Fuat KIZILAY, MEHMET ŞAHİN GÖK, Barış ALTAY

Penil plikasyon tekniği uygulanan konjenital penil kurvatür sonuçları

AMAÇ: Penil plikasyon tekniği, konjenital penil kurvatür hastalığı tedavisinde kullanılan önemli bir tekniktir. Hastalarımızda bu tekniğinin başarısını ve sonuçlarını analiz etmeyi amaçladık.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Penil plikasyon tekniğiyle opere edilen 50 hastanın verileri retrospektif analiz edildi. Hastalara telefon yoluyla ulaşıldı ve kontrole çağrıldı. Hastaların işlemden genel memnuniyetleri, komplikasyon oranı, hastanede yatış süresi, kurvatür dereceleri, erektil fonksiyonları, ele gelen sertlik hissi sorgulandı.BULGULAR: Olguların ortalama yaşı 29,75'di (22-48). Ortalama kurvatür derecesi 40,1°'ydi. Hastalarda en sık ventral kurvatür saptandı. En sık saptanan kurvatür derecesi 45°'ydi (%54). 40 hasta (%80) postoperatif birinci gün eksterne edildi. On hastada (%20) ele gelen lezyon hissi mevcuttu. Otuz altı hasta (%72) işlemden genel olarak memnun olduğunu belirtti. Altı hastada minör komplikasyonlar görüldü, hiçbirisi girişim gerektirmedi. On hastada (%20) rezidü 5° kurvatür saptandı, ancak hiçbirisi ikincil cerrahi gerektirmedi. Dört hasta, ele gelen lezyon hissi olduğunu (%8) ve üç hasta, peniste hissizlik olduğunu (%6) bildirdi. Kırk dört hasta, erektil fonksiyonlarında bozulma olmadığını (%88) belirtti.SONUÇ: Plikasyon tekniği, konjenital penil kurvatür tedavisinde yüksek hasta memnuniyeti ve düşük komplikasyon oranıyla uygulanan bir yöntemdir. Hastaların operasyondan beklentileri preoperatif dönemde iyi irdelenmeli ve hastaların imkansız beklentiler içerisinde olmaları önlenmelidir. Polyester sütürlerin kullanılmasıyla, ele gelen sertlik hissi azalmıştır

Congenital penile curvature results using penile plication technique

OBJECTIVE: Penile plication technique is a fundamental technique used in the treatment of congenital penile curvature disease. We aimed to analyze the success rate and results of this technique in our patients.MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of 50 patients who underwent penile plication. We reached the patients via telephone and called them for control. Patients’ overall satisfaction associated with the procedure, complication rate, hospitalization time, the degree of curvature, erectile function and feeling of palpable lesion were questioned.RESULTS: The mean age of the cases was 29.75 (22–48). The mean curvature degree was 40.1. Ventral was the most common curvature direction. The most common curvature degree was 45°. Forty patients (80%) were discharged on the first postoperative day. There was feeling of palpable lesion in 10 patients (20%). Thirty-six patients (% 72) declared that they were generally satisfied with the procedure. Minor complications were seen in 6 patients, none required intervention. Residual 5° curvature was detected in 10 patients (20%), but no secondary surgery was required. Four patients reported feeling of palpable lesion (8%) and 3 patients had penile numbness (6%). Fortyfour patients (88%) reported no deterioration in erectile function.CONCLUSION: Plication technique is a frequently performed method in the treatment of congenital penile curvature with a low complication rate and high patient satisfaction. Urologists must pay attention to patients’ expectations from the surgery during the preoperative period and patients must be avoided from having impossible expectations. The use of polyester sutures has reduced the feeling of palpable lesion

