İngiliz Ortaklıklar Hukukunda Kurucu ve Kurucuların Görev Sorumlulukları

İngiliz hukukunda, ortaklığın kuruluş işlemlerini gerçekleştiren ve ortak olmak amacıyla veya böyle bir amacı olmaksızın, ortaklığın organizasyonuna yardım eden kişi kurucudur. İngiliz ortaklıklar hukukunda kurucunun tanımı yasada verilmemiştir. Bu nedenle tanım case law da verilmiştir. Kurucular, kurulacak olan ortaklığa karşı güvene esasına dayanan bir konum içerisindedirler. Kurucular kurulacak olan ortaklığın vekili değildirler çünkü ortaklığın varlık kazanmadan önce bir vekile sahip olması mümkün değildir. Kurucuların güven ilişkisinden kaynaklanan görevleri ortaklığa karşı yüklenilmiştir. Güvene esasına dayanan görevler kurucunun iyi niyetli olmasını gerektirir. Bu da kuruluşla ilgili olarak elde ettikleri kazançların özellikle de kendisine ait malın ortaklığa satışından elde edilen tüm kazançları açıklamasını gerektirir. Ortaklık kurucunun güvenden kaynaklanan görevlerini ihlal etmesi durumunda birkaç başvuruya sahiptir. Sözleşmenin iptali, açıklanmamış kazançların talep edilmesi, tazminat ve kurucuya ait malın gerçek değeriyle edinilmesi. Kurucuların ortaklık adına yaptıkları kuruluş öncesi sözleşmeler ortaklığı bağlamaz; bunlardan kişisel olarak kurucular sorumludur. Kurucu, ortaklıkla arasında bir sözleşme olmadığı için kuruluşla ilgili hizmetleri nedeniyle ücret talebinde de bulunamaz.

Promoter and Duties and Responsibilities of Promoters in English Company Law

Any person who does an act with reference, to the formation of a company or in aid of its organization whether he has the intention to be a partners or not is a promoter. No statuary definition of promoter is given in English company law; definition is given in case law. Promoters stand in a fiduciary relation to the proposed company. A promoter is not an agent for the company which he is forming because a company cannot have an agent before it comes into existence. The fiduciary duty is owed to the company. The fiduciary duty requires that he deal good faith; it requires that he make full disclosure of all profits he acquires on promotion; especially where the promoter sells his own property the company. Company has severel remedies for a promoter's breach of fiduciary duty. Rescission, recovery of the undisclosed profits, damages, retention of the promoter's property at its true value. A promoter making a pre-incorporation contracts on behalf of the company will not bind the company nor can a company ratify the contract. The promoter will be personally liable on it. A promoter has no right against the company to payment for his promotion services in the absence of an express contract with the company.

