Teknolojik yetenek yatırımlarının işletmelerin lojistik hizmet performansı üzerine etkileri

İçinde bulunduğumuz süratle değişen bilgi ve teknoloji çağında, işletmeler kendilerinin ve çalışanlarının performansını arttırabilmek için teknolojik değişime uyum sağlamak zorunda kalmaktadırlar. Özellikle, halen emek yoğun faaliyetin devam ettiği lojistik sektöründe işletmeler teknoloji transferiyle yeteneklerini artırmakta ve rekabet avantajı elde etmeye çalışmaktadırlar. Bu araştırmanın amacı teknolojik yetenek yatırımları kapsamında teknoloji edinim ve içselleştirmesi kavramlarının lojistik hizmet performansı üzerindeki etkilerini ortaya çıkartmaktır. Bu maksatla 90 adet lojistik işletmesinden elde edilen 542 anketten oluşturulan veri seti SPSS 15 istatistiksel paket program ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak teknoloji yatırımlarının lojistik hizmet performansı üzerindeki olumlu etkilerine ilave olarak teknoloji adaptasyonunun bu ilişki üzerindeki ara değişken rolü de ortaya çıkartmıştır

The effects of technological investments on firms' logistics service performance

In today's rapidly changing technological era, firms compel to adapt to the technological changes in order to enhance the firm and employee performance. Especially in the logistics industry, generally performs as labor intensive, firms enhance their capabilities and acquire competitive advantage through transferring technologies. The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between technology investments and logistics service performance. In this regard, data gathered from 542 employees of 90 logistics service firms have been analyzed by using SPSS 15 statistical program. The results not only reveal the positive effect of new technology investments on the logistics service performance, but also exposed the mediating role of technology adaptation processes on this relationship

