Burcu OPAK YÜCEL, Nevra KALKAN, Mevlüde KARADAĞ, Sevilay ERDEN, Sevil Güler DEMİR, Zuhal ERDOĞAN, SEMRA ATASAYAR, Ali AY

Cerrahi hastalar için gözden geçirilmiş Amerikan Ağrı Derneği hasta sonuçları anketi'nin Türkçe versiyonu: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Gözden Geçirilmiş Amerikan Ağrı Derneği Hasta Sonuçları Anketi (Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire -APS-POQ-R)’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması, geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarının yapılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Metodolojik ve kesitsel tipteki bu araştırma, Ocak 2015 ve Ocak 2016 yılları arasında yapılmış olup, toplam 250 cerrahi hasta ile yürütülmüştür. Veri toplama formu olarak demografik verileri içeren anket formu ve “Gözden Geçirilmiş Amerikan Ağrı Derneği Hasta Sonuçları Anketi” kullanılmıştır. Anketin, dil geçerliliği, kapsam ve yapı geçerliliği, güvenirlik analizleri yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Cronbach’s Alpha değeri 0.88 olarak hesaplanan Türkçe Gözden Geçirilmiş Amerikan Ağrı Derneği Hasta Sonuçları Anketi’nin doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uyum indekslerine göre, [x2/SD=362.53/125=2.90; RMSEA=0.087 (%90 CI:0.077–0.098); CFI=0.95; IFI=0.95; NNFI=0.94], üç faktörlü yapısının uygun olduğu bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Gözden Geçirilmiş Amerikan Ağrı Derneği Hasta Sonuçları Anketi, Türk toplumunda postoperatif ağrı yönetiminin kalitesini ölçmek ve değerlendirmek için, güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçektir

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of revised American Pain Society patient outcome questionnaire for surgical patients

Objective: This study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish Revised American Pain Society Patient OutcomeQuestionnaire (APS-POQ-R-TR).Methods: A methodological and cross-sectional design was used. This study included a total of 250 surgical patients (98 males,152 females) between January 2015 and January 2016. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire and the APSPOQ-R. Language equivalence, content and construct validity, and reliability of the scale were evaluated.Results: The Pearson correlation coefficient of the scale for parallel test reliability was 0.362, and the Cronbach’s alpha value wasdetermined as 0.88 in the APS-POQ-R-TR. According to fit indexes of the confirmatory factor analysis [x2/SD=362.53/125=2.90;RMSEA=0.087 (90% CI: 0.077–0.098); CFI=0.95; IFI=0.95; NNFI=0.94], three factors were found to be appropriate for the APSPOQ-R-TR.Conclusion: The adaptation of the translated APS-POQ-R in Turkey is reliable and valid to measure and evaluate the quality ofpostoperative pain management in the Turkish population.

PDF

___

Alvarado AJ. Cultural Diversity: Pain Beliefs and Treatment among Mexican-Americans, African-Americans, Chinese-Americans and Japanese-Americans [Senior Honors Theses]. Michigan: Eastern Michigan University; 2008.
Al–Atiyyat NMHJournal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing 2009;11(3):154–64.
Anderson KO, Green CR, Payne R. Racial and ethnic disparities in pain: causes and consequences of unequal care. J Pain 2009;10(12):1187–204.
Hansson E, Fridlund B, Hallström I. Developing and testing a questionnaire to assess the quality of pain management in acute care in Sweden. Pain Manag Nurs 2005;6(3):91–104.
Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain 2004;20(5):309–18.
Naveh P, Leshem R, Dror YF, Musgrave CF. Pain severity, satisfaction with pain management, and patient-related barriers to pain management in patients with cancer in Israel.Oncol Nurs Forum 2011;38(4):E305–13.
Beck SL, Towsley GL, Berry PH, Lindau K, Field RB, Jensen S. Core aspects of satisfaction with pain management: cancer patients’ perspectives. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;39(1):100–15.
Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber II: Psikometrik özellikler ve kültürlerarası karşılaştırma. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi 2003;5(1):3–14
Botti M, Khaw D, Jørgensen EB, Rasmussen B, Hunter S, Redley B. Cross-cultural examination of the structure of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R). J Pain 2015;16(8):727–40.
Ünver S, Turan FN. Turkish validity and reliability study of fear of pain questionnaire-III. Agri 2018;30(1):18–27.
Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994;23:129–38.
Büyüköztürk Ş. Questinaire development. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 2005;3(2):133–51.
Dicle A, Karayurt O, Dirimese E. Validation of the Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory in surgery patients. Pain Manag Nurs 2009 Jun;10(2):107-113.e2.
Wang H, Sherwood G, Gong Z, Liu H. Psychometric Evaluation of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) in Postoperative Patients FAM 2013;20(4):285–91.
Zoëga S, Ward S, Gunnarsdottir S. Evaluating the quality of pain management in a hospital setting: testing the psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the revised American Pain Society patient outcome questionnaire. Pain Manag Nurs 2014;15(1):143–55.
Clark ME, Gironda RJ, Young RW. Development and validation of the Pain Outcomes Questionnaire-VA. J Rehabil Res Dev 2003;40(5):381–95.
Wang H, Sherwood GD, Gong Z, Ren L, Liu H. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Revised American PainSociety Patient Outcome Questionnaire in Postoperative Patients. Pain Manag Nurs 2017;18(2):110–20.
Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK, Brennan TJ. Postoperative pain-clinical implications of basic research. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2007;21(1):3–13.
Gordon DB, Dahl JL, Miaskowski C, McCarberg B, Todd KH, Paice JA, et al. American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(14):1574–80.
Dihle A, Helseth S, Kongsgaard UE, Paul SM, Miaskowski C. Using the American Pain Society’s patient outcome questionnaire to evaluate the quality of postoperative pain management in a sample of Norwegian patients. J Pain 2006;7(4):272–80.
Gordon DB, Polomano RC, Pellino TA, Turk DC, McCracken LM, Sherwood G, et al. Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized adults: preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Pain 2010;11(11):1172–86.
Sawyer J, Haslam L, Daines P, Stilos K. Pain prevalence study in a large Canadian teaching hospital. Round 2: lessons learned? Pain Manag Nurs 2010;11(1):45–55
Richards J, Hubbert AO. Experiences of expert nurses in caring for patients with postoperative pain. Pain Manag Nurs 2007;8(1):17–24.
Polomano RC, Dunwoody CJ, Krenzischek DA, Rathmell JP.Perspective on pain management in the 21st century. J Perianesth Nurs 2008;23(1 Suppl):S4–14.
Öztürk T, Topcu İ, Yaldız S, Özbakkaloğlu A, Aşık K, Yentürk A. Comparison of thoracic epidural and paravertebral analgesia for postoperative pain control after thoracotomy. Agri 2016;28(1):32–8.
Yılmaz M, Gürler H. Nursing approaches toward postoperative pain in patients: patients’ opinions. Agri 2011;23(2):71–9.
Lorentzen V, Hermansen IL, Botti M. A prospective analysis of pain experience, beliefs and attitudes, and pain management of a cohort of Danish surgical patients. Eur J Pain 2012;16(2):278–88.
Ceyhan D, Güleç MS. Is postoperative pain only a nociceptive pain? Agri 2010 Apr;22(2):47–52.