F3:6 Generasyonunda Pamuk (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Döl Sıralarının Tam ve Kısıtlı Sulama Koşullarında Verim ve Lif Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi
Bu çalışma F3:6 generasyonunda tek bitki döl sıralarının tam ve kısıtlı sulama koşullarında verim, verim bileşenleri ve lif kalite özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi uygulama alanında tam (%100) ve kısıtlı (%50) sulama koşullarında yürütülmüştür. Tam sulama denemesinde 76 tek bitki, kısıtlı sulama da 68 tek bitki, Carizma, Gloria, Carmen, Claudia ve Elsa kontrol çeşitleri ile birlikte Tesadüf Bloklarında Augmented deneme desenine göre, 4 tekerrürlü olarak sıra arası 70 cm, sıra üzeri 20 cm, sıra uzunluğu 12 m olacak şekilde ekilmiştir. Kısıtlı sulama (% 50) koşullarında incelenen tüm özellikler bakımından, tam (% 100) sulama koşullarında ise kütlü pamuk verimi, lif uzunluğu ve lif kopma dayanıklılığı yönünden genotipik farklılığın önemli olduğu saptanmıştır. Bu çalışma sonucunda tek bitki döl sıraları; verim ve lif kalite özellikleri bakımından birlikte değerlendirildiğinde; tam sulama koşullarında, Carmen × Tamcot-22, Carmen × Nazilli-503, Nazilli-503 × DPL-90, BA-308 × Carmen, kısıtlı sulama koşullarında ise Nazilli-503 × Tamcot-22, Carmen × Nazilli-503, Nazilli-503 × Şahin-2000, Carmen × Tamcot-22, BA-308 × Nazilli-503, tek bitki döl sıraları ümit verici döl sıraları olarak saptanmıştır.
Determination of Yield and Fiber Quality Parameters of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Progeny Rows at F3:6 Generation Under Full and Deficit Irrigation Conditions
This study was conducted to determine the yield, yield components and fiber quality parameters in a single plant progeny rows at F3:6 generation under the full and deficit irrigation conditions. The experiment was conducted at Adnan Menderes University, Agriculture Faculty in full and deficit conditions.In the full irrigation e×periment, 76 single plants, and in the experiment of deficit irrigation 68 single plants were planted. In addition, planting system was the augmented randomized complete block experimental design by performing 4 replications by 70 cm of row spacing and 12 m of row length. Under deficit irrigation (% 50) genotypic variation was found to be significant for all investigated parameters and, under full irrigation (% 100) condition significant variation was detected for seed cotton yield, fiber length and fiber strength. Based on seed cotton yield and fiber quality parameters of single progeny rows, it was concluded that Carmen × Tamcot-22, Carmen × Nazilli-503, Nazilli-503 × DPL-90, BA-308 × Carmen single progeny rows are promising in the full irrigation conditions, and Nazilli-503 × Tamcot-22, Carmen × Nazilli-503, Nazilli-503 × Şahin 2000, Carmen × Tamcot-22, BA-308 × Nazilli-503 was detected as promising hybrids in the deficit irrigation conditions.
___
- Asadi R, Kohi N, Tavassoli A (2011) Effect of Irrigation
Regime and Method of Strip Irrigation System on
Yield, Yield Components and Water Use Efficiency
of Cotton Under Drought Stress Conditions of
Orzouiyeh Region of Kerman Province in Iran.
Scientific Research and Essays 6: 5812-5819.
- Balkchom KS, Reeves DW, Shaw JN, Burmester CH,
Curtis LM (2006) Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality
From Irrigated Tillage Systems in The Tennessee
Valley. Agronomy Journal 98: 596-602.
- Basal H, Dagdelen N, Unay A, Yılmaz E (2009) Effects of
Deficit Drip Irrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium
hirsutum L.) Yield and Fiber Quality. Journal of
Agronomy and Crop Science 195: 19-29.
