20 Yıl Sonrasında Hiyerarşik Boş Zaman Kısıtlar Teorisini Değerlendirmek

Bu makale hiyerarşik boş zaman kısıtlar teorisinin (Crawford ve Godbey 1987; Jackson ve Godbey 1991) durumu- nu birçok yönden değerlendirmeye yöneliktir. Ele alınan konulardan bazıları orijinal modelin bazı yönlerinin açıklı- ğa kavuşturulması ve detaylandırılması, modelden yararlanan ya da inceleyen çalışmaların ne derece doğrulayıcı  oldukları bakımından değerlendirilmesi, çeşitli yazarlar tarafından orijinal modele yöneltilen eleştiriler ve gelecek  çalışmalar için olasılıklardır. Varılan sonuçlara göre; modelin kültürlerarası kullanıma uygun olduğu, modelin boş  zaman değerlendirmeden başka davranışları incelemek amaçlı kullanılabileceği, günümüze kadar yapılan çalış- malar her ne kadar doğrulayıcı nitelikte olsalar da boş zaman kısıtlar teorisinin bir sonraki basamağa taşınabilme- si için önemli bir potansiyele sahip olduğu görülmektedir. 

Assessing Hierarchical Leisure Constraints Theory af ter Two Decades

This article assesses the status of hierarchical leisure constraints theory (Crawford & Godbey, 1987; Crawford,  Jackson, & Godbey 1991) regarding many issues. Such issues include clarification and elaboration of some as- pects of the original model, a review of studies which have used or examined the model and the extent to which  they are confirmatory, critiques of the original model by various authors, and avenues for further research. Conc- lusions drawn include that the model is cross culturally relevant, that the model may examine forms of behavior  other than leisure, and that, while research to date has been largely confirmatory, there is a high potential for the  theory to be expanded in order to advance leisure constraints research to the next level.

___

  • Alexandris, K. ve Carroll, B. (1997a). An Analysis of Leisure Constraints Based on Different Recreational Sport Parti- cipation Levels: Results from a Study in Greece, Leisure Sciences, 19: 1-15.
  • Alexandris, K. ve Carroll, B. (1997b). Demographic Differences in the Perception of Con-straints on Recreational Sport Participation: Results from a Study in Greece, Leisure Stu- dies, 16 (2): 107-125.
  • Alexandris, K., Grouios, G., Tsorbatzoudis, H. ve Bliatsou, P. (2001). Relationship be¬tween Perceived Constraints and Commitment to Recreational Sport Participation of Uni- versity Students in Greece, International Journal of Sport Management, 2: 282-¬297.
  • Alexandris, K., Tsorbatzoudis, C. ve Grouios, G. (2002). Percei- ved Constraints on Rec-reational Sport Participation: In- vestigating Their Relationship with Intrinsic Moti¬vation, Extrinsic Motivation and Amotivation, Journal of Leisure Research, 34 (3): 233-252.
  • Arab-Moghaddam, N., Henderson K. A. ve Sheikholeslami, R. (2007). Women’s Leisure and Constraints to Participati- on: Iranian Perspectives, Journal of Leisure Research, 39 (1): 109-126.
  • Auster, C. J. (2001). Transcending Potential Antecedent Leisure Constraints: The Case of Women Motorcycle Operators, Journal of Leisure Research, 33 (3): 272-298.
  • Backman, S. (1991). An Investigation of the Relationship betwe- en Activity Loyalty and Perceived Constraints, Journal of Leisure Research, 23: 332-344.
  • Backman, S. J. ve Crompton, J. L. (1989). Discriminating Betwe- en Continuers and Discontinuers of Two Public Leisure Services, Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 7: 56-71.
  • Backman, S. J. ve Crompton, J. L. (1990). Differentiating Betwe- en Active and Passive Discontinuers of Two Leisure Acti- vities, Journal of Leisure Research, 22: 197-212.
  • Berger, P. ve Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Re- ality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company.
  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Rese- arch. New York, NY: Guiford Press.
