Hastaların, ameliyat sonrası ağrı yönetimine ilişkin hemşirelik uygulamalarından memnuniyet düzeyleri: Bir sistematik derleme

Amaç: Bu sistematik derlemede, hastaların ameliyat sonrası ağrı yönetimine ilişkin hemşirelik uygulamalarından memnuniyet düzeylerini incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Konuyla ilgili Science Direct, Türk Medline, Psychinfo, Ovid, Prequest, Google Scholar ve Ulakbim Türk Tıp Dizini veritabanlarından 2005-2015 tarihleri arasında yayınlanmış çalışmalar incelenmiş ve alınma kriterlerine uyan 5 çalışma inceleme kapsamına alınmıştır. Çalışma kapsamına alınan makalelerin metodolojik kaliteleri Türkçe Joanna Briggs Enstitüsü MAStARI Kritik Değerlendirme aracı ile yapılmıştır. Veriler bu çalışma için geliştirilen standart bir veri özetleme formu kullanılarak özetlenmiş ve değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Sistematik derleme kapsamına alınmış çalışmaların örneklem grubunu künt ve penetran travma geçirerek acil ünitesine alınmış hastalar (n=418), total diz protezi takılmış ortopedi ünitesinde yatan hastalar (n=120), batın ve göğüs bölgelerinden çeşitli nedenlerle opere edilmiş hastalar (n=559), kalp ameliyatı geçirmiş hastalar (n=52)oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmalarda en yüksek ağrı puanı 7.20±1.95 (min-max: 0-10) olup, en yüksek memnuniyet düzeyi %100 olarak belirlenmiştir. Tüm çalışmalarda ameliyat sonrası ağrı yönetiminde sıklıkla farmakolojik yöntemlerin kullanıldığı ve hemşireler tarafından özellikle ilaç dışı uygulamaların ağrı yönetiminde yeterince kullanılmadığı, buna rağmen; hastaların memnuniyet düzeyinin çoğunlukla yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: Bu sistematik derlemede, son on yıldır ameliyat sonrası ağrı yönetimi için yapılan hemşirelik uygulamalarından hasta memnuniyetinin yüksek düzeyde olduğu ve ağrı yönetiminde önerilen ilaç dışı hemşirelik uygulamalarının yetersiz olduğunu gösteren bilimsel kanıtlara ulaşılmıştır.

Patient satisfaction with nursing practices about postoperative pain management: A systematic review

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate patient satisfaction with nursing practices regarding postoperative pain management. Methods: A systematic review of the literature published between 2005 and 2015 was conducted, comprising a search of 7 databases: ScienceDirect, Turkish Medline, PsycINFO, Ovid, Prequest, Google Scholar, and the ULAKBIM Turkish Medical Database. Five articles were identified as eligible for review. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Turkish version of the Joanna Briggs Institute-Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI -MAStARI) Critical Appraisal Checklist. The data were extracted using a standard data extraction form developed for this study, and subsequently evaluated. Results: In the articles eligible for this review, the study samples comprised patients with blunt or penetrating trauma sent to the emergency room (n=418) and those who underwent total knee replacement (n=120); heart, lung, or gastrointestinal system surgery (n=559); or open heart surgery (n=52). The maximum pain score was 7.20±1.95 (min-max: 0-10) and the maximum satisfaction score was 100%. The findings revealed that pharmacological methods were most frequently used for postoperative pain management and non-pharmacological methods were not used sufficiently by nurses. Nevertheless, the patients were satisfied with the postoperative pain relief nursing care. Conclusion: In this systematic review, scientific evidence indicated that patient satisfaction with nursing practices related to postoperative pain management was high; however, non-pharmacological methods were used insufficiently in the last decade.

