Ömer ARIÖZ, Ahmet TUNCAN, Mustafa TUNCAN, Taner KAVAS, Kambiz RAMYAR, Kadir KILINÇ, Bekir KARASU

USE OF COMBINED NON-DESTRUCTIVE METHODS TO ASSESS THE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE IN STRUCTURES

Anahtar Kelimeler:

xx

USE OF COMBINED NON-DESTRUCTIVE METHODS TO ASSESS THE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE IN STRUCTURES

The standard and non-destructive tests were performed on totally 144 cubes and 24 beam specimens produced from different concrete mixtures. The results of the non-destructive tests carried out on beams were correlated with cube compressive strength values. The effects of aggregate’s type and its maximum size on the results of ultrasonic pulse velocity and rebound hammer tests were investigated. Simple charts were obtained from the test results and the use of these charts for the quality control of concrete in structural elements cast by locally available materials was discussed. Strength estimations were made using five combined models proposed by various investigators. The estimated strength values were compared with experimental values.

Keywords:

Concrete Strength, Non-Destructive Methods Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity,

PDF

___

1. Neville, A. M., Properties of Concrete, U.K.: Addison-Wesley Longman; 1995.
2. Mindess, S., Young, J. F., Concrete, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, inc.; 1981.
3. Erdogan, T. Y., Concrete, Ankara: METU Publisher; 2003 (in Turkish).
4. Arioglu, E., Arioglu, N., Testing of Concrete Core Samples and Evaluations, Istanbul: Evrim Publisher; 1998.
5. Qasrawi, H.Y., Concrete strength by combined non destructive methods simply and reliably predicted, Cement and Concrete Research, 2000; 30: 739-746.
6. Bungey, J.H., Soutsos, M.N., Reliability of partially-destructive tests to assess the strength of concrete on site, Construction and Building Materials, 2001; 15: 81-92.
7. Price, W.F., Hynes, J.P., In-situ strength testing of high strength concrete, Magazine of Concrete Research, 1996; 48 (176): 189-197.
8. Karaesmen, E., Arioz, O., Armagan, C., Yaman, O., Yildiz, D., A study of the material aspect of the prestressed concrete technology, Concrete Technology for Developing Countries, Fourth International Conference, Eastern Mediterranean University, Turkish Republic of North Cyprus 1996: 32-40.
9. Elvery, R.H., Ibrahim, L.A.M., Ultrasonic assessment of concrete strength at early ages, Magazine of Concrete Research, 1976; 28 (97); 181-90.
10. Yaman, I.O., Inci, G., Yesiller, N., Aktan, H., Ultrasonic pulse velocity in concrete using direct and indirect transmission, ACI Materials Journal, 2001: 98 (6); 450-457.
11. Tomsett, H.N., The practical use of ultrasonic pulse velocity measurements in the assessment of concrete quality, Magazine of Concrete Research, 1980: 32 (110); 7-16.
12. Ye, G., Van Breugel, K., Fraaij, A.L.A., Experimental study and numerical simulation on the formation of microstructure in cementitious materials at early age, Cement and Concrete Research, 2003: 33; 233-239.
13. Van Hauwaert, A., Thimus, J.F., Delannay, F., Use of ultrasonics to follow crack growth, Ultrasonics, 1998: 36; 209-217.
14. ASTM C 597-83, Standard Test method for Pulse Velocity through Concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1994.
15. BS 1881: Part 203: 1986, Recommendations for measurement of pulse velocity through concrete, British Standards Institute, London, 1997.
16. Ohdaira, E., Masuzawa, N., Water content and its effect on ultrasound propagation in concrete-the possibility of NDE, Ultrasonics, 2000: 38; 546-52.
17. Davis, S.G., The effect of variations in the aggregate content of concrete columns upon the estimation of strength by the pulse-velocity method, Magazine of Concrete Research, 1977: 29 (98); 7-12.
18. Qasrawi, H.Y., Marie, I.A., The use of USPV to anticipate failure in concrete under compression, Cement and Concrete Research, 2003: 33; 2017-21.
19. Hernandez, M.G., Anaya, J.J., Izquierdo, M.A.G, Ullate, L.G., Application of micromechanics to the characterization of mortar by ultrasound, Ultrasonics, 2002; 40: 217-221.
20. TS 3260, Determination of Concrete Strength by Surface Hardness Method, Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara, 1978.
21. ASTM C 805-85, Standard test method for rebound number of hardened concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1994.
22. BS 1881: Part 202: 1986, Recommendations for surface hardness testing by rebound hammer, British Standards, 1986.
23. Arioglu, E., Arioglu, N., Girgin, C., A discussion of the paper “concrete strength by combined nondestructive methods simply and reliably predicted” by H.Y. Qasrawi. Cement and Concrete Research, 2001: 31; 1239-1240.
24. Malhotra, V.M., Testing hardened concrete: nondestructive methods, ACI monograph series, 1976: 9; Published jointly by the Iowa State University and ACI.