Büşra İNAL, Yeşim BAKAR, Nuriye ÖZENGİN, Hatice ÇANKAYA

Stres Üriner İnkontinanslı Kadınlarda Kaçırılan İdrar Miktarı Yaşam Kalitesini Etkiler mi? Retrospektif Bir Çalışma

Amaç: Bu çalışmada stres üriner inkontinanslı kadınlarda kaçırılan idrar miktarının algılanan yaşam kalitesi ve algılanan kuruluk hissi üzerindeki etkisini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Stres üriner inkontinanslı 232 kadın ped testi sonuçlarına göre "hafif," "orta" ve "şiddetli/çok şiddetli" idrar kaçıran olmak üzere üç gruba ayrıldı. Kadınların fiziksel özellikleri, sosyodemografik özellikleri ve üriner inkontinans şikayet süreleri kaydedildikten sonra, algılanan kuruluk düzeyi ve algılanan yaşam kaliteleri Vizüel Analog Skalası (VAS) ile, yaşam kaliteleri ise Üriner İnkontinanslı Hasta Yaşam Kalitesi Anketi ile ölçüldü. Bulgular: Stres üriner inkontinanslı kadınların idrar kaçırma miktarına göre fiziksel ve sosyodemografik özellikleri arasında fark olmadığı bulundu. Orta ile şiddetli/çok şiddetli idrar kaçıran kadınların yaşam kalitesi, kuruluk hissi, algılanan yaşam kalitesi ve üriner inkontinans şikayet süreleri arasında fark olmadığı, hafif idrar kaçıran kadınlar ile bu iki grup arasında fark olduğu saptandı. Tartışma ve Sonuç: Hafif derecede stres üriner inkontinanslı kadınların diğer iki gruba göre, algıladıkları yaşam kalitesinin daha iyi olduğu ve kendilerini daha kuru hissettikleri bulundu. Orta ile şiddetli/çok şiddetli stres üriner inkontinanslı kadınların yaşam kalitelerini ve kuruluk hissini algılamalarının benzer olduğu görüldü.

Does the Amount of Urine Leakage Affect Quality of Life in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Retrospective Study

Aim: In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of urine leakage amount on the perceived quality of life and sense of dryness in women with stress urinary incontinence.Materials and Methods: Two hundred and thirty-two women with stress urinary incontinence were divided into three -"mild," "moderate" and "severe/very severe" urine leakage- groups in accordance with their pad test results. After recording physical and sociodemographic characteristics and duration of urinary incontinence complaints of the women, their perceived dryness level and perceived quality of life were measured by using the visual analog scale, and their quality of life by using the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients with Urinary Incontinence. Results: No difference was found between physical and sociodemographic characteristics of the women with stress urinary incontinence on the basis of their amount of urine leakage. While no difference was found between quality of life, sense of dryness, perceived quality of life and duration of urinary incontinence complaints of the women with moderate and severe/very severe urinary incontinence, a difference was found between the women with mild urinary incontinence and these two groups. Discussion and Conclusion: It was observed that perceived quality of life and dryness levels of the women with mild stress urinary incontinence were higher in comparison to the reports of the other two groups. The women with moderate and severe/very severe urinary incontinence reported similar levels of perceived quality of life and dryness.

PDF

___

Hunskaar S, Arnold E, Burgio K, Diokno A, Herzog A, Mallett V. Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2000;11(5):301-19.
Cheater FM, Castleden CM. Epidemiology and classifi- cation of urinary incontinence. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14(2):183-205.
Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Diokno A, Herzog AR, Hjälmås K, Lapitan MC. Epidemiology and natural history of uri- nary incontinence in women. Urology. 2003;62(4):16- 23.
Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female uri- nary incontinence:: The Norwegian EPINCONT Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(11):1150-7.
Andersen JT, Blaivas JG, Cardozo L, Thüroff J. Seventh report on the standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: lower urinary tract rehabilitation techniques. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1992;26(2):99-106.
Abrams P CL, Fall M ve ark. The standardisation of ter- minology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167-78.
Haylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berg- hmans B, Lee J ve ark. An International Urogynecologi- cal Association (IUGA)/International Continence Soci- ety (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pel- vic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5-26.
Kaya S, Akbayrak T, Orhan C, Beksaç S. Kadınlarda fark- lı üriner inkontinans tiplerinde hasta özelliklerinin ve üriner parametrelerin karşılaştırılması: retrospektif bir çalışma. J Exerc Ther Rehabil. 2015;2(3):93-101.
Luber KM. The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol. 2004;6:S3.
Kaya S, Akbayrak T, Demirtaş N, Bakar Y, Tosun ÖÇ, Özengin N ve ark. Kanıt derlemesi. In: Akbayrak T, Kaya S (ed.), KNGF Kılavuzu, Stres Üriner İnkontiontinansı Olan Hastalarda Fizyoterapi. Ankara: Pelikan Kitabevi 2015:9 -97.
Robinson D, Pearce KF, Preisser JS, Dugan E, Suggs PK, Cohen SJ. Relationship between patient reports of uri- nary incontinence symptoms and quality of life measu- res. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(2):224-8.
Kobelt G. Economic considerations and outcome measu- rement in urge incontinence. Urology. 1997;50(6):100-7.
Trutnovsky G, Ulrich D, Rojas RG, Mann K, Aigmueller T, Dietz HP. The "bother" of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(7):947-51.
Brazell HD, O'Sullivan DM, LaSala CA. Does the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life differ based on age? Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(12):2077-80.
Vaart Cvd, Bom Jvd, Leeuw J, Roovers J, Heintz A. The contribution of hysterectomy to the occurrence of urge and stress urinary incontinence symptoms. BJOG. 2002;109(2):149-54.
Utomo E, Groen J, Vroom IH, van Mastrigt R, Blok BF. Urodynamic effects of volume-adjustable balloons for treatment of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Urology. 2013;81(6):1308-14.
Sinclair AJ, Ramsay IN. The psychosocial impact of uri- nary incontinence in women. The Obstetrician & Gyna- ecologist. 2011;13(3):143-8.
Hilton P. Trials of surgery for stress incontinence-- thoughts on the "Humpty Dumpty principle." BJOG. 2002;109(10):1081-8.
Ekici G. Yaşam Kalitesi. In: Karaduman A, Yılmaz ÖT (ed.), Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon. Ankara: Hipokrat Kitabevi; 2016:367 -72.
Barentsen JA, Visser E, Hofstetter H, Maris AM, Dekker JH, de Bock GH. Severity, not type, is the main predictor of decreased quality of life in elderly women with uri- nary incontinence: a population-based study as part of a randomized controlled trial in primary care. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10(1):153.
Paick JS, Cho MC, Oh SJ, Kim SW, Ku JH. Influence of self-perceived incontinence severity on quality of life and sexual function in women with urinary incontinen- ce. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(6):828-35.
Stach-Lempinen B, Kirkinen P, Laippala P, Metsänoja R, Kujansuu E. Do objective urodynamic or clinical fin- dings determine impact of urinary incontinence or its treatment on quality of life? Urology. 2004;63(1):67-71.
Aguilar-Navarro S, Navarrete-Reyes AP, Grados- Chavarría BH, García-Lara JMA, Amieva H, Ávila- Funes JA. The severity of urinary incontinence decreases health-related quality of life among community-dwelling elderly. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012;67(11):1266- 71.
Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Com- parison of two questionnaires for assessing the seve- rity of urinary incontinence: The ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence severity index. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(5):411-5.
Chaliha C, Stanton S. The ethnic cultural and social as- pects of incontinence-a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J. 1999;10(3):166-70.