___

  • Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg 2003;97(2):534–40.
  • Gan TJ, Habib AS, Miller TE, White W, Apfelbaum JL. Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of postsurgical pain: results from a US national survey. Curr Med Res Opin 2014;30(1):149–60.
  • Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 2006;367(9522):1618– 25.
  • Aubrun F, Valade N, Coriat P, Riou B. Predictive factors of severe postoperative pain in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg 2008;106(5):1535–41.
  • Mei W, Seeling M, Franck M, Radtke F, Brantner B, Wernecke KD, et al. Independent risk factors for postoperative pain in need of intervention early after awakening from general anaesthesia. Eur J Pain 2010;14(2):149.e1–7.
  • Eti Aslan F. Ağrı Doğası ve Kontrolü. 2nd ed. Ankara: Akademi Tıp Kitabevi; 2014. p. 185–212.
  • Gordon DB, Polomano RC, Pellino TA, Turk DC, McCracken LM, Sherwood G, et al. Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized adults: preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Pain 2010;11(11):1172–86.
  • Karaçay P, Aslan FE, Selimen D. The determination of the pain relief approaches in emergency trauma units. Agri 2006;18(1):44–51.
  • Şahin Z, Temurlenk H, Atay D, Duman A, Akan D. Travmalı Hastalarda Kullanılan Hemşirelik Girişimleri. Hemşirelik Sınıflama Sistemleri Sempozyum Kitabı. Ankara: Başkent University 5-7 June; 2003. p. 249–56.
  • Ay F, Alpar SE. Approaches taken by nurses in treating postoperative pain. Agri 2010;22(1):21–9.
  • Eti Aslan F, Badir A. Reality about pain control: the knowledge and beliefs of nurses on the nature, assessment and management of pain. Agri 2005;17(2):44–51.
  • Karayurt Ö, Gürbüz H, Bilik Ö, Vural F, Fırat F, Ordin Sarıgöl Y. Kronik ağrılı hastaların tens uygulaması öncesi ve sonrası yaşam kalitesi, ağrı ve hemşirelerden memnuniyet düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi 2014;7(1):26–32.
  • Gordon DB, Pellino TA, Miaskowski C, McNeill JA, Paice JA, Laferriere D, et al. A 10-year review of quality improvement monitoring in pain management: recommendations for standardized outcome measures. Pain Manag Nurs 2002;3(4):116–30.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology 2012;116(2):248–73.
  • Ip HY, Abrishami A, Peng PW, Wong J, Chung F. Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology 2009;111(3):657– 77.
  • Yüceer S. Nursing approaches in the postoperatif pain management. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations 2011;2(4):474–8.
  • Sloman R, Rosen G, Rom M, Shir Y. Nurses’ assessment of pain in surgical patients. J Adv Nurs 2005;52(2):125–32.
  • Strode I, Seimane S. Assessment of Acute Pain in Nursing Practice in Latvia. International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine &Public Health 2011;3(4):320– 6.
  • Yazici Sayin Y, Akyolcu N. Comparison of pain scale preferences and pain intensity according to pain scales among Turkish Patients: a descriptive study. Pain Manag Nurs 2014;15(1):156–64.
  • İçyeroğlu G, Karabulutlu E. Hastaların Hemşirelik Bakımından Memnuniyet Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Fırat Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi 2011;6(17):67–81.
  • Karabulut N, Yaman Aktaş Y, Gürçayır D, Yılmaz D, Gökmen V. Patient satisfaction with their pain management and comfort level after open heart surgery. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 2015;32(3):16–25.
  • Dirimeşe E, Yavuz M, Altınbaş Y. Quality changes in postoperative pain management: Comparison of two periods. Kafkas J Med Sci 2014; 4(2):62–68
  • Akyol O, Karayurt O, Salmond S. Experiences of pain and satisfaction with pain management in patients undergoing total knee replacement. Orthop Nurs 2009;28(2):79–85.
  • Eti Aslan F, Aygın D, Sarıyıldız D. The Satisfaction Level Of Patients With Trauma On Pain Management. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2007;27:687–94.
  • Yılmaz M, Gürler H. Nursing approaches toward postoperative pain in patients: patients’ opinions. Agri 2011;23(2):71– 9.
  • Nahcivan N, Seçginli S. Joanna Briggs Institute Mastari Critical Appraisal Tools: Psychometric Testing Of The Turkish Versions. Second International Clinical Nursing Research Congress, İstanbul. 24-27 June 2015. p.1.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(4):264–9.
  • Rupp T, Delaney KA. Inadequate analgesia in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2004;43(4):494–503.
  • Wadensten B, Fröjd C, Swenne CL, Gordh T, Gunningberg L. Why is pain still not being assessed adequately? Results of a pain prevalence study in a university hospital in Sweden. J Clin Nurs 2011;20(5-6):624–34.
  • Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 2009;146(3):435–43.
  • Carlson C. Development and testing of four instruments to assess prior conditions that influence nurses’ adoption of evidence-based pain management practices. J Adv Nurs 2008;64(6):632–43.
  • Tocher J, Rodgers S, Smith MA, Watt D, Dickson L. Pain management and satisfaction in postsurgical patients. J Clin Nurs 2012;21(23-24):3361–71.
  • Woldehaimanot TE, Eshetie TC, Kerie MW. Postoperative pain management among surgically treated patients in an Ethiopian hospital. PLoS One 2014;9(7):e102835.
  • Pyati S, Gan TJ. Perioperative pain management. CNS Drugs 2007;21(3):185–211.
  • Gordon DB, Dahl JL, Miaskowski C, McCarberg B, Todd KH, Paice JA, et al. American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(14):1574–80.
  • Ward SE, Gordon DB. Patient satisfaction and pain severity as outcomes in pain management: a longitudinal view of one setting’s experience. J Pain Symptom Manage 1996;11(4):242–51.
  • Abdalrahim MS, Majali SA, Stomberg MW, Bergbom I. The effect of postoperative pain management program on improving nurses’ knowledge and attitudes toward pain. Nurse Educ Pract 2011;11(4):250–5.
Ağrı-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0012
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2018
  • Yayıncı: Ali Cangül
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Subkostal transversus abdominal plan bloğun mesh ile inguinal herniorafi sonrası akut ve subakut ağrı gelişimi üzerine etkisinin araştırılması: Randomize, klinik çalışma

