'Örgüt Bilimi' Üzerine
Bu makalede günümüzde disiplinler arası niteliğe sahip örgüt çalışmalarının özerk bir 'örgüt bilimine' dönüşmesinin gerekliliği savunulmaktadır. Bu dönüşümün önündeki engellerden en önemlisi olarak vurgulanan ve ilgili yazında bir süredir tartışmalara yol açan, alanın 'çok paradigmalılığı' sorunsalı incelenmekte ve bunun örgüt bilimin varlığı için engel oluşturmadığı savı desteklenmektedir. Bu bilimin varlığı ve yeniden üretimi ile ilgili olarak asıl bakılması gereken konunun bu alanın 'meşruluğunun ' sağlanabilmesi olduğu düşüncesinden yola çıkılarak bu meşruluğun; ilgi nesnesinin varlığı, alanın nesnesine atfedilen önem, evrensellik ve kullanıcıların gözünde bu meşruluğun sağlanması açılarından tartışması yapılmaktadır. İlk üç unsurla ilgili olarak örgüt bilimin meşruluk sorunu olmadığı savunulmakta, ancak, sonuncusunun henüz yeterince sağlanamadığı vurgulanmaktadır.
On the Science of Organizations
This paper argues that there is a need for the establishment and reproduction of an autonomous social science of organizations. It explores the multi-paradigmatic state of the field, usually referred as 'paradigm wars' and claims that this situation does not constitute a significant problem in that respect. It also argues that maintaining a legitimacy for such a science in the eyes of the constituents is a more important task. Grounds for that is discussed through the legitimization of; the existence of subject matter, the importance attributed to the subject, universality of the field and the probable consumers of the products. Only the last factor is claimed to be not ripe yet, but this also does not show that there is no legitimacy for the establishment of this autonomous social science of organizations.
___
- Alvesson M. (1993), "The Play of Metaphors", Hassard J. ve Parker M. (Ed.) Postmodernism and Organizations, Sage Publications, London.
- Ackroyd S. (1992), "Paradigms Lost:Paradise Regained?", Reed M. ve Hughes M. (ed.), Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organizational Theory and Analysis, Sage Publications, London.
- Broekstra G. (1996), "The Triune-Brain Metaphor: The Evolution of the Living Organization", Grant D. ve Oswick C. (Ed.) Metaphor and Organizations, Sage Publications, Surrey.
- Burrell G. (2002), "Organization Paradigms", Sorge A. (Ed.), Organization, Thomson Learning, London.
- Burrell G. ve Morgan G. (1985/1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements in the Sociology of Corporate Life, Heinemann, NY.
- Canella A. ve Paetzold R. (1994), "Pfeffer's Barriers to the Advance of Organization Science: A Rejoinder", The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19. No. 2, s. 331-341.
- Donaldson L. (1995), American Anti-management Theories of Organization: Acritique of Paradigm Proliferation", Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Donaldson L. (2003), "Organization Theory as a Positive Science", Tsoukas H. Ve Knudsen C. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Fischer F. ve Sirianni C. (1984) (Ed.), Critical Studies in Organization and Bureaucracy, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
- Fleetwood S. (2005), "Ontology in Organization and Management Studies: A critical realist perspective", Organization, Vol. 12, No. 2, s. 197-222.
- Hancock P. ve Tyler M. (2001) Work, Postmodernism and Organization: A critical Introduction, Sage Publications, London.
- Grant D. ve Oswick C. (1996) (Ed), Metaphor and Organizations, Sage Publications, London.
- Hancock P. ve Tyler M. (2001), Work Postmodernism and Organization: A critical Introduction, Sage Publications, London.
- Hassard J. ve Kelemen M. (2002), "Production and Consumption in Organizational Knowledge: The Case of the 'Paradigms Debate', Organization, Vol. 9, No. 2, s. 231-355.
- Heracleous L. (2004), "Interpretivist Approaches to Organizational Discourse", Grant D., Hardy C. ve diğerleri, The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse, Sage Publications, NY.
- Inns D. (2002), "Metaphor in the Literature of Organizational Analysis: A Preliminary Taxonomy and a Glimpse at a Humanities-based Perspective", Organization, Vol. 9, No. 2, s. 305-330.
- Jones C. (2003), "Theory after the Postmodern Condition", Organization, Vol.10, No. 3, s. 503-523.
- Kelemen M. ve Hassard J. (2003), "Paradigm Plurality: Exploring Past, Present and Future Trends", Westwood R. Ve Clegg S., Debating Organization:Point-Counterpoint in Organization Studies, Blackwell Publishing, London.
- McKelvey B. (1997), "QuasiNatural Organization Science", Organization Science, Vol. 8 No.4, s. 352-380.
- McKelvey B. (2003), "From Fields to Science: Can Organization Studies make the Transition?", Westwood R. ve Clegg S. Debating Organization: Point Counterpoint in Organization Studies, Blackwell Publishing. London.
- Miner, J B. (1984), "The Validity and Usefulness of Theories in an Emerging Organizational Science", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, s. 296-306.
- Morgan G. (1997), "An Afterword: Is There Anything More to be Said About Metaphor?", Grant D. ve Oswick W. (Ed.) Metaphor and Organizations, Sage Publications, London.
- Morgan G. (1998), Yönetim ve Örgüt Teorilerinde Metafor (Çev. Gündüz Bulut, Zülfü Dicleli), Mess Yayını, İstanbul.
- Pfeffer J. (1993), "Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a dependent variable", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18. No. 4, s. 599-620.
- Pfeffer J. (1995), "Mortality, Reproducibility, and the Persistence of Styles Theory", Organization Science, Vol. 6. No. 6, s. 681-686.
- Reed M. (1985), New Directions in Organizational Analysis, Tavistock Publications, London.
- Scott R. W. (2003/1981), Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Prentice-Hall, NJ.
- Scott W. G. (1961), "Organization Theory: An Overview and Appraisal", The Journal of The Academy of Management, Vol 4. No. 1, s. 7-26.
- Scott W. G. (1974), "Organization Theory: A Reassesment", The Academy of Management Journal, Vol 17. No. 2, s. 242-254.
- Schultz M. ve Hatch M. J. (1996) "Living with Multiple Paradigms: The Case of Paradigm Interplay in Organizational Culture Studies", The Academy of Management Review, Vol 21. No. 2, s. 529-557.
- Strother G. B. (1963), "Problems in the Development of a Social Science of Organization", Leavitt HJ. (Ed.), The Social Science of Organizations .Four Perspectives, Prentice-Hall, NJ.
- Van Maanen J. (1995), "Fear and Loathing in Organization Studies", Organization Science, Vol 6, No. 6, s. 687-692.
- ISSN: 1300-1795
- Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
- Başlangıç: 1968
- Yayıncı: -
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
Siyasal ve Medyatik Tüketim Nesnesi Olarak Soykırım
Bir Kamu Yatırımı Olarak Havaalanı Mülkiyet Yapısı ve Finansman Kaynakları
Halkın Polis Güçlerine ve Polis Hizmetlerine Bakış Açısı Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Niğde Örneği
M. Emin İNAL, ESEN GÜRBÜZ, Mehmet PEŞMEN
Sosyal Devlet Bireysel Özgürlükleri Sınırladı mı?
Uluslararası Halkla İlişkiler Alanına İlişkin Bir Tanıtım ve Model Arayışı