Faiz oranı kanalının 2001–2008 döneminde Türkiye’de etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi

Parasal aktarım mekanizması içerisinde en temel kanal faiz oranı kanalıdır. Ancak bu kanalın Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan ülkelerde ve özelliklede enflasyon hedeflemesi rejimi altında çalışması mali baskınlığın neölçüde olduğuna bağlıdır. Türkiye ekonomisi özelindemali baskınlık 2004 yılına kadar oldukça yüksektir.Bu çalışma, son iki IMF anlaşmasının geçerli olduğu,2001: 05 – 2008: 05 döneminde faiz oranı kanalınınetkinliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Analizlersonucunda ulaşılan bulgular, faiz oranı kanalının etkinliğinin 2001 -2008 döneminde tek bir örneklem olarak değerlendirilemeyeceği, 2004 öncesi ve sonrası dönemlerin yapısal olarak farklılık gösterdiği yönündedir. Ayrıca, 2004 sonrası dönemde faiz oranı kanalı 2004 öncesi döneme göre çok daha etkin bir şekilde çalışmaktadır. Bu etkinliğin artışında mali baskınlık probleminin ortadan kalkmış olması önem arz etmektedir.

The evaluation of interest rate channel in Turkey 2001 – 2008

The basic channel within monetary transmission mec- hanism is the interest rate channel. However, the pra- xis of this channel in developing countries like Turkey and particularly under the regime of inflation targeting depends on the level of fiscal domination. Particularly fiscal domination within the Turkish economy had been high until 2004. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the interest rate channel in the 2001:05-2008:05 term during which the last two Standby agreements are valid. The findings reached at the end of the analysis are in the direction that the effectiveness of interest rate channel can not be evaluated as an only sample during 2001-2008 term and that the pre and post 2004 terms show structural differences. Moreover, the post 2004 term interest rate channel works much more effectively than pre 2004 term. The disappearen- ce of fiscal domination problem is of vital importance through the increase in this efficiency.