  • Brown, P. R., Brown, Y. M. ve Hansen, V. (2001). Perceived Constraints and Social Support for Active Leisure among Mothers with Your Children, Leisure Sciences, 23: 131-144.
  • Burns, R. C. ve Graefe, A. R. (2007). Constraints to Outdoor Rec- reation: Exploring the Effects of Disabilities on Percepti- ons and Participation, Journal of Leisure Research, 39 (1): 156-181.
  • Caldwell, L. L. (2005). Self-Construal in Context: A Response to Walker, Deng, and Dieser, Journal of Leisure Research, 37: 106-116.
  • Carroll, B. ve Alexandris, K. (1997). Perception of Constraints and Strength of Motiva¬tion: Their Relation to Recrea- tional Sport Participation, Journal of Leisure Research, 29: 279-299.
  • Chick, G. ve Dong, E. (2005). Cultural Constraints on Leisure. E. J. Jackson (Ed.), Constraints to leisure (ss. 169-185). State College, PA: Venture.
  • Clayton, L. B. (2002). The Use of Concept Mapping to Evaluate the Isomorphism of the Hier¬archical Leisure Constraint Typology. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Clemson Univer- sity. (Yayın no. AAT 3071548).
  • Crawford, D. W. ve Godbey, G. (1987). Reconceptualizing Barri- ers to Family Leisure, Leisure Sciences, 9: 119-127.
  • Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L. ve Godbey, G. (1991). A Hierarc- hical Model of Leisure Constraints, Leisure Sciences, 13: 309-320.
  • Crawford, D. W., Houts, R. M., Huston, T. L. ve George, L. J. (2002). Compatibility, Leisure, and Satisfaction in Marital Relationships, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64: 433-449.
  • Crawford, J. L. ve Stodolska, M. (2008). Constraints Experienced By Elite Athletes with Disabilities in Kenya, With Implica- tions for the Development of a New Hierarchical Model of Constraints at the Societal Level, Journal of Leisure Rese- arch, 40 (1): 128¬-155.
  • Culp, R. H. (1998). Adolescent Girls and Outdoor Recreation: A Case Study Examining Constraints and Effective Prog- ramming, Journal of Leisure Research, 30 (3): 356-379.
  • Dominguez, L. A. (2003). Constraints and Constraint Negotia- tion by Women Sea Kayakers Participating in a Women- Only Course. Doktora tezi. Michigan State University. (Ya- yın No. AAT 3100416).
  • Dunlop, P. M. (2006). Active Employees! Exploring the Relati- onship between Job Characteris¬tics, Perceived Constra- ints and Participation in Leisure-Time Physical Activity. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (Yayın No. AAT 1432756).
  • Elkins, D. J. (2004). Levels of Perceived Constraint: A Compara- tive Analysis of Negotiation Strategies in Campus Recre- ational Sports. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Indiana Uni- versity. (Yayın No. AAT 3152800).
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Frederick, C. J. ve Shaw, S. M. (1995). Body Image as a Leisure Constraint: Examining the Experience of Aerobic Classes for Young Women, Leisure Sciences, 17: 57-53.
  • Gilbert, D. ve Hudson, S. (2000). Tourism Demand Constraints: A Skiing Participation, Annals of Tourism Research, 27: 906-925.
  • Han, W. (2004). Leisure Participation and Constraints: The Case of Korean Americans. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). The Pennsylvania State University. (Yayın No. AAT 3147618).
  • Harrington, M. A. (1991). Time after Work: Constraints on the Leisure of Working Women, Loisir et Société, 14 (1): 115-132.
  • Hawkins, B. A., Peng, J., Hsieh, C. M. ve Eklund, S. J. (1999). Le- isure Constraints: A Replication and Extension of Cons- truct Development, Leisure Sciences, 21 (3): 179¬-192.
  • Henderson, K. A. (1991). The Contribution of Feminism to an Understanding of Leisure Constraints, Journal of Leisure Research, 23 (4): 363-377.
  • Henderson, K. A. ve Ainsworth, B. E. (2000). Enablers and Cons- traints to Walking for Older African American and Ame- rican Indian Women: The Cultural Activity Participation Study, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71 (4): 313-321.
