A new target of percutaneus sympathic radiofrequency thermocoagulation for treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis: T4

Amaç: Hiperhidrozun sempatik sinir sisteminin fonksiyonel bozukluğu sonucu oluştuğu düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışmada, konservatif tedaviye yanıt vermeyen palmar hiperhidrozun tedavisinde perkütan T4 sempatik radyofrekans (RF) termokoagülasyon, güvenlik, verimlilik ve hasta memnuniyeti açısından değerlendirildi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma, 16-48 yaş arası 15 hastanın düzenli kayıtlarından elde edilen veriler geriye dönük olarak incelenerek yapıldı. Hasta memnuniyeti skoru (memnun değil, memnun, çok memnun), tedavi sonrası elin durumu (kuru, hafif kuru, hiçbir iyi- leşme yok) ve en sık rastlanan komplikasyon olan kompansatuvar hiperhidroz (KH) derecesi (hiç yok, hafif, orta, şiddetli) incelendi. Bulgular: Bir hastada 2 saat süren öksürük krizi, 1 hasta geçici bradikardi ve tüm vakalarda geçici enjeksiyon yerinde ağrı dışında herhangi bir komplikasyon gözlenmedi. İki hastada 1. haftada, üç hastada da 1., 2. ve 6. aylarda nüks gelişti. Sonuç: Perkütan sempatik T4 RF termokoagülasyon ile ablasyon uzun vadeli (6 ay) hasta memnuniyeti (%80) sağlamıştır. Ayrıca el terlemesinde (kuru veya hafif kuru %80) etkili azaltma gözlendi. KH oranı %27 idi. Bu sonuçlarına göre, perkütan sempatik T4 RF termokoagülasyonun yüksek hasta memnuniyeti ile güvenli ve etkili bir tedavi yöntemi olduğu düşüncesindeyiz.

Palmar hiperhidroz tedavisinde perkütan sempatik radyofrekans termokoagülasyonda yeni hedef: T4

Objectives: Hyperhidrosis is thought to result from a functional impairment of the sympathic nervous system. In this study, percutaneous T4 sympathic radiofrequency (RF) thermocoagulation was used to treat palmar hyperhidrosis which does not respond to conservative treatment. The results were evaluated in terms of safety, efficiency and patient satisfaction. Methods: In this study, 15 patients aged 16-48 years were retrospectively evaluated from prior records. Patient satisfaction scores (very satisfied, satisfied, not satisfied), after treatment of the hand condition (dry, mild dry, no improvement), and whether the most common complication and most patients expressed by the compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) degree (none, mild, moderate, severe) were analyzed. Results: No complications were observed except a coughing crisis that lasted for 2 hours in one patient, transient bradycardia in 1 patient and transient injection site pain in all cases. Two patients 1 per week and three patients 1, 2 and 6 months devel- oped recurrence. Conclusion: Sympathic T4 ablation with RF thermocoagulation was found to have long term (6 months) patient satisfac- tion (80%). It was also effective in reducing the hand sweating (80% dry or mild dry). The CH rate was 27%. According to our results, sympathic T4 ablation with RF thermocoagulation is a safe and effective treatment with a high degree of patient satisfaction.

