Total kalça protezinde preoperatif 3-1 bloğun postoperatif ağrı ve tramadol tüketimi üzerine etkisi

Bu çalışmada total kalça cerrahisinde preoperatif 3-1 bloğun postoperative ağrı ve hasta kontrollü analjezi ile tramadol tüketimi üzerine olan etkisi çalışıldı. Elektif total kalça protezi ameliyatı geçirecek ASA I-II grubundan 30 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar rastgele 2 gruba ayrıldı; Grup I: Cerrahiden 30 dk önce 40ml-%0,25 bupivakain ile 3-1 blok yapılıp, sonrasında genel anestezi verilen hastalar, Grup II: Cerrahiden 30 dk önce blok lokalizasyonuna basit iğne ponksiyonu yapılıp genel anestezi verilen hastalar. Tüm hastalara ameliyat sonunda PCA ile iv-tramadol başlandı. Ağrı, postoperative 0,1/2,1,4,8,12,24 ve 48. saatlerde, istirahatte ve harekette, 10 cm’lik VAS skalası ile değerlendirildi. Ortalama intraoperatif fentanil tüketimi I. Grupta, II. Gruba göre daha düşüktü. VAS skorları istirahatte postoperatif 12 saat, harekette postoperatif 24 saat süresince tüm ölçüm zamanlarında, I. grupta, II. gruba göre daha düşüktü. Ancak VAS skorlarındaki fark, 4. saatten sonra klinik olarak önemsizdi. Uyanma odası ağrı skorları istirahatte ve harekette, I. Grupta II. Gruba göre 3 kat daha azdı (p=0.0001). Total tramadol tüketimi I. Grupta (633.0±119.3 mg), II. Gruba (991.1±41.0 mg) göre daha düşüktü. Hasta memnuniyet skorları I. Grupta, II. Gruba göre yüksekti. Sonuç olarak, elektif TKP ameliyatlarında, 40 ml-%0,25 bupivakain ile preoperatif 3-1 blok uygulamasının, yan etki sıklığını artırmaksızın intraoperatif ve postoperatif analjezik tüketimini azaltarak, efektif postoperatif analjezi oluşturduğu kanaatine varıldı.

The preoperative analgesic effect of 3-in-1 block on postoperative pain and tramadol consumption in total hip arthroplasty

We studied the effect of preoperative 3-in-1 block for total hip replacement surgery on postoperative pain and tramadol consumption during patient-controlled analgesia. Thirty ASA I-II patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups; Group I: Patients who received 3-in-1 block with 40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine 30-minutes before surgery and later received general anesthesia, Group II: Patients who received only a simple needle puncture at the operation site 30-minutes before surgery and later received general anesthesia. All patients received intravenous tramadol at the end of surgery via a PCA device. Pain was evaluated at 0,1/2,1,4,8,12,24 and 48h at rest and on movement of the hip, using a 10cm VAS. The average intraoperative fentanyl consumption was lower in Group I than in Group II. VAS scores were significantly lower in group I, both at rest and during movement at all timepoints over in the first postoperative 12h and also during movement 24h postoperatively. However differences in VAS scores weren’t clinically significant after 4 hours. In the recovery room, Group I VAS scores were only a third of Group II, both at rest and movement (p=0.0001). Total tramadol consumption was lower in GroupI (633.0±119.3 mg) than in GroupII (991.1±41.0 mg). Patient satisfaction scores were higher in GroupI than in GroupII. We concluded that preoperative 3-in-1 block with 40 ml-0,25% bupivacaine provides effective postoperative pain relief for elective THA, reducing intra-and postoperative analgesic consumption without increase in side effects.

___

  • Ashburn MA, Ready LB. Postoperative pain. In: Loeser JD,Butler SH, Chapman CR, Turk DC ,eds. Bonica’s Management of Pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkıns, 2001;765-779.
  • Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Bargues L, Ecoffecy C, Falissard B,Mercier FJ, Bouaziz H, Samii K. Pain and regional anesthesia; major complications of regional anesthesia in France. Anesthesiology 2002;97:1274-1280.
  • Bertini L, Tagariello V, Molino FM, Posteraro CM, Mancini E,Rossignoli L. Patient-controlled postoperative analgesia in orthopedic surgery: epidural PCA versus intravenous PCA. Minerva Anestesiol 1995;61:319-328.
  • Biboulet P, Morau D, Aubas P, Bringuier-Branchereau S, Capdevila X. Postoperative analgesia after total hip-arthroplasty: Comparison of Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Morphine and single Injection of Femoral Nerve or Psoas Compartment Block. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004;29:102-109.
  • Birnbaum K, Prescher A, Hepler S, Heller KD. The sensory innervation of the hip joint-an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat 1997;19:371-375.
  • Chayen D, Nathan H, Chayen M. The psoas compartment block.Anesthesiology 1976;45:95-99.
  • Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ. Nervous system. In:Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, eds.
  • Grays’ Anatomy. New York: Churchill Livingstone,1995;1277-1292.
  • Fournier R, Van Gessel E, Gaggero G, Boccovi S, Forster A,Gamulin Z. Postoperative analgesia with “3-in-1” femoral nerve block after prosthetic hip surgery. Can J Anaesth 1998;45;34-38.
  • Hanna MH, Peat SJ, D’Costa F. Lumbar plexus block:An anatomical study. Anaesthesia 1993;48:675-678.
  • Kampe S, Kiencke P, Delis A, Auweiler M, Konig DP, Kasper SM. The continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% with 0.5microgxml(-1) sufentanil provides effective postoperative analgesia after total hip replacement: a pilot study. Can J Anesth 2003;50: 580-585.
  • Metcalf MH, Larson RV. Painful disorders of the thigh and knee.In: Loeser JD, Butler SH, Chapman CR, Turk DC, eds. Bonica’s Management of Pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001;1593-1613.
  • Parkinson SK, Mueller JB, Little WL, Bailey SL. Extent of blockade with various approaches to the lumbar plexus. Anesth Analg 1989; 68: 243-251.
  • Singelyn FJ, Deyaert M, Joris D, Pendeville E, Gouverneur JM.Effects of patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, continuous epidural analgesia and continuous threein- one block on postoperative pain and knee rehabil itation after unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg 1998;87:88-92.
  • Singelyn FJ, Gouverneur JM. Postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty. IV PCA with morphine, patient controlled epidural analgesia, or continuous “3-in-1” block: a prospective evaluation by our acute pain service in more than 1300 patients. J Clin Anesth 1999;11:550-554.
  • Singelyn FJ, Vanderelst PE, Gouverneur J-M. Extended femoral nerve sheath block after total hip arthroplasty: Continuous versus patient-controlled techniques.Anesth Analg 2001;92:455-459.
  • Spetzler B, Anderson L. Patient-controlled analgesia in the total joint arthroplasty patient. Clin Orthop 1987;215:122-125.
  • Stevens R, Van Gessel E, Flory N, Fournier R, Gamulin Z.Lumbar plexus block reduces pain and blood loss associated with total hip arthroplasty. Anesthesiology 2000;93:115-121.
  • Weller R, Resenblum M, Connard P, Gross JB. Comparison of epidural and patient-controlled intravenous morphine following joint replacement surgery. Can J Anaesth 1991;38:582-586.
  • Winnie AP, Ramamurthy S, Durrani Z, Radonjic R. Plexus blocks for lower extremity surgery. New answers to old problems. Anesth Review 1974;1:11-16.