Yemen'in Kuzeyinde Osmanlı İdaresinin Yeniden Tesis Edilmesi ve Mekke Şerif Muavini Kıbrıslı Tevfik Paşa (1848-1851)

Muavin Tevfik Pasha (1848-1851) and the Re-Establishment of Ottoman Authority in North Yemen

Abstract: After the conquest of Egypt, the Ottoman State had firstly through Hadım Suleiman Pasha, made an intense effort for the retention of the territory of Yemen within Ottoman territory until the outbreak of World War I. After a while, the Ottomans had withdrawn substantially from the region being unable to stand up to the Zaid. However, the Ottoman state was forced to move back into the action in the Yemen due to the concerns raised by the political and military events of the 19th century. Within this context, the military action undertaken by Muavin Tevfik Pasha during the reign of Sultan Abdulmecid, was extremely important. Muavin Tevfik Pasha understood that the important Ottoman authorities attached importance to the region and he had taken on an important task to realise them through military operations. The reason for attempting such an undertaking was the Ottoman concern to secure the Red Sea and the Arabian Peninsula. The control of Yemen was necessary, in terms of the security of the Holy lands of the Hejaz, Mecca and Medina and the continuation of the relationship of the ruler and Muslim community within the boundaries of Ottoman territory with this duty. The military operations undertaken by Muavin Tevfik Pasha on behalf of the Ottoman state are investigated in this article and as Muavin Tevfik Pasha had a very important role in the development of these events, the article focuses on him. In addition there is included a description of the wider politics of the period and also of the policy of the Ottoman state in this region, in order to more completely understand this issue.

___

  • Araştırma ve İnceleme Eserler Ahmet Raşit Paşa (2013). Tarih-i Yemen ve San’a, I-II. Yay. Haz. Sadettin Baştürk, Ankara 2013.
  • Akalın D. (2014). “Aden’in İşgali ve İşgalden Sonra Osmanlı Devleti’nin Kızıldeniz’de Aldığı Bazı Tedbirler”. Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi XXIX/2 (2014) 357-404. Ankara.
  • Akalın D. (2014). “İngiltere ve Osmanlı Devleti Arasında Perim Adası (1798-1914)”. Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi 33/56 (2014) 233-263. İzmir.
  • Akalın D. & Parlaz S. (2010). “Nil’de İktidar Mücadelesi ve Kavalalı”. Çankırı, Avrasya Strateji Dergisi Cilt 1/1 (2010) 115-134.
  • Arendonk C. V. (1997). “Şerif Maddesi”. İslam Ansiklopedisi 11 (1997) 435-442. Eskişehir. Armaoğlu F. (1999). 19. Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi (1789-1914). Ankara 1999.
  • Baldry J. (1976). “Al-Yaman and the Turkish Occupation 1849-1914”. Arabica, T. 23, Fasc. 2, Brill. Darkot B. (1997). “Asir Maddesi”. İslam Ansiklopedisi 1 (1997) 674-675. Eskişehir.
  • Darkot B. (1997). “Hudeyde Maddesi”. İslam Ansiklopedisi, 5/1 (1997) 579-581. Eskişehir. Gencer A. İ. (2001). Bahriye’de Yapılan Islahat Hareketleri ve Bahriye Nezareti’nin Kuruluşu (1789- 1867). Ankara 2001.
  • Karal E. Z. (1999). Osmanlı Tarihi, V. Ankara 1999. Kızıltoprak S. (2010). Mısır’da İngiliz İşgali Osmanlı’nın Diplomasi Savaşı (1882-1887). İstanbul 2010. Orhonlu C. (1996). Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun Güney Siyaseti Habeş Eyaleti. Ankara 1996.
  • Pakalın M. Z. (1993). Osmanlı Tarih Deyimleri ve Terimleri Sözlüğü II, I-II. İstanbul 1993. Sırma İ. S. (2008). Osmanlı Devleti’nin Yıkılışında Yemen İsyanları. İstanbul 2008. Sırma İ. S. (1997). “Yemen Maddesi”. İslam Ansiklopedisi 13 (1997) 373-384. Eskişehir. Yeşilyurt Y. (2011). Yemen’de Osmanlı-İngiliz Mücadelesi 1871-1914. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Tarih Anabilim Dalı 2011. Arşiv Belgeleri A. DVN. 23/34 (1263. 3. 16); 35/43 (1264. 1. 29). A. MKT. 70/96 (1263. 3. 25); 93/15 (1263. 9. 3); 94/85 (1263. 10. 3); 127/35 (1264. 6. 7); 134/66 (1264. 7. 15); 135/1 (1264. 7. 15); 135/14 (1264. 7. 16); 135/75 (1264. 7. 20); 136/56 (1264. 7. 26); 136/96 (1264. 7. 28); 137/77 (1264. 8. 4); 138/18 (1264. 8. 8); 157/47 (1264. 12. 3); 157/52 (1264. 12. 4); 160/28 (1264); 160/38 (1264); 160/51 (1264); 171/60 (1265. 3. 5); 206/35 (1265. 7. 24); 216/15 (1265. 9. 7); 227/58 (1265. 11. 15); 227/76 (1265. 11. 15); 231/17 (1265. 12. 3); 236/54 (1265). A. MKT. MHM. 2/66 (1263. 8. 9); 2/73 (1263. 9. 27); 7/22 (1264. 12. 2); 16/18 (1265. 9. 12); 116/65 (1274. M. 14) A. MKT. MVL. 16/54 (1265. 8. 6). A. MKT. NZD. 39/98 (1267. 10. 8). A. MKT. UM. 10/58 (1266. 4. 27); 12/26 (1266. 5. 23). A. TŞF. 9/95 (1267. 9. 10). A. UM. 7/69 (1266. 1. 23). İ. DH. 138/7089; 170/9031 İ. MMS. 15/320 (1264. Ca. 7); 63/1810 (1264. S. 25); 63/1811 (1264); 63/1815 (1264. C. 5); 63/1821 (1264. N. 20). HR. MKT. 18/55 (1263 N. 27). MVL. 230/71 (1266. M. 9).