20360

Avrupa Birliği Hukukunda Tam Yargı Davaları: AB Kurumları ve Üye Devletlerin Sorumluluklarının Karşılaştırılması

Hukukun üstünlüğü prensibinin önemli unsurlarından biri de yürütme organının eylem ve işlemlerinin hukuka uygunluğunun denetlenmesi ve hukuka aykırılık durumunda zarar gören bireylerin tazmin edilmesidir. Avrupa Birliği hukuk sistemi uyarınca hem Birlik kurumlarının hem de üye devletlerin eylem ve işlemlerinin AB hukukuna uygun olması gerekmektedir. Birlik kurumlarının AB hukukuna aykırı eylem ve işlemlerinden zarar gören bireyler AB mahkemelerinde, ulusal makamların AB hukukuna aykırı eylem ve işlemlerinden zarar gören bireyler de ulusal mahkemlerde tam yargı davası açabilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı AB hukukuna özgü tam yargı davalarının incelenmesi ve her iki düzeydeki sorumluluğun kaynağı, kapsamı, koşulları ve sonuçları arasındaki farkların belirlenmesidir

Actions for Damages in EU Law: A Comparative Analysis of the Liability of EU Institutions and the Liability of Member States.

The rule of law requires that the legality of the actions of administration must be supervised, and individuals must be compensated for any illegal actions of administration. The actions of both the EU institutions and member states should be in conformity with EU law. Individuals, who suffer a damage resulting from the breach of EU law, can bring actions against the EU institutions before the EU courts and against member states before national courts. The aim of this paper is to examine the actions for damages at EU and national level, and to compare the liability of EU institutions and member states in terms of legal bases, content, conditions, and outcomes

