Carrot (Daucus carota L.): yield and quality under saline conditions

Bu çalısmada Tokat ilinde, sera kosullarında, 6 farklı tuzluluk düzeyindeki sulama sularının havuçta verim, kalite, vejatatif gelisme, su tüketimi ve mineral madde alımı arastırılmıstır. Çalısma tesadüf bloklarında 5 tekerrürlü olarak toplam 30 saksıda yürütülmüstür. Tuzlu sulama suları Ca$CI _ 2$, Mg$SO _ 4$ ve NaCl tuzlarının sehir sebeke suyuna karıstırılmasıyla elde edilmistir. Sehir sebeke suyu (ECi= 0.75 dS.$m^ {-1}$) aynı zamanda kontrol konusu olarak kullanılmıstır. Sulama sularının tuz içeriğinin artması ($T _ 0$= 0.75, $T _ 1$= 1.5, $T _ 2$= 2.5, $T _ 3$= 3.5, $T _ 4$= 5.0 ve $T _ 5$= 7.0 dS $m^ {-1}$), toprak tuzluluğunun, meyve tadının, yaprakta Cl ve Na miktarının artmasına yol açarken, meyve çapının, su kullanım etkinliğinin ve yaprakta K miktarının azalmasına neden olmustur. Artan sulama suyu tuzlulukları, meyve birim ağırlığını, rengini, boyunu, sertliğini, bitki su tüketimini, yaprakta Ca ve Mg miktarını istatistiksel olarak etkilememis ancak meyve tadını, kuru madde miktarını artmıs, fakat 2.5 dS $m^ {-1}$ toprak tuzluluğu verimde yaklasık %50 azalmaya neden olmustur.

Tuzlu kosullarda havuç (Daucus carota L.) verım ve kalıtesi

The effects of 6 irrigation salinity levels on yield and quality, vegetative growth, water consumption and ion accumulation of carrot (Daucus carota L.) were studied under greenhouse condition in Tokat/Turkey. The experiment was conducted as a randomized block design with 5 replications using a total of 30 pots. The synthetic saline waters were prepared by adding Ca$CI _ 2$, Mg$SO _ 4$ and NaCl salts to tap water. Tap water (ECi= 0.75 dS.$m^ {-1}$) was applied as a control treatment. Irrigation water salinity ($T _ 0$= 0.75, $T _ 1$= 1.5, $T _ 2$= 2.5, $T _ 3$= 3.5, $T _ 4$= 5.0 and $T _ 5$= 7.0 dS $m^ {-1}$ ) led to increase in soil salinity, carrot flavor, leaf Cl and Na content and decrease in fruit yield, fruit diameter, water use efficiency and leaf K content. Increasing irrigation water salinities did not significantly affect unit weight, color index, height and penetration resistance of fruit, water consumption, leaf Ca and Mg contents but fruit quality such as flavor and dry matter content improved due to salinity, however 50% yield loss occurred even below at 2.5 dS $m^ {-1}$ soil salinity level.

