___

• Allen, N. J. ve Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
• Austin, E. J., Farrelly, D., Black, C. ve Moore, H. (2007). Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side? Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 179-189.
• Ayral, M., Özdemir, N., Türedi, A., Yılmaz-Fındık, L., Büyükgöze, H., Demirezen, S., ...Tahirbegi, Y. (2014). Öğretmen özerkliği ile öğrenci başarısı arasındaki ilişki: PISA örneği. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 4(1), 207-218.
• Berkovich, I. ve Eyal, O. (2015). Educational leaders and emotions. Review of Educational Research, 85(1), 129-167.
• Berkovich, I. ve Eyal, O. (2017). Good cop, bad cop: Exploring school principals’ emotionally manipulative behaviours. Educational Management Administration ve Leadership, 45(6), 944-958.
• Biesta, G. (2009). Values and ideals in teachers’ professional judgement. In S. Gerwirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall ve A. Crib (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism; international trends, challenges and ways forward (ss. 184-193). Oxon: Routledge.
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein ve S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (ss. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Bradley, J. ve Eachus, P. (1995). Occupational stress within a UK higher education institution. International Journal of Stress Management, 2(3), 145-158.
• Briggs, K. L. ve Wohlstetter, P. (2003). Key elements of a successful School-Based Management strategy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 351-372.
• Burns, S. K. (2013). Investigating relationships between trait anxiety emotional processing and psychopathy as a dimensional personality trait. PhD Thesis, Curtin University, Australia.
• Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(6), 1214-1221.
• Çolak, İ. ve Altınkurt, Y. (2017). Okul iklimi ile öğretmenlerin özerklik davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 23(1), 33-71.
• Day, C. (1997). Teachers in the twenty-first century: Time to renew the vision. In A. Hargreaves ve R. Evans (Eds.), Beyond educational reform: Bringing teachers back in (ss. 44–61). Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Day, C., Gu, Q. ve Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221-258.
• Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B. ve Singleton, C. A. (2006). Organizational commitment of teachers in urban schools. Urban Education, 41(6), 603-627.
• Dou, D., Devos, G. ve Valcke, M. (2017). The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration ve Leadership, 45(6), 959-977.
• Eberts, R. W. ve Stone, J. A. (1986). Student achievement in public schools: Do principals make a difference? Economics of Education Review, 7(3), 291-299.
• Fancera, S. F. ve Bliss, J. R. (2011). Instructional leadership influence on collective teacher efficacy to improve school achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 349-370. Firestone, W. A. ve Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential Incentive Policies. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 489-525.
• Friedman, I. A. (1999). Teacher-perceived work autonomy: The concept and its measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 58-76.
• Glatter, R., Mulford, W. ve Shuttlework, D. (2003). Networks of innovation: Towards new models of managing schools and systems. Paris: OECD.
• Grenville-Cleave, B., ve Boniwell, I. (2012). Surviving or thriving? Do teachers have lower perceived control and well-being than other professions? Management in Education, 26(1), 3-5.
• Grossman, P. L. ve Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5-23.
• Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-352.
• Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142.
• Hallinger, P. ve Heck, R. H. (1996). The principal’s role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980–1995 International handbook of educational leadership and administration (ss. 723-783). Springer.
• Hanson, E. M. (1998). Strategies of educational decentralization: Key questions and core issues. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(2), 111-128.
• Howard, S. ve Johnson, B. (2004). Resilient teachers: resisting stress and burnout. Social Psychology of Education, 7(4), 399-420.
• Hoyle, E. ve John, P. D. (1995). Professional knowledge and professional practice. London: Cassell.
• Hu, L. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• Hulpia, H., Devos, G. ve Van Keer, H. (2009). The Influence of distributed leadership on öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığı: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 40-52.
• Huy, Q. N. (1999). Emotional capability emotional intelligence and radical change. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 325-345.
• Hyde, J. ve Grieve, R. (2014). Able and willing: Refining the measurement of emotional manipulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 131-134.
• Khmelkov, V. T. (2000). Developing professionalism: Effects of school workplace organization on novice teachers’ sense of responsibility and efficacy. Yayınlanmamış Doctora Tezi. University of Notre Dame, USA.
• King, M. B. ve Newmann, F. M. (2001). Building school capacity through professional development: conceptual and empirical considerations. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 86-94.
• Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M. ve Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 319- 333.
• Leithwood, K. ve Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.
• Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S. ve Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. New York: The Wallace Foundation.
• Leithwood, K. ve Seashore Louis, K. (2011). Linking leadership to student learning. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
• Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B. ve Wahistrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315-336.
• MacBeath, J. (2012). Future of teaching profession. Brussels: Education International Research Institute.
• Marks, H. M. ve Louis, K. S. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 707-750.
• Marks, H. M. ve Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370- 397.
• Meyer, J. P., Paunonen, S. V., Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D. ve Jackson, D. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 152-156.
• Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W. ve Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic press.
• Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M. ve Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247.
• Mulford, W. (2003). School leaders: Challenging roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness. Paper presented at the OECD Improving School Leadership activity.
• Muthén, L. K., ve Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus User's Guide. (6th Edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén ve Muthén.
• Nguni, S., Sleegers, P. ve Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 145-177.
• Ostroff, C. (1993). Comparing correlations based on individual-level and aggregated data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 569-582.
• Özdemir, N. ve Kavak, Y. (2017). Akademik başarı kıskacındaki okul yöneticileri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Pearson, L. C. ve Hall, B. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172-178.
• Pearson, L. C. ve Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 38-54.
• Pitt, A. (2010). On having one’s chance: Autonomy as education’s Limit. Educational Theory, 60(1), 1-18.
• Pont, B., Nusche, D. ve Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership, Volume 1: Policy and practice (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD publishing.
• Pounder, D. G., Ogawa, R. T. ve Adams, E. A. (1995). Leadership as an organization-wide phenomena: Its impact on school performance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 564-588.
• Ross, J. A. ve Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(3), 798-822.
• Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Bobik, C., Coston, T. D., Greeson, C., Jedlicka, C., ... Wendorf, G. (2001). Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 523–536.
• Sebastian, J. ve Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626-663.
• Short, P. M. (1994). Defining teacher empowerment. Education, 114(4), 488-493.
• Smylie, M. A. ve Wenzel, S. A. (2003). The Chicago Annenberg Challenge: Successes, failures, and lessons for the future. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.
• Sparks, D. (2012). The relationship between teacher perceptions of autonomy in the classroom and standards based accountability reform. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. The University of Maryland, College Park,
• St. Clair, H. R. (1966). Manipulation. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 7(4), 248-258.
• Sun, J. ve Leithwood, K. (2012). Transformational School Leadership Effects on Student Achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(4), 418-451.
• Tabachnick, B. C. ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th Edition). Boston: Pearson.
• Verhoest, K., Peters, B. G., Bouckaert, G. ve Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organisational autonomy: a conceptual review. Public Administration and Development, 24(2), 101-118.
• Wahlstrom, K. L. ve Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458-495.
• Ware, H. ve Kitsantas, A. (2007). Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 303-310.
• Wiley, S. D. (2001). Contextual effects on student achievement: School leadership and professional community. Journal of School Change, 2(1), 1–33.
• Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J. ve Krüger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398-425.
• Wohlstetter, P. ve Chau, D. (2004). Does autonomy matter? Implementing research-based practices in charter and other public schools. In K. Bulkley ve P. Wolhstetter (Eds.). Taking account of charter schools: What’s happened and what’s next (ss. 53–71). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.