  • Henderson, R. A. ve Bialeschki, M. D. (1993). Exploring an Ex- panded Model of Women’s Leisure Constraints, Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 18: 229-252.
  • Henderson, K. A., Bedini, L. A., Hecht, L. ve Shuler, R. (1995). Women with Physical Disabilities and the Negotiation of Leisure Constraints, Leisure Studies, 14: 17-31.
  • Heuser, L. (2005). “We’re Not Too Old to Play Sports”: The Ca- reer of Women Lawn Bowlers, Leisure Studies, 24: 45-60.
  • Hubbard, J. ve Mannell, R. (2001). Testing Competing Models of the Leisure Constraint Negotiation Process in a Corpo- rate Employee Recreation Setting, Leisure Sciences, 23 (3): 145-163.
  • Hultsman, W. Z. (1993). Is Constrained Leisure an Internally Homogeneous Concept? An Extension, Journal of Leisure Research, 25: 319-334.
  • Hultsman, W. Z. (1995). Recognizing Patterns of Constraints: An Extension of the Exploration of Dimensionality, Jour- nal of Leisure Research, 27 (3): 228-244.
  • Iso-Ahola, S. ve Mannell, R. (1985). Social and Psychological Constraints on Leisure. M. G. Wade (Ed.), Constraints on leisure (ss. 111-151). Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
  • Jackson, E. L. (1993). Recognizing Patterns of Leisure Constra- ints: Results from Alternative Analyses, Journal of Leisure Research, 25: 129-149.
  • Jackson, E. L. (1994). Activity-Specific Constraints on Leisure, Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 12 (2): 33-49.
  • Jackson, E. L. (1997). In the Eye of The Beholder: A Comment on Samdahl ve Jekubovich (1997), “A Critique of Leisu- re Constraints: Comparative Analyses and Understan- dings.”, Journal of Leisure Research, 29: 458-468.
  • Jackson, E. L. (2005). Leisure Constraints Research: Overview of a Developing Theme in Leisure Studies. E. L. Jackson, (Ed.), Constraints to leisure (ss. 3-19). State College, PA: Venture.
  • Jackson, E. L. ve Dunn, E. (1991). Is Constrained Leisure an In- ternally Homogeneous Concept?, Leisure Sciences, 13: 167-184.
  • Jackson, E. ve Henderson, K. (1995). Gender-Based Analysis of Leisure Constraints, Leisure Sciences, 17: 31-51.
  • Jackson, E. L. ve Rucks, V. C. (1995). Reasons for Ceasing Partici- pation and Barriers to Participation: Further Examination of Constrained Leisure as an Internally Homoge¬neous Concept, Leisure Sciences, 15: 217-230.
  • Jackson, E. L. ve Scott, D. (1999). Constraints to Leisure. E. L. Jackson ve T. L. Burton (Ed.), Leisure studies: Prospects for The Twenty-First Century (ss.299-321). State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
  • James, K. (2000). “You Can Feel Them Looking At You”: The Ex- periences of Adolescent Girls at Swimming Pools, Journal of Leisure Research, 32: 262-280.
  • Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal Relationships: Their Structures and Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kohlleppel, T. C. (2002). Specialization, Motivation, and Cons- traints: What is the Garden Path? (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). University of Florida. (Yayın No. AAT 3084015).
  • Lee, S. H. ve Tideswell, C. (2005). Understanding Attitudes to- wards Leisure Travel and the Constraints Faced by Senior Koreans, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 11 (3): 249¬-263.
  • Little, D. E. (2002). Women and Adventure Recreation: Recons- tructing Leisure Constraints and Adventure Experiences to Negotiate Continuing Participation, Journal of Leisure Research. 34 (2): 157-177.
  • Livengood, J. S. ve Stodolska, M. (2004). The Effects of Discrimi- nation and Constraints Negotiation on Leisure Behavior of American Muslims in the Post-September 11 America, Journal of Leisure Research, 36 (2): 183-208.
