Öğrencilerin Kişilik Özellikleri ve Performanslarına İlişkin Bir Sosyal Ağ Analizi

Sosyal ağ analizi insanlar, gruplar, örgütler, bilgisayar ya da diğer bilgi akışının yaşandığı her şey arasındaki ilişkileri ölçer ve haritalandırır. Bu araştırmanın katılımcılarını Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Tasarımı dersini alan 22 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Bu araştırma kapsamında derste çeşitli öğretim teknolojilerini dijital ders materyalleri üretmek, ödev yapmak ve konu anlatmak gibi amaçlarla kullanan öğrencilerden bilgiye ulaşmak üzere en çok ve en az tercih edilenlerin ve bunun olası nedenlerinin belirlenmesi, ayrıca bu öğrencilerin performansları ve kişilik özelliklerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Böylece günümüzde teknoloji destekli öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenme ilişkilerinin nasıl olduğunun anlaşılmasına, bu ortamların etkililiğinin ve öğrencilerin performanslarının artırılmasına yönelik ipuçları elde etmek hedeflenmiştir. En çok tercih edilen öğrencilerin iç-derece merkezilik puanları ile derse ilişkin performansları arasında anlamlı yüksek bir ilişki (r=0,703) görülmüştür. Öğrencilerin kişilik özellikleri ve iç-derece merkezilik puanları arasında ise anlamlı bir ilişki görülmemiştir. Bu bulgu en çok tercih edilen öğrencilerin kişilik özelliklerinde görülen çeşitlilik ile desteklenmektedir. Bu öğrencilerde duygusal denge ve duygusal dengesizlik ile deneyime açıklık ve gelişmemişlik kişilik özellikleri bir arada görülebilmektedir. Ancak bu öğrencilerin hepsinin dışa dönüklük, yumuşak başlılık ve sorumluluk faktör puanlarının yüksek olduğu görülmüştür

A Social Network Analysis for Students’ Personal Traits and Performance

Introduction Classes are the most main places where relationships among students are formed. These relationships create big networks and have significant effects on student behaviors. This study aimed to determine the most or least preferred students and the possible reasons to get information concerning the use of computer technologies for the purposes such as lecturing, doing homework or producing digital course materials and to examine these students’ performance scores and personality traits. Variables such as personal traits, the extent to which students are preferred, and their performance scores- which are considered separately in the literature - are considered together in this study. It is thought that analysing those variables would be important in training educators in number of ways and in improving the educational reforms as well as in understanding the social dimensions of learning relations formed in classrooms and seeing the effects of those relations on learning outputs. Methodology Embedded design model, one of the mixed models in which quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques are used together, is employed in this study. The research for the study was conducted with 22 female participants attending the pre-school teaching department of the educational faculty of a private university in Ankara and taking the course of instructional technologies and materials design in the 2015-2016 academic year. Digital materials were designed and developed by students in the course. The process of material development lasted approximately 12 weeks. The interview form developed by the researchers was used in collecting the data needed for the application of social network analysis (SNA). Personality Scale based on Five Factors Theory, which was developed by Bacanlı, Ilhan and Aslan (2009), was used to determine students’ personal traits. Students’ performance scores in relation to the materials developed were considered here. Social Network Analysis was performed so as to find which student is preferred by classmates and which student is not preferred during lessons. Pearson’s correlations coefficient was calculated for the correlations between variables determined within the scope of the study. In the analysis of the quantitative data concerning the reasons why certain students are preferred in reaching knowledge, on the other hand, descriptive analysis was used. Results The students who were consulted the most and had the highest levels of closeness centrality were a2, a5, and a16, respectively. The students coded as a21 and a22 were the ones who were not asked for their opinions and who had the lowest levels of closeness centrality. No significant correlations were found between being the most students and those students’ personal traits. However, positive, significant and high correlations were found between their performance in classes and their closeness centrality scores. It was found that those who were preferred most had performance above average whereas those who were preferred least had performance below average and that therefore there were significant correlations between the two. The findings showed that the reasons why certain students were preferred in reaching knowledge were related rather with those students’ personal traits according to their classmates. These data are followed by thoughts in relation to lessons and homework. The data obtained were divided into 4 categories: General personal traits, personal traits in relation to classes, lessons-homework, and other. Discussion and Conclusion The findings obtained can be important in learning relations created in classrooms and cooperative activities. Students preferred in group work can be distributed equally into groups, and thus it can be assured that they play triggering roles. In this way, the learning relations and levels in a classroom can change positively. Recommendations may be made to prospective researchers to support research results or to make sure that different aspects are also discovered. The study group under analysis can be considered as a whole department without restricting them to grade levels. Thus, students’ network structures with the upper or lower grade levels can be analysed. Comparisons can be made through different tests while determining students’ personality traits and even qualitative data can also be collected from students for this purpose. The reflections of this network structure into digital medium and the similarities between them can be examined by using an online learning environment. This study determined the relations between students according to the students’ names written down by students. Analysing and determining the relations between students by examining the log records in web-based environments can find differing results. This research was carried out within the course of Instructional Technologies and Material Design supported by digital technologies. The question was asked to students "When you were practicing in classes and working on your homework, who would you prefer to get classmates' opinion and why they were?”. According to their answers, students prefer their friends who are well informed about the computer and the content, and doing well designed homework. To be able to design good materials for the purpose of the course and to use the related technology well are also seen as leading reasons for students. This finding is particularly important in terms of understanding how learning relationships are in today's technology-supported learning environments.