PDF

___

1. Makovey I, Higuchi TT, Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Wood HM. Congenital penile curvature: update and management. Curr Urol Rep 2012;13:290–7. PubMed PMID:22688922. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0257-x
2. Hsieh JT, Liu SP, Chen Y, Chang HC, Yu HJ, Chen CH. Correction of congenital penile curvature using modified tunical plication with absorbable sutures: the long-term outcome and patient satisfaction. Eur Urol 2007;52:261–6. doi: 10.1016/j. eururo.2006.12.033
3. Yachia D, Beyar M, Aridogan IA, Dascalu S. The incidence of congenital penile curvature. J Urol 1993;150(5 Pt 1):1478–9. PubMed PMID:8411431.
4. Baldini A, Morel-Journel N, Paparel P, Ruffion A, Terrier JE. Patient-reported long-term sexual outcomes following plication surgery for penile curvature: A retrospective 58-patient study. Prog Urol 2017;27:10–6. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.08.018
5. Montag S, Palmer LS. Abnormalities of penile curvature: chordee and penile torsion. ScientificWorldJournal 2011 Jul 28;11:1470– 8. PubMed PMID:21805016. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2011.136
6. Hatzimouratidis K, Giuliano F, Moncada I, Muneer A, Salonia A, Verze P . EAU Guidelines on Erectile Dysfunction, Premature Ejaculation, Penile Curvature and Priapism; 2016.
7. Cunha GR, Baskin L. Development of the penile urethra. Adv Exp Med Biol 2004;545:87–102. PubMed PMID:15086022.
8. Hynes PJ, Fraher JP. The development of the male genitourinary system: III. The formation of the spongiose and glandar urethra. Br J Plast Surg 2004;57:203–14. PubMed PMID:15006521. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2003.08.017
9. Perriton CL, Powles N, Chiang C, Maconochie MK, Cohn MJ. Sonic hedgehog signaling from the urethral epithelium controls external genital development. Dev Biol 2002;247:26–46. PubMed PMID:12074550. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0668
10. Baskin LS, Lee YT, Cunha GR. Neuroanatomical ontogeny of the human fetal penis. Br J Urol 1997;79:628–40. PubMed PMID:9126098.
11. Cohn MJ. Development of the external genitalia: conserved and divergent mechanisms of appendage patterning. Dev Dyn 2011;240:1108–15. PubMed PMID:21465625. Pubmed Central PMCID. PMC4761266. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22631
12. Sasso F, Vittori M, D’Addessi A, Bassi PF. Penile curvature: an update for management from 20 years experience in a high volume centre. Urologia 2016;83(3):130–8. PubMed PMID:27103093. doi: 10.5301/uro.5000169
13. Maretti C. Symptoms, Their Physiopathology, and Outpatient Clinical Practice and Diagnosis. Peyronie’s Disease: Springer; 2015. p.47–57.
14. Friedrich MG, Evans D, Noldus J, Huland H. The correction of penile curvature with the Essed-Schroder technique: a long-term follow-up assessing functional aspects and quality of life. BJU Int 2000;86:1034–8. PubMed PMID:11119097.
15. Leonardo C, De Nunzio C, Michetti P, Tartaglia N, Tubaro A, De Dominicis C, et al. Plication corporoplasty versus Nesbit operation for the correction of congenital penile curvature. A long-term follow-up. Int Urol Nephrol 2012;44:55–60. PubMed PMID:21559790. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-9976-z
16. Gholami SS, Lue TF. Correction of penile curvature using the 16-dot plication technique: a review of 132 patients. J Urol 2002;167:2066–9.
17. Ryu J-K, Suh J-K. Penile Reconstruction in Peyronie’s Disease. Penile Augmentation: Springer; 2016. p.213–23.
18. Schultheiss D, Meschi MR, Hagemann J, Truss MC, Stief CG, Jonas U. Congenital and acquired penile deviation treated with the essed plication method. Eur Urol 2000;38:167–71. PubMed PMID:10895008. doi: 20275
19. Akbulut F, Akman T, Salabas E, Dinçer M, Ortac M, Kadioglu A. Neurovascular bundle dissection for Nesbit procedure in congenital penile curvature patients: medial or lateral? Asian J Androl 2014;16:442–5. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.123667.
20. Lopes I, Tomada N, Vendeira P. Penile corporoplasty with Yachia’s technique for Peyronie’s disease: Single center experience with 117 patients. Urol Ann 2013;5:167–71. doi: 10.4103/0974- 7796.115736
21. Chen R, McCraw C, Lewis R. Plication procedures –excisional and incisional corporoplasty and imbrication for Peyronie’s disease. Transl Androl Urol 2016;5:318–33. doi: 10.21037/tau.2016.05.01
22. Shaeer O. Shaeer’s corporal rotation for length-preserving correction of penile curvature: modifications and 3-year experience. J Sex Med 2008;5:2716–24. PubMed PMID:18624969. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00913.x
23. Andrews HO, Al-Akraa M, Pryor JP, Ralph DJ. The Nesbit operation for Peyronie’s disease: an analysis of the failures. BJU Int 2001;87:658–60. PubMed PMID:11350407.
24. Essed E, Schroeder FH. New surgical treatment for Peyronie disease. Urology 1985;25:582–7. PubMed PMID:4012950
25. Raimoldi A, Berti GL, Giola V, Longoni E, Paccaduscio A, Pozzoni F, et al. Our experience in the treatment of penile curvature. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2004;76:66–8.
26. Kim DH, Lesser TF, Aboseif SR. Subjective patient-reported experiences after surgery for Peyronie’s disease: corporeal plication versus plaque incision with vein graft. Urology 2008;71:698–702. PubMed PMID:18387398. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.065
27. Mobley EM, Fuchs ME, Myers JB, Brant WO. Update on plication procedures for Peyronie’s disease and other penile deformities. Ther Adv Urol 2012;4:335–46. PubMed PMID:23205060. Pubmed Central PMCID. PMC3491756. doi: 10.1177/1756287212448224
28. Schlomer BJ. Correction of Residual Ventral Penile Curvature After Division of the Urethral Plate in the First Stage of a 2-Stage Proximal Hypospadias Repair. Curr Urol Rep 2017;18:13. PubMed PMID:28213855. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0659-x
29. Vicini P, Di Nicola S, Antonini G, De Berardinis E, Gentile V, De Marco F. Geometrical modified nesbit corporoplasty to correct different types of penile curvature: description of the surgical procedure based on geometrical principles and long-term results. Int J Impot Res 2016;28:209–15. PubMed PMID:27511302. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2016.28
30. Erpenbach K. Penile plication for the treatment of severe penile deviations. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1990;115:1746–9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1065220
31. Yachia D. Our experience with penile deformations: incidence, operative techniques, and results. J Androl 1994;15:63S-8S.
32. Baskin LS, Erol A, Li YW, Liu WH. Anatomy of the neurovascular bundle: is safe mobilization possible? J Urol 2000;164:977–80.
33. Bacal V, Rumohr J, Sturm R, Lipshultz LI, Schumacher M, Grober ED. Correlation of degree of penile curvature between patient estimates and objective measures among men with Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 2009;6:862–5. PubMed PMID:19284472. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01158.x
34. Kim DH, Lesser TF, Aboseif SR. Subjective patient-reported experiences after surgery for Peyronie’s disease: corporeal plication versus plaque incision with vein graft. Urology 2008;71:698–702. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.065
35. Greenfield JM, Lucas S, Levine LA. Factors affecting the loss of length associated with tunica albuginea plication for correction of penile curvature. J Urol 2006;175:238–41. doi: 10.1016/S0022- 5347(05)00063-7