An Overview of Landslide Management: Scope, Difficulties, Limitations with Future Directions and Opportunities

This study explores the scope, difficulties, limitations, and future directions of landslide management. Landslides pose significant threats to human lives, infrastructure, and the environment, necessitating effective management strategies. The study begins by introducing the topic of landslide management and its importance in mitigating landslide risks. It then delves into the scope of landslide management, including activities such as early warning systems, hazard mapping, and slope stabilization. The study highlights the various challenges faced in landslide management, such as limited resources, technical expertise, and data availability. Additionally, it discusses the limitations of current landslide management practices, emphasizing their inability to completely prevent landslides and the reliance on available technologies. Furthermore, the study presents case studies to provide real-world examples and insights into landslide management approaches. Future directions and opportunities in landslide management are explored, including the integration of advanced technologies, community-based approaches, and improved risk assessment techniques. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for a holistic approach that combines scientific expertise, community engagement, and policy support to achieve effective landslide management and reduce the impacts of these natural hazards.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Disaster, Management Landslide Hazard, Landslide Management, Landslide Risk, Landslide Susceptibility

An Overview of Landslide Management: Scope, Difficulties, Limitations with Future Directions and Opportunities

Keywords:

Disaster, Management Landslide Hazard, Landslide Management, Landslide Risk, Landslide Susceptibility,

PDF

___

Coutts, C., & Hahn, M. (2015). Green infrastructure, ecosystem services, and human health. International journal of environmental research and public health, 12(8), 9768-9798.
Dai, F. C., Lee, C. F., & Ngai, Y. Y. (2002). Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Engineering geology, 64(1), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00093-X
Derin Cengiz, L. & Ercanoglu, M. (2022). A novel data-driven approach to pairwise comparisons in AHP using fuzzy relations and matrices for landslide susceptibility assessments. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(7), 222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10312-0
Fan, X., Xu, Q., Scaringi, G., Dai, L., Li, W., Dong, X., ... & Havenith, H. B. (2017). Failure mechanism and kinematics of the deadly June 24th 2017 Xinmo landslide, Maoxian, Sichuan, China. Landslides, 14, 2129-2146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0907-7
Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ. (2008). Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol. 102(3-4):85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.022
Glade, T. (2001). Landslide Hazard Assessment and Historical Landslide Data — An Inseparable Couple?. In: Glade, T., Albini, P., Francés, F. (eds) The Use of Historical Data in Natural Hazard Assessments. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3490-5_12
Gökçeoğlu, C., & Ercanoğlu, M. (2001). Heyelan duyarlılık haritalarının hazırlanmasında kullanılan parametrelere ilişkin belirsizlikler. Yerbilimleri, 22(23), 189-206.
Hu, K., Wu, C., Tang, J. et al. New understandings of the June 24th 2017 Xinmo Landslide, Maoxian, Sichuan, China. Landslides 15, 2465–2474 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1073-2
Ho, K., Leroi, E., & Roberds, B. (2000, November). Quantitative risk assessment: application, myths and future direction. In ISRM International Symposium. OnePetro.
Kaya, Ç. M. (2022). Taşkın Duyarlılık Haritalarının Oluşturulmasında Kullanılan Yöntemler. Turkish Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, 3(2), 191-209. https://doi.org/10.48123/rsgis.1129606
Kremen, C., & Miles, A. (2012). Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecology and society, 17(4).
Musoke, R., Chimbaru, A., Jambai, A., Njuguna, C., Kayita, J., Bunn, J., ... & Fall, I. S. (2020). A Public health response to a mudslide in Freetown, Sierra Leone, 2017: Lessons Learnt. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 14(2), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2019.53
Naiman, R. J., Decamps, H., & McClain, M. E. (2010). Riparia: ecology, conservation, and management of streamside communities. Elsevier.
Pramova, E., Locatelli, B., Djoudi, H., & Somorin, O. A. (2012). Forests and trees for social adaptation to climate variability and change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(6), 581-596.
Sandholz, S., Lange, W., & Nehren, U. (2018). Governing green change: Ecosystem-based measures for reducing landslide risk in Rio de Janeiro. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 32, 75-86.
Ulusay, R., Aydan, Ö., & Kılıc, R. (2007). Geotechnical assessment of the 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Turkey). Engineering geology, 89(1-2), 112-128.
URL 1, https://www.who.int/health-topics/landslides#tab=tab_1 Accessed 26 March 2023
URL 2, https://www.washington.edu/news/2014/07/22/oso-disaster-had-its-roots-in-earlier-landslides/ Accessed 26 March 2023
URL 3, https://www.usgs.gov/news/featured-story/five-years-later-oso-sr-530-landslide-washington Accessed 26 March 2023
URL 4, https://www.environmentandsociety.org/arcadia/sidoarjo-mudflow-and-muddiness-environmental-disaster Accessed 26 March 2023
URL 5, https://www.wired.com/2010/02/mudvolcano/ Accessed 26 March 2023
URL 6, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-40390642 Accessed 26 March 2023
URL 7, https://www.cepf.net/stories/sierra-leone-mudslide Accessed 26 March 2023
URL 8, https://www.africanews.com/2022/08/30/sierra-leone-landslide-floods-kill-eight/ Accessed 26 March 2023
URL 9, https://www.preventionweb.net/news/sierra-leone-climate-disaster-and-crisis-financing-shock-responsive-safety-nets Accessed 26 March 2023
URL 10, https://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/18/africa/sierra-leone-mudslides/index.html Accessed 26 March 2023
URL 11, https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/video/koyulhisardaki-heyelan-felaketi-16-yildir-20-milyon-metrekup-topragin-altindalar-41764968 Accessed 26 March 2023
Varol, N., & Kaya, Ç. M. (2018). Afet Risk Yönetiminde Transdisipliner Yaklaşim. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.418307
Vojteková, J., & Vojtek, M. (2020). Assessment of landslide susceptibility at a local spatial scale applying the multi-criteria analysis and GIS: a case study from Slovakia. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 11(1), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1713233
Wartman, J., Montgomery, D. R., Anderson, S. A., Keaton, J. R., Benoît, J., dela Chapelle, J., & Gilbert, R. (2016). The 22 March 2014 Oso landslide, Washington, USA. Geomorphology, 253, 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.10.022
Yilmaz, I., Ekemen, T., Yildirim, M., Keskin, İ., & Özdemir, G. (2006). Failure and flow development of a collapse induced complex landslide: the 2005 Kuzulu (Koyulhisar, Turkey) landslide hazard. Environmental geology, 49, 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-0113-0