Emre ERBABACAN, Çiğdem AKYOL BEYOĞLU, Aylin ÖZDİLEK, Fatiş ALTINTAŞ, Birsel EKİCİ, Sevim PURİSA, Güniz KÖKSAL, Elif Aybike ÖZMUMCU

Unruptured aneurysm producing thunderclap headache treated with endovascular coil embolization

Pınar Gelener, Süha Halil AKPINAR

Effect of applying reflexology massage on nitroglycerin-induced migraine-type headache: A placebo-controlled clinical trial

Nima IMANI, Shams Aldin SHAMS, Moloud RADFAR, Haleh GHAVAMI, Hamid Reza KHALKHALI

Hastaların, ameliyat sonrası ağrı yönetimine ilişkin hemşirelik uygulamalarından memnuniyet düzeyleri: Bir sistematik derleme

Fatma ETİ ASLAN, Sennur KULA ŞAHİN, SELDA SEÇGİNLİ, SEMRA BÜLBÜLOĞLU

Laparoscopic gastrostomy under awake thoracic epidural anesthesia: A successful experience

Ömer KARACA, Hüseyin Ulaş PINAR, Enes DUMAN, Rafi DOĞAN

Ultrasound-guided distal adductor canal catheter placement for continuous postoperative analgesia in lower leg surgery

ONUR BALABAN, TAYFUN AYDIN, Lokman DEMİR

Alt extremite cerrahisinde postoperatif ağrı kontrolü için ultrason eşliğinde distal adduktor kanala kateter yerleştirilmesi

Onur BALABAN, Tayfun AYDIN, Lokman DEMİR

Endovasküler koil embolizasyonu ile tedavi edilen rüptüre olmamış anevrizmaya bağlı gökgürültüsü başağrısı

Süha Halil AKPINAR, Pınar GELENER

Effect of proprioceptive training on balance in patients with chronic neck pain

MEHMET DURAY, Şule ŞİMŞEK, FİLİZ ALTUĞ, Uğur CAVLAK

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension without headache: A case report and literature review

Yasemin EREN, Naciye KABATAŞ, Neşe GÜNGÖR YAVAŞOĞLU, Selim Selçuk ÇOMOĞLU