- Bradow JM, Davidonis, GH (2000) Quantitation of Fiber
Quality and The Cotton Production-Processing
Interface: A Physiologist’s Perspective. Journal of
Cotton Science 4: 34-64.
- Cave J. (2013) Cotton Lint Yield, Fiber Quality, and
Water-Use Efficiency As İnfluenced by Cultivar and
Irrigation Level. Master of Sciences, Texas Tech
University, USA.
- Hussein F, Janat M, Yakoub A (2011) Assessment of
Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Drip Irrigated
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as Affected by Deficit
Irrigation. Turkish Journal of Agrıculture and
Forestry 35: 611-621.
- Karademir Ç, Karademir E, Gençer O (2011) Yield and
Fiber Quality of F1 and F2 Generations of Cotton
(Gossypium hirsutum L.) Under Drought Stress
Conditions. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science
17: 795-805.
- Krieg DR (1997) Genetic and Environmental Factors
Affecting Productivity of Cotton. In: Dugger P,
Richter DA (eds.), Proceeding Beltwide Cotton
Conf., January 7–10 1997. New Orleans, LA, 1347.
- Marani A, Amirav A (1971) Effects of Soil Moisture
Stress on Two Varieties of Upland Cotton in Israel.
Experimental Agriculture 7: 213-224.
- McWilliams D (2004) Drought Strategies for Cotton.
Cooperative Extension Service Circular 582 College
of Agriculture and Home Economics
http://www.cahe.nmsu.edu/pubs/circulars (Erişim
Tarihi: 15/10/2011).
- Mert M (2005) Irrigation of Cotton Cultivars Improves
Seed Cotton Yield, Yield Components and Fibre
Properties in The Hatay Region, Turkey. Acta
Agriculturae Scandinavica B 55: 44-50.
- Özkara M, Sahin A (1993) Ege Bölgesinde Farklı Sulama
Programlarının Nazilli-84 ve Nazilli-87 Pamuk
Çesidinin Verim ve Bazı Kalite Özelliklerine Etkileri.
Menemen Araştırma Enst. Md. Yayınları, Genel Yayın
No:193, s. 58, Menemen.
- Papastylianou P, Argyrokastritis I (2014) Effect of Limited
Drip İrrigation Regime on Yield, Yield Components,
and Fiber Quality of Cotton Under Mediterranean
Conditions. Agricultural Water Management
142:127-134.
- Petersen RG, Calvin LD (1965) Sampling. In: Black, CA
(ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis: Physical and
Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of
Measurement and Sampling. Madison, American
Society of Agronomy, 54-71.
- Pettigrew WT (2004) Moisture Deficit Effect on Cotton
Lint Yield, Yield Components and Boll Distribution.
Agronomy Journal 96: 377-383.
- Price K (2009). Investigation of Methods to Evaluate
Drought Toerance in Cotton. The Degree of Doctor
of Philosopy. Texas Tech University, Texas Lubbock,
USA.
- Quisenberry JE, Roark B, Fryrear DW, Kohel RJ (1980)
Effectiveness of Selection in Uplan Dcotton in Stres
Environments. Crop Science 20: 450 - 453.
- Rai E (2011) Mechanism of Drought Tolerance in
Cotton-Response of Cotton Cultivars to Irrigation in
The Texas High Plains. Master of Science, Texas
Tech University. Texas Lubbock, USA.
- Shakoor MS, Malik TA, Azhar FM, Saleem MF (2010)
Genetics of Agronomic and Fiber Traits in Upland
Cotton Under Drought Stress. International Journal
of Agriculture and Biology 12: 495–500.
- Stiller WN, Reid PE, Constable GA(2004) Maturity and
Leaf Shape as Traits Influencing Cotton Cultivar
Adaptation to Dry Land Conditions. Agronomy
Journal 96: 656–664.
- Türkeş M (2008) Gözlenen İklim Değişiklikleri ve
Kuraklık: Nedenleri ve Geleceği. Toplum ve Hekim,
23: 97-107.