___

• Brooks, J. & Brooks, M. (1999). In search of understanding the case for a constructivist classroom. Alexandria, VA. ASCD.
• Cameron, L. (1999 Operationalisin g metaphor for a pplied linguistic research. (Ed. L.
• Cameron and G. Low). Researching and Applying Metaphor Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cameron, L. (2002). Metaphors in the learning of science: a discourse focus . British Educational Research Journal. 28(5), 673 -688.
• Chesley, L. G., Gillett, D. A. and Wagner, W., G. (2008). Verbal and Nonverbal Metaphor With Children in Counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development. (86), 399 -411.
• Davis, R., Maher, C., Noddıngs, N. (1990). Introduction: Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Reston, Va: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Doll, Jr. W., E. (2008) “Maturana is not a constructivist” … nor is piaget louisiana state university (USA) & university of victoria (Canada) complicity: An Intern ational Journal of Complexity and Education , 5, (1),
• Geldard, K., Foo, R., Y. and Finch, J. S. (2009). How is a fruit tree like you? using artistic metaphors to explore and develop emotional competence in children. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling. 19(1), 1 -13.
• Hove, H. V., Schauwer, E. D., Mortier, K., Bosteels, S., Desnerck, G. and Loon J. V. (2009). Working with mothers and fathers of children with disabilities: metaphors used by parents in a continuing dialogue. European Early Childhood Edu cation Research Journal. 17(2), 187 -201.
• Jakobson, B. and Wickman, P. (2007). Transformation through language use: Children’s spotaneous metaphors in elementry school science. Science & Education. (16), 267-289.
• Jones M. Gail And Brader-Araje Laura. (2002). The Impact of Constructivism on Education: Language, Discourse, and Meaning. American Communication Journal. 5, (3).
• Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2005). Metaforlar: Hayat, anlam ve dil (Çeviren G.Y. Demir). İstanbul: Paradigma.
• Leavya, A. M., McSorleya, F. A. ve Bote, L. A. (2007). An examination of what metaphor construction reveals about the evolution of preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching and Learning. Teaching and Teacher Education 23, 1217 –1233.
• Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Özçalışkan, Ş. (2007). Metaphors we move by: children’s developing understanding of metaphorical motion in typologically distinct languages. Metaphor and Symbol. 22(2), 147 -168.
• Pikul, M., B. (2010). Teaching children to understand metaphors as a path leading to theory of mind development. European Journal Of Developmental Psychology. 7(5). 529 -544.
• Rundblad, G and Annaz, D. (2010). Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: Receptive vocabulary and concep tual knowledge. British Journal Developmental Psychology. (28), 547 -563.
• Saban, A. (2004). Prospective classroom teachers’ metaphorical images of selves and comparing them to those they have of their elementary and cooperating teachers. International Journ al of Educational Development. 24, 617 –635.
• Saban, A. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının öğrenci kavramına ilişkin sahip oldukları zihinsel imgeler. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 7(2), 281 -326.
• Saban, A. (2010). Prospective teachers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of learner. Teaching and Teacher Education . 26, 290 –305.
• Saban, A., Koçbeker, B. N. ve Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction . 17, 123 -139.
• Super, C. M. (2003). The metaphors of development. Human Development. (46), 3 -23.
• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Washington, DC:Falmer
• Welton, J. (2005). The art of visualisation: understanding metaphors. Internatio nal Journal of Disabilit. Development and Education. 54(2), 257 -262.