___

  • Akbay Doğan, H. (2007). Çevrimiçi öğrenme topluluklarının sosyal ağ analizi: Bir öğretmen forumu örneği. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., and Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1289–1295.
  • Bacanlı, H., İlhan, T. ve Aslan, S. (2009). Beş faktör kuramına dayalı bir kişilik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: sıfatlara dayalı kişilik testi (SDKT). Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 261-279.
  • Bakioğlu, A. ve Banoğlu, K. (2013). Öğretmenlikte kariyer basamakları uygulamasına ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin metaforlar ve sosyal ağ analizi yöntemiyle incelenmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 37,28-55.
  • Bedel, E. F. (2008). Interactions among attitudes toward teaching and personality constructs in early childhood preservice teachers. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 4 (1),31-48.
  • Borgatti, S.P. and Foster, P. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. of Management, 29(6) 991-1013.
  • Cela, K.L., Sicilia, M.Á. and Sánchez, S. (2015). Social network analysis in e-learning environments: A preliminary systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 219-246.
  • Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B. and Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49, 309-329.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 4th edition, Boston: Pearson.
  • Dawson, S. (2010). “Seeing” the learning community: an exploration of the development of a resource for monitoring online student networking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 736– 752.
  • Divjak, B. and Peharda, P. (2010). Social network analysis of study environment. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 34(1), 67-80.
  • Dolgova, E, van Olffen, W., van den Bosch, F.A.J. and Volberda, H.W. (2010). The interaction between personality, social network position and involvement in innovation process. 9 Ekim 2016 tarihinde http://hdl.handle.net/1765/26295 adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Dündar, S. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kişilik özellikleri ile problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 139-150.
  • Ergün, E. ve Usluel, Koçak, Y. (2016). An analysis of density and degree-centrality according to the social networking structure formed in an online learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (4), 34–46.
  • Fang, R., Landis, B., Zhang, Z., Anderson, M., H., Shaw, J., D., and Kilduff, M. (2015). Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science, 26(4), 1243–1260.
  • Gürsakal, N. (2009). Sosyal Ağ Analizi.Bursa, Dora Yayıncılık
  • Karataş, S. (2010). Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri (BÖTE) öğretmen adaylarının mesleklerine ilişkin zihin haritalarının analizi (Gazi Üniversitesi örneği). Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11( 1), 159-173.
  • Makara, K., A. (2013). Students' peer relationships, social and academic goals, and academic achievement: A social network analysis approach. Unpublished PhD thesis, Education and Psychology, in the University of Michigan
  • Marcos, L., García-Lopez, E., García-Cabot, A., Amelio, J., Medina-Merodio, J. A. and Domínguez, A., (2016). Social network analysis of a gamified e-learning course: Small-world phenomenon and network metrics as predictors of academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 312- 321.
  • Rentfrow, P.J. and Gosling, S. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1236–1256.
  • Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G. and Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578–586.
  • Selfhout, S., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M. and Meeus, M. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78 (2), 509–538.
  • Skiera, B., Hinz, O. and Spann, M. (2015). Social media and academic performance: Does the intensity of facebook activity relate to good grades?. Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR), 67, 54-72.
  • Tatlılıoğlu, K. (2014). Üniversite öğrencilerinin Beş Faktör Kişilik Kuramı’na göre kişilik özellikleri alt boyutlarının bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Tarih Okulu Dergisi, 17, 939-97.
  • Uça-Güneş, P. ve Eby, G. (2014). Uzaktan eğitim programlarının yapılandırılması için bir yaklaşım: Sosyal ağ sentezi. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3).
  • Wasserman, S. And Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge University, New York.
  • Wehrli, S. (2008). Personality on social network sites: An application of the Five Factor Model. ETH Zurich Sociology Working, 7, 1-16.
  • Yı, J-S. and Park, S. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in decision –making styles: a study of collage students in five countries. (Çeviren: Engin İdemen). An International Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 31 (1), 35-48.
  • Yıldız, M. ve Dilmaç, B. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının sahip oldukları değerler ile kişilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkilerini incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi (MEÜ) Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(3).
Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-1037
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2000
  • Yayıncı: Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi