How can independency level of an independent regulatory agency in alcohol market affect alcohol marketing? The Turkish case

Alkol piyasası, ekonomik ve toplumsal yaşamda hassas olarak nitelendirilebilecek piyasaların başında gelmektedir. Bu sektör, birçok ülkede Bağımsız Düzenleyici Kuruluşlar (BDK) tarafından denetlenmektedir. Bununla birlikte, alkol piyasasında BDK'nın bağımsızlık düzeyinin etkisini inceleyen çalışmalar pek fazla değildir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, Tütün, Tütün Mamulleri ve Alkollü İçkiler Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumunun formal bağımsızlık düzeyinin makro açıdan alkol piyasasındaki rekabet yapısı, mikro açıdan ise alkol piyasasındaki işletmelerin pazarlama faaliyetleri üzerindeki etkilerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Analizin temelini oluşturan formal bağımsızlık düzeyinin ölçümü için çalışmada çok boyutlu ölçekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda, Tütün, Tütün Mamulleri ve Alkollü İçkiler Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumu Türkiye'deki en düşük bağımsızlık düzeyine sahip düzenleyici kurumlardan biri olarak bulunmuş ve bu durumun alkol piyasasını özellikle de bu piyasadaki işletmelerin pazarlama faaliyetlerini nasıl şekillendirebileceği çalışmada ele alınmıştır.

Alkol piyasasındaki bir bağımsız düzenleyici kurumun bağımsızlık düzeyi alkol pazarlamasını nasıl etkiler? Türkiye örneği

The alcohol market is one of the leading sensitive markets in terms of economic and social life of a society. This sector is regulated by independent regulatory agencies (IRAs) in many countries. However, it is not usually easy to find empirical studies on the impact of independency level of IRAs on the alcohol market. In this context, this study aims to analyze the impact of the formal independency level of the Tobacco and Alcohol Market Regulatory Agency (TAMRA) on the competitive structure of the alcohol market from macro point of view and on the marketing activities of the companies in the alcohol market from micro point of view. For the measurement of formal independency level comprising the basis of the analysis, multi-dimensional scaling has been used in this study. As a result of analysis, it has been established that the TAMRA is one of the regulatory agencies with the lowest level of independency in Turkey and it has also been argued how this state of affairs is likely to shape up especially the marketing activities of the companies in the alcohol market.

