Objective: This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) scoring systeminto Turkish and to determine the reliability and validity of the translated version for the functional evaluation of patients withmusculoskeletal tumors.Methods: A total of 36 patients (16 women, 20 men; mean age=36.6; age range=13–75 years) who underwent limb-salvage surgeryowing to benign aggressive or malignant musculoskeletal tumors were included in the study. Translation and back translations of theMSTS were performed according to the published guidelines. Short form (SF) 36 physical component, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH), and range of motion scale (ROMS)that were previously analyzed for Turkish validation were used for validity. Reliability of MSTS Turkish version was evaluated bycalculating test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the inter-observer consistency and test-retest reliability. Alpha coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) was used to evaluate the internal consistency.Results: It was observed that total MSTS score has a strong negative correlation with DASH (r=−0.689; p
___
1. Kim H-S, Yun J, Kang S, Han I. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score for extremity sarcoma. J Surg Oncol 2015; 112: 93-7.
2. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 286: 241-6.
3. Xu L, Li X, Wang Z, Xiong J, Wang S. Functional evaluation for patients with lower extremity sarcoma: application of the Chinese version of Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017; 15: 107.
4. Saebye CKP, Keller J, Baad-Hansen T. Validation of the Danish version of the musculoskeletal tumour society score questionnaire. World J Orthop 2019; 10: 23-32
5. Rebolledo DCS, Vissoci JRN, Pietrobon R, de Camargo OP, Baptista AM. Validation of the Brazilian version of the musculoskeletal tumor society rating scale for lower extremity bone sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 4020-6.
6. Uehara K, Ogura K, Akiyama T, et al. Reliability and Validity of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System for the Upper Extremity in Japanese Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475: 2253-9.
7. Mei J, Zhu X-Z, Wang Z-Y, Cai X-S. Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with osteosarcoma treated with amputation versus limb-salvage surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014; 134: 1507-16.
8. Tang X, Guo W, Yang R, Tang S, Ji T. Synthetic mesh improves shoulder function after intraarticular resection and prosthetic replacement of proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 1464-71.
9. Öztürk R, Arıkan ŞM, Toğral G, Güngör BŞ. Malignant tumors of the shoulder girdle: Surgical and functional outcomes. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2019; 27: 2309499019838355.
10. Öztürk R, Arıkan ŞM, Bulut EK, Kekeç AF, Çelebi F, Güngör BŞ. Distribution and evaluation of bone and soft tissue tumors operated in a tertiary care center. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2019; 53: 189-94.
11. Öksüz DC, Tural D, Dinçbaş FÖ, et al. Non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors of bone in adolescents and adults: prognostic factors and clinical outcome-single institution results. Tumori 2014; 100: 452-8.
12. Akgül T, Sormaz İC, Aksoy M, Uçar A, Özger H, Eralp L. Results and functional outcomes of en-bloc resection and vascular reconstruction in extremity musculoskeletal tumors. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2018; 52: 409-14.
13. Sağlık Y, Atalar H, Armangil M, Başarır K, Yıldız Y, Bilgin S. Management of tumors and tumor-like lesions of the hand: a review of 191 patients. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2013; 24: 149-55.
14. Argun G, Çayırlı G, Toğral G, Arıkan M, Ünver S. Are peripheral nerve blocks effective in pain control of pediatric orthopedic tumor surgery? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2019; 30: 46-52.
15. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 3186-91.
16. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1417-32.
17. Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, Olmez N, Memis A. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Short Form-36. Drug Ther J 1999; 12: 102-6.
18. Duger T, Yakut E, Oksuz C, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. Turk J Physiother Rehabil 2006; 17: 99-107.
19. Tüzün EH, Eker L, Aytar A, Daşkapan A, Bayramoğlu M. Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13: 28-33.
20. Gregory RJ. Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications. 5th ed. London: Allyn & Bacon; 2007.
21. Gerhardt JJ. Clinical measurements of joint motion and position in the neutral-zero method and SFTR recording: basic principles. Int Rehabil Med 1983; 5: 161-4.
22. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42.
23. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 231-40.
24. Iwata S, Uehara K, Ogura K, et al. Reliability and Validity of a Japanese-language and Culturally Adapted Version of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System for the Lower Extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474: 2044-52.
25. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 293-307.