Femur başı avasküler nekrozu olan hastalarda çimentosuz total kalça artroplastisi

Amaç: İleri evre femur başı avasküler nekrozu olan hastalarda çimentosuz total kalça artoplastisi sonuçları değerlendirildi. Çalışma planı: Femur başı avasküler nekrozu nedeniyle 25 hastaya (19 erkek, 6 kadın; ort. yaş 39.6; dağılım 26-56) tek taraflı çimentosuz total kalça artroplastisi uygulandı. Asetabuluma çimentosuz, vidalı asetabuler kaplar yerleştirildi. Femurda ise çimentosuz femoral komponentler kullanıldı. Hastalar fonksiyonel olarak Harris kalça skoru ile değerlendirildi. Radyografik değerlendirmede, asetabuler komponent için Lins ve ark.nın, femoral komponent için de Engh ve ark.nın ölçütleri kullanıldı. Heterotopik osssifikasyon Brooker ve ark.nın sınıflandırmasına göre değerlendirildi. Hastalar ortalama 63.9 ay (dağılım 48-94 ay) takip edildi. Sonuçlar: Ameliyat öncesinde ortalama 41.5 (dağılım 33- 52) olan Harris kalça skoru son kontrollerde 87.1 puana (dağılım 74-96) yükseldi (p

Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head

Objectives: We assessed the results of cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with late-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Methods: Unilateral cementless total hip replacement was performed in 25 patients (19 males, 6 females; mean age 39.6 years; range 26 to 56 years) with avascular necrosis of the femoral head. A cementless acetabular cup with screws was used for the acetabulum with a cementless femoral component. Functional results were evaluated according to the Harris hip score. Radiographically, acetabular and femoral components were evaluated according to the criteria of Lins et al. and Engh et al., respectively. Heterotopic ossification was assessed according to the criteria of Brooker et al. The mean follow-up was 63.9 months (range 48 to 94 months). Results: The mean Harris hip score increased from 41.5 (range 33 to 52) to 87.1 (range 74 to 96) after the treatment (p<0.001). No radiographic loosening was detected in 22 patients (88%). Radiolucent lines were observed in one acetabular and two femoral components, but no secondary interventions were performed as the patients were asymptomatic. Heterotopic ossification was observed in 13 patients, which was grade 1 in eight patients, grade 2 in two patients, and grade 3 in three patients. Conclusion: In general, patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of the femoral head are younger and more active compared to those with osteoarthritis, showing a high likelihood of future revision procedures. Our results favor cementless applications as a more appropriate alternative in this patient group.

___

  • 1. Phillips FM, Pottenger LA, Finn HA, Vandermolen J. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with steroidinduced avascular necrosis of the hip. A 62-month follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;(303):147-54.
  • 2. Chan YS, Shih CH. Bipolar versus total hip arthroplasty for hip osteonecrosis in the same patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;(379):169-77.
  • 3. Kenzora JE. Treatment of idiopathic osteonecrosis: the current philosophy and rationale. Orthop Clin North Am 1985;16:717-25.
  • 4. Meyers MH. Resurfacing of the femoral head with fresh osteochondral allografts. Long-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;(197):111-4.
  • 5. Stulberg BN, Davis AW, Bauer TW, Levine M, Easley K. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A prospective randomized treatment protocol. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;(268):140-51.
  • 6. Sugioka Y. Transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy in the treatment of idiopathic and steroid-induced femoral head necrosis, Perthes’ disease, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and osteoarthritis of the hip. Indications and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;(184):12-23.
  • 7. Brinker MR, Rosenberg AG, Kull L, Galante JO. Primary total hip arthroplasty using noncemented porous-coated femoral components in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:457-68.
  • 8. Cornell CN, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM. Long-term follow-up of total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1985;16:757-69.
  • 9. Dorr LD, Takei GK, Conaty JP. Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1983;65:474-9.
  • 10. Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77:459-74.
  • 11. Ficat RP, Arlet J. Necrosis of the femoral head. In: Hungerford DS, editor. Ischemia and necroses of bone. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1980. p. 53-74
  • 12. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969;51:737-55.
  • 13. Lins RE, Barnes BC, Callaghan JJ, Mair SD, McCollum DE. Evaluation of uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;(297):168-73.
  • 14. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;(257):107-28.
  • 15. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1973;55:1629-32.
  • 16. Coventry MB, Beckenbaugh RD, Nolan DR, Ilstrup DM. 2,012 total hip arthroplasties. A study of postoperative course and early complications. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1974;56:273-84.
  • 17. Jacobs B. Epidemiology of traumatic and nontraumatic osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978;(130):51-67.
  • 18. Salvati EA, Cornell CN. Long-term follow-up of total hip replacement in patients with avascular necrosis. Instr Course Lect 1988;37:67-73.
  • 19. Stauffer RN. Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1982;64:983-90.
  • 20. Saito S, Saito M, Nishina T, Ohzono K, Ono K. Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A comparison with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;(244):198-207.
  • 21. Garino JP, Steinberg ME. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a 2- to 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;(334):108-15.
  • 22. Piston RW, Engh CA, De Carvalho PI, Suthers K. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head treated with total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994;76:202-14.
  • 23. Xenakis TA, Beris AE, Malizos KK, Koukoubis T, Gelalis J, Soucacos PN. Total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis and degenerative osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;(341):62-8.
  • 24. Dudkiewicz I, Covo A, Salai M, Israeli A, Amit Y, Chechik A. Total hip arthroplasty after avascular necrosis of the femoral head: does etiology affect the results? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004;124:82-5.
  • 25. Ritter MA, Meding JB. A comparison of osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis patients following total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;(206):139-46.
  • 26. Knelles D, Barthel T, Karrer A, Kraus U, Eulert J, Kolbl O. Prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement. A prospective, randomised study using acetylsalicylic acid, indomethacin and fractional or single-dose irradiation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1997;79:596-602.
  • 27. Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 10- to 12-year results of prospective and consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:538-48.
  • 28. Schneider W, Knahr K. Total hip replacement in younger patients: survival rate after avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:142-6.
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Lomber spinal stenozda objektif ve subjektif değerlendirme ölçütleri arasındaki ilişki