___

  • BOONE, L.E., & KURTZ, D.L. (1995) Contemporary Marketing, 8. Edition, The Dryden Pres, Forth Worth.
  • CASSWELL, S. (2004) Alcohol brands in young peoples' everyday lives: New developments in marketing, Alcohol & Alcoholism, 39(6), 471-476.
  • CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH (2004) Retail alcohol monopolies and regulation: Preserving the public interest, CAMH Position Paper: Ontario.
  • CHRISTENSEN, T., & LAEGREID, P. (2005) Regulatory reforms and agencification, Paper prepared for the 3. ECPR Conference.
  • CUSHMAN, R. (1953) The problems of independent regulatory commissions, In Ideas and Issues in Public Administration, Waldo D. (ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York, 138-156.
  • DAS U., QUINTYN, M., & TAYLOR, M.W. (2002) Financial regulators need independence Finance _____& Development: A Quarterly Magazine of the IMF, 39(4), 1-6.
  • DIBB, S., & SIMKIN, L. (1997) A program for implementing market segmentation, Journal of Business _____& Industrial Marketing, 12(1), 51-65.
  • DOHLER, M. (2002) Institutional choice and bureaucratic autonomy in . Germany, West European Politics, 25(1), 101-124.
  • FESLER, J. (1968) Independent regulatory agencies, In Elements of Public Administration, F. Morstein MF. (ed), Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, 191-219.
  • FOSTER, SE., VAUGHAN, RD., FOSTER, WH, & CALIFANO, J.A. (2006) Estimate of the commercial value of underage drinking and adult abusive and dependent drinking to the alcohol industry, Arch Pediatr AdolescMed, 160(5), 473-478.
  • GARFIELD, CF., CHUNG, PJ., & RATHOUZ, PJ. (2003) Alcohol advertising in magazines and adolescent readership, The Journal of the American Medical Association -JAMA, 289(18), 2424-2429.
  • GEHRING, T. (2004) The consequences of delegation to independent agencies: Separation of powers, discursive governance and regulation of telecommunications in Germany, European Journal of Political Research, 43(4), 677-698.
  • GILARDI, F. (2001a) Independent regulatory agencies as ultimate step of delegation: hypotheses from the transaction-cost politics approach, Paper for presentation at the Workshop Delegating Powers to Independent Agencies.
  • GILARDI, F. (2001b) Principal-agent models go to Europe: independent regulatory agencies as ultimate step of delegation, Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference.
  • GILARDI, F. (2002) Policy credibility and delegation to independent regulatory agencies: A comparative empirical analysis, Journal of European Public Polity, 9(6), 873-893.
  • GÜMÜŞ, S. G. ve GÜMÜŞ, A. H. (2009) Avrupa Birliğine üyelik sürecinde Türkiye şarap sektörünün sorunları, Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(1), 43-51.
  • HOGWOOD, B. (1990) Developments in regulatory agencies in Britain, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 56(4), 595-612.
  • HURTZ, SQ., HENRIKSEN, L., WANG, Y., FEIGHERY, E.C., & FORTMANN, S.P. (2007) The relationship between exposure to alcohol advertising in stores, owning alcohol promotional items; and adolescent alcohol use, Alcohol & Alcoholism, 42(2), 143-149.
  • JACKSON, M.C, HASTINGS, G., WHEELER, C., EADIE, D., & MACKINTOSH, A.M. (2000) Marketing alcohol to young people: implications for industry regulation and research policy, Addiction, 95(12), 597-608.
  • JACOBZONE, S. (2005) Independent regulatory authorities in OECD countries: An overview, In Designing Independent and Accountable Regulatory Authorities for High Quality Regulation (Proceedings of an Expert Meeting in London, 10-11 January 2005). OECD: Paris, 72-100.
  • JERNIGAN, D.H. (2002) Marketing alcohol to young people: effects, responses, evaluations and prospects, Paper prepared for the WHO international technical meeting on Marketing and Promotion of Alcohol to Young People.
  • JERNIGAN, D.H., OSTROFF, J, ROSS, C., & O'HARA, III.JA. (2004) Sex differences in adolescent exposure to alcohol advertising in magazines, (Reprinted) Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med,. 158, 629-634.
  • JOBSON, J.D. (1992) Applied Multivariate Data Analysis Volume II: Categorical and Multivariate Methods, Springer Verlang Inc., New York.
  • JONES, S.C. (2000) The decline of ethics or the failure of self-regulation? The case of alcohol advertising, Faculty of Health and Bahavioural Sciences Papers, University of Wollongong.
  • JONES, S.C., & DONOVAN, R.J. (2001) Messages in alcohol advertising targeted to youth, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(2), 126-131.
  • JONES, S.C., & DONOVAN, R.J. (2002) Self-regulation of alcohol advertising: Is it working for Australia? journal of Public Affairs, 2(3), 153-165.
  • KOTLER, P. (2000) Marketing Management The Millennium Edition, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
  • KOTLER, P., & ARMSTRONG, G. (1991) Principles of Marketing, 5. Ed, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
  • KUO, M, WECHSLER, H, GREENBERG, P, & LEE, H. (2003) The marketing of alcohol to college students the role of low prices and special promotions, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25(3), 204-211.
  • MAJONE, G. (2001) Two logics of delegation: Agency and fiduciary relations in EU Governance, European Union Politics, 2, 103-122.
  • NOVAK, J.A. (2004) Alcohol promotion and the marketing industry: Trends, tactics and public health, Association to Reduce Alcohol Promotion in Ontario, Toronto.
  • POLLACK, M. (2002) Learning from the Americanists (again): Theory and method in the study of delegation, West European Politics, 25(1), 200-219.
  • PORTER, M.E. (1980) How competitive forces shape strategy, The McKinsey Quarterly, Spring, 34-50.
  • PORTER, M.E. (2008) The five competitive forces that shape strategy, Harvard Business Review, January, 78-93.
  • SCOTT, C. (2000) Accountability in the regulatory state, Journal of Law and Society, 27(2), 38-60.
  • SCOTT, MM., COHEN, D.A., SCHONLAU, M., FARLEY, T.A., & BLUTHENTHAL, R.N. (2008) Alcohol and tobacco marketing: Evaluating compliance with outdoor advertising guidelines, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(3), 203-209
  • SIEGEL, M., KING, C., OSTROFF, J., ROSS, C, DIXON, K., & JERNIGAN, D.H. (2008) Comment—Alcohol advertising in magazines and youth readership: are youths disproportionately exposed?, Contemporary Economic Policy, 26(3), 482-492.
  • SMITH, W. (1997) Utility regulators-the independence debate, Public Policy for Private Sector, December, 9-12.
  • SOBACI, M.Z. (2006) Türk idari teşkilatındaki "Adalar": Bağımsız idari otoriteler, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 55(2), 157-180.
  • SÖNMEZ, Ü. (2004) Independent regulatory agencies: The World experience and the Turkish case, The Degree of Master of Science in Political Science and Public Administration, The Graduate School of Social Sciences, Middle East Technical University, September, pp. 1-280.
  • T.C. BAŞBAKANLIK- DEVLET PLANLAMA TEŞKİLATI DOKUZUNCU KALKINMA PLANI 2007-2013 (2007) İçki, Tütün ve Tütün Ürünleri Sanayii Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara, http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/imalatsa/tutun/oik677.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 23.07.2010.
  • T.C. CUMHURBAŞKANLIĞI DEVLET DENETLEME KURULU DENETLEME RAPORU, "Tütün ve Alkol Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumunun 2006, 2007 ve 2008 Yılları Faaliyet ve İşlemlerinin Denetlenmesi", Tarih: 17 /02/ 2010, Sayı: 2010 / 8,1-44.
  • TAKEUCHI, K., YANAI H, & MUKHERJEE B.N. (1983) The Foundations of Multivariate Analysis, Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi.
  • TAPDK Website, Retrieved March 2, 2009, from www.tapdk.gov.tr
  • TERRY-MCELRATH, Y.M., HARWOOD, E.M., WAGENAAR, A.C., SLATER, S., CHALOUPKA, F.J., BREWER, R.D., & NAIMI, T.S. (2003) Point-of-purchase alcohol marketing and promotion by store type - United States, 2000-2001, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 52(14), 310-313.
  • THATCHER, M. (2001) Delegation to independent regulatory agencies in Western Europe,
  • http://www.essex.ac.uk/ECPR/ events/jointsessions/paperarchive/gr enoble/ws20/thatcher.pdf [15.05.2005].
  • THATCHER, M. (2002a) Regulation after delegation: Independent regulatory agencies in Europe, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 954-972.
  • THATCHER, M. (2002b) Analysing regulatory reform in Europe, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 859-872.
  • THATCHER, M. (2005) The third force? Independent regulatory agencies and elected politicians in Europe, Governance: International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 18(3), 347-373.
  • THATCHER, M., & SWEET, A.S. (2002) Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions, West European Politics, 25(1), 1-22.
  • TIMM, N.H. (2002) Applied Multivariate Analysis, Springer, New York.
  • TKIEWICZ, G.S. (1997) Regulating unregulated markets, Addiction, 92(3), 67-72.
  • TROLLDAL, B., & PONICKI, W. (2005) Alcohol price elasticities in control and license states in the United States, 1982-99, Addiction, 100(8), 1158-1165.
  • VIRAG, G. (1999) Independence of a regulatory institution - A means to alleviate credibility problems in the CEE countries, Case-Ceu Working Papers Series 34, Warsaw.
  • WILICS, S., & BARTLE, I. (2002) The unanticipated consequences of creating independent competition agencies, West European Politics, 25(1), 148-172.
  • WORLD BANK. (1997) State in a changing world, World development report, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • ZAKOCS, R.C. (2000) Local option policies and alcohol availability in North Caroline Counties, Journal of Pub lie Health Policy, 21(3), 328-341.