___

  • Baines, Tere (1958), "Company Liability for Pre-Incorporation.Contracts", Faculty of Law Review, Volume 34.
  • Cheffins, Brian R. (1997), Company Law: Theory, Structure, And Operation, New York.
  • Derek, French (1998), Blackstone's Statutes on Company Law, 1998-9, 2nd Edition, London.
  • Dick, Robert M. (1964-1966), "A Reconsideration Of The "Justice" Exeption to The Rule In Foss v.Harbottle", University Of British Columbia Law Review, Volume 2
  • Enrich, Manfred W. -Bunzl, Lucille C.( 1928-1929), "Promoters' Contracts", Yale Law Jurnal, Volume. 38.
  • Flores, Eddie R.(1990), "The Case For Promoter Eliminating Liability On Preincorporation Agrements", Arizona Law Review, Volume 32.
  • Forde, Michael (1999), Company Law, Third Edition, Sweet & Maxwell, Dublin.
  • Foster, Walter Herbert (1914-1915), "Promoters Liability to the Corporation", Maine law Review, Volume 8.
  • Funk, John W. (1977), "A Primer For Promoters", Symposium: Corporation Notes, Oklahoma Law Review, Volume.30.
  • Grier, Nicolas (1998), UK Company Law, England.
  • Henry III, Robert L. (1940-1941), "Corporations: The Promoter's Dilemma", Kentucky Law Journal, Volume 29.
  • Hicks, Andrew -Goo, S.H. (1997), Cases and Materials on Company Law, Second Edition, London.
  • Isaacs, Nathan (1924-1925), "The promoter: A Legislative Problem", Harvard Law Review, Volume 38.
  • Kenan, Denis - Biscare (2002), Josephine, Company law, 12th Edition, England.
  • Kiernan, Joseph W. (1939-1940), "Judical and Administrative Control Over Promoters' Profits, Judical Control", The Georgetown Law Journal, Volume 28.
  • Linton, Ross B. (1960), "Remedies For Non-Disclosure of Promoters' Profits", Faculty of Law Review, Volume, 18.
  • Little, Charles G.(1910-1911), "Promoters' Fraud in The Organization of Corporations: The Old Dominion Copper Mining Cases",Illions Law Review,Volume.5.
  • Lloyd, Malcolm (1897a), "The Principles of The Law Relating to Corporate Liability For Acts of Promoters, Chapter I, Who are Promoters", The American Law Register And Review, Volume 45
  • Lloyd, Malcolm (1897b), "The Principles of The Law Relating to Corporate Liability For Acts of Promoters, Chapter IV, Ratification", The American Law Register And Review, Volume 45.
  • Mayson, Stephen W. - French, Derek -Ryan, Christopher(1994), Company Law, llth Edition, Blackstone Press Limited, London.
  • McCrea Brian E.(1967-1969), "Disclusure of Pomoters' Secret Profits", University of British Columbia Law Review, Volume 3.
  • McGovan, Carl (1936-1937), "Legal Controls of Corporate Promoters' Profits", Georgetown Law Journal, Volume 25.
  • Morse, Geofrey (1999), Charles and Morse Company Law, Sixteenth Edition, Sweet and Maxwell, London.
  • Osunbor, O.A.(1987), "A Critical Appraisal Of "The Interest Of Justice" As Ân Exeption To The Rule In Foss v. Harbottle, International And Comparative Law Quarterly, Volum 36.
  • Ottley, Michael (2002), Brifcase Company Law, Second Edition, London. Pettet, Ben(2001), Company Law, England.
  • Poroy, Reha-Tekinalp, Ünal:Çamoğlu, Ersin, Ortaklıklar ve Kooperatif Hukuku, B.8, İstanbul, (2000).
  • Richards, H.S.(1905-1906), "Liability of Corporations on Contracts Made By Promoters", Harvard Law Review, Volume. 19.
  • Smith, Douglas (1999), Company Law.
  • Spahr, Boyd Lee (1955), "Liabilities Under Promoters' Contracts", West Virginia Law Review, Volume 57.
  • Tekil, Fahiman (1998), Anonim Şirketler Hukuku, B.2, Istanbul.
  • Tekinalp, Güleren - Tekinalp (2000), Ünal, Avrupa Birliği Hukuku, B.2, İstanbul.
  • Walters, Adrian -Davis-White, Malcolm (1999), Directors' Disqualification Law and Practice, Sweet&Maxwell, London
  • Watkins, Boaz B.(1915-1916), "Conpensation of Promoters", St.Louis Law Review, Volume 1.
  • Weston, R.D.(1916-1917), "Promoters' Liability: Old Dominion v. Bigelow", Harward Law Review, Volume.30.
  • Vıllıers, Charlotte, "Harmonisation of Company Law in Europe-With an Introduction to Some Comparative Issues", Europen Business Law, European Business Law Library, Great Britain, (1996).
  • -----Acca Study Text, Company Law, London, 1989.
  • -----Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
  • http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts 1999/19990031 .htm
  • (erişim tarihi 21 Mayıs 2003)
  • -----Dictionary of Legal Terms, Brockhampton Press, London, 1997.
  • -----Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
  • http://www.fsa.gov.uk/fsma/data/fsma/act/act_part_vi.htm (erişim tarihi 06 Mayıs 2003)
  • -----İncolvency Act 1986
  • http://www.insolvency.co.uk/legal/p04cl0_l.htm#212 (erişim tarihi 26 Haziran 2003)
  • -----Misrepresentation Act 1967
  • http://www.consuml.freeuk.com/Misrepresentation_Act_1967.PDF (26 Haziran 2003)
  • -----Statutory Instrument 1987 No.l991(The Companies (Mergers and Division) Regulations 1987)
  • http://www.hmso.gov.uk/si/sil987/Uksi_19871991_en_l.htm (5 Kasım 2003)
  • -----Statutory Instrument 1992 No.3179 (The Oversea Companies and Financial Institutions (Branch Disclosure) Regulations 1992)
  • http://www.hmso.gov.uk/si/sil992/Uksi_19923179_en_l.htm (5 Kasım 2003)
  • -----Statutory Instrument 1992 No. 1699 (The Companies (Single member Private Limited Companies) Regulations 1992
  • http://www.hmso.gov.uk/si/sil992/Uksill9921699_en_l.htm (5 Kasım 2003)
  • -----"The Liability of Corporation Promoters to Account for Profits", The American Law Register, Volume 54, February, 1906