___

  • 1. Gürkök S, Genç O. Hiperhidrozis (Endoskopik Torakal Sem- patektomi). Türkiye Klinikleri J Thor Surg-Special Topics 2009;2(2):62-9.
  • 2. Ergin A, Yegül Mİ. Hiperhidrozis tedavisinde torakal sempa- tik gangliyon radyofrekans termokoagülasyon uygulamaları yararlı olabilir mi? (iki olgu nedeniyle). Gülhane Tıp Dergisi 2006;48(1):48-9.
  • 3. Wali MA. Early experience with thoracoscopic sympathec- tomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;9(6):351-4.
  • 4. Horma Babana H, Lucas A, Marin F, Duvauferrier R, Rolland Y. Evaluation of the efficacy of CT guided thoracic sympatholy- sis to treat palmar hyperhidrosis. [Article in French] J Radiol 2004;85(1):21-4.
  • 5. Kim WO, Kil HK, Yoon KB, Yoon DM, Lee JS. Influence of T3 or T4 sympathicotomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Am J Surg 2010;199(2):166-9.
  • 6. Vadoud-Seyedi J. Treatment of plantar hyperhidrosis with botulinum toxin type A. Int J Dermatol 2004;43(12):969-71.
  • 7. Läuchli S, Burg G. Treatment of hyperhidrosis with botuli- num toxin A. Skin Therapy Lett 2003;8(7):1-4.
  • 8. Haider A, Solish N. Focal hyperhidrosis: diagnosis and man- agement. CMAJ 2005;172(1):69-75.
  • 9. Hashmonai M, Assalia A, Kopelman D. Thoracoscopic sym- pathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Ablate or resect? Surg Endosc 2001;15(5):435-41.
  • 10. Togel B, Greve B, Raulin C. Current therapeutic strategies for hyperhidrosis: a review. Eur J Dermatol 2002;12(3):219-23.
  • 11. Dumont P, Denoyer A, Robin P. Long-term results of thora- coscopic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78(5):1801-7.
  • 12. Chang YT, Li HP, Lee JY, Lin PJ, Lin CC, Kao EL, et al. Treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis: T(4) level compared with T(3) and T(2). Ann Surg 2007;246(2):330-6.
  • 13. Mahdy T, Youssef T, Elmonem HA, Omar W, Elateef AA. T4 sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: looking for the right operation. Surgery 2008;143(6):784-9. doi: 10.1016/j. surg.2008.01.007.
  • 14. Wolosker N, Yazbek G, Ishy A, de Campos JR, Kauffman P, Puech-Leão P. Is sympathectomy at T4 level better than at T3 level for treating palmar hyperhidrosis? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008;18(1):102-6.
  • 15. Ribas Milanez de Campos J, Kauffman P, Wolosker N, Munia MA, de Campos Werebe E, Andrade Filho LO, et al. Axillary hyperhidrosis: T3/T4 versus T4 thoracic sympathectomy in a series of 276 cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006;16(6):598-603.
  • 16. Wolosker N, Yazbek G, Milanez de Campos JR, Kauffman P, Ishy A, Puech-Leão P. Evaluation of plantar hyperhidrosis in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic sympa- thectomy. Clin Auton Res 2007;17(3):172-6.
  • 17. Montessi J, Almeida EP, Vieira JP, Abreu Mda M, Souza RL, Montessi OV. Video-assisted thoracic sympathectomy in the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis: a retrospective study of 521 cases comparing different levels of ablation. J Bras Pneu- mol 2007;33(3):248-54.
  • 18. Munia MA, Wolosker N, Kaufmann P, de Campos JR, Puech- Leão P. Sustained benefit lasting one year from T4 instead of T3-T4 sympathectomy for isolated axillary hyperhidrosis. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2008;63(6):771-4.
  • 19. Liu Y, Yang J, Liu J, Yang F, Jiang G, Li J, Huang Y, Wang J. Surgi- cal treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis: a prospective randomized study comparing T3 and T4 sympathicotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35(3):398-402.
  • 20. Fibla JJ, Molins L, Mier JM, Vidal G. Effectiveness of sympa- thetic block by clipping in the treatment of hyperhidro- sis and facial blushing. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009;9(6):970-2.
  • 21. Wilkinson HA. Percutaneous radiofrequency upper tho- racic sympathectomy: a new technique. Neurosurgery 1984;15(6):811-4.
  • 22. Chuang KS, Liou NH, Liu JC. New stereotactic technique for percutaneous thermocoagulation upper thoracic ganglio- nectomy in cases of palmar hyperhidrosis. Neurosurgery 1988;22(3):600-4.
  • 23. Stolman LP. Treatment of hyperhidrosis. Dermatol Clin 1998;16(4):863-9.
  • 24. Rodríguez PM, Freixinet JL, Hussein M, Valencia JM, Gil RM, Herrero J, et al. Side effects, complications and outcome of thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar and axil- lary hyperhidrosis in 406 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34(3):514-9.
  • 25. Horma Babana H, Lucas A, Marin F, Duvauferrier R, Rolland Y. Evaluation of the efficacy of CT guided thoracic sympatholy- sis to treat palmar hyperhidrosis. [Article in French] J Radiol 2004;85(1):21-4.
  • 26. Romano M, Giojelli A, Mainenti PP, Tamburrini O, Salvatore M. Upper thoracic sympathetic chain neurolysis under CT guidance. A two year follow-up in patients with palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis. [Article in English, Italian] Radiol Med 2002;104(5-6):421-5. [Abstract]
  • 27. Licht PB, Pilegaard HK. Severity of compensatory sweat- ing after thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78(2):427-31.
  • 28. Riet M, Smet AA, Kuiken H, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ. Prevention of compensatory hyperhidrosis after thoracoscopic sympa- thectomy for hyperhidrosis. Surg Endosc 2001;15(10):1159- 62.
  • 29. Neumayer C, Zacherl J, Holak G, Függer R, Jakesz R, Herbst F, et al. Limited endoscopic thoracic sympathetic block for hyperhidrosis of the upper limb: reduction of compensatory sweating by clipping T4. Surg Endosc 2004;18(1):152-6.
  • 30. Yang J, Tan JJ, Ye GL, Gu WQ, Wang J, Liu YG. T3/T4 thoracic sympathictomy and compensatory sweating in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2007;120(18):1574-7.
  • 31. Kwong KF, Cooper LB, Bennett LA, Burrows W, Gamliel Z, Krasna MJ. Clinical experience in 397 consecutive thoraco- scopic sympathectomies. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80(3):1063- 6; discussion 1066.
  • 32. de Campos JR, Kauffman P, Werebe Ede C, Andrade Filho LO, Kusniek S, Wolosker N, et al. Quality of life, before and after thoracic sympathectomy: report on 378 operated patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76(3):886-91.
  • 33. Singh B, Moodley J, Allopi L, Cassimjee HM. Horner syn- drome after sympathectomy in the thoracoscopic era. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006;16(4):222-5.
  • 34. Kim DH, Paik HC, Lee DY. Video assisted thoracoscopic re- sympathetic surgery in the treatment of re-sweating hyper- hidrosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27(5):741-4.
  • 35. Yano M, Kiriyama M, Fukai I, Sasaki H, Kobayashi Y, Mizuno K, et al. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hy- perhidrosis: efficacy of T2 and T3 ganglion resection. Surgery 2005;138(1):40-5.
  • 36. Cho HM, Lee DY, Sung SW. Anatomical variations of rami communicantes in the upper thoracic sympathetic trunk. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27(2):320-4.