___

Adaoğlu, S. H.(2006), Avrupa Topluluğu Hukukunun Üye Ülkelerde Uygulanmasında Ulusal Mahkemeler ve Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı İlişkisi, A.Ü. Avrupa Toplulukları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, Araştırma Dizisi, No:24, Ankara.
Adaoğlu, S. H. (2005), "Francovich'ten Köbler'e AT Hukukunda Devletin Sorumuluğu Prensibi", Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 54, Sayı:2, s.249-267.
Akgül, M. E. (2008), Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı'nın Yargı Yetkisi, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara.
Anagnostaras, G. (2000), "State Liability v Retroactive Application of Belated Implementing Measures: Seeking the Optimum Means in Terms of Effectiveness of EC Law", Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, Issue:1, s.1-12.
Anagnostaras, G. (2001), "The Principle of State Liability for Judicial Breaches: The Impact of European Community Law", European Public Law, Vol. 7, No: 3, s. 281- 305.
Arat, T. (1989), Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı, Ankara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Yayınları, Ankara.
Arsava, F. (2009), "Lisbon Sözleşmesi-Reform Sözleşmesi'nin Önemli Unsurları", Dokus Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 11, Özel Sayı, s.1457-1479.
Arsava, F. (2011), "Topluluk Hukukunda Bireysel Hakların Etkin Olarak Temini", Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, Cilt 25, Sayı 1-2, s.23- 44.
Baykal, S. (2002), AT Hukukunun Etkili Biçimde Uygulanması ve Bireysel Haklar, A.Ü. Avrupa Toplulukları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, Araştırma Dizisi, No :14, Ankara.
Baykal, S. (2006), Avrupa Birliği Hukukunda Tazminat Davası AB Kurumlarının ve Üye Devletlerin Tazminat Sorumluluğu Çerçevesinde Bir İnceleme, Yetkin
Caranta, R. (1993), "Governmental Liability after Francovich", Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 52, No: 2, July, s.272-297.
Craig, P. (2006), EU Administrative Law, Oxford University Press, New Yok.
Craig, P. ve Burca, D. (1996), EC Law Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford University Press, New York.
Davies, A. (2012), "State Liability for Judicial Decisions in European Union and International Law", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 61, s. 585
Dougan, M. (2000), "The Francovich Right to Reparation: Reshaping the Contours of Community Remedial Competence", European Public Law, Vol. 6, No:1, s.103
Downes, T.A. (2006), "Trawling for a Remedy: State Liability under Community Law", Legal Studies, Vol. 17, No: 2, s.286-304.
Eilmansberger, T. (2004), "The Relationship Between Rights and Remedies in EC Law: In Search of the Missing Link", Common Market Law Review, Vol. 41, s.1199-1246.
Groussot, X. ve Minssen, T. (2007), "Res Judicata in the Court of Justice Case-Law: Balancing Legal Certainity with Legality?" European Constitutional Law Review,Vol. 3, s.385-417.
Hartmann, B. J. (2011), "Alignment of National Government Liability Law in Europe after Francovich", ERA Form, Conference on "State Liability 20 Years after Francovich", 1-2 December, Trier, s.613-623.
Hartley, T.C. (2010), The Foundations of European Community Law, Oxford University Press, New York.
Hilson, C. (1997), "Liability of Member States in Damages: The Place of Discretion", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.46, No:4, October, s.941-947.
Hilson, C. (2005), "The Role of Discretion in EC Law on Non-Contractual Liability", Common Market Law Review, Vol. 42, s. 677-695.
Horspool, M. ve Humphreys, M. (2010), European Union Law, Oxford University Press, New York.
Kapteyn, P.J.G.ve Van Themat, P. V. (1998), Introduction to the Law of the European Communities, Kluwer Law International, The Netherlands.
Karayiğit, M. T. (2009), Gerçek ve Tüzel Kişilerin AB Tasarruflarına Karşı Yargısal Korunması, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara.
Lee, I. B. (1999), "In Search of a Theory of State Liability in the European Union", Harvard Law School Jean Monnet Working Papers, No: 9, USA, s.1-57.
Nikolaou, E. (2005), From Francovich to Köbler and Beyond: The Evolution of a State Liability Regime for the European Community, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Reçber, K. (2010), Avrupa Birliği Kurumlar Hukuku ve Temel Metinleri, Alfa Aktüel
Ruffert, M. (1997), "Rights and Remedies in European Community Law: A Comparative View", Common Market Law Review, Vol. 34, s.307-336.
Schermers H. ve Waelbroeck, D. F. (1992), Judicial Protection in the European Communitıes, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Boston.
Scherr, K. M. (2011), "Comparative Aspects of the Application of the Principle of State Liability for Judicial Breaches", ERA Form, Conference on "State Liability 20 Years after Francovich", 1-2 December, Trier, s. 565-588.
Smith, F. ve Woods, L. (1997), "Causation in Francovich: The Neglected Problem", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 46, No:4, October, s.925-941.
Tallberg, J. (2011), "Supranational Influence in EU Enforcement: The ECJ and the Principle of State Liability", Journal of European Public Policy, Vol.7, No:1, s.104
Toth, A.G. (1975), "The Individual and European Law", The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.24, No:4, October, s. 659-706.
Trimidas, T. (2001), "Liability for Breach of Community Law: Growing Up and Mellowing Down?", Common Market Law Review, Vol. 38, s.301-332.
Van Gerven, W. (1996), "Bridging the Unbridgeable: Community and National Tort Laws after Farncovich and Brasserie", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 45, No:3, July, s.507-544.
Ward, A. (2011), "Damages under the EU Charter", ERA Form, Conference on "State Liability 20 years after Francovich", 1-2- December, Trier, s.589-611.
Wakefield, J. (2006), "Trends in the Case Law on the Action for Damages against Community Institutions", ERA Form, Conference on "Current Trends in the Judicial Review of EC Regulatory Acts", 27 April, Brussels, s.519-529.
Wakefield, J. (2011), "The Changes in Liability of EU Institutions: Bergaderm, FIAMM and Schneider", ERA Form, Conference on "State Liablity 20 Years after Francovich", 1-2 December, Trier, s.625-639.
Wattel, P. J. (2004), "Köbler, CILFIT and Welthgrove: We Can't Go on Meeting Like This", Common Market Law Review, Vol.41, No:1, February, s. 177-190.
Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı Kararları
C-25/62 Plaumann v. Commission of the European Community, 1963, ECR 199.
C-5/71 Zuckerfabrik Schoeppenstedt v. Council, 1971, ECR 975.
C-63-69/72 Werhahn Hansmuehle and Others v. Council of the European Communities, 1973, ECR 1229.
C-56/74 Kampffmeyer v. Council and Commission, 1976, ECR 711.
C-83/76 Bayerische HNL Vermehrungsbeitriebe GmbH & Co. KL and Others v. Council and Commission, 1978, ECR 1209.
C-116/77 G.R. Amylum NV and Tunnel Refineries Limited v. Council and Comission, 1979, ECR 2497.
C-182/85 Lütticke v. Denkavit-Futtermiltel, 1987, ECR 3159.
C-104/89 J.M. Mulder and Others v. Council and Commission, 2000, ECR 1257.
C-6/90 Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci and Others v. Italian Republic, 1991, ECR 5357.
C-220/91 Commission v. Stahlwerke Peine - Salzgitter AG., 1993, ECR 2393.
C-46/93 Brasserie du Pecheur v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland and the Queen/ Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame and Others, 1996, ECR 1029.
T/455/93 Hedley Lomas and Others v Commission, 1997, ECR 1095.
C-178/94 Erich Dillenkofer and Others v. Bundesrepublic Deutschland, 1996, ECR
C-35/98 Bergaderm nad Goupil v. Commission, 2000, ECR 1.
C- 453/00 Kühne & Heitz v. Produktschap voor Pluimvee en Eieven, 2004, ECR 837.
C-224/01 Gerhard Köbler v. Republik Österreich, 2003, ECR 10239.
C-120/06 FIAMM and Others v. Council and Commission, 2008, ECR 6513.
C-385/07 P Der Grüne Punkt - Duales System Deutchland v. Commission, 2009, ECR 6155.
C- 620/13 P British Telecommunications plc v. Commission, 2014, ECR 2309.