Günlük Yaşamdaki Olayların Fen Bilimleri Öğretiminde Kullanılması

Bu çalışma, öğrencilerin fen kavramlarıyla günlük yaşamdaki olaylar arasındaki ilişkileri irdeleyen ve grup tartışmaları ile zenginleştirilmiş öğretimin geleneksel yaklaşıma göre etkililiğini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu amaçla 50’şer kişilik iki sınıf deney ve kontrol grubu olarak belirlenmiştir. Grupların eşdeğer seviyede olup olmadığını belirlemek amacıyla öğrencilere konu ile ilgili geliştirilen başarı testi uygulanmış ve istatistiksel olarak grupların eşdeğer seviyede oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Deney grubunda öğrencilere günlük hayatta karşılaşılan problem durumları, öğretmen rehberliğinde grup tartışmaları ile sunulurken; kontrol grubunda ise geleneksel öğretimle konu işlenmiştir. Ders ortamında sunulan örneklere benzer fakat yeni problem durumları soru haline dönüştürülerek her iki gruptaki öğrencilere son test olarak uygulanmıştır. Son test sonuçları, deney grubunun günlük hayattaki olayları yorumlamada kontrol grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde başarılı olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu sonuç fen konularının öğretiminde bu çalışmada denenen yöntemin uygulanmasının daha yararlı olacağını göstermektedir.

PDF

___

Berge, Z. L. (1995). Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations From the Field. Educational Technology. 15(1): 22-30.
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to studying and learning. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Brad, R. (1994). Eleştirel Düşünme Becerilerini Öğretme. (Çev. Güzin Büyukkurt). Eğitim ve Bilim. 18 (91). 45-49.
Cathcart, R. S, ve Samovar, L.A. (1992). Small group communication. Dubuque. IA: Wm.C Brown Publishers.
Clement, J., Lochhead, J. and Soloway, E. (1980). Positive effects of computer programming on students' understanding of variables and equations. Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery National Conference, Nashville, TN.
Demirci, C. 2000. Eleştirel Düşünme. Eğitim ve Bilim. Cilt.25 (115), s:3-9.
Facione, P.A ve Facione, N. C. (1994). Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric. California Academic Press.
Facione, P.A. (1990). A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purpose of Educational Assessment and Instructions. The Delphi Report. East Lansing, National Center for Research on Teacher Training , EBSCOST ERIC Document No: ED315423.
Foshay, R., Bergeron, C. (2000). Web-based education: A Reality Check. TechTrends. 44,16-19.
Gagne, R. M. (1980). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. New York, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education. 7 (1).
Hannafin, M.J. ve Land, S. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced, student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167-202.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C. ve Oliver, R. (2004). A Development Research Agenda from Online Collaborative Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (4), s:53-65.
Jonassen, D.H. (1997). Instructional Design Models for Well-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem Solving Learning Outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development. 45 (1), s:65-94.
Jonassen, D.H. (2002). Integrating of Problem Solving into Instructional Design. In Instructional Design and Technology. Reiser R.A ve Dempsey J.V. (Ed.).
Jonassen, D.H. (2002). Integrating of Problem Solving into Instructional Design. In Instructional Design and Technology. Reiser R.A ve Dempsey J.V. (Ed.).
Jonassen, D.H. ve Kwon, H.I. (2001). Communication Patterns in Computer Mediated Versus Face to Face Group Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development. 49 (1), s:35-51.
Jonassen, H.D. (2000a). Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development. 48 (4), s:63-85
Kökdemir, D. (2003). Belirsizlik Durumlarında Karar Verme ve Problem Çözme. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Psikoloji Anabilim Dalı.
Landa, L.N., (1999). Landamatics Instructional Design Theory and Methdology for Teaching General Methods of Thinking. In Instructional Design Theories and Models by Charles M. Reigeluth.
Lau, J. (2003). A Mini Guide to Critical Thinking. Department of Philosophy, The University of Hong Kong. http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/project/miniguide.pdf adresinden 01.05.2005 tarihinde erişildi.
Lee, K.S. (2004). Effects of Individual Versus Online Collaborative Case Study Learning Strategies On Critical Thinking of Undergraduate Students. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Teksas Üniversitesi. ()
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres. Moallem, M., (2003). An Interactive Online Course: A Collaborative Design Model. Educational Technology Research and Development. 51 (4), s:85-103.
Nelson, L.M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.).
Neo, M. (2003). Developing a collaborative learning environment using a web based design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 19, s:462-473.
Pascarella, E. T., ve Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Paul, R. C. (1992). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. (2. Baskı). Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J., ve Oliver, R. (2004). A Development Research Agenda from Online Collaborative Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (4), s:53-65.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive developments in social context, New York: Oxford University Press.
Romiszowski, A. (1996). Web-based distance learning and teaching: Revolutionary invention or reaction to necessity? Khan, BH (Ed). Web based instruction (s:25-37). Educational Technology Publicatins. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Sage, S. (2000). A natural fit: problem-based learning and technology standards. Learning and Learning with Technology, 28(1), s:6-12
Savery, J.R. ve Duffy,T.M. (1996). Problem based learning An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. Wilson (Ed). Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. s. 135-148
Semerci, N. (2000a). Kritik düşünme ölçeği. Eğitim ve Bilim, 25 (116), s:23-26.
Torp, L. ve Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possbilities. Problem based learning for K-16 education (2. Bas.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Veerman, A., ve Veldhuis-Diermanse, E. (2001). Collaborative learning through computer mediated communication in academic education, in proceedings CSCL 2001. Maastricht McLuhan Institute. http://www.ll.unimaas.nl/euro-cscl/presentations.htm adresinden 14/02/2005 tarihinde erişildi.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wilkie, K. ve Burns, I. (2003). Problem-Based Learning. A Handbook for Nurses. Bristol. Palgrave.