Diş Hekimliğinde Distraksiyon Osteogenezi

Diş hekimliğinde kemik yetersizliklerinin tedavisi her zaman zorluklar içeren bir alan olmuştur. Hastaların dental ve iskeletsel tedavileri öncesinde çene kemiklerinin istenilen konum ve kalınlığa getirilmeleri için birçok cerrahi prosedür tanımlanmış ve uygulanmıştır. Distraksiyon osteogenezi ise diş hekimliğinde yeni sayılabilecek bir tedavi seçeneği olarak bilinmektedir. Bu yöntem ortognatik cerrahide, protetik tedavi ve implant cerrahisi öncesinde kullanılabilmektedir. Bu derlemede distraksiyon osteogenezi teknikleri ve safhaları ile diş hekimliğindeki endikasyonları, kullanım alanları ve avantajları incelenmiş olup distraksiyon osteogenezi ile ilgili son çalışmalardan bahsedilmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Distraksiyon osteogenezi, İlizarov teknikleri, Kemik kazanımı

Distraction Osteogenesis In Dentistry

Treatment of bone deficiencies have always been difficult applications in maxillofacial surgery. Several surgical procedures were described to ensure the required position and thickness of jaw bones prior to dental and skeletal treatments. Distraction osteogenesis is known as a relatively new treatment option in dentistry. This method can be used for orthognathic and implant surgery and also prior to prosthodontic treatment. Distraction osteogenesis techniques and phases, indications, advantages and recent studies were reviewed in this article

Keywords:

Distraction osteogenesis, İlizarov techniques, Bone augmentation,

PDF

___

Sailhan F. Bone lengthening (Distraction Osteo- genesis) : A literature review. Osteoporos. Int. 22:2011-2015, 2011.
Polat HB. Lokal olarak uygulanan yağlı kalsiyum hikroksitin distraksiyon osteogenezi üzerine etki- lerinin deneysel olarak incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Üni. Sağ. Bil. Ens. Ağız Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi AD – 2007, Doktora Tezi.
Yen S.L., Shang W., Shuler C., Yamashita D.D. Orthodontic spring guidance of bilateral mandi- bular distraction in rabbits. Am. J. Orthod. Dento- facial. Orthop. 120: 435-442, 2001.
Sencimen M., Aydintug Y.S., Ortakoglu K., Kars- lioglu Y., Gunhan O., Gunaydin Y. Histomorpho- metrical analysis of new bone obtained by dist- raction osteogenesis and osteogenesis by perios- teal distraction in rabbits. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 36:235-242, 2007.
Hönig J.F., Grohmann U.A., Merten H.A. Facial bone distraction osteogenesis for correction of malocclusion: A more than 70-year-old concept in craniofacial surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 109: 41-49, 2002.
Ilizarov G.A. The principles of the Ilizarov met- hod. Bulletin of the Hospital For Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute 47: 1-17, 1989.
Yazdurdıyev B. Distraksiyon Osteogenezinde yu- muşak doku değişiklikleri. İstanbul Üni. Sağ. Bil. Ens. Ağız, Diş, Çene Cerrahisi AD – 2006, Dok- tora Tezi.
Samchukov M.L., Cope J.B., Cherkashin A.M. Crainofacial Distraction Osteogenesis. Harco- urt Health Sciences Company, Missouri, USA, Mosby, 2001; s:10-35.
Annino D.J., Goguen L.A., Karmody C.S. Distrac- tion osteogenesis for reconstruction of mandibu- lar symphyseal defects. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 120:911-916, 1994.
Mario J.I., David D.H., Gentry T., Khalid C., The Versatility of Distraction Osteogenesis in Cranio- facial Surgery. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 4:8-19, 2002.
McCarthy J.G., Stelnicki E.J., Mehrara B.J., Lon- gaker M.T. Distraction osteogenesis of the cra- niofacial skeletion. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 107: 1812-1826, 2001.
Swennen G., Schliephake H., Dempf R. Schierle H., Malavez C. Crainofacial distraction osteoge- nesis: a review of the literature: Part 1: Clinical studies. Int. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 30:89- 103, 2001.
Tavakoli K., Stewart K.J., Poole M.D. Distraksiyon osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery; A review. Ann. Plast. Surg. 40: 88-99, 1998.
Moore C., Campbell P.M., Dechow P.C., Ellis M.L., Buschang P.H. Effects of latency on quality and quantity of bone produced by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofa- cial Orthop. 140:470-478, 2011.
Ilizarov G.A. The principles of the Ilizarov Met- hod. Bull. Hosp. Jt. Dis. Orthop. Inst. 48:1-11, 1988
Goldwaser B.R., Papadaki M.E., Kaban L.B., Troulis M.J. Automated Continuous Mandibular Distraction osteogenesis: Review of the literature. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 70:407-416, 2012.
Cohen, M.M.Jr. Malformations of the Craniofa- cial Regions: Evolutionary, Embriyonic, Genetic and Clinical Perspectives. Am. J. Med. Genet. 115: 245-268, 2002.
Hunt J., Flood J. Craniofacial anomalies II: Syndromes and surgery. Selected Readings in Plastic Surgery. 9: 1-9, 2002.
Olson T.P., McMurray J.S., Mount D.L. Endosco- pic Changes in the Upper Airway After Mandibu- lar Distraction Osteogenesis; J. Craniofac. Surg. 22:105-109, 2011.
Kisnisci R., İşeri H. Dentoalveolar Transport oste- odistraction and canin distalization. J. Oral Ma- xillofac. Surg. 69:763-770, 2011.
Garcia A.G., Matrin M.S., Villa P.G., Maceiras J.L. Minor Complications Arising in Alveolar Dist- raction Osteogenesis. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 60:496-501, 2002.
Synthes Medical Device Company. Switzeland. Erişim tarihi: 07.12.2011 www.synthes.com/ sites/intl/Products/CMF /DistractionOsteogene- sis.
Okcu K.M., Sencimen M., Karacay S., Bengi A.O., Ors F., Dogan N., Gokce H.S. Anterior segmental distraction of the hypoplastic maxilla by a tooth borne device: a study on the move- ment of the segment. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 38:817-822, 2009.
Kolstad C.K., Senders C.W., Rubinstein B.K., Tol- lefson T.T. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: At what age to proceed. Int. J. Pediatric Otorhi- nolaryngology. 75:1380-1384, 2011.
Keçeli H.G., Demiralp B., Muhtaroğulları M., De- miralp B. Disraksiyon Osteogenez: Yeni Kemik Formasyonu, Tarihçe ve Biyolojik Prensipler: Bö- lüm 1. Hacettepe Üni. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 30- 1;31-41, 2006.
Cope J.B., Samchukov M.L., Cherkashin A.M. Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis; Historical perspective and future directions, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 115: 448-460, 1999.
Kaya D., Kocadereli İ. Mandibular orta hat dist- raksiyonu. E.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 28:135-144, 2007.
Veziroğlu F., Develi T., Uçkan S. Alveoler kret ogmentasyonunda distraksiyon osteogenezinin komplikasyonları ve implant sağ kalım oranları- nın değerlendirilmesi. S.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 19:35-39, 2010.
Cheung K., Hariri F., Chua H.D.P. Alveolar dist- raction osteogenesis for oral rehabilitation in re- constructed jaws. Current Opinion in Otolaryngo- logy & Head and Neck Surgery 19:312–316, 2011.
Davies J., Turner S., Sandy J.R. Distraction Oste- ogenesis – A Review. Br. Dent. J. 185:462-467, 1998.
Keçeli H.G., Demiralp B., Muhtaroğulları M., Demiralp B. Diş Hekimliğinde Distraksiyon Oste- ogenez: Bölüm 2. Hacettepe Üni. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 30:2030, 2006.
Shang H., Lin X., Du J., He L., Liu Y. Use of a new curvilinear distractor to repair mandibular defects in dogs. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 50:166- 170, 2012.
Liu R., Schindeler A., Little D.G. The potential role of muscle in bone repair. J. Musculoskelet Neuro- nal Interact. 10:71-76, 2010.
Hong P. A clinical narrative review of mandi- bular distraction osteogenesis in neonates with Pierre Robin sequence. Int. J. Pediatric Otorhino- laryngology. 75:985-991, 2011.
Mutlu İ., Aydıntuğ Y.S., Kaya A., Bayar G.R., Suer B.T., Gülses A. The evaluation of effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on new bone formati- on obtained by distraction ostoegenesis in terms of consolidation periods. Clin. Oral Investig. 2011 Dec 3. (Epub ahead of print).