Belgin UÇAR KOCAOĞLU, Ayşegül SAYLAM

11675

Kamu Yönetiminde Yönetsel Kapasiteyi E-Katılım Perspektifinden Değerlendirmek

Kamu yönetiminde yönetsel kapasite üzerine yapılan çalışmalar gün geçtikçe art-maktadır. Yönetsel kapasite, kamu politikalarının etkin ve etkili bir şekilde uygulanma-sında önemli bir yere sahiptir. Yönetsel kapasite literatürde farklı bileşenleri içerisinde barındıran şemsiye bir kavram olarak ele alınmaktadır. Bu çerçevede yönetsel kapasiteyi değerlendirmek önce onu bileşenlerine ayırmak ile mümkün olmaktadır. Son yıllarda yö-netsel kapasite içerisinde önemi gittikçe artan en önemli bileşenlerden biri elektronik va-tandaş katılımıdır (e-katılım). Yönetimin politika oluşturma, uygulama ve kamu hizmet-lerinin sunulmasına ilişkin süreçlerine vatandaşların bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri kana-lıyla katılımı olarak ifade edilebilen e-katılımın yönetsel kapasiteyi geliştirmede önemli faydaları bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı da son yıllarda yönetimlerde artan oranda yer verilmeye başlanan elektronik vatandaş katılımının yönetsel kapasite üzerin-deki olası faydalarını analiz etmektir. Bu çalışmada e-katılımın, yönetsel kapasite üze-rinde idarenin meşruiyetini güçlendirme, idareye güven sağlama, hesap verilebilir ve şef-faf bir yönetim sağlama gibi demokratik anlamda değer yaratan faydaları yanında kay-nakları doğru ve yerinde kullanma, var olan ve yeni bilgileri daha az maliyetle depolama, kamu hizmetlerini ve politikalarını daha az maliyetle, daha kaliteli ve hızlı gerçekleş-tirme, liderlik niteliklerini geliştirme gibi yönetsel kapasiteye yönelik ekonomik ve idari kararlar ekseninde değer yaratan faydaları olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Evaluation of Administrative Capacity in the Public Administration from the Perspective of E-Participation

The studies on administrative capacity in public administration have progres-sively been increasing. The administrative capacity has a significant role in the efficient and effective implementation of public policies. It is acknowledged in the literature that the administrative capacity is an umbrella concept that includes several components. In this regard, evaluating the administrative capacity initially requires setting apart its com-ponents. One of the most important components of the administrative capacity is elec-tronic participation (e-participation), which has become important in the recent years. E-participation that is regarded as public participation in processes of policy making, implementation, and delivery of public services of administration via information and communication technologies has significant benefits in improving the administrative capacity. The aim of this study is to analyze the potential benefits of electronic participation that has widely been employed in governments in the recent years for the administrative capacity. The study finds that e-participation contributes to the administrative capacity at the democratic level by strengthening of legality of the administration, providing trust for the administration, ensuring accountable and transparent administration and also at the economic and administrative level by using resources appropriately and accurately, storing current and new information with low cost, carrying out public services and policies rapidly with high quality and low cost, and improving qualities of leadership.
PDF

