of halothane- epinephrinearrhythmias in rats. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1689-1694. 21. Göthert M. Inhalation Anaesthesia Today and Tomorrow. Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine / Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin.ed: Peter K, Jesch F. 1th ed. Newyork, Springer Company, 1982; 97-108. 22. Lee J, Jung CW. The target concentration of remifentanil to suppress the hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation during inhalational induction with desflurane. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011; 60: 12-18. 23. Park KW. Cardiovascular effects of inhalational anesthetics. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2002; 40: 1-14. 24. Ebert TJ. Anesthetic issues related to the autonomic nervous system, ASA Refresher Courses in Anesthesiology: 2001; 29: 113-122. 25. Goodarzi M. Narasimhan RR. The effect of large-dose intrathecal opioids on the autonomic nervous system. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 456-459. 26. Wolf AR. Effects of regional analgesia on stress responses to pediatric surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22: 19-24. 27. Freise H, Van Aken HK. Risks and benefits of thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 859-868.