___

  • ALTAY, T.A. (2004) Sektörel teknolojik durum değerlendirme modeli. KİPER, M. per.) Teknoloji,, TMMOB Yayınları, Ankara, 251 -284.
  • BAGOZZI, R.P. ve PHILLIPS, L.W. (1982) Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construct. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459-489.
  • BARNEY, J.B. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120.
  • BARON, R.M. ve KENNY, DA. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic ve statistical considerations. Journal of Personality ve Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • BENITO, J.G. (2007) Information technology investment and operational performance in purchasing, Industrial Management and Data System, 107(2), 201-228.
  • BRISLIN, R.W. (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
  • CARAYANNIS, E.G. (1994) The strategic management of technological learning: transnational decision making frameworks and their empirical effectiveness. Published PhD Dissertation, School of Management, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
  • CARAYANNIS, E.G. ve ALEXANDER, J. (2002) Is technological learning a firm core competence, when, how and why? A longitudinal, multi-industry study of firm technological learning and market performance, Technovation, 22, 625—643
  • CELUCH, K.G., KASOUF, C.J. ve PERUVEMBA, V. (2002) The effects of perceived market and learning orientation on assessed organizational capabilities, Industrial Marketing Management. 31, 545-554.
  • CHANG, S.-C., LIN, N.-P., YANG, C.-L. ve SHEU, C. (2003) Quality dimensions, capabilities ve business strategy: An empirical study in high-tech industry. Total Quality Management, 14(4), 407-421.
  • CHEN, M.A. (1996) Managing International Technology Transfer, International Thomson Business Press, London
  • CHURCHILL, G.A. (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (Feb.), 64-73.
  • D'AVENI, R.A. (1994) Hypercompetition. Free Press, New York.
  • DEMİR, İ. (1986) Teknolojik Gelişme ve Türkiye'nin Teknolojik Meseleleri, DPT, Sosyal Planlama Başkanlığı, Ankara.
  • DUNNING, J.H. (1992) The Globalisation of Business, London, Routledge, New York.
  • FAWCETT, S.E., STANLEY, L.L. ve SMITH, S.R. (1997) Developing a logistics capability to improve the performance of international operations. Journal of Business Logistics, 18 (2), 101-127.
  • BARON, R.M. ve KENNY, DA. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic ve statistical considerations. Journal of Personality ve Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • BENITO, J.G. (2007) Information technology investment and operational performance in purchasing, Industrial Management and Data System, 107(2), 201-228.
  • BRISLIN, R.W. (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
  • CARAYANNIS, E.G. (1994) The strategic management of technological learning: transnational decision making frameworks and their empirical effectiveness. Published PhD Dissertation, School of Management, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
  • CARAYANNIS, E.G. ve ALEXANDER, J. (2002) Is technological learning a firm core competence, when, how and why? A longitudinal, multi-industry study of firm technological learning and market performance, Technovation, 22, 625—643
  • CELUCH, K.G., KASOUF, C.J. ve PERUVEMBA, V. (2002) The effects of perceived market and learning orientation on assessed organizational capabilities, Industrial Marketing Management. 31, 545-554.
  • CHANG, S.-C., LIN, N.-P., YANG, C.-L. ve SHEU, C. (2003) Quality dimensions, capabilities ve business strategy: An empirical study in high-tech industry. Total Quality Management, 14(4), 407-421.
  • CHEN, M.A. (1996) Managing International Technology Transfer, International Thomson Business Press, London
  • CHURCHILL, G.A. (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (Feb.), 64-73.
  • D'AVENI, R.A. (1994) Hypercompetition. Free Press, New York.
  • DEMİR, İ. (1986) Teknolojik Gelişme ve Türkiye'nin Teknolojik Meseleleri, DPT, Sosyal Planlama Başkanlığı, Ankara.
  • DUNNING, J.H. (1992) The Globalisation of Business, London, Routledge, New York.
  • FAWCETT, S.E., STANLEY, L.L. ve SMITH, S.R. (1997) Developing a logistics capability to improve the performance of international operations. Journal of Business Logistics, 18 (2), 101-127.
  • LLUSAR, J.C.B. ve ZORNOZA, C.C. (2002) Development and validation ' of a perceived business quality measurement instrument. The Quality Management journal 9(4), 23-38.
  • LU, C.-S. ve YANG, C.-C. (2006) Evaluating key logistics capabilities for international distribution center operators in Taiwan. Transportation Journal 45, 9-27.
  • LYNCH, D.F., KELLER, S.B. ve OZMENT, J. (2000) The effects of logistics capabilities and strategy on firm performance. Journal of business Logistics, 21(2), 47-67.
  • MARTIN, G., MASSY, J. ve CLARKE, T. (2003) When absorptive capacity meets institutions and (e)learners: adopting, diffusing and exploiting e-learning in organizations. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 228-244.
  • MORASH, E.A., DROGE, C.L.M. ve VICKERY, S.K. (1996) Strategic logistics capabilities for competitive advantage and firm success. Journal of Business Logistics, 17(1), 1-22.
  • MORASH, E. A. (2001) Supply chain strategies, capabilities and performance, Transportation Journal, Fall, 37-54.
  • NIJHOF, W.J., DE JONG, M.J. ve BEUKHOF, G. (1998) Employee Commitment in Changing Organizations: An Exploration. Journal of European Industrial Training, 22(6), 243-248.
  • OLSEN, O.E. ve LINDOE, P.H. (2008) Risk on the ramble: The international transfer of risk and vulnerability. Safety Science, 47(6, July), 743-755.
  • PORTER, M.E. (1980) Competitive Strategies. The Free Pres, New York.
  • PORTER, M.E. (1985) Competitive Advantage-Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. The Free Pres, New York.
  • RADOSEVIC, S. (1999) International Technology Transfer and Catch-up in Economic Development, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, UK.
  • ROSENBERG, N. (1982) Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • ROSENZWEIG, E.D, ROTH, A.V. ve DEAN Jr., J.W. (2003) The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: an exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 437-456.
  • SNOW, C. ve OTTENSMEYER, E. (1990) Managing strategies and technologies. In LAWLESS, M. ve GOMEZ-MEJIA, L. (eds.), Strategic Management in High Technology Firms, JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 181-193.
  • SRIRAM, V., STUMP, R.L. ve BANERJEE, S. (1997) Information technology investments in purchasing: an empirical study of dimensions and antecedents. Information _____& Management, 33(2), 59-72.
  • TEECE, D.J. (2000) Strategies for managing knowledge assets: the role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 35-54 .
  • TEKİN, M., GÜLEŞ, H.K. ve ÖĞÜT, A. (2003) Teknoloji Yönetimi, (Yenilenmiş II.Baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • TÜRK, M. (2003) Küreselleşme Sürecinde işletmelerde Bilgi Yönetimi, Türkmen Kitabevi, İstanbul.
  • VAN den POEL, D. ve LARIVIERE, B. (2004) Customer attrition analysis for financial services using proportional hazard models. European Journal of Operational Research, 157(1), 196-217
  • YAMIN, S., GUNASEKARAN, A. ve MAVONDO, F.T. (1999) Relationship between generic strategies, competitive advantage and organizational performance: an empirical analysis. Technovation, 19, 507-518.
  • ZAHRA, S.A. ve GEORGE, G. (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualisation, ,and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.