___

  • Al Wahedi, I. S., S. A. Hoshang ve H. Tamimi (2015). “Investigating Factors Influencing the Acceptance and Utilization of Government Mobile Crowdsourcing Applications Case Study: Cityguard Application in Abu Dhabi City”. 13th International Conference on e-Society 2015, Madeira, Portugal.
  • Albert, A. ve E. Passmore (2008). Public Value and Participation: A Literature Review for the Scottish Government, The Work Foundation, www.scotland.gov.uk/socialresearch, (17.04.2022).
  • Al-Dalou, R. ve E. Abu Shanab (2013). “E-Participation Levels and Technologies”. ICIT 2013 The 6 International Conference on Information Technology, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273632293_Eparticipation_levels_and technologies, (10.02.2022).
  • Balm, K. (2008). Pacific Choice Building Capacity through Participation. Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
  • Besaleva, L. I. ve A. C. Weaver (2013). “Crowdhelp: Application for Improved Emergency Response Through Crowdsourced Information”. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication-UbiComp ’13 Adjunct, 1437-1446.
  • Bott, M., B. S. Gigler ve G. Young (2012). “The Role of Crowdsourcing for Better Governance in Fragile State Contexts”. Word Bank Publications.
  • Bovaird, T. (2007). “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services”. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846-860.
  • Brabham, D. C. (2009). “Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects”. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242-262.
  • Brabham, D. C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press.
  • Caiden, G. (1973). “Development, Administrative Capacity and Administrative Reform”. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 39(4), 327-344.
  • Callahan, K. (2007). “Elements of Effective Governance: Measurement, Accountability and Participation”. Public Administration and Public Policy, 126, New York, London: Taylor & Francis, 149-172.
  • Charalabidis, Y. N., E. Loukis, A. Androutsopoulou, V. Karkaletsis ve A. Triantafillou (2014), “Passive Crowdsourcing in Government Using Social Media”. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8, 283-308.
  • Chatfield, T. ve U. Brajawidagda (2014). “Crowdsourcing Hazardous Weather Reports from Citizens via Twittersphere under the Short Warning Lead Times of EF5 Intensity Tornado Conditions”. Proc. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, 2231-2241.
  • Chen, K. ve T. Aitamurto (2019). “Barriers for Crowd’s Impact in Crowdsourced Policymaking: Civic Data Overload and Filter Hierarchy”. International Public Management Journal, 22(1), 99-126.
  • Christensen, R. K. ve B. Gazley (2008). “Capacity for Public Administration: Analysis of Meaning and Measurement”. Public Administration and Development, 28(4), 265-279.
  • Clark, B. Y. ve J. L. Brudney (2018). “Citizen Representation in City Government-Driven Crowdsourcing”. Journal of Collaborative Computing, 27(36, SI).
  • Cordella, A. ve A. Paletti (2017). “Value Creation, ICT, and Co-Production in Public Sector: Bureaucracy, Opensourcing and Crowdsourcing”. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. New York: ACM, 185-194.
  • El-Taliawi, O. G. ve Z. Van Der Wal, (2019). “Developing administrative capacity: an agenda for research and practice”. Policy Design and Practice, 2(3), 243-257.
  • Farazmand, A. (2009). “Building administrative capacity for the age of rapid globalization: A modest prescription for the twenty-first century”. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1007-1020.
  • Hacker, K. L. ve J. Van Dijk (Ed.) (2000). Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practices. London: Sage.
  • Haltofová, B. (2019). “Critical Success Factors of Geocrowdsourcing Use in E-Government: A Case Study from the Czech Republic”, Urban Research & Practice, 13(4), 434-451.
  • Harrison, S. ve P. Johnson (2019). “Challenges in the Adoption of Crisis Crowdsourcing and Social Media in Canadian Emergency Management”. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 501-509.
  • Heald, D. (2006). “Varieties of Transparency”. Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? (Ed. C. Hood ve D. Heald). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25-43.