  • Lu, J. (2006). Perceived Constraints on Participating in Walking or Hiking Along the Trans Canada Trail. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). University of Manitoba (Kanada). (Yayın No. AAT MR22555)
  • Mannell, R. C. ve Loucks-Atkinson, A. (2005). Why Don’t People Do What’s “Good” For Them? Cross-Fertilization among the Psychologies of Nonparticipation in Leisure, Health, and Exercise Behaviors. E. L Jackson (Ed.), Constraints to Leisure (ss. 221-¬232). State College, PA: Venture.
  • McCarville, R. E. ve Smale, B. J. (1993). Perceived Constraints to Leisure Participation within Five Activity Domains, Jour- nal of Park and Recreation Administration, 11 (2): 40-59.
  • McQuarrie, F. A. ve Jackson, E. L. (1996). Negotiation of Leisure Constraints and Serious Leisure: Exploring Connections in a Case Study of Adult Amateur Ice Skaters, Leisure and Society, 19: 459-483.
  • McQuarrie, F. A. ve Jackson, E. L. (2002). Transitions in Leisure Careers and Their Paral¬lels in Work Careers: The Effect of Constraints on Choice and Action, Journal of Career De- velopment, 29 (1): 37-53.
  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, And Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Nadirova, A. ve Jackson, E. L. (2000). Alternative Criterion Vari- ables against which to Assess the Impacts of Constraints to Leisure, Journal of Leisure Research, 32 (4): 396-405.
  • Norman, W. (1995). Perceived Constraints: A New Approach to Seg- menting the Vacation Travel Market. 1995 Symposium on Lei- sure Research Bildiri Özetleri (s. 113). Arlington, VA: Natio- nal Recreation and Park Association.
  • Nyaupane, G. P. ve Andereck, K. L. (2008). Understanding Tra- vel Constraints: Application and Extension of a Leisure Constraints Model, Journal of Travel Research, 46 (4): 433-440.
  • Nyaupane, G. P., Morais, D. B. ve Graefe, A. R. (2004). Nature Tourism Constraints: A Cross-Activity Comparison, An- nals of Tourism Research, 31 (3): 540-555.
  • Oh, S. (2005). Successful Aging through Leisure Gardening: A Study on Constraints Negotiation. (Yayımlanmamış Dok- tora Tezi). The Pennsylvania State University. (Yayın No. AAT 3172993).
  • Oh, S. ve Caldwell, L. L. (1999). Examining Leisure Constraints among Older Adults Using the Theory of Selective Opti- mization and Compensation. Leisure Research Symposium Bildiri Kitabı: 59.
  • Pennington-Gray, L. ve Kerstetter, D. (2002). Testing a Constra- ints Model within the Context of Nature-Based Tourism, Journal of Travel Research, 40 (4): 416-423.
  • Petrick, J. F., Backman, S. J., Bixler, R. ve Norman, W. C. (2001). Analysis of Golfer Motivations and Constraints by Expe- rience Use History, Journal of Leisure Research, 33 (1): 56-70.
  • Philipp, S. F. (1994). Racial Differences in Perceived Leisure Constraints, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79 (3): 1339-1343.
  • Raymore, L. A., Godbey, G., Crawford, D. W. ve Von Eye, A. (1993). Nature and Process of Leisure Constraints: An Empirical Test, Leisure Sciences, 15: 99-113.
  • Raymore, L., Godbey, G. ve Crawford, D. (1994). Self-Esteem, Gender, and Socioeconomic Status: Their Relation to Per- ceptions of Constraint on Leisure among Adolescents, Jo- urnal of Leisure Research, 26 (2): 99-118.
  • Samdahl, D. M. ve Jekubovich, N. J. (1997). A Critique of Leisure Constraints: Comparative Analyses and Understandings, Journal of leisure Research, 29 (4): 430-452.
  • Scott, D. (1991). The Problematic Nature of Participation in Contract Bridge: A Qualitative Study of Group-Related Constraints, Leisure Sciences, 1: 321-336.
