Objective: This study aims to investigate compensatory rotational movements of the wrist joint in patients with proximal congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS), using a valid and reliable three-dimensional (3D) motion analysis technique.Methods: A total of 26 patients (6 females, 14 males; mean age=15.3 years; and age range=6-32 years) who were diagnosed withunilateral proximal CRUS but were not operated were enrolled in this study. Patients were then categorized into 2 groups: GroupI included 5 patients younger than 10 years, and Group II included 15 patients older than 10 years. Eighteen light-reflective skinmarkers were placed on the bony landmarks of both upper limbs, and both distal forearms were fixed using a U-shaped device tominimize forearm rotation. Each patient grasped the handle of an instrument that used a goniometer to measure wrist rotation;maximal passive pronation and supination angles of the wrist were measured in this manner and also using 3D motion analysis.Results: There was a significant correlation between measurements by the goniometer and 3D motion analysis (r=0.985, p
___
1. Murase T, Tada K, Yoshida T, Moritomo H. Derotational osteotomy at the shafts of the radius and ulna for congenital radioulnar synostosis. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28: 133-7.
2. Green WT, Mital MA. Congenital radio-ulnar synostosis: surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61: 738-43.
3. Lin HH, Strecker WB, Manske PR, Schoenecker PL, Seyer DM. A surgical technique of radioulnar osteoclasis to correct severe forearm rotation deformities. J Pediatr Orthop 1995; 15: 53-8.
4. Hung NN. Derotational osteotomy of the proximal radius and the distal ulna for congenital radioulnar synostosis. J Child Orthop 2008; 2: 481-9.
5. Simcock X, Shah AS, Waters PM, Bae DS. Safety and efficacy of derotational osteotomy for congenital radioulnar synostosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2015; 35: 838- 43.
6. Horii E, Koh S, Hattori T, Otsuka J. Single osteotomy at the radial diaphysis for congenital radioulnar synostosis. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39: 1553-7.
7. Fujimoto M, Kato H, Minami A. Rotational osteotomy at the diaphysis of the radius in the treatment of congenital radioulnar synostosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25: 676-9.
8. Ogino T, Hikino K. Congenital radio-ulnar synostosis: compensatory rotation around the wrist and rotation osteotomy. J Hand Surg Br 1987; 12: 173-8.
9. Yammine K, Salon A, Pouliquen JC. Congenital radioulnar synostosis. Study of a series of 37 children and adolescents. Chir Main 1998; 17: 300-8.
10. Kasten P, Rettig O, Loew M, Wolf S, Raiss P. Three-dimensional motion analysis of compensatory movements in patients with radioulnar synostosis performing activities of daily living. J Orthop Sci 2009; 14: 307-12.
11. Cleary JE, Omer GE, Jr. Congenital proximal radio-ulnar synostosis. Natural history and functional assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 539-45.
12. Rab G, Petuskey K, Bagley A. A method for determination of upper extremity kinematics. Gait Posture 2002; 15: 113-9.
13. Weir PJ. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 231-40.
14. Simmons BP, Southmayd WW, Riseborough EJ. Congenital radioulnar synostosis. J Hand Surg Am 1983; 8: 829-38.
15. Antonio DH, Magalhaes CS. Survey on joint hypermobility in university students aged 18-25 years old. Adv Rheumatol 2018; 58: 3.
16. Ritt MJ, Stuart PR, Berglund LJ, et al. Rotational laxity and stiffness of the radiocarpal joint. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1996; 11: 227-32.
17. Nakasone M, Nakasone S, Kinjo M, Murase T, Kanaya F. Three-dimensional analysis of deformities of the radius and ulna in congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018; 43: 739-43.