___

  • Ayars, J. E., Hutmacher, R.B., Schoneman, R.A. Vail, S.S., and Pfaum T., 1993. Long term use of saline water for irrigation. Irri. Sci. 14:27-34.
  • Berstein L., Ayers A. D., 1953. Salt tolerance of five varieties of carrots. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 61: 360-366.
  • De Pascale,S., and Barbieri, G., 2000. Yield and Quality of Carrot as Affected by Soil Salinity from Long-Term Irrigation with Saline Water. Proc. 3rd on Irrigation Hort. Crops, eds. Ferreira & Jones, Acta Hort. 537.
  • Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (eds) (1986) Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33, Rome.
  • Garcia-Sanchez F, Carvajal M, Porras I, Botia P, Martinez V, 2003. Effects of salinity and rate of irrigation on yield, fruit quality and mineral composition of ‘Fino 49’ lemon. Europ. J. Agronomy 19: 427-437.
  • Gibberd, M.R., Turner N.C. and Storey, R. 2002. Influence of saline irrigation on growth, ion accumulation and partitioning, and leaf gas exchange of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Annals of Botany 90:715-724.
  • Grieve, C. M., and Suarez, D.L., 1997. Purslane: A halophytic crop for drainage water reuse systems. Plant Soil 192:227-283.
  • Imperial Valley study. I. Hypothesis, experimental procedures and cropping results, Hilgardia 56:1-16.
  • Jensen M.E., Burman R.D., (Ed.) and Allen R.G. 1989. Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE Manual Rep. Eng. Pract. No: 70, NY.
  • Kadayıfçı, A., Tuylu İ. G., ve Uçar, Y. 2004. Sulama Suyu Tuzluluğunun Soğan Bitkisinin Yumru Verimi, Bitki Su Tüketimi ve Toprak Profili Üzerine Etkileri. TARIM BILIMLERI DERGISI 2004, (10-1) 45-49.
  • Khan, S., Tariq, F., Yuanlai, C., and Blackwell J., 2006. Can irrigation be sustainable?. Agricultural Water Management, Volume 80, Issues 1-3, 24 February 2006, Pages 87-99
  • Hardly, D., 2008. Effect of fertilizer salts on soil pH. Soil Testing Section Chief. NCDA&CS Agronomic Division. January.
  • Lambert R.S. and DuBois R.J., 1971. Specrophotometric determination of nitrate in the presence of chloride. Anal. Chem. 43: 955-957.
  • Maas, E.V. 1986. Salt tolerance of plants. Appl. Agric. Res. 1, 12-26.
  • Maas, E.V., and Hoffman, G.J., 1977. Crop salt tolerance current assessment. Journal Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE, 103 (IR2), 115-134.
  • Maggio, A., Hasegawa, P.M., Bressan, R.A., Consiglio, M.F., and Joly, R.J. (2001). Unraveling the functional relationship between root anatomy and stress tolerance. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 28, 999-1004
  • Mangal, J.L., Lal, S., Hooda P.,S., 1989. Salt tolerance in carrots seed crop. Haryana Agricultural University Journal of Research. 19:256-259.
  • Matsubara, S., Tasaka, Y., 1988. Studies of salt tolerance of vegetables. II. Sand culture. Scientific reports of Faculty of Agriculture. Okayama University. 72:9-18.
  • Munns R., Passioura J.B., 1984. Hydraulic resistance of plants. III. Effects of NaCl in barley and lupin. Aust. J. Plant Physiol 11(5):351-359.
  • Öztürk, A. 1997. Sulama suyu tuzluluğu ve taban suyu değisiminin havuç bitkisinin bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. 3(1);54-58.
  • Pessarakli, M., and Szabolcs, I., 1999. Soil Salinity and Sodicity as Particular Plant/Crop Stress Factors In: Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress edited by Pessarakli. CRC Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
  • Pratt P.F. and Suarez D.L., 1990. Diagnosis of salt problems. In: Agricultural salinity assessment and Management; ASCE Manuals&Reports on Engineering Practice No. 71. ASCE, NY. pp.220-236.
  • Rausch, T., Kirsch, M., low, R., Lehr, A., Viereck, R., and Zhigang, A. (1996). Salt stress responses of higher plants: the role of proton pumps and Na+/H+ antiporters. J. Plant Physiol 148, 425-433
  • Richards LA 1969. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Agriculture Handbook No: 60. US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC. Pp. 160.
  • Rhoades, J.D.,Bingham, F.T., Letey, J., Dedrick, a.R., Bean, M., Hoffman, G.J., Alves W.J., Swain, R.V., Pacheco, P. G., and LeMert, R.D., 1988. Reuse of drainage water for irrigation: Results of Imperial Valley study. II. Soil salinity and water balance. Hilhardia 56: 17-44.
  • Shannon, M.C. and Grive, C.M., 1999. Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity. Sciente Horticulturae. 78:5- 38.
  • Schmidhalter, U. and Oretli, J.J, 1991. Germination and seedling growth of carrots under salinity and moisture stress. Palnt Soil 132, 243-251.
  • Skarie, R.L., Richardson, J.L., Mianu, A., and Clambey G.K. 1986. soil and ground water salinity along drainage ditches in eastern North Dacota. J., Environ. Qual. 15;335-340.
  • Wang, D., Shannon, M.C., Grieve, C. M., Shouse, P.J., and Suarez, D.L., 2002. Ion partitioning among soil and plant component under drip, furrow and sprinkler irrigation regimes: Field and Modeling assessments. J. Environ. Qual. 21:1684-1693.
Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1308-8750
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1986
  • Yayıncı: Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Ziraat Fak.