  • Scott, D. ve Munson, W. (1994). Perceived Constraints to Park Usage among Individuals with Low Incomes, Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 12: 79-96.
  • Scott, D. ve Jackson, E. L. (1996). Factors That Limit and Strate- gies That Might Encourage People’s Use of Public Parks, Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 14 (1): 1-11.
  • Searle, M. S. ve Brayley, R. E. (1992). Is Constrained Leisure an Internally Homogeneous Concept? A Further Examina- tion, NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Shaw, S. M. ve Henderson, K. (2005). Gender Analysis and Lei- sure Constraints: An Uneasy Alliance. E. L. Jackson (Ed.), Constraints to leisure (23-34). State College, PA: Venture.
  • Son J. S., Kerstetter, D. L. ve Mowen, A. J. (2008). Do Age and Gender Matter in the Constraint Negotiation of Physi- cally Active Leisure?, Journal of Leisure Research, 40 (2): 267-289.
  • Stodolska, M. (1998). Assimilation and Leisure Constraints: Dynamics of Constraints on Leisure in Immigrant Popu- lations, Journal of Leisure Research, 30 (4): 521-551.
  • Tian, S., Crompton, J. L. ve Witt, P. A. (1996). Integrating Cons- traints and Benefits to Identify Responsive Target Mar- kets for Museum Attractions, Journal of Travel Research, 35 (2): 34-45.
  • Tsai, E. ve Fung, L. (2005). Perceived Constraints to Leisure Ti- me Physical Activity Participation of Students with Hea- ring Impairment, Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 39 (3):192-206.
  • Walker, G. L. (2007). Multicultural Perspectives. R. McCarville ve K. MacKay (Ed). Leisure f or Canadians (ss.155-161). Sta- te College, PA: Venture.
  • Walker, G. J., Deng, J. ve Dieser, R. B. (2005). Culture, Self- Construal, and Leisure Theory and Practice, Journal of Lei- sure Research, 37: 77-99.
  • Walker, G. J., Jackson, E. L. ve Deng, J. (2007). Culture and Le- isure Constraints: A Comparison of Canadian and Main- land Chinese University Students, Journal of Leisure Rese- arch, 39 (4): 567-590.
  • Walker, G. J., Jackson, E. J. ve Deng, J. (2008). The Role of Self- Construal as an Intervening Variable between Culture and Leisure Constraints: A Comparison of Canadian and Mainland Chinese University Students, Journal of Leisure Research, 40 (1): 90-109.
  • Walker, G. ve Virden, R. (2005). Constraints on Outdoor Recrea- tion. E. L. Jackson (Ed.), Constraints to Leisure (ss.201-219). State College, PA: Venture.
  • Williams, P. ve Fidgeon, P. R. (2000). Addressing Participation Constraint: A Case Study of Potential Skiers, Tourism Ma- nagement, 21: 379-393.
  • Wright, B. A, ve Goodale, T. (1991). Beyond Non-Participation: Validation of Interest and Frequency of Participation Ca- tegories in Constraints Research, Journal of Leisure Rese- arch, 23: 314-331.
  • Wright, B. A., Drogin Rodgers, E. B. ve Backman, K. F. (2001). Assessing the Temporal Stability of Hunting Participati- on and the Structure and Intensity of Constraints: A Panel Study, Journal of Leisure Research, 33 (4): 450-469.
  • Xiong, F. (2007). Constraints on Leisure Activities Participati- on among Chinese Immigrants in Canada. Yüksek lisans tezi. Lakehead University, (Kanada). (Yayın No. AAT MR31872).
  • Young, S. J., Ross, C. M. ve Barcelona, R. J. (2003). Perceived Constraints by College Students to Participation in Cam- pus Recreational Sports Programs, Recreational Sports Jo- urnal, 27 (2): 47-62.
  • Zhang, M. L. (2007). An Analysis of Recreational Golfer Moti- vation, Constraints, and Satisfaction on the Mastery and Frequency of Play in the Gulf Coast Region of Missis- sippi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). United States Sports Academy (Yayın No. AAT 3285712).