Selmin GÜLBAHAR, RASİM HALUK BERK, Elif PEHLİVAN, EMİNE ÖZLEM ŞENOCAK, Ömer AKÇALI, Can KOŞAY, Ayşe GÜRCAN, Serap ALPER

Semptomatik mezo-akromiyon cerrahi tedavisinin sonuçları

Mehmet Uğur ÖZBAYDAR, İlker KERİŞ, MEHMET ALTUN, Okan YALAMAN

Travma şiddeti ile serum eser element düzeyi ilişkili mi?

Aykın ŞİMŞEK, Alpaslan ŞENKÖYLÜ, Erdal CİLA, Mahmut UĞURLU, AHMET BAYAR, Akif M. ÖZTÜRK, Sedat IŞIKLI, Yasin MUŞDAL, Haluk YETKİN

El bileğinde dev hücreli tümör: Yirmi üç olgunun incelenmesi

Taçkın ÖZALP, Hüseyin YERCAN, Güvenir OKCU, Oğuz ÖZDEMİR, Erhan COŞKUNOL

Femur başı avasküler nekrozu olan hastalarda çimentosuz total kalça artroplastisi

Levent ÇELEBİ, HASAN HİLMİ MURATLI, Ertuğrul AKŞAHİN, Mehmet Fırat YAĞMURLU, Halil Yalçın YÜKSEL, Ali BİÇİMOĞLU

Koroner arter baypas ameliyatı sonrası oluşan omuz sıkışma sendromunun tedavisi

Koray ÜNAY, Oğuz POYANLI, Kaya AKAN, Mehmet VESKE, Nadir ŞENER

Elin duyu restorasyonu için pediküllü flep uygulamaları ve geç dönem sonuçlar

Türker ÖZKAN, Fatih KABAKAŞ, Atakan AYDIN, Bülent YAPRAK, Eftal GÜDEMEZ

Aşil tendonu tamirinde kullanılan dikiş materyallerinin tendonu tutma kapasiteleri

Yakup YILDIRIM, BARANSEL SAYGI, Hasan KARA, Cengiz ÇABUKOĞLU, BEHİÇ TANIL ESEMENLİ

Çarpık ayağın konservatif tedavisi: Fonksiyonel Yöntem ve uzun dönemli izlem

Henri BENSAHEL, Pascal JEHANNO, Jean-Pierre DELABY, Christine THEMAR-NOEL

Superior labrum anterior posterior ve Bankart kombine lezyonlarının artroskopik tamiri

Mehmet Uğur ÖZBAYDAR, Çağrı TEKİN, Rıfat KOCABAŞ, MEHMET ALTUN