  • Hyeon-Suk Lyu (2008). “The Public’s E-Participation Capacity and Motivation in Korea: A Web Survey Analysis from a New Institutionalist Perspective,”. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(4), 65-79.
  • Ingraham, P. W. (2007). “Studying State and Local Government Management Systems: Why We Need to Do It”. Pursuit of Performance: Management Systems in State and Local Government. (Ed. P. W. Ingraham). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1-14
  • Ingraham, P. W. ve A. K. Donahue (2000). “Dissecting the Black Box Revisited: Characterizing Government Management Capacity”. Governance and Performance: New Perspectives. (Ed. C. J. Heinrich, ve L. E. Lynn, JR.). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, (Kindle Edition).
  • Joaquin, M. E. ve T. J. Greitens (2021). American Administrative Capacity: Decline, Decay, and Resilience. Switzerland: Springer. Kim, S. ve J. Lee (2012). “E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government”. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 819-828.
  • Ko, K., H. H. Park, D. C. Shim ve K. Kim (2021). “The change of administrative capacity in Korea: contemporary trends and lessons”. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(2), 238-255.
  • Krishnan, S., T. S. H. Teo ve J. Lim (2013). “E-Participation and E-Government Maturity: A Global Perspective”. Grand Successes and Failures in IT: Public and Private Sectors. (Ed. Y. K. Dwivedi, H. Z. Henriksen, D. Wastell ve R. De’). Berlin: Springer, 420-435.
  • Kühl, S. (2009). “Capacity Development as the Model for Development Aid Organizations”. Development and Change, 3(40), 551-577.
  • Kutlu, Önder (2013). “Yerel Yönetimlerde Kurumsal Kapasite Geliştirme Çalışmaları”. Kamu Yönetiminde Değişim ve Güncel Sorunlar: 60. Yılında TODAİE. (Ed. E. G. İsbir). Ankara: TODAİE Yayını, 459-479.
  • Kyere, F. ve N. Y. Kumah Gyamea (2017). “The imperative of e-participation in sustainable community development in Ghana”. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 7(4), 211-223.
  • Le Blanc, D. (2020). “E-participation: a quick overview of recent qualitative trends”. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Working Paper, No. 163.
  • Leffeler E. (2021). “The Four Co’s: Co-commissioning, Co-design, Co-delivery and Co-assessment of Public Services and Outcomes Through Traditional and Digital Mechanisms”. Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lodge, M. ve K. Wegrich (2014). “Setting the Scene: Challanges to the State, Governance Readiness, and Administrative Capacities”. The Governance Report 2014. Oxford: Hertie School of Governance, 15-26.
  • Lukensmeyer, C. J. ve W. Jacobson (2013). Bringing Citizen Voices to the Table: A Guide for Public Managers. New York: Jossey-Bass.
  • Macintosh, A. (2004). “Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making”. In the Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37).
  • Macintosh, A. (2007). Challenges and Barriers of eParticipation in Europe. Future of Democracy Forum. Stockholm: Riksdag.
  • Magno, F. ve F. Cassia (2015). “Public Administrators’ Engagement in Services Co-Creation: Factors That Foster and Hinder Organisational Learning About Citizens”. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(11-12), 1161-1172.
  • Malle, S. A. (2019). “Local Government Capacity On Electronic Participation: A Case Study Of Kinondoni Municipal”. A Dissertation Degree of Master of Business Administration in Corporate Management (MBA-CM) of University.
  • Meijer, A. ve W. Boon (2021). “Digital Platforms for The Co-creation of Public Value”. Policy and Politics, 49(2), 231-248.
  • Mizrahi, Y. (2003), Capacity Enhancement Indicators: Review of the Literature, WBI Evaluation Studies, No: EG03-72, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Institute, https://www.academia.edu/11097461/Capacity_Enhancement_Indicators_Review_of_the_Literature, (15.04.2022).
  • Moon, M. J. (2018). “Evolution of Co-production in the Information Age: Crowdsourcing as a Model of Web-based Co-production in Korea”. Policy and Society, 37(3), 294-309.
  • Morgan, P. (2006). “The Concept of Capacity”. Study on Capacity, Change and Performance, https://ecdpm.org/wp-content/uploads/2006-The-Concept-of-Capacity.pdf, (15.04.2022).
  • Mossberger, K., Y. Wu ve J. Crawford (2013). “Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities”. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 351-358.
  • Nabatchi, T. (2012). A Manager’s Guide to Evaluating Citizen Participation, Fostering Transparency and Democracy Series, IBM Center fort the Business of Government, http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan048340.pdf, (15.05.2022).
  • Nabatchi, T. ve M. Leighninger (2015). Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy. New York: Jossey-Bass.
  • Nam, T. (2012). “Suggesting Frameworks of Citizen-Sourcing via Government 2.0.”. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 12-20.
  • NJI (2002). The New Jersey Initative: Building Management Capacity in New Jersey Municipalities, Alan K. Campbell Public Affairs Institute, New York.
  • OECD (2003). Promise and Problems of E-Democracy, Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. OECD Publishing. OECD (2006). The Challenge of Capacity Development: Working Toward Good Practice. Development Assistance Committee. Paris, https://www.oecd.org/env/outreach/40695940.pdf (04.04.2022).
  • Osborne, S. P. (2006). “The New Public Governance?”. Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387.
  • Pak, B., A. Chua ve A. Vande Moere (2017). “FixMyStreet Brussels: Socio-Demographic Inequality in Crowdsourced Civic Participation”. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(2), 65-87.
  • Peixoto, T. ve , J. A. Fox (2016). “When Does ICT-Enabled Citizen Voice Lead to Government Responsiveness?”. World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends.
  • Prpić, J., A. Taeihagh, J. Taeihagh ve J. Melton (2015), “The Fundamentals of Policy Crowdsourcing”, Policy and Internet, 7(3), 340-361.
  • Reddick, C. G. (2011). “Citizen Interaction and E-Government: Evidence for the Managerial, Consultative, and Participatory Models”. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(2), 167-184.
  • Roberts, N. C. (2008). The Age of Direct Citizen Participation. New York: Routledge.
  • Rose, J., ve C. Sanford (2007). “Mapping eParticipation Research: Four Central Challenges”. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 909-943.
  • Samonte, M. J. C., J. M. Q. Arganza, C. M. E. Aurelio ve P. D. A. Gonzales (2019). “E-Complaint: An Analytical Crowdsourcing Mobile Application for Community Peace and Order System”. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F148384, 105-109.
  • Saylam, A. (2019). “Kamu Yönetiminde E-Katılım”. Kamu Yönetiminde Doğrudan Vatandaş Katılımı. (Ed. Belgin Uçar Kocaoğlu). Ankara: İmaj Yayınevi, 91-115.
  • Saylam, A. (2020). “Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Merkezi Düzeyde E-Katılım: Bakanlıkların Web Siteleri Üzerinden Bir Araştırma”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (41), 23-37.
  • Saylam, A. (2021a). “Kamu Yönetimde Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri (BİT) Destekli Yaygın Katılım Modelleri: BİT Destekli Ortak Yapım Üzerinden Bir İnceleme”. Kamu Yönetiminde Elektronik Vatandaş Katılımı. (Ed. A. Saylam). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Saylam, A. (2021b). “Kamu Yönetiminde Elektronik Vatandaş Katılımını Etkileyen Faktörler Ekseninde Türk Kamu Yönetimi için Bir Ortak Yapım Portal Önerisi: Milletinkarari.gov.tr.”. Kamu Yönetimi ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 3(1), 81-101.
  • Saylam, A. ve M. Yıldız (2022). “Conceptualizing citizen-to-citizen (C2C) interactions within the E-government Domain”. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 1-14.
  • Saylam, A., N.Karkın ve B. Uçar Kocaoğlu (2020). “Higher Public Officials on Direct Citizen Participation in Turkey: Institutionalized vs. Curious Public Administrators”. Civic Engagement Frameworks and Strategic Leadership Practices for Organization Development. (Ed. S. Chhabra ve M. Kumar). US: IGI Global Publication, 142-170.
  • Schuurman, D., B. Baccarne, L. De Marez ve P. Mechant (2012). “Smart Ideas for Smart Cities: Investigating Crowdsourcing for Generating and Selecting Ideas for ICT Innovation in A City Context”. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 49-62. Sobacı, Z. (2010). “What the Turkish Parliamentary Web Site Offers to Citizens in Terms of Eparticipation: A Content Analysis”. Information Polity, 15(3), 227-241.
  • Song, Z., H. Zhang ve C. Dolan (2020). “Promoting Disaster Resilience: Operation Mechanisms and Self-Organizing Processes of Crowdsourcing”. Sustainability, 12, 1862.
  • Tai, K.-T., G. Porumbescu ve J. Shon (2020). “Can e-participation stimulate offline citizen participation: an empirical test with practical implications”. Public Management Review, 22(2), 278-296.
  • Tambouris, E., A. Macintosh, S. Coleman, M. Wimmer, T. Vedel, H. Westholm, B. Lippa, E. Dalakiouridou, K. Parisopoulos, J. Rose, G. Aichholzer ve R. Winkler (2007a). “Introducing eParticipation”. DEMO-net The Democracy Network. (Ed. E. Tambouris). University of Macedonia.
  • Tambouris, E., N. Liotas ve K. Tarabanis (2007b). “A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools”. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1530-1605/07.
  • Uçar Kocaoğlu, B. (2018). “Vatandaş Katılım Sürecinin Tasarımı”. Trakya Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 42-61.
  • Uçar Kocaoğlu, B. ve M. K. Öktem (2016a). “Administrative Capacity for Municipalities: Comparison of Sample Case Municipalities of Central Anatolia Region and the State of Arizona”. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 7(2), 69-85.
  • Uçar Kocaoğlu, B. ve M. K. Öktem (2016b). “Belediyelerde Yönetsel Kapasite Değerlendirmesi: İç Anadolu Bölgesi Örneği”. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 25(2), 53-79.
  • Uçar Kocaoğlu, B. ve R. Phillips (2017). “Direct Public Participation in Local Government as Community Development: The Case of Turkey”. The Routledge Handbook of Community Development: Perspectives from Around the Globe (Ed. S. Kenny, B. McGrath ve R. Phillips). New York and London: Routledge, 451-462.
  • Uçar Kocaoğlu, B. ve A. Saylam (2017). “Türkiye’de Vatandaş Katılımı: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Örneği”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 123-144.
  • Uçar Kocaoğlu, B. ve E. Seçkiner (2015). “Belediye Hizmetlerinde Gönüllü Katılım: Konya Örneği”. Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 17(29), 53-62.
  • United Nations (Birleşmiş Milletler) (2003). “World Public Sector Report 2003”. E-Government at the Crossroads. United Nations, New York. United Nations (Birleşmiş Milletler) (2020). “E-Government Survey 2020, Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development”, https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2020-Survey/2020%20UN%20E-Government%20Survey%20(Full%20Report).pdf, (03.03.2022).
  • United Nations Development Programme (Birleşmiş Milletler Kalkınma Programı) (UNDP) (2010). Measuring Capacity. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/UNDP_Measuring_Capacity_July_2010.pdf, (04.04.2022).
  • Wimmer, M. A. (2007). “Ontology for an E-Participation Virtual Resource Centre”. ICEGOV 2007: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. (Ed. T. Janowski ve T. A. Pardo). New York: ACM, 89-98.
  • Wu, X., M. Ramesh ve M. Howlett (2015). “Policy Capacity: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Policy Competences and Capabilities”. Policy and Society, 34(3-4), 165-171.
  • Zambrano, R. ve S. Eymann (2014). “Crowdsourcing and Human Development: The Role of Governments”. ICEGOV’14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York: ACM, 170-177.
  • Zheng, Y. (2015). “Explaining Government Performance on E-Participation in New Jersey: Government Capacity and Willingness”. A Dissertation Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Award of Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Public Administration of Rutgers University-Graduate School-Newark.
Amme İdaresi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1795
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1968
  • Yayıncı: -
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Kamu Yönetiminde Yönetsel Kapasiteyi E-Katılım Perspektifinden Değerlendirmek

Belgin UÇAR KOCAOĞLU, Ayşegül SAYLAM

Türkiye’de Politik Kutuplaşmanın Tarihsel Kökenleri/Kolektif Hafıza

Fatih ERTUGAY

Türk Dışişleri Bürokrasisinde Değişen Normlar: Kariyerdışı Büyükelçi Atamalarının Yasal Arka Planı

Fırat YALDIZ, Evren KÜÇÜK

19. Yüzyılda Osmanlı ve Rus İmparatorluklarında Yerel Yönetim Reformu: 1864 Zemstvo Kanunu ve 1864 Vilayet Nizamnamesi Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz

Aslı YİĞİT