___

  • Angeloni, I., Kashyap, A., Mojon, B. ve Terlizzese, D. (2003). Monetary Transmission in the Euro Area: Does the Interest Rate Channel Explain it All?. NBER Working Paper, No.9984, Cambridge, (eri- şim tarihi 08 Kasım 2010) http://www.nber.org/ papers/w9984.pdf.
  • Başçı, E., Özel, Ö. ve Sarıkaya, Ç. (2007). The Mo- netary Transmission Mechanism in Turkey: New Developments. Research and Monetary Policy De- partment Working Paper No. 07/04, The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
  • Bernanke, B. S. ve Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the Black Box: the Credit Channel of Monetary Po- licy Transmission. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 27-48.
  • Blanchard, O. (2004). Fiscal Dominance and Inflati- on Targeting: Lessons From Brezil. NBER Working Paper 10389, Cambridge, (erişim tarihi 16 Ekim 2010) http://www.nber.org/papers/w10389.
  • Butzen, P., Fuss, C. ve Vermeulen, P. (2001). The In- terest Rate and Credit Channels in Belgium: An Investigation with Micro Level Firm Data. The Na- tional Bank of Belgium Working Paper, 18, 1-43.
  • Büyükakın, F., Bozkurt, H. ve Cengiz, V. (2009). Türkiye’de Parasal Aktarımın Faiz Kanalının Gran- ger Nedensellik ve Toda-Yamamota Yöntemleri ile Analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilim- ler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 101-118.
  • Candelon, B. ve Lütkepohl, H. (2001). On The Relia- bility of Chow-type Tests for Parameter Constancy in Multivariate Dynamic Models. Economics Let- ters, 73, 155-160.
  • Cheong, D. ve Boodoo, E. (2008). The Monetary Transmission Mechanism: A Closer Look at the Interest Rate Channel in Trinidad and Tobago. 29th Annual Review Seminar Research Depart- ment Central Bank of Barbados. (erişim tarihi 18 Kasım 2010) http://www.centralbank.org.bb/ WEBCBB.nsf/vwPublications/3308141A5143535 0042577F2005E7CDC/$FILE/Monetary_Trans- mission_Mechanism_A_CloserLook_at_the_Inte- rest_Rate_Channe_in_TT.pdf.
  • Chrinko, R. ve Kalckreuth, U.V. (2003). On the Ger- man Monetary Transmission Mechanism: Interest Rate and Credit Channels for Investement Spen- ding. Cesifo Working Paper, 838, 1-49. Çiçek, M. (2005). Türkiye’de Parasal Aktarım Meka- nizması: VAR (vektör otoregresyon) Yaklaşımıyla Bir Analiz. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 20(233), Ağus- tos, Ek, 82-105.
  • De Bondt, G.J. (1997). Monetary Transmission in Six EU-Countries: an introduction and overview. Re- search Memorandum WO&E nr 527/9742.
  • Diebold, F. X. ve Chen, C. (1996). Testing Structu- ral Stability with Endogenous Breakpoint, A size Comparison of Analytic and Bootstrap Procedu- res. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 221-241.
  • Egert, B. ve MacDonald, R. (2009). Monetary Trans- mission Mechanism in Central and Eastern Euro- pe: Surveying the Surveyable. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(2), 277-327.
  • Enders, W. (2004). Applied Econometric Time Series. 2. Edition, John willey and Sons, New Jersey. Erdoğan, S. ve Yıldırım, D. (2009). Türkiye’de Faiz Kanalı ile Parasal Aktarım Mekanizması. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 4(2), 57-72.
  • Ersel, H. ve Özatay, F. (2007). Fiscal Dominance and Inflation Targeting: Lessons from Turkey. (erişim tarihi 4 Aralık 2010) http://fatih.ozatay.etu.edu.tr/ ersel_ozatay.pdf.
  • Garretsen, H. ve Swank, J. (1998). The Transmission of Interest Rate Changes and the Role of Bank Ba- lance Sheets: A VAR-Analysis for the Netherlands. Journal of Macroeconomics, 20(2), 325-339.
  • Gerlach, S. ve Smets, F. (1995). The Monetary Trans- mission Mechanism: Evidence from the G-7 Count- ries. BIS Working Paper, No.26, (erişim tarihi 6 Tem- muz 2010) http://www.bis.org/publ/work26.pdf .
  • Gertler, M. ve Gilchrist, S. (1993). The Role of Credit Market Imperfections in the Monetary Transmis- sion Mechanism: Arguments and Evidence. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95(1), 43-64. Gujarati, D. N. (2001). Temel Ekonometri. (cev. U. Se- nesen ve G. Gunluk Senesen). (İstanbul: Literatur Yayıncılık).
  • Gündüz, L. (2001). Türkiye’de Parasal Aktarım Me- kanizması ve Banka Kredi Kanalı. İMKB Dergisi, Cilt.5, Sayı.18, Nisan/Mayıs/Haziran, ss.13-30. Hubbard, G. R. (1995). Is There a “Credit Channel” for Monetary Policy. Federal Reserve Bank of St Lo- uis Review, 77(3), 63-77.
  • Ireland, P. N. (2005). The Monetary Transmission Mechanism. FRRB Working Papers 06-1, (erişim tarihi 17 Aralık 2009) http://www.frb.org/econo- mic/wp/wp2006/wp0601.htm.
  • Kara, H.A. ve Orak, M. (2008). Enflasyon Hedefle- mesi. Ekonomik Tartışmalar Konferansı, İstanbul, (erişim tarihi 14 Kasım 2010) http://www.scribd. com/doc/22761037/Enflasyon-Hedeflemesi- Hakan-Kara-Musa-Orak-TCMB.
  • Loayza, N. ve Hebbel, K.S. (2002). Monetary Po- licy Functions and Transmission Mechanisms: An Overview. (erişim tarihi 3 Temmuz 2009) http://bcentral.cl/estudios/banca-central/pdf/ v4/001_020Gallego.pdf .
  • Meltzer, H.A. (1995). Monetary, Credit and (Other) Transmission Processes: A Monetarist Perspective. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 49-72. Mirdala, R. (2009). Interest Rate Transmission Mec- hanism of the Monetary Policy in the Selected EMU Candidate Countries (SVAR approach).
  • MPRA Paper No.14072, (erişim tarihi 16 Temmuz 2010) http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14072/ . Mishkin, F. S. (1995). Symposium on the Monetary Transmission Mechanism. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 3-10.
  • Mishkin, F.S. (1996). The Channels of Monetary Transmission: Lessons for Monetary Policy. NBER Working Paper 5464, Cambridge, (erişim tarihi 16 Ekim 2009) http://www.nber.org/papers/w5464 . Mishkin, F.S. (2004). The Economics of Money Ban- king and Financial Markets. Seventh Edition, Ad- dison Wesley.
  • Modigliani, F. (1971). Monetary Policy and Con- sumption, in Consumer Spending and Monetary Policy: The Linkages. Boston:Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
  • Mojon, B. (2000). Financial Structure and the Interest Rate Channel of ECB Monetary Policy. Working Paper Series, No.40, European Central Bank, (eri- şim tarihi 21 Kasım 2010) http://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=356001 .
  • Mukherjee, S. ve Bhattacharya, R. (2011). Inflati- on Targeting and Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanisms in Emerging Market Economies. IMF Working Paper, WP/11/229, (erişim tarihi 16 Ka- sım 2011) http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ wp/2011/wp11229.pdf .
  • Neumann, M. (1995). A Conference Panel Discussi- on: What Do We Know About How Monetary Po- licy Affects the Economy. Review, May/June, Fede- ral Reserve Bank of St.Louis. pp.138-142.
  • Özatay, F. (2005). Monetary Policy Challenges for Turkey in European Union Accession Process. Re- search Department Working Paper, No:05/11, The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
  • Özatay, F. (2009). Enflasyon ve Para Politikası, Tür- kiye Ekonomisi: Yeni Yapı (2000-2008). (eds. N.Özkaramete Coşkun), Ankara: İmaj Kitabevi, 1-34.
  • Özatay, F. (2011). Parasal İktisat Kuram ve Politika. Efil Yayınevi, Ankara. Sarıkaya, Ç., Öğünç, F., Ece, D., Kara, H. ve Özlale, Ü. (2005). Estimating Output Gap for the Turkish Economy. Research Department Working Paper, No: 05/03, The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
  • Sims, C.A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Eco- nometrica, 48(1), 1-48.
  • Taylor, J.B. (1995). The Monetary Transmission Mec- hanism: An Empirical Framework. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 11-26.
  • TCMB t.y. Para Politikası Aktarım Mekanizması. (erişim tarihi 7 Temmuz 2010) http://kamag.etu. edu.tr/TCMBPARASALAKTARIM.pdf .
  • Tobin, J. (1969). A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29.
  • Wrobel, E. ve Pawlowska, M. (2002). Monetary Transmission in Poland: Some Evidence on Inte- rest Rate and Credit Channels. National Bank of Poland, Materialy I Studia, (erişim tarihi 21 Ka- sım 2010) http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=395741 .
  • Weber A., Gerke R. ve Worms A. (2010). Changes in Euro Area Monetary Transmission?. Applied Fi- nancial Economics, 21(3), 1-15.
  • Woodford, M. (2001). Fiscal Requirements for Price Stability. NBER Working Paper 8072, Cambridge, (erişim tarihi 18 Mart 2010) http://www.nber.org/ papers/w8072.pdf .