Does gender sensitive joint forest management programme increase women’s contribution on household’s income? Evidence from west bengal in Indian context

Does gender sensitive joint forest management programme increase women’s contribution on household’s income? Evidence from west bengal in Indian context

[This study tries to examine as to whether gender sensitive planning under participatory forest management programme increases women’s contribution on household’s income by augmenting women’s physical involvement in forest works based on an empirical study in such an Indian state-West Bengal- which acts as key-precursor of the implementation of participatory forest management programme in general and gender sensitive participatory forest management programme in particular. Most important finding of this study is that under female-organised forest management unit (called female FPC) women are the major contributors to their family income, which they only receive from forest source, after JFM programme. However more worrying is that despite women’s major share of households income from female FPC villages in particular, male control over household’s income implying that this might undermine women’s empowerment and equity principle of people’s centered forest management programme.]

___

  • Adhikari B and Lovett JC (2006). Institutions and Collective Action: Does Heterogeneity Matter in Community-Based Resource Management?. Journal of Development Studies 42(3): 426-455.
  • Agarwal B (2001). Participatory Exclusions, Community Forestry and Gender: An Analysis and Conceptual Framework. World Development 29(10): 1623-1648.
  • Bahuguna VK (2004). Root to Canopy: An Overview. In Bahuguna VK, Mitra D, Capitrano and Sargal S (Eds) In Root to Canopy: Regenerating Forests through Community-State Partnerships. Delhi: Winrock International and Commonwealth Forestry Association.
  • Bhattacharya AK (2001). Community Participation and Sustainable Forest Development – Global Perspective. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.
  • Das PK (1994). Women in Joint Forest Management. Social Action 44(2): 56-68.
  • Das N (2008). Women’s Dependence on Forest and Participation in Forestry: A Case Study of Joint Forest Management Programme in West Bengal. PhD dissertation in Economics, Kolkata: University of Calcutta.
  • Das N and Sarker D (2002). Population, Forest Degradation and Environment: A Nexus. 22nd Annual Conference Volume, pp. 61-68. Kolkata: Bangiya Arthanity Parishad (BEA).
  • Das N and Sarker D (2008). Reforms in Forest Management in West Bengal: A Game of Strategic Profile. In Sarker D (Ed) Second Generation Reforms, pp. 79-101. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.
  • Dutta KK (1940). The Santal Insurrection of 1955- 1857. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.
  • Fuquan Y and Yuhua X (2003). Naxi Women: Protection and Management of Forests in Lijiang, China. In Kelkar G, Nathan D and Walter P (Eds) Gender Relations in Forest Societies in Asia: Participatory at Odds, pp. 177-200. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • GoWB (1994). Role of Forest Protection Committees in West Bengal. Calcutta: Forest Department, Government of West Bengal.
  • Jackson C (1993). Doing What Comes Naturally? Women and Environment in Development. World Development 21(12): 1947-63.
  • Kabeer N (1994). Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. London: Verso.
  • Kelkar G and Nathan D (2003). Forest Societies in Asia: Gender Relations and Change. In Kelkar G, Nathan D and Walter P (Eds.) Gender Relations in Forest Societies in Asia: Patriarchy at Odds, pp.13-45. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Kumar N (2005). Tribals and Forest: Emerging Symbiosis. IASSI Quarterly 23(4): 92-106.
  • Locke C (1999). Women’s Representation and Roles in Gender Policy in JFM. In Jeffery R and Sundar N (Eds) A New Moral Economy for India’s Forests? Discourses of Community and Participation, pp. 235- 253. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Ministry of Environment and Forests(ed)(1988). ‘National Forest Policy Resolution 1988(Initiative in Conservation of Forests),New Delhi: MOEF
  • Pattanayak SK and Sills EO (2001). Do Tropical Forests Provide Natural Insurance: The Microeconomics of Non-timber Forest Products Collection in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Economics 77: 595-612.
  • Poffenberger M (1995). The Resurgence of Community Forest Management in the Jungle Mahals of West Bengal. In Arnold D and Guha R (Eds) Nature Culture Imperialism: Essays on the Environmental History of South Asia, pp.336-69. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Ravillion M (2001). The Mystery of the Vanishing Benefits: An Introduction to Impact Evaluation. World Bank Economic Review 15(1):115-140.
  • Reddy VR, Reddy MG, Galab S, Soussan J and Springate-Baginski O (2004). Participatory Watershed Development in India: Can it Sustain Rural Livelihoods?. Development and Change 35(2): 297-326.
  • Sarker D and Das N (2002). Women’s Participation in Forestry: Some Theoretical Issues. Economic and Political Weekly 37(43): 4407-4412.
  • Sarker D and Das N (2006). Towards a Sustainable Joint Forest Management Programme: Evidence from Western Midnapore Division in West Bengal. South Asia Research 26(3): 269-289.
  • Sarker D and Das N (2008). A Study of Economic Outcome of Joint Forest Management Programme in West Bengal: The Strategic Decisions between Government and Forest Fringe Community. Indian Economic Review 43(1): 17-45.
  • Sarmah D and Rai SN (2001). Forest Resource Management in India: Role of the State and its Effectiveness. In Chary SN and Vyasulu V (Eds) Environment and Management, pp.206-220. New Delhi: Macmillan.
  • SFR (2000). State Forest Report. Kolkata: Office of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Directorate of Forest, Government of West Bengal.
  • SPWD (1992, 1998). Joint Forest Management Updated. New Delhi: Society for Promotion of Wastelands Development.
  • Sundar N and Jeffery R (Eds) (1999). A New Moral Economy for India’s Forests? Discourses of community and Participation, pp.15-54. New Delhi: Sage Publication.
  • Tinker I (1994). Women and Community Forestry in Nepal: Expectations and Realities. Society and Natural Resources 7(4): 367-381.
  • Vasundhara, (2000). Women’s Concern in Community Forest Rights Debate in orissa. In Contreras A, Dachang L, Edmunds D, Kellar G, Nathan D, Sarin M, Singh N and Wollenberg E (Eds.) Creating Space for Local Forest Management. Bogor: CIFOR.
  • World Bank (2006). India: Unlocking Opportunities for Forest-Dependent People. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2001
  • Yayıncı: Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi