İş İdeolojisi ve Eleştirisine Psikanalitik Yaklaşım

Batı’da, Lacancı psikanalitik yaklaşımı söylem düzeyinde analiz eden çalışmalar, firma ideallerine sinik ve mesafeli yaklaşan enformel iş pratiklerinin işyerinde denetim ve kontrolü görünürde askıya alırken, aslında tersinden, otorite ve tahakküm ilişkilerini yeniden ürettiğini ileri sürmüşlerdir. Benzer biçimde, bu makale, Türkiye’de işyeri ve emek süreci üzerinde yürütülen araştırmaların bulgularını inceleyerek işçilerin üretim süreci ilkelerine karşı alaycı sinik tutum gösterdiklerini, işyerinde serbesti ve aile fantezileri dolayımıyla fabrika gevşek disiplinini farklı algıladıkları ve etnik/mezhepsel olarak farklı olan işçi akranlarını Ötekileştirerek işyeri yönetiminin hegemonyasını yeniden ürettiklerini ileri sürmektedir. Klinik psikanalizin fantezi ve arzu gibi kategorileri işyeri pratiklerinin ideolojik söylemsel eleştirisinde önemli rol oynamaktadır.

A Psychoanalytical Approach to the Ideology of Work and Its Critique

Applying the Lacanian psychoanalytical approach to the discursive level, the studies in the West indicate that informal workplace practices reproduce the relations of authority and subordination, while seemingly suspending the authority and control of management through cynical performances against organisational ideals. Likewise, departing from the evidences of workplace and labour process studies in Turkey, this article argues that workers reproduce the hegemony of factory management by exhibiting cynicism and mockery against the principles of production, misrecognising the loose workplace discipline through fantasies of family and freedom and otherising their peers who are different on the ethno-religious basis. The categories of clinical psychoanalysis such as fantasy and desire play an important role in the ideological discursive critique of workplace practices.

___

  • Žižek, S. (1997), The Plague of Fantasies, Verso, London.
  • Žižek, S. (1993), Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel and the Critique of Ideology, Duke University Press, Durham.
  • Yücesan-Özdemir, G. (2000), "Başkaldırı, onay ya da boyun eğme?: Hegemonik Fabrika Rejiminde Mavi Yakalı İşçilerin Hikâyesi, Toplum ve Bilim, Cilt 86, s. 241-259.
  • Yıldırım, E. (2000), "Türkiye’deki Toplam Kalite Yönetimi Uygulamalarının İşçiler ve Endüstri İlişkileri Üzerindeki Etkileri", Toplum ve Bilim, Cilt 86, s. 260-280.
  • Wright, E. (1985), Classes, Verso, London.
  • Willmott, H. (2005), "Theorizing contemporary control: some poststructuralist responses to some critical realist questions", Organization, Vol 12, No:5, s. 747-780.
  • Walsh, M. ve Bahnisch, M. (2002), "Political Subjects, Workplaces and Subjectivities", Challenging Subjects: Critical Psychology for a New Millenium, Palgrave, Basingstoke, s. 23-38.
  • Walkerdine, V. (2008), "Contextualizing debates about psychosocial studies", Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, Vol 13, No: 4, s. 341-345.
  • Walkerdine, V. (2006), "Workers in the new economy: transformation as border crossing, Ethos, Vol 34, No:1, s. 10-41.
  • Walkerdine, V. (2005), "Freedom, psychology and the neoliberal worker", Soundings, Volume 29, s. 47-61.
  • Walkerdine, V. (2002), Challenging subjects: Critical Psychology for a New Millennium, Palgrave, Basingstoke.
  • Stewart, T. A. (2002), The Wealth of Knowledge: Intellectual Capital and the Twenty- First Century Organization, Currency Doubleday, New York.
  • Stavrakakis, Y. ve Chrysoloras, N. (2006), "(I can’t get no) Enjoyment: Lacanian Theory and the Anlaysis of Nationalism", Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, Vol 11, s. 144-163.
  • Stavrakakis, Y. (2010), "Symbolic Authority, Fantasmatic Enjoyment and the Spirits of Capitalism: Genealogies of Mutual Engagement", Lacan and Organization, MayFly, San Francisco, CA, s. 59–100.
  • Stavrakakis, Y. (2007), The Lacanian Left, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
  • Stavrakakis, Y. (1999), Lacan and The Political, Routledge, London.
  • Spicer, A. ve Cederström, C. (2010), "For the Love of the Organization", Lacan and organization, MayFly, San Francisco, CA, s. 133-167.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1938), The Behavior of Organisms, D. Appleton & Company, New York.
  • Sennett, R. (1992), The Fall of Public Man, Norton, New York.
  • Scott, J. C. (1990), Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts, Yale university press, New Haven and London.
  • Sashkin, M. ve Kisser, K. J. (1993), Putting Total Quality Management to Work, Berret- Koehler, San Fancisco.
  • Rother M. (2009), Toyota Kata: Managing people for improvement, adaptiveness and superior results, McGraw-Hill Professional, New York.
  • Roberts, J. (2005), "The power of the Imaginary in disciplinary processes", Organization, Vol 12, No:5, s. 619-642.
  • Morgan, C. ve Murgatroyd, S. (1999), Total Quality Management in the Public Sector, Open University Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia.
  • Miner, J. B. (2006), Organizational behavior three: Historical origins, theoretical foundations, and the future, Vol. 3, Armonk M.E.Sharpe, NY ve London.
  • Mayo, G. E. [1933] (2003), The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization, Routledge, London.
  • Manley, J. E. (1998), "Symbol, ritual, and doctrine: The cultural ‘Tool Kit’ of TQM", Journal of Quality Management, December, Vol 3, No:2, s. 175-191.
  • Lok, J. ve Willmott, H. (2014), "Identities and identifications in organizations: Dynamics of antipathy, deadlock, and alliance", Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol 23, No:3, s. 215-230.
  • Lennerfors, T. T ( 2013), "Beneath good and evil?", Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol 22, No:4, s. 380-392.
  • Larrain, J. (1983), Marxism and Ideology, Macmillan, New York.
  • Larrain, J. (1979), The Concept of Ideology, Hutchinson, London.
  • Laclau, E. ve Mouffe, C. (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, Verso, London.
  • Laclau, E. (2005), On Populist Reason, Verso, London
  • Laclau, E. (1990), New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time, Verso, London.
  • Jones, C. ve Spicer, A. (2005), "The sublime object of entrepreneurship", Organisation, Vol 12, No:2, s. 223-226.
  • İrani, Z., Beskese, A. ve Love, P. E. (2004), "Total Quality Management and corporate culture: constructs of organisational excellence", Technovation, Ağustos, Vol 24, No: 8, s. 643-650.
  • Howarth, D., Norval, A. ve Stavrakakis, Y., (2000), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies, and Social Change, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
  • Güler, H. (2014), Patron Baba ve İşçileri İşçi Sınıfı, Köylülük ve Paternalizm, İletişim, İstanbul.
  • Glynos, J. ve Stavrakakis, Y. (2008), "Lacan and Political Subjectivity: Fantasy and Enjoyment in Psychoanalysis and Political Theory", Subjectivity, Volume 24, s. 256- 274.
  • Glynos, J. ve Howarth, D. (2007), Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory, Routledge, London.
  • Glynos, J. (2011), "On the ideological and political significance of fantasy in the organization of work", Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, Vol 16, No: 4, s. 373-393.
  • Glynos, J. (2010), "Lacan at work", Lacan and organisation, MayFly, San Francisco, CA, s. 13-58.
  • Glynos, J. (2008), "Ideological fantasy at work", Journal of Political Ideologies, Vol 13, No:3, s. 275-296.
  • Glynos, J. (2001), "The Grip of Ideology: A Lacanian approach to the theory of ideology", Journal of Political Ideologies, Vol 6, No:2, s. 191-214.
  • Gabriel, Y. (1997), "Meeting God: when organizational members come face to face with the supreme leader", Human Relations, Vol 50, No:4, s. 315-342.
  • Gabriel, Y. (1995), "The unmanaged organization: stories, fantasies and subjectivity", Organization Studies, Vol 16, No:3, s. 477-501.
  • Frosh, S. (2002), Key Concepts in Psycho-analysis,The British Library, London.
  • Freud, S. (1991), On Metapsychology,Penguin, London.
  • Freud, S. [1930] (1963), Civilization and Its Discontents,Norton, New York.
  • Freud, S. [1923] (1962), The Ego and the Id, and Other Works, Hogarth Press, London.
  • Freud, S. [1922] (1975), Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Norton, New York.
  • Frayne, C. A. ve Latham, G. P. (1987), "Application of social learning theory to employee self-management of attendance", Journal of applied psychology, Vol 72, No: 3, s. 387–392.
  • Fleming, P. ve Sturdy, A. (2009), “Just be yourself!”: towards neo-normative control in organizations?", Employee Relations, Vol 31, No:6, s. 569-583.
  • Fleming, P. ve Spicer, A. (2008), "Beyond power and resistance", Management Communication Quarterly, Vol 21, No: 3, s. 301-309.
  • Fleming, P. ve Spicer, A. (2003), "Working at a cynical distance: implications for power, subjectivity and resistance", Organisation, Vol 10, No: 1, s. 157-179.
  • Fleming, P. (2015), The Mythology of Work, Pluto, London.
  • Fleming, P. (2010), "You Are Where You Are Not: Lacan and Ideology in Contemporary Workplaces", Lacan and organization, MayFly, San Francisco, CA, s. 169-187.
  • Fleming, P. (2009), Authenticity and the Cultural Politics of Work, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Fink, B. (1999), A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Fink, B. (1997), The Lacanian Subject, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
  • Durak, Y. (2011), Emeğin Tevekkülü Konya’da İşçi-İşveren İlişkileri ve Dindarlık, İletişim, İstanbul.
  • Delbridge, R., Turnbull, P. ve Wilkinson, B. (2009), "Pushing back the frontiers: management control and work intensification under JIT/TQM factory regimes", New Technology, Work and Employment, Vol 7, No: 2, 97–106.
  • Contu, A. ve Willmott, H. (2006), "Studying practice: Situating talking about machines", Organization Studies, Vol 27, No: 12, s. 1769-1782.
  • Cederström, C. ve Hoedemaekers, C. (2010) Lacan and Organization,MayFly, San Francisco, CA.
  • Casey, C (1995), Work, Self and Society: After Industrialism, Routledge, London.
  • Carter, C. ve Mueller, F. U. (2002), "The ‘long march’ of the management modernizers: ritual, rhetoric and rationality", Human Relations, Vol 5, No: 11, s. 1325-1354.
  • Carr, A. (2002), "Managing in a psychoanalytically-informed manner", Journal of Management Psychology, Vol 17, No:5, s. 343-347.
  • Byrne, K. ve Healy, S. (2006), "Cooperative subjects", Rethinking Marxism , Vol 18, No:2, s. 241–258.
  • Burawoy, M. (1979), Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Braverman, H. (1974), Labor and Monopoly Capital, Monthly Review Press, New York.
  • Bramming, P. ve Johnsen, R. (2011), "Love will tear us apart–transformational leadership and love in a call centre", European Journal of International Management, Vol 5, No: 1, s. 80-95.
  • Birelma, A. (2014), Emek ve Haysiyet Mücadelesi Günümüz Türkiye’sinde Üç İşçi Hareketinin Ethnografisi, İletişim, İstanbul.
  • Barley, S. ve Kunda, G. (1992), "Design and devotion: surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 37, No: 3, s. 363–399.
  • Bandura, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory,Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Arslan, O.E. (2012), Devlet Bürokrasi ve Kamu Personel Rejimi, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Andersen, N. A. ve Born, A. (2008), "The employee in the sign of love", Culture and Organization, Vol 14, No: 4, s. 325-343.
  • Andersen, N. Å. (2015), "Lay-offs in the name of love-the Danish example", International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, Vol 7, No: 1, s. 16-34.
  • Alvesson, M. ve Willmott, H. (2002), "Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual", Journal of Management Studies, Volume 39, s. 619–644.
  • Alpenberg, J. ve Scarbrough, P. (2009), "Culture and the Toyota Production System Archetype: a preliminary assessment", Creativity and control in management control, Växjö University Press, Växjö.
  • Ahmed, S. (2004), "Affective economies", Social Text, Vol. 22, No:2, s. 117–139.